Watch Company Launches Response To Gillette ‘Toxic Masculinity’ Ad; It Goes Viral

On Tuesday, Egard Watch Company released an advertisement on YouTube in response to Gillette’s controversial ad regarding alleged "toxic masculinity."
The video features footage of men in various situations – from fighting fires to hugging their children – while the company’s founder, Ilan Srulovicz, narrates. The footage and narration are accompanied by sobering statistics relating to men.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Catholic Pro-Life Children Now In Fear For Their Lives After Being Doxxed By Far Left Media


Catholic Pro-Life Children Now In Fear For Their Lives After Being Doxxed By Far Left Media

Cristina Laila
by Cristina Laila
January 19, 2019

BuzzFeed and the hateful left-wing media is at it again — these MAGA teens were doxxed and are now in fear for their lives! 

On Friday, a group of high school boys from Kentucky went to the Lincoln Memorial after attending the March For Life.

While standing at the memorial a group(?) of Native Americans were beating drums at the public memorial.

A Native American man, reportedly a Vietnam veteran, got up in one boy’s face and started screaming and beating his drum.

According to one of the high school boys who was present, a group of black men were taunting the Trump supporters, calling them “shooters” and “crackers” and said the white kids “had everything given to them by their parents.”

At first, the Trump supporting teens ignored the black men who were harassing them, but after the blacks continued to taunt the white kids, the white kids began to chant back at them.

According to a witness, it was at this point that a Native American man showed up “out of no where” and began drumming in the high school kid’s face.

“We weren’t even chanting at him, we were chanting at the African American guy, but obviously social media made us look bad to get views and stuff,” a witness said.

Video of the black men harassing the teenage Trump supporters:

The media isn’t interested in facts — they want to push their left wing agenda so they doxxed the high school kids.

The high school boy was doxxed by the liberal fascist mob.

The boys are from a Catholic HIGH SCHOOL in Kentucky!

Daily Beast doxxed the high school.

Now BuzzFeed is reporting the high school kids may get expelled!

The kids are now in fear for their lives!

“My dad who was on the trip with me was being harassed all morning online and I’m honestly scared for my safety,” one of the teens said.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Trump Puts Schumer and Pelosi in a Brilliant Vise Grip


The federal government shutdown has presented a unique opportunity for President Donald Trump to clear out the deadwood in the federal bureaucracy, saving U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars in salaries, perks, and rented office space for people who aren’t doing anything productive.


At the same time, Trump can get rid of dozens, possibly even hundreds of Deep State operatives in the government, handpicked by Barack Obama and Bill Clinton for their loyalty to the Democratic Party, not their country or the law.



These people leak like a screen door in a submarine, mainly to CNN and MSNBC, the twin headquarters of Trump-hatred on cable TV.  Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were choreographing their leaks to the media via text messages.  Even though Strzok was fired and Page resigned, it’s clear there are many others.  They actively resist Trump and the Republicans at every opportunity.  This is the core of the Resistance.


A high-ranking Trump administration official wrote four days ago in the Daily Caller that the shutdown enables Trump to get rid of people like this.  As members of the Senior Executive Service, many of them can’t be fired unless they’re convicted of a felony, or of committing some flagrant misconduct.


This is indeed Trump’s chance to “smoke out the Resistance,” but he must do it carefully.  Thomas Lifson has published two columns in the American Thinker, here and here, explaining that SES employees cannot be furloughed (laid off) under normal circumstances, but they can be removed during a Reduction in Force (RIF) when their positions are found to be unnecessary.


In the D.C. article, our unnamed administration official explains that roughly 80% of the federal work force in many departments, including his own, simply don’t do anything.  They plan shopping trips and vacations.  They send out résumés for better-paying positions, perhaps without realizing that any new employer might expect them to actually get some work done.


