Posted on

I am willing to entertain your most insane conspiracy theories about Epstein’s death

Normally I scoff at Birthers, sneer at QAnoners, and laugh in the face of Pizzagaters. Although, between the Epstein saga and the Catholic Church’s endless scandals, the laughter about that last one has gradually turned from uproarious to more like uncomfortable throat-clearing.

Today, though? Today this mind is open for business on conspiracy theories. That’s how dubious Epstein’s death is. Gimme your best shot: Clinton-backed assassination? Trump-backed assassination? Coordinated hit by a cabal of international jetset pedos? The Saudis? Mossad?

Me before Epstein’s death: Conspiracy theories are facile misdirections favored by people who crave simplistic explanations to soothe their own feelings of powerlessness.

Me now: The Illuminati whacked Epstein.

Everything’s on the table. If that guy with the crazy hair from “Ancient Aliens” wants to pitch me on something involving ET, I’ll listen to that too. There’s only one no-go zone:

I just can’t. I can’t do another years-long MSNBC-driven cycle involving Russians hiding under the bed. Shoot me anything else and we’ll talk.

I mean, really:

Jeffrey Epstein told prison guards and fellow inmates that he believed someone had tried to kill him weeks before his death, a source has revealed to DailyMail.com

The insider, who had seen the billionaire on several occasions during his incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, also claims that the normally reserved Epstein seemed to be in good spirits.

‘There was no indication that he might try to take his own life,’ the source told DailyMail.com

‘From what I saw, he was finally starting to adjust to prison. I think he was comforted by the rigidity of his new life’.

It’s a good thing public faith in institutions was already in the toilet or this episode really might have shaken it.

According to the Times, the most famous defendant in the federal prison system outside of Supermax, who tried to kill himself — or survived a murder attempt — just three weeks ago, was placed on suicide watch for all of … one week. It began on July 23 and ended on July 29, never mind the tremendous public and prosecutorial interest in keeping Epstein alive in hopes of him eventually telling all about his activities with rich men and underaged girls. A different NYT piece explains just how difficult it is to commit suicide when you’re on suicide watch:

Inmates on suicide watch are generally placed in a special observation cell, surrounded with windows, with a bolted down bed and no bedclothes. A correction officer — or sometimes a fellow inmate trained to be a “suicide companion” — is typically assigned to sit in an adjacent office and monitor the inmate constantly.

Robert Gangi, an expert on prisons and the former executive director of the Correctional Association of New York, said guards also generally take shoelaces and belts away from people on suicide watch.

“If he’s on suicide watch, it’s virtually impossible to kill yourself,” Mr. Gangi said.

You can’t be removed from suicide watch until the chief psychologist decides that you’re no longer a risk to self-harm. Somehow, it seems, Jeffrey Epstein convinced MCC officials that he’d regained the will to live in the course of seven days. “For them to pull him off suicide watch is shocking,” said a former federal warden to NBC. “For someone this high-profile, with these allegations and this many victims, who has had a suicide attempt in the last few weeks, you can take absolutely no chances. You leave him on suicide watch until he’s out of there.”

Presumably the feds’ defense will be, “No, really, people in our custody die all the time.”

I’m not onboard with the Clinton theory, I must say. In fact, I’d encourage Bill and Hillary to put out this statement: “If we wanted to take him out, we would have gotten him on the first try.” I’m not onboard with the Trump/cabal/Saudi/Mossad theory either. My preferred insane explanation is that Epstein isn’t really dead. Remember, he’s a supervillain with his own island lair who wanted to seed the world with his DNA. If you know anything about movies, you know dudes like that are never dead the first time you think they are. Right now, I expect, the FBI is prying open the door of Epstein’s Rape Temple and discovering elaborate high-tech equipment labeled “CLONE MACHINE.” He’ll reemerge eventually in some global TV transmission demanding a trillion dollars or else he’ll blow up the sun or whatever.

And if he doesn’t, rest assured that there’ll soon be an Internet cottage industry of “Epstein is alive!!1!” videos/photos taken on the street from far away of men who bear a vague resemblance to him.

