Is a Second Civil War Coming?

Is a Second Civil War Coming?Civil wars are horrendous and bloody affairs. That’s why we should avoid them.  They happen when two sides cannot settle on who runs the country.  When they can’t reconcile the matter through elections, the country falls apart.  When one side does not accept the election results, we have a countdown to a civil war. 

This is the thesis put forth by journalist Daniel Greenfield.  It rings true on many levels.

Does the fact that Democrats are rejecting a duly elected Republican president really mean they don’t accept the results of any election they don’t win?  If so, we may be already nearing America’s Second Civil War.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/

In 2016 Americans Were A Sure Bet Because Donald Trump Believed in Them

In 2016 Americans Were A Sure Bet Because Donald Trump Believed in ThemDemocrats: What do you have in common with Billionaires?
How do you explain your support of a party of wealthy elites who live highly at your expense?

Did you know that almost every well-known billionaire backed Hillary Clinton?

Did you know that almost every one of them shorted the markets – meaning, they bet on the markets to plummet right after the November 2016 elections?

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/

Co-Founder of Greenpeace RIPS Ocasio-Cortez: “Pompous Little Twit… You Would Bring About Mass Death”

Finally someone says what we’ve all been thinking…
Patrick Moore, the co-founder of Greenpeace, lectured Democrat darling and chatterbox Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the rules of life.

Moore opened up with the best line of the week… “Pompous little twit.” Then he went on to explain the impossibility of heating homes without fossil fuels.

Patrick Moore: Replying to @AOC
Pompous little twit. You don’t have a plan to grow food for 8 billion people without fossil fuels, or get the food into the cities. Horses? If fossil fuels were banned every tree in the world would be cut down for fuel for cooking and heating. You would bring about mass death.

This was similar to a Gateway Pundit tweet that was too challenging for chatterbox AOC.

Patrick Moore was not yet finished and rattled off a few more facts for the feckless AOC.

Patrick Moore: You are delusional if you think fossil fuels will end any time soon, maybe in 500 yrs. AOC’s attitude is unjustifiably condescending. She is a neophyte pretending to be wise. Her kind bring ruination if allowed to be “in charge”. (from the cheap seats).

Patrick Moore: ‘@AOC ‘s Green New Deal calls for:
“(J) removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.”
https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/
Technically (scientifically) this would mean removing all H2O vapour and all CO2 which would mean the eradication of all life on Earth.
Brilliant.

Patrick Moore: ‘@RepAOC Perhaps you are unfamiliar with my wager. I will bet US$100K that global CO2 emissions are higher in 2025 than in 2015 (Paris). Will the “boss” put $$ where zie mouth ? is?

The post Co-Founder of Greenpeace RIPS Ocasio-Cortez: “Pompous Little Twit… You Would Bring About Mass Death” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Michelle Malkin under fire after barn-burner of a CPAC speech

Michelle Malkin doesn’t give a damn what the progressive media and PC hordes say about her. She speaks her mind – which is precisely why I enjoy her work so much.

Yesterday, she generated quite a bit of controversy (see this compilation of commentary) in her 20-minute speech to CPAC ). The entire speech is embedded below.  

No small part of the criticism was implied outrage over her rejection of the “ghost of John McCain” in her jeremiad over the “grifters” who are “in bed with immigration saboteurs.”

 

 

She followed with a call-out of who she had in mind as saboteurs, and grifters:

“And yes I’m looking at you retired Paul Ryan,” she said. “And yes I’m looking at you Mitch McConnell. And yes I’m looking at you, Bush family. And yes I’m looking at you, the ghost of John McCain.”

It’s worth noting that she called out other people, including the presence of communist Van Jones at CPAC.

Watch and enjoy a warrior who never relents and never gives up:

 

 

Michelle Malkin doesn’t give a damn what the progressive media and PC hordes say about her. She speaks her mind – which is precisely why I enjoy her work so much.

