Mueller drumroll: Are White House officials worried that snitches get stitches?

Everyone in Washington says that they want as much transparency from the Mueller report as possible. At least a handful wouldn’t mind seeing a bit less, according to NBC. A few White House officials who came into contact with special-counsel investigators don’t want to find their names in the index or attached to anything that makes Donald Trump look bad.

I’m sure the president will handle such instances with his usual tact and decorum. And so are the aides frantically asking the Justice Department to keep them out of it:

Some of the more than dozen current and former White House officials who cooperated with special counsel Robert Mueller are worried that the version of his report expected to be made public on Thursday will expose them as the source of damaging information about President Donald Trump, according to multiple witnesses in the investigation.

Some of the officials and their lawyers have sought clarity from the Justice Department on whether the names of those who cooperated with Mueller’s team will be redacted or if the public report will be written in a way that makes it obvious who shared certain details of Trump’s actions that were part of the obstruction of justice probe, people familiar with the discussions said. But, they said, the Justice Department has refused to elaborate.

Of particular concern is how Trump — and his allies — will react if it appears to be clear precisely what specific officials shared with Mueller, these people said.

“They got asked questions and told the truth and now they’re worried the wrath will follow,” one former White House official said.

If it does follow, though, it’s likely to be very, very quiet. The White House will want the big takeaway from the Mueller report to be that it’s no big deal at the very least, and at the most a complete exoneration of the boss. Firing people and issuing angry rebukes in public will only make it look like the report has wounded Trump in a significant manner.

Privately, of course, the reaction might well be explosive, but it’s likely to be more tempered with the knowledge that these White House officials didn’t have much choice. As with other special counsels, Robert Mueller proved very aggressive in charging process crimes, just as with other special-counsel investigations, those were the only direct indictments that ended up getting prosecuted. (The Paul Manafort/Rick Gates indictments were leftovers from previous Department of Justice investigations with added obstruction charges from Mueller’s core probe tacked onto them.) Mueller made an example of Michael Flynn and George Papadopoulos and succeeded in instilling that old-time religion of the Church of Not Lying to Federal Investigators. Trump can’t blame them for cooperating under those circumstances, especially while saying he had nothing to hide. Well, Trump can, but not reasonably so.

All of this existential angst about being an informant of sorts tells us that the White House will be dealing with some unpleasant factoids from Mueller starting on Thursday morning. Here’s one legit defense to that: it shows that Mueller didn’t get stymied in his investigation. If officials in the White House are worried about retribution, they must have spilled all the beans they had to spill. If that’s the case and Mueller came up empty on both collusion and obstruction, then the Trump administration has even more reason not to get vindictive. That doesn’t mean he won’t, but at least it might suit Trump’s interest to proclaim it rather than punish it.

The post Mueller drumroll: Are White House officials worried that snitches get stitches? appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

HAMMER: Duke And UNC Should Both Be Ashamed Of Their Co-Hosted Jew-Bashing Conference

In late March, the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (UNC) and my alma mater, Duke University, co-hosted a conference entitled, "Conflict over Gaza: People, Politics, and Possibilities." Specifically, the conference was co-hosted by the Duke-UNC Consortium for Middle East Studies, which received a whopping $235,000 Departm

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml/favicon.ico

Twitter Erupts After Ilhan Omar Issues Statement on Notre Dame Cathedral Fire

Notre Dame Cathedral has stood since medieval times as a symbol of Paris, its inhabitants, and their faith.

After the catastrophic fire Monday that destroyed the cathedral’s roof and iconic spire, and scorched the inside of the church, Parisians have vowed to rebuild.

The world reached out through social media to express grief and sadness with the French people, but one response is standing out from the others, both for what was said — and what wasn’t.

Rep. Ilhan Omar, fresh off the fallout from downplaying the 9/11 attacks, apparently hasn’t learned a single lesson from the tidal wave of outrage she faced.

The Minnesota Democrat’s response to the Notre Dame fire is conspicuously absent of any mention of the religious purpose of the cathedral itself, or its place in Western Christianity as one of the most iconic churches in the world.

TRENDING: Left Eat Their Own as Pelosi Takes Down Ocasio-Cortez and the District That Elected Her

And there it is — the Notre Dame Cathedral was just reduced to “art and architecture.”

Although she did call it a “wonder,” which it most certainly is, considering the groundbreaking structural designs that stand as a testament to the strength and beauty of Gothic construction, Twitter users were not happy with Omar’s reaction.