Trump hasn’t said anything yet as of 4 p.m. ET but I figure that’s because Kellyanne Conway is busy trying to explain to him why it’d be wrong for the president to start tweeting conspiracy theories about a prisoner who died in federal custody. Even so, the odds that POTUS ends up tweeting out #ClintonBodyCount sometime tonight can’t be worse than 50/50. While we’re waiting for his reaction, House and Senate should be sending out subpoenas for MCC administrators demanding answers on how Epstein managed to pull this off — unless Congress would rather see the Epstein matter go away, of course. If they do hold hearings, I want someone to ask how common it is for prisoners to be taken off suicide watch after a week and how often prisoners die when they’re a known suicide risk to the staff.

Oh, and like all you, of course I want to know if there’s surveillance video of Epstein’s cell last night. If this really was a suicide, it should be easy to prove.

There’s one other terrifying explanation for Epstein’s mysterious death that we haven’t considered yet. What if … federal prison officials really are so callous and incompetent as to have not kept special watch over him?

Exit question: Will the DOJ honor Epstein’s wishes to have his dong frozen postmortem?

The post I am willing to entertain your most insane conspiracy theories about Epstein’s death appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

Posted on

Common Sense in Free Fall on College Campuses

Evidence is mounting that political
ideology is corrupting the liberal arts.

According to Campus
Reform, in late July, Portland State University accused one of its professors, Peter
Boghossian, of “‘questionable ethical behavior’ and banned him from conducting
academic research.”

What was the professor’s offense? He successfully convinced several prestigious, peer-reviewed journals to publish articles that were anything but scholarly. In one, he analyzed “dog rape culture,” in another, he republished portions of Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf,” spruced up with academic buzzwords.

This may sound like an
off-color prank, but it was a serious effort to expose a grave problem on
college campuses. Boghossian’s hypothesis was simple: the leftist fixation on intersectionality
and what he termed “grievance studies” have led to a sharp decline in the
quality and rigor of scholarship within the discipline.

Boghossian and his two colleagues, Helen Pluckrose and James Lindsay, made headlines in 2018 for completing an investigation into how lax some humanities journals had become.

The trio wrote and submitted 20 “hoax” articles to several prominent academic journals in various academic fields, including gender and queer studies, that the researchers felt were most influenced by progressive ideology rather than objective research.

When seven of their “fake” studies were published after undergoing the purportedly-scrupulous “peer review” process, Boghossian and his team released a report demonstrating how ideologically-driven academia has become.

It brings to mind the “Sokal hoax” of the mid-90s, when a New York University physicist submitted a similarly “fake” study that also ended up being published.

PSU’s Internal Review
Board then sanctioned Boghossian for “fabricating data and studying human
subjects, specifically the various journal editors, without their consent.”

The Internal Review
Board seems to have missed the purpose of the professor’s study.

The censure led
directly to the ban Boghossian now faces. The academy seems more interested in
making an example of him than acknowledging the concern about a lack of quality
control in the field of “grievance studies,” which his efforts unveiled.

It is not as if
citizens are unaware of the issues plaguing higher education.

From the oft-referenced
replication crisis in the social sciences (wherein
academic studies cannot be reproduced by unaffiliated researchers), the insane cost of college, and the liberal bent
of a staggering percentage of university professors, many students
would do well to reconsider the value of attending college over trade schools
or other similar, skill-developing opportunities.

Boghossian’s study revealed the dangerous road that academia is sprinting down. He cited “constructivism”—the idea that truth is temporally and culturally situated—as the main culprit infecting academic research, especially within the humanities.

The research team noted
that “radical constructivists tend to believe science and reason must be
dismantled to let ‘other ways of knowing’ have equal validation as
knowledge-producing enterprises.” This idea could be what is driving many
academic journals down the ideological rabbit hole.

As Boghossian and his
team stated in their study, “As we progressed, we started to realize that just
about anything can be made to work,
so long as it falls within the moral orthodoxy and demonstrates understanding
of existing literature.”