Yesterday, she generated quite a bit of controversy (see this compilation of commentary) in her 20-minute speech to CPAC ). The entire speech is embedded below.  

No small part of the criticism was implied outrage over her rejection of the “ghost of John McCain” in her jeremiad over the “grifters” who are “in bed with immigration saboteurs.”

 

 

She followed with a call-out of who she had in mind as saboteurs, and grifters:

“And yes I’m looking at you retired Paul Ryan,” she said. “And yes I’m looking at you Mitch McConnell. And yes I’m looking at you, Bush family. And yes I’m looking at you, the ghost of John McCain.”

It’s worth noting that she called out other people, including the presence of communist Van Jones at CPAC.

Watch and enjoy a warrior who never relents and never gives up:

 

 

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

The Kiss of Death Supported by Democrats Across the US!

The Kiss of Death Supported by Democrats Across the US!When a mother tosses her newborn into a dumpster to die, it is considered murder in every state in the US. But when a newborn baby is left to die after birth in a hospital, why is it considered legal in almost every Democratic state?

Republicans attempted to pass the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act on Monday, failing miserably due to Democrats who seemingly support Infanticide.

Senate minority leader, Democrat Chuck Shumer, New York, said,

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/

PRESIDENT TRUMP Walks Away from Kim Jong-un Talks — Leaves Summit Early

President Trump walked out of his second summit with North Korean tyrant Kim Jong-un on Thursday.

The US presented evidence of additional nuclear sites which stunned the North Korean delegation.
President Trump walked away early after a deal could not be reached.

Bloomberg reported:

President Donald Trump said he walked out of his second summit with Kim Jong Un after the two leaders couldn’t agree on a deal to relieve North Korea of U.S. sanctions in exchange for Pyongyang giving up much of its nuclear weapons program.

Trump said Kim “wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety, and we couldn’t do that.” In exchange, the North Korean leader had offered to dismantle its main nuclear facility at Yongbyon.

“It wasn’t enough,” the president said at a news conference after the summit collapsed.

The U.S. presented Kim with evidence of additional secret nuclear sites, surprising the North Koreans, according to Trump. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo said that even without Yongbyon the country would still possess missiles, warheads and other elements of a nuclear program that were unacceptable to the U.S.

“Sometimes you have to walk,” Trump told reporters.

The post PRESIDENT TRUMP Walks Away from Kim Jong-un Talks — Leaves Summit Early appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Report: PayPal Using Notoriously Anti-Conservative SPLC To Figure Out Who Gets Banned

One of the more controversial aspects of online money transfer company PayPal has been its treatment of certain groups it considers to be fringe political organizations — almost always conservative.

Some of these groups are indeed controversial enough that they would probably warrant a second look. Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes is one person who’s been banned from using the platform.

So has Laura Loomer, the conservative provocateur who chained herself to the door to Twitter’s headquarters after her Twitter account was also banned (while this certainly got attention, it doesn’t really bode well for one’s sanity and/or journalistic bona fides).

However, whatever direction PayPal is planning to go, it isn’t exactly working. While sites like Alex Jones’ Infowars — another PayPal exile — may indeed not be the most rigorous journalistic organizations in the world, banning them just flames the fires of conspiracy theorists. (PayPal’s August 2017 decision to ban the website Jihad Watch, a decision that was later rescinded, according to Fox News, didn’t help.)

In fact, it all might just make those on the right think PayPal is using some sort of far-left group to determine who’s going to get banished from its services.

TRENDING: Disgraceful Daily Show Host Used African Language To Hide Sick, Racist Joke at Oscars

Which, in fact, is exactly what PayPal is doing.

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal published Monday. PayPal CEO Dan Schulman said the company uses the Southern Poverty Law Center’s list of “hate groups” as, in part, a guide regarding whom to ban.

If you’ve ever followed the SPLC or its hate group list, it wouldn’t be too much of a stretch to say the group considers everything to the right of Marco Rubio giving a luncheon speech to a local chamber of commerce to be a hate organization.