My experience in employment law teaches me that all federal employees are working under some kind of written contract, whether it’s a collectively bargained contract with a union or an individual employment contract.  As of today (January 18), the shutdown is in its 28th day.  At 30 days, even SES executives loyal to the Democratic Party become vulnerable to the RIF monster.


Lifson believes, and I also suspect, that Trump suckered the Democrats into a battle royale over the southern border wall Trump has proposed.  By refraining from declaring a national emergency and then building the wall (with Department of Defense funds saved from the withdrawal from Syria), Trump can simply bypass Congress.  He can order the Army Corps of Engineers to build it.


I believe that by making that threat and repeating it, but not following through on it, Trump has created a lingering atmosphere in which Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer feel compelled to stop him at any cost.  In political terms, they’re willing to die on this hill.


Immigrants, when they gain the right to vote for the first time, almost always vote for Democrats.  A recent Yale-MIT study reveals that the actual number of illegal aliens in the U.S. is 22 million, which is roughly the populations of Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Finland combined.  The largest landslide in U.S. presidential history (Reagan vs. Dukakis Mondale, 1980) was 17 million.  And the Democrats want all 22 million to have amnesty, citizenship, and voting rights as quickly as possible.


So Chuckie and Nancy want no wall.  They want no ICE.  They may not have openly expressed the latter sentiment, but several prominent younger voices in their party have done so clearly.


The longer-term goal of a vastly larger, mostly Latino U.S. voting population would be an enormous gain for the Democratic Party, but Trump may bait them into losing their Deep State network of loyal Democratic Party operatives in the bureaucracy.


As Lifson explains, and Michael Roberts explains at The Balance Careers here, on Day 30 of the shutdown, a clause is triggered in these federal employment contracts that enables RIF.  The Office of Personnel Management oversees the RIF process.


A downsizing plan must be presented to OMB on Day 31.  Trump’s team needs to act fast.  The plan must include all of the people who just sit around texting each other about their next leak to MSNBC, or planning their next protest march in a pink hat.  It will take another 30 days to implement the plan.  Roughly 800,000 federal employees could be permanently removed under this plan, with an annual savings of roughly $80 billion in salaries alone.  Including the pensions; the government vehicles; and the rented office space, furniture, and equipment, it could be $150 billion.


In particular, removing the SES employees and their hefty salaries represents a huge savings.  After the massive RIF, Trump could go ahead with Plan B, declare an emergency, and send that order to the Corps of Engineers.  The Democratic Party will be faced with a Hobson’s choice: lose the Latino vote, or lose the Deep State.  I suspect that when presented with this possibility, Chuckie and Nancy will immediately cave in (they aren’t that stupid).


At that point, Trump should raise the stakes.  ”Approve all of my judicial nominees immediately, or the shutdown continues, and the RIF takes effect.  Then I declare an emergency, and I get my border wall anyway.”


Since the Latino vote isn’t a sure thing, they’ll choose to keep the Deep State, and they’ll cave in.  The Latino population will gradually go from mostly pro-Democrat to independent, or even Republican, as so many Latinos in the Rio Grande Valley have done.  Most people outside Texas don’t know this, but Governor Greg Abbott (R-Texas) won with a plurality of the Latino vote – and a slender majority (50%-49%) of Latino males.  If we can duplicate that in the rest of the country, the Democratic Party is finished.


We didn’t hire Trump to go to church with us.  We hired him to clean house.  This is the best chance to get it done.










The federal government shutdown has presented a unique opportunity for President Donald Trump to clear out the deadwood in the federal bureaucracy, saving U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars in salaries, perks, and rented office space for people who aren’t doing anything productive.


At the same time, Trump can get rid of dozens, possibly even hundreds of Deep State operatives in the government, handpicked by Barack Obama and Bill Clinton for their loyalty to the Democratic Party, not their country or the law.


