Man Arrested At Elizabeth Warren Event After Allegedly Threatening Protesters In MAGA Hats

On Thursday night, a man hostile to Trump supporters who were protesting at a Tempe, Arizona, event for Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) was arrested when he reportedly threatened to strike one of them.

The Washington Post reported that the man was feuding with members of the AZ Patriots, who were wearing red “Make America Great Again” hats and carrying a Trump flag at the Marquee Theater. The Post reported that Jennifer Harrison, a member of the group, claimed he threatened to strike her as well as attempt to seize a member’s cellphone being used to record the event.

ABC News reported, “The man was abruptly taken into the lobby, where he was pushed onto the ground and pinned down. At least six members of the event security staff then forcefully dragged the man, who did not appear to cooperate with attempts to bring him outside, across the lobby by his arms and legs.”

Tempe Police Sgt. Kevin Renwick said of the arrest, “It’s pretty cut and dried.” He told ABC News, "This is just people behaving badly. Absolutely it was appropriate and lawful the way the security removed him." He concluded, "It never looks pretty, but sometimes that’s the way to do it, unfortunately.”

Detective Greg Bacon, a spokesman for the Tempe Police Department, added the man would be charged with “assault and disorderly conduct for confronting another subject at the event.”

Harrison said members of Warren’s campaign staff tried to block the view of the AZ Patriots by using signs. She added that, prior to the incident with the arrested man, security at the event asked her group to leave. She said, “No problem, we left peacefully, no problem. We respect the law.” But as they were leaving, the arrested man went into action, allegedly trying to seize her compatriot’s phone. She said that later the man “came after me and tried to take a swing at me.” She concluded, “Liberals cannot keep their hands to themselves at these events. They see a Make America Great Again hat and they become unglued.”

AZCentral.com reported that the crowd at the Marquee Theater numbered roughly 3,000 people, and although the event was billed as a townhall, Warren took no questions.

In May, OH Predictive Insights released the results of a poll surveying the top six Democratic candidates at the time versus President Trump. Former Vice president Joe Biden was the only Democratic candidate to lead Trump, 49%-44%. Warren trailed Trump 42%-47%. Mike Noble, Chief of Research and Managing Partner at Predictive Insights, commented, “Biden is currently the king of the hill, although just like in the childhood game many of us used to play at recess, the question remains if he will be on top of the hill when the bell rings. The winners and losers of the 2020 election cycle will greatly depend on who ultimately lands up becoming the Democratic nominee for President.”

Fivethirtyeight.com pointed out, “Arizona’s primary is scheduled for March 17, 2020. 67 delegates will be awarded proportionally based on the results statewide and in each congressional district. In 2016, Hillary Clinton got 56.3% of the vote in Arizona, and Bernie Sanders got 41.4%.”

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Poll: 9 in 10 Young Britons Believe Their Lives Have No Purpose

A nationwide poll has revealed that 89 per cent of 16- to 29-year-olds believe that their lives have no meaning or purpose.

The poll, conducted by Japanese company Yakult and reported by The Sun, also found that 30 per cent of young people believe they are stuck in a rut with 84 per cent saying that they believe they are failing to “live their best life”.

Across all age groups, over half (51 per cent) of those surveyed believe they were put on the earth to be as happy as they can be, whilst 37 per cent believe that it is their role to make people around them happy, with 31 per cent believing humanity’s purpose should be to do good.

With religion being a major source of sense of purpose, a separate survey reported last month that those professing a Christian faith in the UK is at a record low at 38 per cent, with only one per cent of 18- to 24-year-olds identifying as belonging to the Church of England.

Young people are not the only demographic to be expressing a profound level of negativity about the state of their existence. In 2017, a survey by the commission on loneliness, set up by MP Jo Cox before her murder, found that almost three-quarters (73 per cent) of older people feel lonely, with nearly half (49 per cent) of those saying they have been feeling like that for years.