Scholars
across the world agreed with the authors’ motives and conclusions, and wrote to
PSU’s vice president for research administration in support of Boghossian. Even
Alan Sokal, the NYU scientist who got into hot water for his similar effort in 1996, defended the beleaguered
Portland professor, writing:

It seems to me that it would be a grave injustice to punish Professor Boghossian for a violation of the letter of the [Research Misconduct Policy] that did not constitute in any way a violation of that policy’s purpose and which moreover was undertaken with the goal of serving, and which did, in fact, serve the public interest …

Unfortunately, but unsurprisingly, given the university administration’s reaction, many of Boghossian’s fellow professors at PSU were not as supportive. In an anonymous letter to the editor in the university’s newspaper, the anti-Boghossian group wrote:

[T]he ‘hoaxes’ are simply lies peddled to journals, masquerading as articles. … Chronic and pathological, unscholarly behavior inside an institution of higher education brings negative publicity to the institution as well as the honest scholars who work there. Worse yet, it jeopardizes the students’ reputations, as their degrees in the process may become devalued.

Boghossian’s aggrieved colleagues
seem to have missed the entire point of his study, and may prefer for their
students to learn from such indoctrination.  

Christina Hoff Sommers, noted scholar and critic of modern feminism, described Boghossian’s hoax project as an “eye-opening experiment,” the results of which “raise serious questions about the methods of several seemingly legitimate academic journals.”

She went on, according
to Campus Reform, to “address the accusation of improperly studying human
subjects, saying ‘This charge is hard to take seriously. By its very nature,
the parody rules out the possibility of consent: It is the view of the [Internal
Review Board] that academic journals should be shielded from critical or
irreverent scrutiny?”

PSU stated in its
disciplinary letter that it is willing to give
Boghossian another chance to conduct research, if he completes a required “protection
of human subjects training” course and otherwise satisfies the university’s administration.

However, for a nontenured professor who himself acknowledges he does not “fit the mold” of the “ideological community” on campus, the odds of him being permitted to resume his research may be slim.

Boghossian’s experiment
highlights the problems of groupthink in any environment, especially academia.

If humanities
professors are going to be more interested in placating popular opinion rather
than exposing shoddy academic practices bordering on charlatanry, then we should stop describing our
humanities’ departments as bastions of truth.

Truth is objective, not
subject to the prevailing winds of academia and the left at large.

Stifling academic
debate, exercising a heckler’s veto over messages that do not fit within an
ideology prescribed by liberal academics, and promoting shoddy “research” that
supports that ideology, will not advance the search for truth, which should be
the ultimate goal of any serious academic institution. 

All it will do is
perpetuate irrationality and ignorance.

The post Common Sense in Free Fall on College Campuses appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Posted on

5 Years Later, This Nonprofit Keeps Growing Conservative Leaders Beyond Its Borders

In a world that appears to be increasingly hostile to America’s founding principles, can conservatives have an impact without compromising their values?

Five years ago, two 25-year-olds from Ohio started the Forge Leadership Network in their home state to answer that question. 

The Daily Signal sat down with Adam Josefczyk, president and co-founder of the Christian organization, after this year’s July summit to learn how its scope and influence have grown.

Beyond the Buckeye

Josefczyk and Justin Powell founded Forge in 2014 to mentor young people to become principled conservative leaders in their chosen careers. 

They brought in 45 students for the first annual Forge Leadership Summit, a five-day conference in Circleville, Ohio. It has nearly doubled in size, with 80 young adults attending the summit this summer. 

Josefczyk said Forge’s leaders realized early on that their training was relevant beyond Ohio. 

“We still have about 30 Ohioans,” he said of the yearly total. “But we now have students from Tennessee, California, Texas, Arizona, [and] New Hampshire. Students are coming from across the country to come to Forge.”

The summit now boasts 300 alumni. 

‘Border-Spanning Mission’

Forge’s reach has extended outside the U.S., with three students from China attending the 2019 summit. 

“We want to train world-changers, and we want their time in America to have been a blessing to them,” Josefczyk said. 

“Most of the international students come to us not because they know William F. Buckley or conservative orthodoxy, but because they’re Christian believers who share our views of truth and want to better themselves and love their neighbor. And that’s a border-spanning mission,” he said.

Forge also attracted students in the U.S. from Uganda, South Africa, and Venezuela over the past two years. 

Attracting Conservatives From ‘Alienated America’

Josefczyk said journalist and “Alienated America” author Tim Carney was shocked to learn Forge students were from the areas he visited. His book is about the sociological makeup of Middle America and its apparent decline.