These people leak like a screen door in a submarine, mainly to CNN and MSNBC, the twin headquarters of Trump-hatred on cable TV.  Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were choreographing their leaks to the media via text messages.  Even though Strzok was fired and Page resigned, it’s clear there are many others.  They actively resist Trump and the Republicans at every opportunity.  This is the core of the Resistance.


A high-ranking Trump administration official wrote four days ago in the Daily Caller that the shutdown enables Trump to get rid of people like this.  As members of the Senior Executive Service, many of them can’t be fired unless they’re convicted of a felony, or of committing some flagrant misconduct.


This is indeed Trump’s chance to “smoke out the Resistance,” but he must do it carefully.  Thomas Lifson has published two columns in the American Thinker, here and here, explaining that SES employees cannot be furloughed (laid off) under normal circumstances, but they can be removed during a Reduction in Force (RIF) when their positions are found to be unnecessary.


In the D.C. article, our unnamed administration official explains that roughly 80% of the federal work force in many departments, including his own, simply don’t do anything.  They plan shopping trips and vacations.  They send out résumés for better-paying positions, perhaps without realizing that any new employer might expect them to actually get some work done.


My experience in employment law teaches me that all federal employees are working under some kind of written contract, whether it’s a collectively bargained contract with a union or an individual employment contract.  As of today (January 18), the shutdown is in its 28th day.  At 30 days, even SES executives loyal to the Democratic Party become vulnerable to the RIF monster.


Lifson believes, and I also suspect, that Trump suckered the Democrats into a battle royale over the southern border wall Trump has proposed.  By refraining from declaring a national emergency and then building the wall (with Department of Defense funds saved from the withdrawal from Syria), Trump can simply bypass Congress.  He can order the Army Corps of Engineers to build it.


I believe that by making that threat and repeating it, but not following through on it, Trump has created a lingering atmosphere in which Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer feel compelled to stop him at any cost.  In political terms, they’re willing to die on this hill.


Immigrants, when they gain the right to vote for the first time, almost always vote for Democrats.  A recent Yale-MIT study reveals that the actual number of illegal aliens in the U.S. is 22 million, which is roughly the populations of Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Finland combined.  The largest landslide in U.S. presidential history (Reagan vs. Dukakis Mondale, 1980) was 17 million.  And the Democrats want all 22 million to have amnesty, citizenship, and voting rights as quickly as possible.


So Chuckie and Nancy want no wall.  They want no ICE.  They may not have openly expressed the latter sentiment, but several prominent younger voices in their party have done so clearly.


The longer-term goal of a vastly larger, mostly Latino U.S. voting population would be an enormous gain for the Democratic Party, but Trump may bait them into losing their Deep State network of loyal Democratic Party operatives in the bureaucracy.


As Lifson explains, and Michael Roberts explains at The Balance Careers here, on Day 30 of the shutdown, a clause is triggered in these federal employment contracts that enables RIF.  The Office of Personnel Management oversees the RIF process.


A downsizing plan must be presented to OMB on Day 31.  Trump’s team needs to act fast.  The plan must include all of the people who just sit around texting each other about their next leak to MSNBC, or planning their next protest march in a pink hat.  It will take another 30 days to implement the plan.  Roughly 800,000 federal employees could be permanently removed under this plan, with an annual savings of roughly $80 billion in salaries alone.  Including the pensions; the government vehicles; and the rented office space, furniture, and equipment, it could be $150 billion.


In particular, removing the SES employees and their hefty salaries represents a huge savings.  After the massive RIF, Trump could go ahead with Plan B, declare an emergency, and send that order to the Corps of Engineers.  The Democratic Party will be faced with a Hobson’s choice: lose the Latino vote, or lose the Deep State.  I suspect that when presented with this possibility, Chuckie and Nancy will immediately cave in (they aren’t that stupid).


At that point, Trump should raise the stakes.  ”Approve all of my judicial nominees immediately, or the shutdown continues, and the RIF takes effect.  Then I declare an emergency, and I get my border wall anyway.”