The following year, the British government appointed a so-called Minister for Loneliness, with state-funded programmes and initiatives to help lonely people connect with others around them and make friends.

Research from the government revealed some nine million people “always or often feel lonely”, with some 200,000 older people saying they had not had a conversation with a friend or relative in more than one month.

Forbes reported last year on a Norwegian start-up called No Isolation that aims to “fight loneliness” using “warm technology”, i.e., robots, and has developed artificial intelligence devices for two groups of identified vulnerable people, those over the age of 80 and children who are suffering from long-term illness, which it hopes to roll out across Europe to fill the care gap.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

How to Write the Perfect Passive Description of Chappaquiddick

Are you writing an article about Chappaquiddick, the 1969 "incident" where Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy drove a car into a pond after drinking at a party, swam out while 28-year-old Mary Jo Kopechne was still stuck inside, gave up trying to rescue her as she eventually died of suffocation, didn’t tell the authorities who likely could have saved her life until the next morning, worried first and foremost about the harm to his political career, tried to fake an alibi, never spent a day in jail, and went on to serve 40 more years in the Senate?

Well, yuck. That sounds a lot like manslaughter that should have sent the scion to prison and put an end to his unearned political career. We can’t have that, so here are some examples of how to passively frame this atrocity in the friendliest possible terms.

"Senator Kennedy Becomes Entangled in a Tragic Car Accident"

In a 2015 piece for The Hollywood Reporter, the writer framed the plot of the upcoming film Chappaquiddick this way: "On the eve of the moon landing, Senator Kennedy becomes entangled in a tragic car accident that results in the death of former Robert Kennedy campaign worker Mary Jo Kopechne."

In addition to making Kennedy a seeming witness to an accident he caused, this is also an interesting choice of words since he was able to free himself from the watery wreckage almost immediately.

Bonus: Producer Mark Ciardi added you’ll see what Kennedy "had to go through" in the story.

"Everyone has an idea of what happened on Chappaquiddick and this strings together the events in a compelling and emotional way," he said. "You’ll see what he had to go through."

The movie was eventually released in 2018 to positive reviews, and it was far more devastating in its account of Kennedy’s conduct than Ciardi made it out to be with that description.

"Kennedy’s car went off a bridge into the water"

On the 50th anniversary of Chappaquiddick, the Associated Press tweeted out its description of the event: "Sen. Edward M. Kennedy left a party on Chappaquiddick Island near Martha’s Vineyard with Mary Jo Kopechne, 28; some time later, Kennedy’s car went off a bridge into the water. Kennedy was able to escape, but Kopechne drowned."

"The car went off a bridge into the water" allows the reader to think that perhaps it wasn’t Kennedy’s negligent—and very likely drunken—driving that plunged the car into the tidal basin. Perhaps it was unknown forces like the bad luck that’s long plagued the Kennedy clan. Clearly, mistakes were made.

"The Ted Kennedy accident"

You also can go the route of Vox, which explains the news and decided in its assessment of the Chappaquiddick film to throw up its hands. Sigh, we just may never know what happened!

Writer Alissa Wilkinson conceded the movie was "skeptical of Kennedy’s version of events:"

That Ted Kennedy got different treatment than virtually anyone else in America would in the same position is obvious — even if the version of events in the film is different from what really happened (something nobody knows). And no matter what happened, Kennedy got away with something because he was a Kennedy — that much is clear — which is a striking indictment of a country that still tells itself stories about equal justice under the law for every citizen.

Vox promoted the story by tweeting the film was about "the Ted Kennedy accident" and "part of a larger entertainment pattern deconstructing the iconic family."

We, of course, do know what happened, thanks to extensive reporting both then and now, but that doesn’t mean we have to be jerks to the deceased titan.

"A car driven by Kennedy went over the side of a bridge"

The end of the official caption of the Getty Images photograph with this story reads: "Kopechne died when a car driven by Kennedy went over the side of a bridge on Chappaquiddick Island four days earlier."