RELATED: Watch: Bernie Sanders’ Refusal To Call Out Ilhan Omar’s Anti-Semitism Should Have Supporters Worried

This disaster, although difficult to imagine for the faithful who depend on the cathedral for religious services, shouldn’t have been hard to respond to.

Should Ilhan Omar apologize for this Twitter post?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

A simple “thoughts and prayers” for the congregation, the first responders, and the clergy would have been sufficient.

To go even further, sympathizing with the Christian community for the near-destruction of a religious icon might have been more than enough.

But expecting that from someone who downplayed 9/11 as simply an event where “some people did something” may be too much to ask.

Omar had an opportunity here to reach out to people of a faith different from her own, as well as work to repair the damage done by her previous comments.

But she torched that chance to the ground with a single tweet.

Under the circumstances, it would have been better if she hadn’t commented at all.

Ilhan Omar can easily rectify her mistakes with a public apology, but no one familiar with her public life so far will be expecting that.

We can only hope the lawmaker does better during the next catastrophe.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Liberal Seattle Mayor Welcomes All the New Illegal Aliens Surging Across the US Border — Please, President Trump! Grant Her Wish!

While most of the “sanctuary city” mayors are pushing back against Trump’s proposal to ship all of the illegals into their cities, Seattle’s mayor, Jenny Durkan, openly welcomes and invites Trump to do just that.

In a recent op-ed she penned for the Washington Post, she says “Seattle is not afraid of immigrants and refugees.”

Highlights of her article include:

Here’s a message to President Trump: Seattle is not afraid of immigrants and refugees. In fact, we have always welcomed people who have faced tremendous hardships around the world. Immigrants and refugees are part of Seattle’s heritage, and they will continue to make us the city of the future.

What does scare us? A president and federal government that would seek to weaponize a law enforcement agency to punish perceived political enemies. A would-be despot who thinks the rule of law does not apply to him.

It’s clear he hates the fact that the very cities he scorns are engines of innovation, opportunity and economic power. But we will not be deterred. The president’s threats won’t intimidate me as a mayor of a city with an open door, as a former federal prosecutor or as the granddaughter of a teenager who fled a war-torn, starving and impoverished country only to be welcomed in America.

In Seattle, we have started to provide tuition-free college for our public high school graduates, regardless of a young person’s immigration status. We’re expanding internship and apprenticeship opportunities to connect all our young people with the jobs and opportunities of the future. We’re working to help tens of thousands of legal permanent residents become U.S. citizens as part of the New Citizen Campaign and our other citizenship programs. Our Ready to Work program connects people with case managers and English language education to help our immigrant and refugee neighbors gain the skills necessary to enter our booming jobs market.

So if this president wants to send immigrants and refugees to Seattle and other welcoming cities, let me be clear: We will do what we have always done, and we will be stronger for it. And it will only strengthen our commitment to fighting for the dignity of every person. We will not allow any administration to use the power of America to destroy the promise of America.

She appeared on MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Matthews to double down.

Jason Rantz, of My Northwest, points out how Durkan is contradicting herself and even insulting the very same immigrants she purports to care so deeply about:

Durkan’s editorial manages the kind of doublespeak you expect from a politician who picks virtue signaling over sound policy. Woke Durkan writes, “Seattle is not afraid of immigrants and refugees.”

But then, she almost immediately criticizes the president’s plan:

“What does scare us? A president and federal government that would seek to weaponize a law enforcement agency to punish perceived political enemies. A would-be despot who thinks the rule of law does not apply to him.”

Why does Durkan view bringing illegal immigrants to Seattle as punishment? How would Seattle be punished, in her eyes, by welcoming folks in need of help — the kind she likes to play White Knight towards?

In her (or the staff member who wrote this) zest to attack Trump — while weirdly claiming she’s not a political enemy of his — she implies it would be bad to bring illegal immigrants here. One might say she committed a microaggression.

“He is demonizing immigrants and refugees to incite fear and to distract the American public from his own failures,” Durkan continues.

Why does Durkan think Seattle would be scared to invite illegal immigrants into this sanctuary city? Or is Durkan the one that’s scared?

She then spends a couple paragraphs laying on the pandering really, really thick, reminding us that our immigrant and refugee community are an integral part of our community.

But this isn’t in dispute and comes off as incredibly condescending, as if they need her approval. If she spoke this way about Jews (though given her inaction on local anti-Semitism, she might not), I’d be incredibly annoyed: I don’t need her telling me what I’m capable of. I don’t need your approval.

Not to mention, she would — and likely has — described every other demographic group in Seattle in the same way.

