Follow the money if the PLA kills the Hong Kong protesters

Few understand how big an influence Hong Kong money is on the PRC. Over two decades ago I followed that money.

In The Year of The Rat days in the late nineties, as the financial crimes investigator for the House Committee on Rules, I followed the actions of  one of the wealthiest men in the world.  Based in Hong Kong, multi-billionaire Li Ka-shing was one of the most important and richest men in Asia.

His financial empire, Hong Kong based, was an important PRC early indicator of Chinese ruling class money and influence in their emergence into global financial markets. By all accounts it was recognized that the leaders of China in Beijing saw Li as a very smart man. I was told he actually had a financial “hot line” phone directly to the Chinese Communist Party Politburo.

In trying to go direct in following PRC funds illegally flowing into the Clinton Administration, the biggest takeaway in those years was that the Bank of China was brilliant at hiding sources and uses of money.

One of the best money tracking organizations in the world is the US Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. ”FinCEN” reported that the best we could do in following money was to look at English banking transparency in the Hong Kong capital markets.  Additionally, in those days, individuals in the former Portuguese Colony of Macau, often a Triad center for graft and corruption, also laundered illegal money into the Clinton Administration.

Li Ka-shing’s family now is part of capital flight — his invisible financial hand is being made visible.  This 2015 article is very insightful about Li’s relationship with the truly supreme rulers of China. They are informally known as “the Shanghai Mafia,” in the sense they network each other into very powerful positions.

“He has fallen from the moral high ground,” it said, reminding Li that his huge wealth as head of the Hutchison Whampoa conglomerate had come from his connections to powerful Chinese officials, not from a level playing field in a market economy.

Now that Li is at age 90+, his sons, the oldest and by all accounts the “wicked smart” Victor Li Tzar-kuoi and younger Richard Li Tzar Kai (spelling always drove us nuts) are Canadian Citizens. World financial writers have been sensing that following closely what one of the wealthiest families in the world actually does during this time of testing for HK can bring interesting insights.

I hope the Hong Kong protests ends peacefully, but I have my doubts.  And where it gets very interesting is a current left/right unity of purpose.  The left also follows China’s nasty oppression very closely (except the “Feel the Bern” phony). The numerical range of dissidents killed at Tiananmen, was quoted In The Progressive no less:

No one knows the exact number of deaths. In the aftermath, a government spokesperson understated the figure, saying 300 civilians and soldiers died. Edward Timperlake, late director of technology assessment of the Office of the U.S. Secretary of Defense, put the number between 4,000 and 6,000.

I do not know what is the smart move to ultimately have China turn into a Chinese version of freedom and non-belligerence, but President Trump has unleashed an economic war plan that could lead to a tectonic shift in the leadership model of the People’s Republic of China and what they choose to do in Hong Kong will be a global seismic event.

It is very simple: many in China see that very successful leaders and their families have become extremely wealthy, essentially economic leaches, while preaching and enforcing communism for all others. So much for benefits of Communist equality.  And like Li’s family, they also have explored moving money out of China.

The horrific lesson learned from Tiananmen is that if the PLA/People Armed Police do make a move, I suspect it will be swift and brutal. If history is a guide they will kill the kids, kill the medical teams, kill the relatives identifying the victims, and then burn the bodies and claim minor or no casualties using every denial and deception trick in their book.

I reported on their gross denial and deception, hang-tough position over a decade ago by the PLA Chief of Staff:

Gen Chi stated on PBS, “I can tell you in a responsible and serious manner that at that time not a single person lost his life in Tiananmem Square.”

Consequently, it is now time to see how many Party Leaders and others in the economically rigged upper class families in China have followed  Li’s family odyssey to leave their PRC citizenship behind and  have taken huge sums of money out of China. They should be put on notice right now that if they have anything to do with killing the protesters and if off-shore ill-gotten gains exist, they are vulnerable.

The very simple point is that those giving a genocidal “go” order against the legitimate Hong Kong protesters should be identified and if possible have off their offshore money  legally targeted for confiscation by the International Criminal Court (ICC), and those funds   then used to establish a trust fund for Hong Kong victims. The ICC already has authority:

The Fund’s mission is to support and implement programmes that address harms resulting from genocide, crimes of humanity, war crimes and aggression. To achieve this mission, the TFV has a two-fold mandate: (i) to implement Court-Ordered reparations and (ii) to provide physical, psychological, and material support to victims and their families. By assisting victims to return to a dignified and contributory life within their communities, the TFV contributes to realizing sustainable and long-lasting peace by promoting restorative justice and reconciliation.