Since the Latino vote isn’t a sure thing, they’ll choose to keep the Deep State, and they’ll cave in.  The Latino population will gradually go from mostly pro-Democrat to independent, or even Republican, as so many Latinos in the Rio Grande Valley have done.  Most people outside Texas don’t know this, but Governor Greg Abbott (R-Texas) won with a plurality of the Latino vote – and a slender majority (50%-49%) of Latino males.  If we can duplicate that in the rest of the country, the Democratic Party is finished.


We didn’t hire Trump to go to church with us.  We hired him to clean house.  This is the best chance to get it done.




via American Thinker

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/

HORRIFYING! Rapper and Instagram User ‘Cash Bently’ THREATENS AND HARASSES Young Teens in MAGA Hats at McDonald’s (VIDEO)

ONCE AGAIN THE LEFT HAS BROUGHT THEIR POLITICS AND VIOLENCE TO A NEW LOW—

On Friday rapper Cash Bently threatened two little white boys at a McDonald’s wearing MAGA hats.

Democrats today in the media and television are encouraging their supporters to abuse Trump supporters.
So we are seeing more and more of this coming from the left.

Of course, the fake news liberal media NEVER reports on these horrific incidents of violence.

Cash Bently describes himself as a husband, dad, TV personality, promoter and rapper on his Instagram account.

Cash Bently approached the young teenagers and threatened them, “Look at these ni**ers with the f**king hat on. Let me see your hat. Let me see your hat. You and you is bitches. I like to knock the f*ck out right now. Look at your f**king hat man you is retarded.

Via Jack Posobiec:

Meanwhile, across town on Friday Catholic school boys were approached and harassed by a Native American protester who then ran to the media and lied about the boys chanting build the wall in his face. The videos show the man harassing the children.

Now the fake news liberal media is lying about the incident and putting the boys’ lives in danger.

The post HORRIFYING! Rapper and Instagram User ‘Cash Bently’ THREATENS AND HARASSES Young Teens in MAGA Hats at McDonald’s (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

At March for Life, Sen. Daines Announces First Pro-Life Caucus in Senate


Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.)

(Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) — At the 46th annual March for Life in Washington, D.C. on Friday, Jan. 18, Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) announced he had formed the first pro-life caucus in U.S. Senate history.

“I’m very proud to announce that I have founded the first ever pro-life caucus in the United States Senate,” Daines said, to loud cheers from the crowds gathered on the National Mall.

“This pro-life caucus, and our new expanded pro-life majority – thank God in November we sent more pro-life senators to the United States Senate – and that’s thanks to you – that will allow us to accelerate the momentum of the past two years in protecting and defending life,” he said.

(Getty Images)

Sen. Daines’s announcement came just minutes after President Donald Trump announced his intention to veto any legislation that attempted to weaken pro-life protections.

Sen. Daines joined tens of thousands of Americans who were gathered in the nation’s capital to peacefully protest legalized abortion. On Jan. 22, 1973, the Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade legalized abortion across-the-board throughout the United States.

Each year since 1974 Americans have gathered on the steps of the Supreme Court to support life. This year, the official theme of the March for Life is “Unique from Day One: Pro-Life is Pro-Science.”

The congressman also reaffirmed his belief in the science behind the pro-life movement.

“I’m the only chemical engineer in Congress, and if you want to have a debate on the science, I’m ready to have it,” Sen. Daines said. “The science is clear. Life begins at conception. And because of that, every life must be valued, and every life must be protected.”

via CNS RSS Feed Navbar

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.cnsnews.com/

Packing Up Nauseating Bob Costas Political Lectures For His Exit From NBC Sports


The nauseatingly controversial Bob Costas, an eight-time National Sportscaster of the Year award winner, is leaving NBC. The New York Post’s Andrew Marchand reports it is difficult for Costas and the network to find projects he feels passionate about and which fit into NBC’s current properties. No wonder. Costas has, over his four decades with the network, demonstrated his passion is political lecture. He’s worn out his welcome among sport fans who tune into sports broadcasts for sports and prefer that politics be left to the newscasters.