My favorite part of Durkan’s piece is when she tells Trump that his administration can learn from her own. She left out all the damning statistics of homelessness, traffic congestion, property crime, rape, robbery, and murder all trending in the wrong direction under her watch.

Yes, this is the same city whose homeless and drug crisis is reaching peak liberal and has been the subject of a critically acclaimed documentary, Seattle Is Dying.

While Durkan encourages everyone to take in illegal aliens, she seems to not care half an iota about the homeless citizens who are suffering on the streets in the city that she rules over.

She’s joined by Burlington, VT, Mayor Miro Weinberger, who is also hoping that his city gets a metric ton of cultural diversity via throngs of illegal aliens.

The post Liberal Seattle Mayor Welcomes All the New Illegal Aliens Surging Across the US Border — Please, President Trump! Grant Her Wish! appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

ADAMS: Our Constitutionally Illiterate Faculty

Each semester, I am reminded of the constitutional illiteracy of American college students. I cannot help but be reminded because I teach courses in criminal procedure and evidence, which often focus on various constitutional limitations on police conduct. Naturally, I have to test the students to see how well they understand the cases and the rules I teach and assign for outside reading. Sometimes their answers floor me.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Liberal Feminist Mother Warns Transgender Activists Are Taking Control of Mental Health Profession

A liberal feminist mother of a gender-dysphoric teen warns parents that transgender activists are ensuring it will soon be “nearly impossible” to find a mental health professional who is willing to help these children evaluate their self-perceptions.

“I quickly discovered that it is nearly impossible to find therapists who do this kind of work,” wrote the anonymous mother in a piece that appeared at the Federalist Tuesday. “If a girl presents as transgender today, the vast majority of therapists will immediately affirm the girl’s declared gender identity and ask her what steps she would like to take toward transition.”

Currently, transgender activists are celebrating their success in pressing lawmakers in 16 states and the District of Columbia to ban what they call “conversion therapy.” These political supporters of gender ideology claim therapists who do not immediately affirm the perception of young people claiming to be a gender that is incompatible with their biological sex are “harmful” and “abusive” and must be outlawed.

As the anonymous Federalist writer discovered, most mental health professionals from the states in which “conversion therapy” is now banned will not be willing to help a child explore his or her feelings or perceptions about sexual identity.

The mother wrote:

I interviewed at least a dozen therapists in search of one who could help my daughter examine her feelings and motivations. I finally resorted to paying out-of-pocket for my daughter to talk online to a therapist who lives in another state. I know I am not alone. I belong to an online support group of nearly 1,500 parents of gender dysphoric youth. Finding therapists who provide standard mental health therapy rather than automatic affirmation is a frustration for most of us.

Mental health professionals who work with children in states in which the transgender activists have successfully banned traditional therapy with children would be risking their licenses and their livelihood if they took on such cases.

“The goal of anti-conversion therapy bills is to ban mental health therapists from using conversion therapy with minors,” the mother wrote. “I am afraid these bills will have a chilling effect on therapists’ ability to help girls who say they are transgender.”

At a recent Heritage Foundation panel, Walt Heyer, founder of Sex Change Regret, said his organization receives many letters from parents, and those who have begun transitioning to the opposite sex themselves, seeking help.

Heyer, as the Christian Post reported, lived as a transgender woman for eight years and underwent surgery in 1983. In his discussion, he labeled what transgender activists are doing to young people today – controlling mental health therapy and pushing hormonal treatments and surgical interventions – as “abuse.”

“That is child abuse,” Heyer said. “We need to be calling it what it is. It’s not affirming a child. It’s causing them to be depressed and anxious about who they are.”

“The only reason I am able to speak to you today is because after 46 years dealing with this issue, I was able to de-transition in 1990 after I had psychotherapy, the very same psychotherapy [transgender activists] are trying to prevent people from having,” he explained. “Why? Because they don’t want them to de-transition.”

The Federalist author also asked:

Why are transactivists so determined to prevent youth from receiving therapy that in any other context would be considered good and ethical practice? I think it is because transactivists believe they should be exempt from the rules the rest of us follow when we seek medical care.

“What the general public does not understand is that standard mental health therapy is now considered conversion therapy when practiced with gender-dysphoric youth,” the mother asserted.

Heyer said the current situation amounts to: “We are manufacturing transgender kids.”