It may soon be a time to see the full power and reach of the International Criminal Court emerging,

The Court may exercise jurisdiction in a situation where genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes were committed on or after 1 July 2002 and:

  • the crimes were committed by a State Party national, or in the territory of a State Party, or in a State that has accepted the jurisdiction of the Court; or

  • the crimes were referred to the ICC Prosecutor by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) pursuant to a resolution adopted under chapter VII of the UN charter.

Photo credit: Studio Incendo

Few understand how big an influence Hong Kong money is on the PRC. Over two decades ago I followed that money.

In The Year of The Rat days in the late nineties, as the financial crimes investigator for the House Committee on Rules, I followed the actions of  one of the wealthiest men in the world.  Based in Hong Kong, multi-billionaire Li Ka-shing was one of the most important and richest men in Asia.

His financial empire, Hong Kong based, was an important PRC early indicator of Chinese ruling class money and influence in their emergence into global financial markets. By all accounts it was recognized that the leaders of China in Beijing saw Li as a very smart man. I was told he actually had a financial “hot line” phone directly to the Chinese Communist Party Politburo.

In trying to go direct in following PRC funds illegally flowing into the Clinton Administration, the biggest takeaway in those years was that the Bank of China was brilliant at hiding sources and uses of money.

One of the best money tracking organizations in the world is the US Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. ”FinCEN” reported that the best we could do in following money was to look at English banking transparency in the Hong Kong capital markets.  Additionally, in those days, individuals in the former Portuguese Colony of Macau, often a Triad center for graft and corruption, also laundered illegal money into the Clinton Administration.

Li Ka-shing’s family now is part of capital flight — his invisible financial hand is being made visible.  This 2015 article is very insightful about Li’s relationship with the truly supreme rulers of China. They are informally known as “the Shanghai Mafia,” in the sense they network each other into very powerful positions.

“He has fallen from the moral high ground,” it said, reminding Li that his huge wealth as head of the Hutchison Whampoa conglomerate had come from his connections to powerful Chinese officials, not from a level playing field in a market economy.

Now that Li is at age 90+, his sons, the oldest and by all accounts the “wicked smart” Victor Li Tzar-kuoi and younger Richard Li Tzar Kai (spelling always drove us nuts) are Canadian Citizens. World financial writers have been sensing that following closely what one of the wealthiest families in the world actually does during this time of testing for HK can bring interesting insights.

I hope the Hong Kong protests ends peacefully, but I have my doubts.  And where it gets very interesting is a current left/right unity of purpose.  The left also follows China’s nasty oppression very closely (except the “Feel the Bern” phony). The numerical range of dissidents killed at Tiananmen, was quoted In The Progressive no less:

No one knows the exact number of deaths. In the aftermath, a government spokesperson understated the figure, saying 300 civilians and soldiers died. Edward Timperlake, late director of technology assessment of the Office of the U.S. Secretary of Defense, put the number between 4,000 and 6,000.

I do not know what is the smart move to ultimately have China turn into a Chinese version of freedom and non-belligerence, but President Trump has unleashed an economic war plan that could lead to a tectonic shift in the leadership model of the People’s Republic of China and what they choose to do in Hong Kong will be a global seismic event.

It is very simple: many in China see that very successful leaders and their families have become extremely wealthy, essentially economic leaches, while preaching and enforcing communism for all others. So much for benefits of Communist equality.  And like Li’s family, they also have explored moving money out of China.

The horrific lesson learned from Tiananmen is that if the PLA/People Armed Police do make a move, I suspect it will be swift and brutal. If history is a guide they will kill the kids, kill the medical teams, kill the relatives identifying the victims, and then burn the bodies and claim minor or no casualties using every denial and deception trick in their book.

I reported on their gross denial and deception, hang-tough position over a decade ago by the PLA Chief of Staff:

Gen Chi stated on PBS, “I can tell you in a responsible and serious manner that at that time not a single person lost his life in Tiananmem Square.”

Consequently, it is now time to see how many Party Leaders and others in the economically rigged upper class families in China have followed  Li’s family odyssey to leave their PRC citizenship behind and  have taken huge sums of money out of China. They should be put on notice right now that if they have anything to do with killing the protesters and if off-shore ill-gotten gains exist, they are vulnerable.