In June of 2018, British Muslim pundit Maajid Nawaz and his group Quillam, both of which are anti-extremist and believe the Islamic faith should be modernized, won a $3.375 million settlement against the company for those bans, according to The Daily Caller.

Do you think PayPal is discriminating against conservatives?

There’s also the Alliance Defending Freedom and the Family Research Council. Both are fairly mainstream Christian conservative groups that are considered “extremist” and “hate groups” by PayPal, according to Faithwire.

Yet, Schulman doesn’t seem too concerned about all this.

“There are those both on the right and left that help us. Southern Poverty Law Center has brought things,” Schulman said.

“We don’t always agree. We have our debates with them. We are very respectful with everyone coming in. We will do the examination carefully. We’ll talk when we don’t agree with a finding: We understand why you think that way, but it still goes into the realm of free speech for us.”

Oh, OK. Are there any conservative groups you’d like to mention as being part of the discussion about who gets banned?

Anyone? Bueller?

No, that’s not going to happen, because of course it’s not.

It’s not just PayPal, either. As The Daily Caller points out, companies like Patreon, Indiegogo, Kickstarter, Google and Amazon, inter alia have also taken action against conservatives.

So how does PayPal not always agree with the SPLC? What are the other groups involved in making these decisions? How does PayPal come to these rulings on “fringe” groups? Again, we get nothing.

However, Schulman told The Journal that the 2017 clash in Charlottesville, Virginia, was a “defining moment” for the company, which should tell you something.

“Because the line between free speech and hate, nobody teaches it to you in college. Nobody’s defined it in the law,” Schulman said.

He said the company already had a working group to study the organizations that use its services, but decided to make it bigger after Charlottestville.

“The reason we had to expand the group is because websites may say something, but the links they have can link to hateful material and videos,” he said. “You can’t look at a headline and make a determination. You have to spend time to really think about it.”

If PayPal really is spending time to think about decisions like that, I’d like to hear about the conservative groups they’re consulting.

If not, one can only assume the worst — that it’s using an anti-Christian, anti-conservative group to discriminate when it comes to who uses its service.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

New Poll: ‘Trust In Media Hits Bottom’

Paul Bedard of the Washington Examiner reports on another new poll demonstrating that confidence in the media “has hit rock bottom, with many news consumers believing that reporters file their reports before knowing the facts.” The press had a higher percentage of people choosing they have "hardly any confidence at all" in it than the Congress. 

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

President Trump Responds to Michael Cohen Democrat Sideshow: “He Lied a Lot… But No Collusion”

President Trump held historic peace talks with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un on Wednesday and Thursday.

At the same time the Democrat-media complex held sideshow hearings with convicted liar Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former personal attorney.

This was a new low for the Democrat Party — holding sham hearings while the president is negotiating peace in Asia.
But Democrats have lost all sense of respectability and now only care about power and destroying this president damned the country’s future

President Trump was asked about the sham hearing with the convicted liar while in Hanoi.

The president responded: “He lied a lot… but it was very interesting. He didn’t lie about one thing. He said no collusion with the Russian hoax. And I said I wonder why he didn’t just lie about that too like he did about everything else… He said no collusion and I was a little impressed by that frankly… He only went about 95% instead of 100%.”

The post President Trump Responds to Michael Cohen Democrat Sideshow: “He Lied a Lot… But No Collusion” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Facebook Insider Leaks Docs; Explains “Deboosting” “Troll Report” & Political Targeting in Interview

Facebook Insider Leaks Docs; Explains Deboosting Troll Report & Political Targeting in InterviewProject Veritas has obtained and published documents and presentation materials from a former Facebook insider. This information describes how Facebook engineers plan and go about policing political speech. Screenshots from a Facebook workstation show the specific technical actions taken against political figures, as well as “[e]xisting strategies” taken to combat political speech.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/