“We are manufacturing their depression, their anxiety, and it has turned into a huge industry that people are profiting from after kids’ lives are completely torn apart,” he asserted.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Wired: Mark Zuckerberg Faced ‘Fresh Hell’ with Facebook and Instagram

A major exposé by technology magazine Wired has shed light on Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s deteriorating relationship with the platform he bought, Instagram, and its co-founders.

The 10-000 word article, entitled 15 Months of Fresh Hell inside Facebook, drew on testimony from 65 current and former employees to tell the story of the company’s challenging 2018, which involved rising tensions between Zuckerberg and Instagram’s c0founders Kevin Systrom and Mike Krieger that eventually led to their departure in September last year.

Facebook bought Instagram for $1 billion back in 2012, and it now has an estimated one billion active users per month.  Yet according to sources who spoke with the magazine, Zuckerberg started “souring” on the two men after he began excessively interfering in the platform’s decisions, many of which they did not agree with.

Zuckerberg was also reportedly left frustrated by Facebook’s declining user growth compared with Instagram’s aggressive expansion, leading some executives to believe that he was deliberately torpedoing its success over fears it was “cannibalizing” Facebook itself.

Amid repeated success stories for Instagram and difficulties for Facebook, including the Cambridge Analytica data harvesting scandal that emerged in early 2018, Zuckerberg allegedly became upset. In response, Zuckerberg forced efforts to artificially boost Facebook by scrapping publicity for Instagram and providing linkbacks to Instagram when users cross-posted their content onto their Facebook feeds.

Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg also faced many internal challenges based on what insiders told Wired. They mentioned pressure put on Sandberg by Breitbart News, amongst other outlets:

But resentment had been building for years, and after the Definers mess the dam collapsed. She was pummeled in the Times, in The Washington Post, on Breit­bart, and in WIRED. Former employees who had refrained from criticizing her in interviews conducted with WIRED in 2017 relayed anecdotes about her intimidation tactics and penchant for retribution in 2018. She was slammed after a speech in Munich. She even got dinged by Michelle Obama, who told a sold-out crowd at the Barclays Center in Brooklyn on December 1, “It’s not always enough to lean in, because that shit doesn’t work all the time.”

The report merely provides the latest headache for the social media giant, with the leaks indicating a sense of disunity within the Silicon Valley firm. Facebook has so far refused to comment on the report.

Follow Ben Kew on Facebook, Twitter at @ben_kew, or email him at bkew@breitbart.com.

 

 

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Pelosi Admits She Defended Ilhan Omar’s 9/11 Remarks Without Knowing What Was Said

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on Tuesday admitted that she does not know the content of Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) recent remarks about 9/11 — despite offering a full-throated defense of the freshman congresswoman in the wake of criticism from President Donald Trump.

In an interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, Pelosi rejected charges of antisemitism against Omar and pushed back against criticism that the Democrat Party is doing enough to combat it.

“I don’t think the congresswoman is anti-Semitic. I wouldn’t even put those in the same category,” Pelosi told interviewer Christiane Amanpour in Ireland. “We have no taint of that [anti-Semitism],” she added. “And just because they want to accuse somebody of that doesn’t mean that we take that bait.”

Pelosi also dismissed criticisms that she hasn’t done enough to defend Omar, conceding, “Until I talk to somebody, I don’t even know what was said.”

“I do know that what the president did was not right,” she added.

Omar is facing blowback for downplaying the September 11, 2001, terror attack, describing it last month private fundraiser for  Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as a day on which “some people did something,”  before adding “and that all of us were starting to lose our civil liberties.”

In reaction to the Minnesota Democrat’s remarks, President Trump shared a video to social media of Omar’s remarks and scenes of the World Trade Center engulfed in flakes shortly after it was attacked by radical Islamic terrorists. The video’s caption reads: “WE WILL NEVER FORGET!”

“She’s got a way about her that’s very, very bad, I think, for our country. I think she’s extremely unpatriotic and extremely disrespectful to our country,” the president said at an event in Minnesota on Monday.

Several Democrats, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and 2020 Democrat candidate Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke, said President Trump was inciting violence against Omar by tweeting the clip. In a statement Saturday, Pelosi demanded the president remove the video and said Capitol Police are conducting a security assessment to safeguard Omar amid a growing number of death threats.

“Following the President’s tweet, I spoke with the Sergeant-at-Arms to ensure that Capitol Police are conducting a security assessment to safeguard Congresswoman Omar, her family and her staff. They will continue to monitor and address the threats she faces,” Pelosi said.

“The President’s words weigh a ton, and his hateful and inflammatory rhetoric creates real danger. President Trump must take down his disrespectful and dangerous video,” she added.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com