"Another Kennedy family tragedy"

The New York Times referred to Chappaquiddick as "another Kennedy family tragedy" Thursday in a report on the overdose death of Saoirse Kennedy Hill, Robert F. Kennedy’s granddaughter:

Last month marked the 50th anniversary of Chappaquiddick, another Kennedy family tragedy that took place when Edward Kennedy drove off a bridge on a small island next to Martha’s Vineyard. The accident killed Mary Jo Kopechne, the 28-year-old passenger in Mr. Kennedy’s car.

While the death of Kopechne was really a "Kopechne family tragedy" and a "Kennedy family distraction," this portrays Kennedy as the true victim in this situation. Don’t let the reader forget the truly sad part of this saga: Kennedy never became president because of this silly car bridge drowning pond thing.

"Another huge tragedy for the Kennedy family"

ABC’s Cokie Roberts, described accurately in Slate as the living embodiment of "conventional wisdom," mourned Ted Kennedy’s lot in life in an episode of the docuseries 1969.

"There was a party going on on Chappaquiddick in Massachusetts, and it turned out to be another huge tragedy for the Kennedy family," Roberts said, in a clip flagged by NewsBusters.

"Tragedy has again struck the Kennedy family"

That’s how New York Times reporter James "Scotty" Reston dictated the first line of his initial story on Chappaquiddick. He was on the island the weekend the accident occurred, and as Slate tells it, didn’t mention the female victim until the fourth paragraph. The print edition was edited to include her:

A 28-year-old woman passenger drowned today when a car driven by Senator Edward M. Kennedy plunged 10 feet off a bridge into a pond on Chappaquiddick Island near this community on Martha’s Vineyard.

According to a biography of him, he fished at the site of the accident while another Times reporter took statements from boys who discovered the car.

"Nothing much was covered up"

Neal Gabler, who is working on a biography of Kennedy, griped in the New York Times that the 2017 film amounted to "character assassination" of the man, and hey, "nothing much was covered up."

"Let’s set aside the fact that, despite the film’s advertisements claiming to tell the "untold true story" of a "cover-up," the story has been told plenty, and no one but the most lunatic conspiracy theorists see this as anything but a tragic accident in which nothing much was covered up," Gabler wrote.

"Nothing much," although a judge didn’t subpoena anyone at the party Kennedy was at to determine if he drank before the accident. Kennedy’s account that he was taking Kopechne back to her hotel didn’t make sense since she left her purse and room key behind, his claim to be unfamiliar with the roads didn’t make sense since he knew the island well, a 1970 inquest on the subject was done in secret, a grand jury convened months later wasn’t allowed to view evidence from the inquest, and the chief investigator of the accident told Vanity Fair, "The Kennedy machine buried what really happened."

I can’t wait for this biography.

"A 28-year-old named Mary Jo Kopechne drowned in his automobile"

Behold left-wing crank Charles Pierce’s description of "the dead woman" who "drowned in his automobile."

Pierce wrote in 2004 about Kennedy’s legacy in the Senate, acknowledging that Kennedy "would have done time" if his last name were different. Yet, the poor plutocrat had soldiered on from the tragedy to a celebrated Senate career, in Pierce’s estimation. NewsBusters flagged the column:

And what of the dead woman? On July 18, 1969, on the weekend that man first walked on the moon, a 28-year-old named Mary Jo Kopechne drowned in his automobile. Plutocrats’ justice and an implausible (but effective) coverup ensued. And, ever since, she’s always been there: during Watergate, when Barry Goldwater told Kennedy that even Richard Nixon didn’t need lectures from him; in 1980, when his presidential campaign was shot down virtually at its launch; during the hearings into the confirmation of Clarence Thomas, when Kennedy’s transgressions gagged him and made him the butt of all the jokes.