“’These students are from the towns I just studied, in Middle America,’” Josefczyk said Carney told him. “’Lancaster, Ohio? Flint, Michigan? A lot of these towns are seen as being in their twilight, how do you guys have so many students from there?’”

Josefczyk pointed to the summit’s geographic location, but also emphasized what he calls the organization’s “posture.”

“We try to present ourselves as humble,” he said. “We don’t have a lot of bells and whistles, but we know the quality that’s here. Not that we don’t like nice things and don’t want to be professional, but we try to make people feel at ease. It’s not a resume competition on Day One.” 

‘Tell Me Who You’re With … ’

A 2018 graduate of Forge, Matt Brokke, spoke with The Daily Signal about how he was fed up with school before he applied to the leadership summit. 

An atheist at the time, Brokke said he came to Forge seeking validation for his conservative views. Instead, he found friendship.

“Never, before I came here, had I met someone who held me accountable,” Brokke said. “I went to the summit because I thought it would just be an echo chamber that validated my beliefs, but I ended up changing my mind on a lot of things, and growing. I realized that these were people I could see myself being friends with for the rest of my life.”

After the summit, Brokke was accepted into the Forge Mentorship Academy, a yearlong mentorship program where 30 students are paired with a mentor in their field of interest, participate in monthly conference calls with the Forge team and speakers, and travel together to Washington, D.C., and Israel. 

Brokke said he became a Christian and moved with his wife to Ohio while in the academy. He is now working toward becoming a professor of history and politics.

“You know that saying, ‘Tell me who you’re with and I’ll tell you who you are’?” he said. “People have a lot of influence in our lives. And Forge is definitely that place for me, where I was able to find people who are more knowledgeable than me and more moral than me, and because of them I’m growing to be more like that.”

The post 5 Years Later, This Nonprofit Keeps Growing Conservative Leaders Beyond Its Borders appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Posted on

Former Islamist Extremist Describes His Escape From the Ideology and How to Help the Most Vulnerable

What leads a person to become an Islamist extremist? For one immigrant, it was not fitting in with his American classmates.

Mohammed Khalid, a former Islamist extremist, described what drew him to the radical ideology and why he left it at an event last month at The Heritage Foundation. 

Khalid, now a scholar in cybersecurity studies at the University of Maryland, was born in the United Arab Emirates and lived in Pakistan before emigrating to the United States in 2010. 

As a 14-year-old struggling to fit in at an American public high school, Khalid said he turned to the internet to make sense of what some saw as the negative connotation of his first name, “Mohammed.”

 He said he quickly became enthralled with the answers online extremists offered. 

He absorbed as much material as he could, Khalid said, watching propaganda videos that painted the West in a negative light. He said the ideology resonated with him because he remembered seeing the same clips on the news when he lived in Pakistan.

“One of the biggest things that I remember was that the Twin Towers, when they were falling down—I could not forget one of the comments,” Khalid said. “One of the commentators was like, ‘Well, maybe they had it coming.’ This was when it began to kind of make sense to me, that well, maybe what’s happening to me is reflective of a wider ideology that I’m not aware of.”

At 16, Khalid said he was spending 40 hours a week communicating with Islamists through password-protected online forums, translating Islamist propaganda videos into English to radicalize American Muslims. He confided in these Islamists, whom he considered closer than family.

“The more I confided in them, the more separated and secluded I became from my own family,” Khalid said. “My family could not figure out what was wrong with me; they did not know what was happening because I kept it very well hidden from them.”

Khalid was arrested in April 2014, charged with conspiracy to provide material to terrorists, and convicted. He says he spent five years in federal prison.

At 17, he was the youngest person to be convicted of terrorism-related charges in the U.S.

Slowly, with the help of officers at the juvenile detention center, he said, he began to emerge from the extremist mindset.

The officers “explained about their struggles, they explained about their dreams, about their journeys,” Khalid said. 

“And so began a process of humanization, a process in which I was able to finally relate to these people whom I’d other-ized under the umbrella of Islamist ideology, and whom I finally, when I reached that beginning step, began to see as human beings,” he said. 