We may not have seen the last of Costas yet, but here’s a review of his most disgusting political lectures and controversies.

Costas Wins Walter Cronkite Award for Excellence in Journalism (awarded by the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University)

You don’t win this award for objective reporting. It’s a who’s who award that goes to the left-stream media’s heaviest hitters, including: Anderson Cooper, Gwen Ifill, Scott Pelley, Bob Schieffer, Christiane Amanpour, Diane Sawyer, Brian Williams, Tom Brokaw, Helen Thomas, Al Michaels and Ben Bradlee, among others.

Sunday Night Football and Gun Control

During NBC’s Sunday Night Football halftime show December 2, 2012, Costas advocated for gun control. He raised the topic because Jovan Belcher, a linebacker for Kansas City, had shot and killed his girlfriend, Kasandra Perkins, then drove to the Chiefs’ practice facility and fatally shot himself. Costas said it was likely that neither would have died if he didn’t have a gun.

Among the critics were Lou Dobbs, then Republican presidential candidates Herman Cain and Mike Huckabee and others. Washington Post reporter Erik Wemple defended Costas for taking advantage of the opportunity to speak on the issue. In the following week, Costas went on MSNBC’s The Last Word with Lawrence Donnell (see photo of Costas above) and denied he was advocating for repeal of the Second Amendment or gun control. But his denial of the obvious was befitting of former President Bill Clinton’s famous word parsing:

“What I was talking about here, and I’m sorry if that wasn’t clear to everyone, was a gun culture. I never mentioned the second amendment, I never used the words ‘gun control’. People inferred that.

“Now, do I believe that we need more comprehensive and more sensible gun control legislation? Yes I do. That doesn’t mean repeal the second amendment. That doesn’t mean a prohibition on someone having a gun to protect their home and their family. It means sensible and more comprehensive gun control legislation. But even if you had that, you would still have the problem of what Jason Whitlock wrote about, and what I agree with. And that is a gun culture in this country.”

George W. Bush’s “Failed Presidency”

On his May 26, 2007 radio program, Costas said the course of the Iraq War and President George W. Bush’s other mis-steps led him to conclude Bush’s presidency had “tragically failed.” Even if you’re a conservative Republican and you’re honest about it, you have to conclude this is a failed administration, he said.

Winning GLAAD’s Gold Medal Award For Condemning Russia’s ‘Homophobic’ Winter Olympic Games

The 2014 Winter Olympics took place in Sochi, Russia, which Costas and Vladimir Pozner deemed the homophobic games because of the host nation’s “anti-LGBT” stance. Their commentary earned them the Gold Medal awarded by GLAAD, the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.

Ross Murray, senior director of the GLAAD Media Institute, wrote that “Costas didn’t waste any time, opening NBC’s Olympic coverage of the games by mentioning Russia’s anti-LGBT and human rights violations. Hopefully other sports commentators will follow his lead.” Here’s a transcript of their discussion:

Costas: “What is the likely practical effect, if any, on athletes and visitors, of the anti-gay propaganda law?

Pozner: I think zero. No effect at all. I don’t see anything happening. In fact, I think that they, the powers that be, are going to be super careful to see that nothing happens to any gay athletes or guests during the Olympics.

Costas: What about gay Russians and their supporters after the Olympics pack up and leave?

Pozner: Gay Russians have a very tough time. I’ve known some who have been on the brink of suicide. Others who want to leave the country. This is a homophobic country. I would guess that 85% of the population is really, really anti-gay. I mean, it can be physical. They are in a very difficult situation. And the law that was passed, although it is a law to protect minors from gay propaganda, in fact, plays into the whole homophobic mentality.