[…]

He has spent so much of his professional life draining that line of its meaning — the defining line, what would have been the knockout line if his name hadn’t been Edward Moore Kennedy. He went to the Senate. He respected its traditions. He learned from its elders; his office today is in the building named after Richard Russell, with whom, according to Adam Clymer, Kennedy first attempted to break the ice by mentioning that Russell himself had entered the Senate when he was 36. Yes, Russell replied, but I’d been governor of Georgia by then, and Kennedy had had the good grace (and the good sense) to laugh.

"Maybe she’d feel it was worth it"

If you must discuss Kopechne in your piece on Kennedy, consider the fact her ghost was probably cheering on Kennedy’s legacy of expanded government and Borking.

Melissa Lafsky of Discovery magazine wrote following Kennedy’s death in 2009 that "maybe she’d feel it was worth it." Her words:

Mary Jo wasn’t a right-wing talking point or a negative campaign slogan. She was a dedicated civil rights activist and political talent with a bright future….We don’t know how much Kennedy was affected by her death, or what she’d have thought about arguably being a catalyst for the most successful Senate career in history. What we don’t know, as always, could fill a Metrodome.

Still, ignorance doesn’t preclude a right to wonder. So it doesn’t automatically make someone (aka, me) a Limbaugh-loving, aerial-wolf-hunting NRA troll for asking what Mary Jo Kopechne would have had to say about Ted’s death, and what she’d have thought of the life and career that are being (rightfully) heralded.

Who knows — maybe she’d feel it was worth it.

Readers love a happy ending.

UPDATE, 3:32 P.M.: This article removed a line written by Pierce: "Through his tireless work as a legislator, Edward Kennedy would have brought comfort to her in her old age." He claimed it was written sardonically and not as a compliment to Kennedy.

The post How to Write the Perfect Passive Description of Chappaquiddick appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://freebeacon.com

WALSH: Mario Lopez Proves Yet Again That It Never Pays To Apologize To The Left-Wing Mob

I often think about a certain scene near the end of Robert Bolt’s "A Man For All Seasons." Thomas More is on trial for treason (a phony charge stemming from More’s refusal to acknowledge the king as the Supreme Head of the Church), and he has just been delivered the fatal legal blow due to testimony from a former friend. His one-time confidant Richard Rich claims that he heard More making treasonous statements — a false allegation that seals More’s fate and sends him to the gallows.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Attorneys File Suit for 8 Convington HS Students Against 12 Top Liberal Elite Figures Including Liz Warren and Loudmouth Ana Navarro

Attorneys Robert Barnes and Kevin Murphy filed suit for eight Covington High School students against twelve top liberal elite figures including: Liz Warren, CNN’s Ana Navarro and New York Times crank Maggie Haberman.

Law and Crime reported:

Lawyers for eight Covington Catholic students (John Does 1-8) filed a defamation lawsuit on Thursday in Kentucky’s Kenton County Circuit Court against 12 individuals — lawmakers, journalists/media figures and social media personalities included.

Attorneys Robert Barnes (disclosure: Barnes has written columns for Law&Crime) and Kevin Murphy began the suit by going back to January 18, 2019, when, they say, “A field trip to our nation’s capital for a group of minors from Covington, Kentucky turned into a social media nightmare that changed their futures forever.”

This was when MAGA hat wearing high school students (Nick Sandmann, in particular) came face to face with a 65-year-old Native American man identified as Nathan Phillips. The lawsuit said that the defendants jumped to conclusions, painting the plaintiffs as racists, lying about an event they didn’t witness firsthand, and libeling the minors. (Note that these minors are bringing this lawsuit through their parents.)

From the lawsuit:

“Several of our Senators, most-famous celebrities, and widely read journalists, collectively used their large social media platforms, perceived higher credibility and public followings to lie and libel minors they never met, based on an event they never witnessed,” the lawsuit said. “These defendants called for the kids to be named and shamed, doxxed and expelled, and invited public retaliation against these minors from a small town in Kentucky.The defendants circulated false statements about them to millions of people around the world. The video of the entire event, known to the defendants, exposed all of their factual claims against the kids as lies. The defendants were each individually offered the opportunity to correct, delete, and/or apologize for their false statements, but each refused, continuing to circulate the false statements about these children to this very day on their social media platforms they personally control.”