When an audience member asked whether it is possible for Muslims to reject extremism without leaving their faith, Khalid, who remains a Muslim, answered yes:

I see … a lot of my friends actually struggling to reconcile [Islam] with the society they find themselves in. They want to be partakers of this American culture. At the same time, they want to hold on to a Muslim identity that unfortunately, you know, sometimes is collapsed together with a whole bunch of outdated traditions. … I think moving forward, a lot of people individually have to decide how they want to interpret the religion, instead of letting religion be this one-size-fits-all approach.

Maajid Nawaz, founder and chairman of the London-based counterextremism think tank Quilliam, also spoke at the event.

Nawaz said the most vulnerable groups in society are former Muslims. He suggested that Islamic theology should be updated to develop a “Western Muslim identity.” 

Muslims have a responsibility to respect those who leave the religion, he added, rather than isolating or targeting them. 

“If Muslims … want to explore other faith traditions, or none, we have to protect them and their right to do so,” Nawaz said. “Because in our communities still, that is a big to-do, and they are discriminated against.”

The post Former Islamist Extremist Describes His Escape From the Ideology and How to Help the Most Vulnerable appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Posted on

BREAKING: CONVICTED PEDOPHILE JEFFREY EPSTEIN DEAD! – Financier Found Dead in Prison — Was on Suicide Watch? — Day After Documents Implicate Democrats


JEFFREY EPSTEIN FOUND DEAD IN PRISON!

ABC 7 says he died by SUICIDE!

The 66-year-old financier was hospitalized in July after he was found unresponsive in what appeared to be a possible suicide attempt.

In July Epstein was found injured and in a fetal position inside his cell at a New York City jail,

He was reportedly put under suicide watch.

Epstein found dead a day after documents were unsealed implicating several Democrats including Al Gore and former Governor Bill Richardson.

And yesterday court documents revealed Bill Clinton held a private party on Epstein Island.

The post BREAKING: CONVICTED PEDOPHILE JEFFREY EPSTEIN DEAD! – Financier Found Dead in Prison — Was on Suicide Watch? — Day After Documents Implicate Democrats appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Posted on

Sick: Leftists doxx and threaten Dayton nurse who saved lives for appearing in picture with President Trump

Need any proof that the left has gone crazed with hate and malice?

Try this:

 

 

Here is an obviously warm-hearted lady who has literally saved dozens of lives in the most stressful professional setting imaginable, the terrible Dayton mass shooting, and for merely posing for posing for a picture with the president, she gets threats, security, and her life upended, too. She also got doxxed. It wasn’t in the Instagram post, it was in this sick leftist tweet here, encouraging harassment calls:

 

 

It’s a mark of the left’s insanity that they would go after someone like this, because up until now, such pictures with visiting presidents have always been routine, no matter who the president was, and people have always gathered around and smiled no matter what their politics.  I recall that even the military would ask troops serving in Afghanistan who supported President Obama to go to the cameras for pictures and smile happily. 

This sliming of the innocent nurse by the left suggests not just unhinged rage, but a very negative underlying agenda: to intimidate voters in order to make the rest of the public fearful of posing for pictures with the president. It’s a sort of repression of mobs, the way Castroite Cuba sends in the turbas to hurl rocks to intimidate dissent. It’s the same sick logic that prevents people from putting Trump bumper stickers on their cars out of fear of having them keyed or their tires punctured. The vile stunt just took things to a new level.

It shows that there is indeed a real downward slide in civil discourse and the momentum for it is coming from the embittered left. It is also revolting to see that no Democrats have condemned this nasty act against someone who should be respected as a heroic first responder. Where are their condemnations of the mobbing and ganging up on this innocent person for something that is no crime whatsoever? Nowhere. This is how silent majorities form.

Image credit: Instagram screen shot

 

Need any proof that the left has gone crazed with hate and malice?

Try this:

 

 

Here is an obviously warm-hearted lady who has literally saved dozens of lives in the most stressful professional setting imaginable, the terrible Dayton mass shooting, and for merely posing for posing for a picture with the president, she gets threats, security, and her life upended, too. She also got doxxed. It wasn’t in the Instagram post, it was in this sick leftist tweet here, encouraging harassment calls:

 

 

It’s a mark of the left’s insanity that they would go after someone like this, because up until now, such pictures with visiting presidents have always been routine, no matter who the president was, and people have always gathered around and smiled no matter what their politics.  I recall that even the military would ask troops serving in Afghanistan who supported President Obama to go to the cameras for pictures and smile happily. 