Football Critic

By expressing skepticism about the future of football, Costas did nothing to endear himself to the NFL and pro football fans. He also turned off fans by opposing the Redskins’ nickname and by supporting the NFL players who kneeled during the national anthem. Newsbusters’ Curtis Houck posted this highly objectionable Costas quote in 2017:

“Now, if you want to make the point that the National Anthem is about something more than the nation’s flaws and shortcomings, it’s also about its ideals and that people can see some texture to what the National Anthem means, and you might prefer that people protest or make their point outside of the National Anthem, that’s something that can be argued. But the idea this doesn’t have something to do with race is preposterous.”

It was all in 40 years’ work on NBC since Costas started there in 1979. As Newsbusters’ Matt Philbin wrote last August, with Costas gone NBC is about to become “a lot more watchable” because the network “seems to have caught on: people don’t tune in to a football game to receive political lectures.”

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

King: Should Pence Family’s Christianity Disqualify Them from Secret Service Protection?

Check out the link to the full post here from NewsBusters!
Amidst the liberal media’s long-delayed realization that perhaps their friends in the Women’s March are anti-Semites, CNN host John King leveled an attack Friday on Christianity through the lens of the Second Family, wondering if the conservative Christianity espoused by the Pence’s disqualifies Second Lady Karen Pence from Secret Service protection.

via CNS RSS Feed Navbar

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.cnsnews.com/

King: Should Pence Family’s Christianity Disqualify Them from Secret Service Protection?


Amidst the liberal media’s long-delayed realization that perhaps their friends in the Women’s March are anti-Semites, CNN host John King leveled an attack Friday on Christianity through the lens of the Second Family, wondering if the conservative Christianity espoused by the Pence’s disqualifies Second Lady Karen Pence from Secret Service protection.

Earth to John King — Joy Behar tried pulling a fast one like this almost a year ago on ABC’s The View and, if you’d ask Behar and her bosses, it didn’t turn out too well.

 

 

The Pence’s were the topic at the end of Friday’s Inside Politics in light of what King deemed “controversy over a new job for his wife Karen Pence” teaching art at a Northern Virginia Christian elementary school and the Vice President’s subsequent defenses of her decision.

Here’s King’s full comment about the Pence’s: “Does it matter that all taxpayers pay for her housing? That all taxpayers pay for her Secret Service protection? She, you know, it’s not her fault that she needs protection. This is the world we live in, but all taxpayers pay for, subsidize her life. Does it matter?”

Thankfully, Yahoo! News’s Olivier Knox seemed stunned by King and thus responded: “So, do you mean does her First Amendment — do her First Amendment freedoms, get somehow curtailed because taxpayers pay for her accommodations and her security? I don’t know that a lot of people would sign on to that.”

Exactly.

Nonetheless, The Washington Post’s Karoun Demirjian knocked the Pence’s as somehow taken off guard by the left’s criticism. 

Trying to end the show on a note of unity, Knox added that “this is criticism of the Pence’s doing this, it’s not a blind criticism of Christian education.” Sorry, but not sure King’s questions were about that point, though.

King then ended the show by offering a pathetic defense, asserting that “[e]verything is fair debate” because “[w]e live in a democracy.”

Before King’s ugly smear, he began the segment by exclaiming that Pence was “defending his wife Karen’s new job, which is teaching art at a Christian art that bans gay students, parents, and employees” and that it’s triggered “an interesting debate” because while Mrs. Pence has her First Amendment rights, “this decision being made as we head into a reelection campaign.”

Demirjian agreed in questioning this announcement, fretting that “the First and Second Family do are viewed by people across the country as a model to look up to and this one, you know, I think there are even some people who are proponents of Christian education who would say, yeah, but not this kind.”

“So, they’re making a play at a very slim part of the population that they count as part of their base but potentially offending a lot of people,” she added, showing quite the blindspot for just how many people who hold right-of-center theological beliefs about Christianity.