The defendants have been named as follows (Law&Crime is not including a copy of the lawsuit here so as not publicize their addresses): 2020 presidential hopeful Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Rep. Deb Haaland (D-New Mexico), CNN’s Ana Navarro, Maggie Haberman of the New York Times, comedian Kathy Griffin, ABC News political analyst Matthew Dowd, Reza Aslan (formerly of CNN), Kentucky entrepreneur Adam Edelen, Princeton University History Professor Kevin M. Kruse, activist and journalist Shaun King, Mother Jones editor-in-chief Clara Jeffery and Rewire.News editor-in-chief Jodi Jacobson.

The post Attorneys File Suit for 8 Convington HS Students Against 12 Top Liberal Elite Figures Including Liz Warren and Loudmouth Ana Navarro appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Chick-fil-A Beats In-N-Out as America’s Favorite Fast Food, Means 2 Christian Companies Are in Top 5

When it comes to our nation’s favorite fast food, two Christian companies — Chick-fil-A and In-N-Out — are the order of the day, according to South Carolina’s WCSC-TV. Food & Wine publishes Market Force, whose recent survey of 7,600 consumers resulted in a 79 percent “loyalty rating” for Chick-fil-A, which took top honors. Earning a…

The post Chick-fil-A Beats In-N-Out as America’s Favorite Fast Food, Means 2 Christian Companies Are in Top 5 appeared first on Conservative Tribune.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Gillette CEO: $8 Billion Loss over Woke Ads ‘Worth Paying’

Gillette CEO and president Gary Coombe is defending the $8 billion write-down Procter & Gamble experienced last quarter related to his brand, saying in a recent interview that it was “worth paying” and that he doesn’t mind alienating some customers.

Coombe told Marketing Week that the loss was “a price worth paying” as the 188-year-old maker of razors, blades and other grooming products contends with dwindling sales.

“It was pretty stark. We were losing share, we were losing awareness and penetration, and something had to be done,” Coombe said. He said Gillette decided to “take a chance in an emotionally-charged way.”

Gillette debuted a commercial in January that not only spotlighted the #MeToo movement but attacked traditional masculinity. In a series of scenes, the commercial depicted men and boys engaging in sexual harassment, bullying and workplace condescension towards women.

“Is this the best a man can get?” the commercial asked, inverting Gillette’s famous tagline “the best a man can get.”

Another ad debuted in May showing a transgender male youth learning how to shave. Gillette also attacked traditional feminine beauty in ads for its Venus razors for women, featuring obese and transexual models.

The commercials received widespread pushback on social media. Coombe told Marketing Week that the backlash was more intense than he expected, but that he doesn’t regret running them.

“I don’t enjoy that some people were offended by the film and upset at the brand as a consequence. That’s not nice and goes against every ounce of training I’ve had in this industry over a third of a century,” he said.

“But I am absolutely of the view now that for the majority of people to fall more deeply in love with today’s brands you have to risk upsetting a small minority and that’s what we’ve done.”

Coombe said the ads were an attempt to capture millennial consumers, many of whom have defected to competitors like Dollar Shave Club and Harry’s.

“The worst thing during that period was, we also lost connection with the millennial generation. Gillette quickly became the brand of the millennial generation’s dads,” he said.

Gillette reported a $8 billion write-down during the recent fiscal fourth quarter, pushing its parent company Proctor & Gamble into a loss for the period.

The company blamed the loss on currency fluctuations as well as “market contraction” due to the continued fad of men growing out facial hair.