This sliming of the innocent nurse by the left suggests not just unhinged rage, but a very negative underlying agenda: to intimidate voters in order to make the rest of the public fearful of posing for pictures with the president. It’s a sort of repression of mobs, the way Castroite Cuba sends in the turbas to hurl rocks to intimidate dissent. It’s the same sick logic that prevents people from putting Trump bumper stickers on their cars out of fear of having them keyed or their tires punctured. The vile stunt just took things to a new level.

It shows that there is indeed a real downward slide in civil discourse and the momentum for it is coming from the embittered left. It is also revolting to see that no Democrats have condemned this nasty act against someone who should be respected as a heroic first responder. Where are their condemnations of the mobbing and ganging up on this innocent person for something that is no crime whatsoever? Nowhere. This is how silent majorities form.

Image credit: Instagram screen shot

 

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Posted on

Rudy Giuliani on Jeffrey Epstein’s Alleged Suicide: ‘This Is Very Questionable’

Rudy Giuliani reacted to Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged suicide Saturday morning, asking a series of questions about his death and stating, “Committing suicide on suicide watch doesn’t happen.”

Authorities found the convicted pedophile dead in his cell early Saturday morning, according to several reports.

Epstein committed suicide via hanging, according to reports from the New York Times and ABC News. The Associated Press reported that the “medical examiner’s office in Manhattan confirmed Epstein’s death.”

Many, including Giuliani, have questions.

“What does the word suicide mean in the phrase suicide WATCH? Who was watching? Did they fall asleep? Did the camera malfunction? Was there camera surveillance? Who was he about to implicate?” Giuliani tweeted Saturday.

“This is very questionable. Committing suicide on suicide watch doesnt [sic] happen,” he added:

Giuliani is not the only high profile figure asking questions.

“We need answers. Lots of them,” freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) tweeted Saturday:

“The suicide of Mr. Epstein is an impossibilty [sic]. When an impossiblty [sic] occurs involving powerful people and possible criminality there must be an investigation to end speculation,” Rep. Al Green (D-TX) wrote.

“Because the public has a right to know, I’m calling for a congressional investigation,” he added:

NBC News reported that Epstein was “not on suicide watch at the time of his death,” but that has yet to be confirmed.

Attorney General William Barr released a statement about Epstein’s death and said it “raises serious questions that must be answered.”

“I was appalled to learn that Jeffrey Epstein was found dead early this morning from an apparent suicide while in federal custody. Mr. Epstein’s death raises serious questions that must be answered,” Barr said in a statement.

“In addition to the FBI’s investigation, I have consulted with the Inspector General who is opening an investigation into the circumstances of Mr. Epstein’s death,” he added.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Posted on

MS-13 Murdered A California High School Student. The School Kept It Quiet For Nearly Two Years.

Brayan Andino, 16, was murdered by MS-13 gang members after he was lured to Lake Balboa in Los Angeles, California, back in October 2017. Two female gang associates, who were also students, had gained Andino’s trust, which is why he went with them to the lake. The two were part of the Fulton clique, a faction within MS-13. When Andino arrived at the lake, other members of the gang beat him to death.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Posted on

Hah! Harvard Elitist Liz Warren Goes to Iowa – Gets Lectured by Farmer on Her Green New Deal Insanity (VIDEO)

Well this was not supposed to happen.

Elitist Harvard professor Elizabeth Warren went to Iowa this week.
She stopped by a farm in Harlan, Iowa where the farmer did not hesitate to lecture her on her Green New Deal plan to eliminate cows.

This is where we are in America.
Where an Iowa farmer has to lecture the far left Harvard law professor on her wild insanity.

During a farm visit in Harlan, Iowa, a farmer confronted Sen. Elizabeth Warren over the Green New Deal, specifically concerning the elimination of cows, on 8/8/19. Be sure to like, subscribe, and comment below to share your thoughts on the video.

Hah-Hah!

The post Hah! Harvard Elitist Liz Warren Goes to Iowa – Gets Lectured by Farmer on Her Green New Deal Insanity (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com