The very simple point is that those giving a genocidal “go” order against the legitimate Hong Kong protesters should be identified and if possible have off their offshore money  legally targeted for confiscation by the International Criminal Court (ICC), and those funds   then used to establish a trust fund for Hong Kong victims. The ICC already has authority:

The Fund’s mission is to support and implement programmes that address harms resulting from genocide, crimes of humanity, war crimes and aggression. To achieve this mission, the TFV has a two-fold mandate: (i) to implement Court-Ordered reparations and (ii) to provide physical, psychological, and material support to victims and their families. By assisting victims to return to a dignified and contributory life within their communities, the TFV contributes to realizing sustainable and long-lasting peace by promoting restorative justice and reconciliation.

It may soon be a time to see the full power and reach of the International Criminal Court emerging,

The Court may exercise jurisdiction in a situation where genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes were committed on or after 1 July 2002 and:

  • the crimes were committed by a State Party national, or in the territory of a State Party, or in a State that has accepted the jurisdiction of the Court; or

  • the crimes were referred to the ICC Prosecutor by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) pursuant to a resolution adopted under chapter VII of the UN charter.

Photo credit: Studio Incendo

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Suspect Arrested In Molotov Cocktail Attack On DHS Facility In Florida

(1/2) “Today’s attempted attack on one of our USCIS facilities using a Molotov cocktail is another example of the use of violence in place of debate by those who oppose the proper application of our immigration laws… https://t.co/5o9AehyLo1 — USCIS Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli (@USCISCuccinelli) August 31, 2019 But, no, there’s no connection between the […]

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

What was Madeleine Westerhout doing at the White House at all?

In retrospect, one wonders why Madeleine Westerhout, the White House aide to President Trump who resigned after drunken indiscreet comments to reporters, was there in her job as “Director of Oval Office Operations” at all. 

According to Politico:

Madeleine Westerhout, who left her White House job suddenly on Thursday as President Trump’s personal assistant, was fired after bragging to reporters that she had a better relationship with Trump than his own daughters, Ivanka and Tiffany Trump, and that the president did not like being in pictures with Tiffany because he perceived her as overweight.

Given Westerhout’s sensitive role as a confidante to the president, the few details the White House shared about her abrupt firing had Washington’s political-media class in a quiet frenzy on Thursday night and Friday.

This was just one incident, and sure enough the press acted as Aesop’s scorpion, unable to help itself to hold off on the stinging even to save itself (or their source), so she was quite the fool to think they’d behave otherwise. It sounds as though she might just have gotten away with it a lot up until now – leaks and mean talk – as both Politico and the New York Times lightly suggest she did.

Five things stand out here about her: She was affiliated with Mitt Romney, who hates President Trump and does everything he can to oppose him from the Republican side. So the NeverTrumpism from her origins ran thick. Two, she was affiliated with Reince Priebus and Katie Walsh, two White House aides who left early because they had leak and loyalty problems with President Trump, too. Three, she cried on election night, which, if true, would be the most damning thing. If she cried, it means she voted for the other side – and given the choice, how could she pick Hillary Clinton even if she didn’t care for Trump much? This goes beyond bad judgment. Two other things: the 28-year-old aide was billed as “immature” by other White House aides who wanted her about, which would certainly explain her impulsiveness and susceptibility to the effects of drinking with journalists, which effectively did her in. Four, she was said to be ambitious for power, which would have natural vectors in sucking up to the press as she tried to do, much to her eternal grief, as well as in her willingness to use President Trump (a guy she hated) to climb to the top.

A sad story. Was she hired because she was young and good looking? If so, what a weakness of President Trump’s.

Someone in Trump’s position requires loyalty, something that cannot be bought, educated, or plastic-surgeried in. And for an employee who basically served as a glorified secretary, it was really the only thing such a person could potentially offer of value. Westerhout, in retrospect, seems to have sent up some red flags and President Trump — and we the people who elected him — deserved better.

 

In retrospect, one wonders why Madeleine Westerhout, the White House aide to President Trump who resigned after drunken indiscreet comments to reporters, was there in her job as “Director of Oval Office Operations” at all. 

According to Politico:

Madeleine Westerhout, who left her White House job suddenly on Thursday as President Trump’s personal assistant, was fired after bragging to reporters that she had a better relationship with Trump than his own daughters, Ivanka and Tiffany Trump, and that the president did not like being in pictures with Tiffany because he perceived her as overweight.

Given Westerhout’s sensitive role as a confidante to the president, the few details the White House shared about her abrupt firing had Washington’s political-media class in a quiet frenzy on Thursday night and Friday.