Associated Press D.C. bureau chief Julie Pace preceded King, arguing that people can have “core beliefs,” but “[w]hen you use your core beliefs in a public way, obviously it does open yourself up to criticism, and I think the Pence’s might be a little naive to think that wouldn’t happen if she is going to make this decision.”

Ah, yes, so Pace offered up the suggestion that someone can hold whatever views they want so long as they don’t publicize it (and especially if it runs afoul of societal norms). Got it.

To see the relevant transcript from CNN’s Inside Politics on January 18, click “expand.”

CNN’s Inside Politics
January 18, 2019
12:52 p.m. Eastern [TEASE]

JOHN KING: Next for us, amid controversy over a new job for his wife Karen Pence, the Vice President just moments ago saying he could not be more proud of her.

VICE PRESIDENT MIKE PENCE: My wife is many things. [SCREEN WIPE] She’s even an art teacher at a Christian school and I couldn’t be more proud of our Second Lady, my wife, Karen Pence.

(….)

12:57 p.m. Eastern

KING: Just before the break, you heard the Vice President Mike Pence defending his wife Karen’s new job, which is teaching art at a Christian art that bans gay students, parents, and employees. Responding to criticism last night, Pence told Catholic televisions he’s deeply offended by what he calls the media’s attack on Christian education. 

PENCE: We have a rich tradition in America of Christian education, and frankly religious education broadly defined. We celebrate it. It’s — the freedom of religion is enshrined in the Constitution of the United States. [SCREEN WIPE] We’ll let the other critics roll off our back, but this criticism of Christian education in America should stop. 

KING: Immanuel Christian School’s parent agreement says it can refuse a student if the parent’s students are “participating in, supporting or condone, sexual immorality” and it asks parents to “embrace biblical family values such as a healthy marriage between one man and one woman.” it is — it’s an interesting debate. To me, Karen Pence has every right. Her First Amendment belong to the Pence’s as much as it belongs to anybody. Christian schools, as private organizations, have the right to have their views, but this decision being made as we head into a reelection campaign. Number one, the Trump campaign has to know this is making a statement, a statement that it’s Christian conservative base will applaud, but a statement, if you look at Trump polling, and whether it’s gay American, millennial Americans, younger Americans, who are more tolerant of these issues, they don’t like this in the administration. It is a statement, correct? 

KAROUN DEMIRJIAN: Definitely. I mean, anything that the First and Second Family do are viewed by people across the country as a model to look up to and this one, you know, I think there are even some people who are proponents of Christian education who would say, yeah, but not this kind. So, they’re making a play at a very slim part of the population that they count as part of their base but potentially offending a lot of people. 

JULIE PACE: Pence himself — Pence and Karen Pence — I think it’s somewhat surprising coming from them. They have really been — you know, they have been backed by the evangelical community. That is who they view as their base. This is also very personal for them. This is — this is their core beliefs. When you use your core beliefs in a public way, obviously it does open yourself up to criticism, and I think the Pence’s might be a little naive to think that wouldn’t happen if she is going to make this decision. It’s interesting, to me, they made no attempt to get ahead of it. They — they made the announcement she would be working at this school and then saw the backlash come a couple days later. 

KING: Does it matter that all taxpayers pay for her housing? That all taxpayers pay for her Secret Service protection? She, you know, it’s not her fault that she needs protection. This is the world we live in, but all taxpayers pay for, subsidize her life. Does it matter?

OLIVIER KNOX: So, do you mean does her First Amendment — do her First Amendment freedoms, get somehow curtailed because taxpayers pay for her accommodations and her security? I don’t know that a lot of people would sign on to that. 

DEMIRJIAN: But she can — other people have the First Amendment to criticize and they should expect that there will be.

PACE: Sure. Of course.

[PANELISTS MUMBLING]

KNOX: But also, this is criticism — this is criticism of the Pence’s doing this, it’s not a blind criticism of Christian education. 

KING: Everything is fair debate. We live in a democracy.

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/