Follow David Ng on Twitter @HeyItsDavidNg. Have a tip? Contact me at dng@breitbart.com

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Oops: Apple Promises to Stop Listening to Your Life

Good news! After being exposed, Apple claims its contractors will stop listening in on your intimate moments, at least for a while. According to The Verge, “Apple has said that it will temporarily suspend its practice of using human contractors to grade snippets of Siri voice recordings for accuracy.” This came after a revelation from The Guardian where an anonymous whistelbower claimed that workers “regularly hear confidential medical information, drug deals, and recordings of couples having sex” as a common part of the job. 

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

Katy Perry ordered to pay $2.7 million to Christian rap artist

As I said earlier this week, I’m not a closet Katy Perry fan. What interests me about this story is that something that almost never happens has happened. A pop star with all the money and lawyers she could want has lost a court battle to a relatively unknown artist (and his co-writers) who convinced a jury his music was stolen for her hit song. Earlier this week, a jury decided that all six of Perry’s songwriters plus the companies that distributed her music were liable. The trial then moved to a penalty phase which concluded rather quickly:

Katy Perry and her collaborators at her record label have to pay $2.78 million after a federal jury found the pop star copied one of her hit songs…

The amount fell well short of the nearly $20 million sought by attorneys for Gray and the two co-writers of “Joyful Noise” — Emanuel Lambert and Chike Ojukwu — but they said they were pleased…

Perry herself was hit for just over $550,000, with Capitol Records responsible for the biggest part of the award — $1.2 million. Defense attorneys had argued for an overall award of about $360,000.

Perry’s attorney, Christine Lepera, said they plan to vigorously fight the decision.

So expect some sort of appeal and maybe the amount will get knocked down or maybe the entire decision will be overturned. Still, for this moment it looks bad for Perry and the small army of people who prop up her career.

Of course, whether you think Perry deserves this will depend on whether you think she, or more likely her producers, actually stole part of someone else’s song. The jury didn’t prove that did happen on that it could have happened based on the popularity of the rap song in the Christian market around the time Perry’s tune was being written.

As for the similarity between the two tracks, that’s definitely there, though musicologists who testified in Perry’s defense claimed any overlap was attributable to people playing with the same basic building blocks of music. Maybe so but they really do sound a lot alike. If you want, you also click back and hear each song separately. Here’s the video I posted earlier which slows down the rap tune a bit so it matches the tempo of Perry’s song exactly. They blend really well:

The post Katy Perry ordered to pay $2.7 million to Christian rap artist appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

Here We Go: Dems Pushing to Replace Dan Coats with Brennan BFF Sue Gordon After Ratcliffe Withdraws Nomination


Sue Gordon

All of the Deep State Democrat swamp creatures are pushing for Sue Gordon to not only sit in as the Acting DNI, but to actually replace Dan Coats and be confirmed as the next Director of National Intelligence.

Last weekend President Trump announced he nominated GOP Congressman John Ratcliffe to replace outgoing DNI Dan Coats.

The Democrat-media complex, along with RINOs attacked Ratcliffe, an honorable former US Attorney who has served in the House for many years.

Because of the nonstop attacks, Ratcliffe decided to withdraw his name from consideration and stay in Congress.

Sue Gordon is currently the number 2 at the intel agency and President Trump said he may name her as acting director of national intelligence after Ratcliffe decided to withdraw his name.

House Intel Chairman Adam Schiff on Friday said that Sue Gordon is “superbly qualified” for the job and called for her to replace Dan Coats.

Former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who plotted to wear a wire to record President Trump and oust him via the 25th Amendment, jumped into the fray Friday morning and endorsed Sue Gordon.

The highly corrupt Vice Chairman of the Senate Intel Committee Mark Warner also called on Trump to name Sue Gordon as acting DNI.

That’s all we need to know about Sue Gordon — she’s the choice for the Deep State coup plotters.

Donald Trump Jr. said, “If Adam Schiff wants her in there, the rumors about her being besties with Brennan and the rest of the clown cadre must be 100% true.”

The post Here We Go: Dems Pushing to Replace Dan Coats with Brennan BFF Sue Gordon After Ratcliffe Withdraws Nomination appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com