This was just one incident, and sure enough the press acted as Aesop’s scorpion, unable to help itself to hold off on the stinging even to save itself (or their source), so she was quite the fool to think they’d behave otherwise. It sounds as though she might just have gotten away with it a lot up until now – leaks and mean talk – as both Politico and the New York Times lightly suggest she did.

Five things stand out here about her: She was affiliated with Mitt Romney, who hates President Trump and does everything he can to oppose him from the Republican side. So the NeverTrumpism from her origins ran thick. Two, she was affiliated with Reince Priebus and Katie Walsh, two White House aides who left early because they had leak and loyalty problems with President Trump, too. Three, she cried on election night, which, if true, would be the most damning thing. If she cried, it means she voted for the other side – and given the choice, how could she pick Hillary Clinton even if she didn’t care for Trump much? This goes beyond bad judgment. Two other things: the 28-year-old aide was billed as “immature” by other White House aides who wanted her about, which would certainly explain her impulsiveness and susceptibility to the effects of drinking with journalists, which effectively did her in. Four, she was said to be ambitious for power, which would have natural vectors in sucking up to the press as she tried to do, much to her eternal grief, as well as in her willingness to use President Trump (a guy she hated) to climb to the top.

A sad story. Was she hired because she was young and good looking? If so, what a weakness of President Trump’s.

Someone in Trump’s position requires loyalty, something that cannot be bought, educated, or plastic-surgeried in. And for an employee who basically served as a glorified secretary, it was really the only thing such a person could potentially offer of value. Westerhout, in retrospect, seems to have sent up some red flags and President Trump — and we the people who elected him — deserved better.

 

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Purging Dude Walls Toward Leftist Utopia

If the left is so loving, tolerant and inclusive, why is it so driven by unquenchable bitterness? What fuels it to divide Americans? No, I’m not talking about the Democratic presidential candidates, though any one of them demonstrates the same theme. The American left is just gorged with angst and apparently on a mission to share its misery. The insanity emanating from leftists today is overwhelming.

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

Court Reverses Conviction in Kate Steinle Killing

Shameful, he completely walks. Via Newsmax: A California state appeals court has thrown out the sole conviction against an illegal immigrant who fatally shot a woman on the San Francisco waterfront in 2015. The 1st District Court of Appeal on Friday overturned a gun conviction against Jose Inez Garcia-Zarate because the judge failed to instruct […]

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

GOP Rep. Rogers: ‘Barack Obama Could Not Win the Nomination in This Year’s Democrat Field — He Is Not Socialist Enough to Win’

While the state of the Democratic Party in 2020 may make some Republicans cringe, it could pay off in the long run for Republicans according to Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL).

During an appearance on Huntsville, AL radio’s WVNN on Thursday, Rogers speculated that if former President Barack Obama were one of the candidates in the 2020 Democratic presidential field, he would not win the party nomination for not being “socialist enough.”

“I hear it everywhere I go in my district – people do see them as the face of the future Democrat Party, and they see these presidential debates, and they see how far left they’re going with their rhetoric,” Rogers said. “I just spoke to a civic group in Alex City today at lunch, and I told them – and I really mean this – Barack Obama could not win the nomination in this year’s Democrat field. He is not socialist enough to win. That’s how far left they’ve moved. So yeah, when I hear Omar and AOC and Tlaib all talking, I want them to keep it up because it is turning off Americans from coast to coast.”

Rogers was still optimistic about Republicans chances of picking up the House in 2020 and warned not to read too much into the recent wave of Republican retirements.

“It doesn’t have any effect on it,” he added. “One of the things that drives me nuts about the national news media is they spin these things to support a narrative they’re promoting. The fact that is we’re not having a larger retirement than we usually have.  If you take the last three-and-a-half years and you compare it to the previous three-and-a-half years, it’s the same percentage. Every August recess, we have a lot of people announce they’re retiring in part because they get back home in August and realize ‘I like being home. I don’t want to do this anymore.’ It’s a tough way of life. There’s a lot of time away from your family. A lot of time spent fundraising. Social media has made it just a nightmare to have to be in these jobs because people just beat the crap out of you constantly, cable news. A lot of folks just don’t want to do this for a long time.”

“But this is nothing out of the ordinary,” he continued. “One of the things I would urge your audience to look at in the future because I’ve been doing this 17 years now, and I’ve seen this pattern: Every August, especially right at the end of August you get a lot of people announce they’re retiring because they’ve been home for a month and they like being out of Washington and back home. And then after every Christmas break, we have a wave of announcements for the same reason – people are back home with their family. They realize they like the private life and they want to go back to it. So there is nothing unusual about what’s happening right now.”

Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Reports: Mainland Chinese Joining Pro-Democracy Hong Kong Protesters

China’s worst nightmare may be happening: Mainland Chinese citizens are now participating in pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, according to recent reports.

Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that a “small cohort of mainlanders have joined the demonstrations, taking extraordinary risks to support a society that offers freedoms unavailable back home.”

“My understanding is that ‘one country, two systems’ is a creative set of ideals,” a 24-year-old Chinese graduate student living in Hong Kong with the last name Chen told the paper. “Now those ideals are threatened.”

The mainlanders said they value Hong Kong’s autonomy from Chinese control and have joined marches, signed open letters supporting Hong Kong, and defended the movement on social media.

Their participation is an indication that the movement could spread to mainland China, despite attempts by the government to brand the Hong Kong protesters as traitors.

Chinese authorities are reportedly checking travelers’ smartphones as they reenter China for evidence of participation in the demonstrations.

Another mainland Chinese citizen who took part in the protests has fled to Taiwan where he is hoping to stay, according to a report by Radio Free Asia.

Zhang Wen, 47, who is sleeping on the streets in Taipei after he abandoned a tour group he arrived with, told the outlet, “I definitely don’t want to go back to mainland China now … So I have two options: I can either apply to extend my visa here, or I can apply for political asylum.”

Zhang said he crossed into Hong Kong several times in June and July to take part in the protests. He reportedly has video of himself storming the Hong Kong Legislative Council building.

“The risk that I will be caught for my support for the anti-extradition protests is very high,” he told Radio Free Asia. “I will definitely get arrested for the storming of LegCo, because some people have been detained just for posting that they support the anti-extradition movement online.”

The protesters have been protesting the encroachment of Beijing on their freedoms following the United Kingdom’s handover of Hong Kong to China in 1997.

China and the United Kingdom signed a treaty in 1984 that agreed to a 50-year time period after the handover wherein Hong Kong would enjoy some political and social autonomy under a “one country, two systems” policy, ending in 2049.

However, since then, pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong say they have faced an erosion of that autonomy by Beijing. In 2014, Hong Kong residents were forced to choose their next chief executive from a list of candidates vetted by Beijing, which sparked protests known as the Umbrella Movement.

The recent protests were sparked by a proposed bill that would allow those charged with crimes in Hong Kong to be extradited to the mainland where they could face harsher punishment under an opaque justice system.

The bill was tabled, but Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam has refused to withdraw it altogether, fueling continued protests throughout the summer that risk a violent crackdown by Chinese troops reminiscent of the brutal 1989 crackdown in Tiananmen Square.

Still, most mainlanders in Hong Kong share the Chinese government’s antipathy against the protesters, and some have even fought against the protesters, as the WSJ also reported.

The Chinese government have portrayed the protesters as violent extremists and have accused the U.S. of being behind the protests. Some protesters have carried the American flag as a symbol of freedom.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Tear Gas and Petrol Bombs as Hong Kongers Defy Regime Protest Ban

(AFP) — Police fired water cannon and tear gas to clear Hong Kong pro-democracy protesters from outside the city’s parliament on Saturday, as demonstrators defied a ban on rallying and the arrests of leading activists to take to the streets for a 13th straight weekend.

Police had banned the demonstration on security grounds, then organisers had cancelled it, after last weekend saw some of the most violent clashes in months of political turmoil.

But large crowds, many in their signature black T-shirts and under a colourful canopy of umbrellas, snaked through Hong Kong island anyway, blocking roads and chanting “reclaim Hong Kong, revolution of our times”.

Chaos engulfed the financial heart of the city, with hardcore protesters throwing rocks, starting fires and shining laser pens at a rank of police behind a barricade at the city parliament known as the Legislative Council (LegCo).

Police fired a water cannon and rounds of tear gas to disperse protesters, who hit back with a barrage of molotov cocktails that left fires burning.

As dusk drew in, protesters smashed through the barrier outside the parliament building, but were repelled by tear gas and jets of blue-coloured liquid fired from the water cannon.

Local media reported the colour spray aimed to make it easier to identify suspects.

The LegCo was stormed on July 1 — the 22nd anniversary of the handover of Hong Kong from British to Chinese rule.

Earlier on Saturday protesters marched by the official residence of Hong Kong’s embattled Beijing-backed leader Carrie Lam, who is the focal point of anger after trying to pass a bill which would have allowed extradition to China.

“I’m prepared for the consequences of coming out,” said one protestor, who gave his name as Jay, adding “Hong Kongers have the right to assembly.”

Opposition to the extradition bill — now suspended but not permanently withdrawn — has brought much of Hong Kong to the streets.

The protests have expanded into a wider pro-democracy call and a rejection of attempts by Beijing to curtail the freedoms of the semi-autonomous territory.

Protesters were in defiant mood throughout Saturday, which marked the fifth anniversary of Beijing’s rejection of a call for universal suffrage for Hong Kong that sparked the 79-day “Umbrella Movement” in 2014.

“I’m not afraid to come out here today,” said another 25-year-old protester who gave his surname as Ng.

Many protesters are determined not to let the new movement fizzle out as the Umbrella protests did.

“It’s ‘now or never’ for Hong Kong,” said a 33-year-old accountant who gave her surname as Wong.

“I’m a mother-of-two. They didn’t come today but their grandmother did. We’re defending the right of assembly for the next generation in Hong Kong.”

At least five high-profile activists and three lawmakers were arrested on Friday in a sweep aimed at defanging Saturday’s rally.

Rights groups say the tactics are cribbed directly from Beijing’s protest playbook.

Two of the Umbrella Movement’s leaders, Joshua Wong and Agnes Chow were among those arrested, charged and bailed for “inciting others to take part in unauthorised assembly”.

The European Union’s diplomatic chief Federica Mogherini said the developments were “extremely worrying”, while US President Donald Trump said his economic pressure on China was forcing Beijing to take a more moderate line in Hong Kong.

Protesters sidestep ban 

In an attempt to sidestep Saturday’s protest ban, crowds earlier carried Christian crosses and sang “Hallelujah” in religious gatherings — which do not require the same stringent permission from authorities.

The demonstrators, who have earned a reputation for their creativity and unpredictability, also called for “mass shopping trips” in the city centre.

On Saturday morning, LIHKG, the Reddit-like forum used by protesters to communicate, reported via Twitter that its app had suffered the “largest attack it has ever seen”.

Police on Friday confirmed three lawmakers — and a district councillor — had been arrested over their alleged actions in previous protests, but denied the sweep was timed specifically to weaken the weekend’s protests.

More than 900 people have been arrested since June in connection to protests.

Hong Kong’s crisis-hit government has refused to back down over the protests, which have seen millions march peacefully through the streets but also hardcore groups of radical protesters hurl bricks and petrol bombs at police armed with tear gas and rubber bullets.

The violence has damaged Hong Kong’s reputation for stability and prosperity.

China has responded with a campaign of intimidation. State media on Friday reported that fresh military anti-riot drills were held across the border in Shenzhen.

burs-apj/kaf

Follow Breitbart London on Facebook: Breitbart London

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Report: Google to Pay up to $200 Million for Child Privacy Violations

Google will reportedly pay between $150 and $200 million to resolve a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigation into YouTube regarding its potential violation of a children’s privacy law, according to a report.

Politico report detailed that the agency voted 3-2 along party lines to settle with Google. The settlement will then go to the Department of Justice (DOJ) as part of its review process.

The FTC’s settlement with Google serves as the latest move against big tech. The agency fined Facebook $5 billion to resolve its probe over its Cambridge Analytica scandal, which violated millions of Americans’ privacy.

Privacy groups have complained to the consumer protection agency that YouTube violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) by collecting personal information about children and using it to target them with ads without receiving their parents’ consent.

Google’s settlement with the FTC serves as the largest fine for COPPA violations. The agency previously fined Chinese social media company Musical.ly, now TikTok, $5.7 million in February.

Jeff Chester, the executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, said that the agency should fine Google much more for its COPPA violations.

“I think the message here is that when the commission did have a privacy law to enforce, it refused to do so. The punishment should’ve been at least half a billion dollars,” Chester said. “It’s scandalous. It sends the signal that you in fact can break a privacy law and get away largely scot-free.”

Marc Rotenberg, president of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), said that perhaps even more important than the fine is the terms the FTC might impose on Google regarding its collection of children’s information.

Rotenberg said, “The critical challenge for the FTC is whether it has the ability to restrain business practices that violate privacy. Imposing large fines does not address that problem.”

Sean Moran is a congressional reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter @SeanMoran3.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com