California Dems Pushing For Medicaid For Illegal Immigrants


Have they fallen into the sea yet? Sounds like they’re well on their way.

Via Washington Examiner:

A California lawmaker has pledged to re-introduce a bill that would allow adults who live in the state illegally to receive medical care paid for by the government.

State Assembly member Joaquin Arambula, a Democrat and a doctor, announced the plans Monday as the legislature convened at the state capitol, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Should the bill advance, California would become the first state to extend Medicaid coverage regardless of immigration status. State projections for last year’s bill found that 1.8 million people in California are uninsured and reside there illegally; roughly 1.2 million would qualify for Medi-Cal, the name of the state’s Medicaid program.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

9th Circuit Blocks Trump’s Effort To Stop False Asylum Claims By Illegal Aliens


Claims for asylum have more than tripled despite the fact that most don’t qualify. But they know they will then be released into the U.S. and can just disappear.

Via Daily Caller:

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a temporary restraining order against a Trump administration policy that denies asylum to illegal aliens.

The 2-1 decision is the latest setback the 9th Circuit has rendered to President Donald Trump’s immigration agenda.

“Just as we may not, as we are often reminded, ‘legislate from the bench,’ neither may the executive legislate from the oval office,” Judge Jay Bybee wrote for the majority. Former President George W. Bush appointed Bybee to the bench, and the judge has a conservative reputation.

Read the 9th Circuit’s decision

U.S. District Court Judge Jon Tigar entered an injunction against President Donald Trump’s new asylum rules on Nov. 19.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Martin Luther King Jr.’s Daughter Writes Letter Supporting Trump-Endorsed Bill

Dr. Bernice King, the daughter of Martin Luther King Jr., wrote a letter this week in support of a criminal justice reform bill that has bipartisan support and has been endorsed by President Donald Trump.
In a letter obtained by The Daily Wire from the National Diversity Coalition For Trump, King wrote in a "plea to Congress" that the "First Step Act" is an opportunity to take a "monumental" step "towards assisting and empowering the least of these in America."

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Google Engineer: Company Blacklisted Dissident to Please Chinese Government


A Google software engineer revealed concerning details about the company’s efforts to please the government China before it launched its latest entry into the country — the censored Chinese search app “Project Dragonfly” — which allegedly included the company blacklisting Chinese dissidents from its buildings for fear of upsetting the Chinese government.

In a series of Twitter posts, Thursday, Google software engineer Mike Wacker discussed Project Dragonfly — Google’s controversial censored Chinese search app — and claimed Google refused to allow Chinese artist and dissident Ai Weiwei on the company’s New York City campus for fear of upsetting the Chinese government.

“A story relevant to Project Dragonfly, the censored search engine Google is building for China: back in September 2016, Talks at Google snubbed [Ai Weiwei], an artist and activist who has criticized the Chinese government’s stance on democracy and human rights,” declared Wacker. “The decision to not host [Weiwei] at Google’s NYC campus back then was related to Google’s (unsuccessful) attempts to launch Google Play in China. As one could imagine, hosting a political dissident such as [Weiwei] would probably upset the Communist Party of China.”

“This decision set a disturbing precedent for two reasons. First, it is one thing to play by China’s rules on Chinese soil (where China recently demolished [Weiwei]’s Beijing studio). It is a whole nother thing to play by China’s rules on *American* soil,” he continued. “Second, I later learned that [Weiwei] would only have been coming in his capacity as an artist, not as an activist. Not that that there was anything wrong with his activism, but it was stunning that Talks at Google would not host him in *any* capacity because of that activism.”

“As for how I discovered this story, in an interesting plot twist, I only learned about it when Talks at Google also snubbed [Jordan Peterson]. In May 2018, Talks at Google had rejected my pitch to invite him to speak on his new book ’12 Rules for Life’. In a follow-up conversation with someone from Talks at Google, he tried to assuage my disappointment by listing other proposals that they had snubbed, and it was in that context he mentioned [Weiwei] and Google Play,” Wacker explained. “A few hours later, I realized what I had just stumbled upon. If Google didn’t have the moral courage back then to let a Chinese political dissident speak on American soil for the sake of launching Google Play in China, then one can only imagine what sort of moral compromises they will make—and have made—for Project Dragonfly.”

Wacker, who also identified himself as the owner of an internal Republican mailing list at Google, then claimed that “bipartisan opposition exists internally” against Project Dragonfly, and added, “For those worried about censorship of conservatives by the tech industry, I have emphasized this message internally: imagine the worst case scenario there, and know that Project Dragonfly would be at least 10x worse than that.”

“There has been a lot of great press coverage on the disturbing persecution of Uighur Muslims by the Chinese government, and I would add that the Chinese government’s disturbing persecutions extend to Christians as well,” he concluded. “I’m left wondering if people who speak the truth as to what is happening in China, such as [Weiwei] or [Dr. Michael L. Brown], will no longer be welcome to speak at Google…”

730 Google employees have currently signed an open letter calling on the company to end development of Project Dragonfly.

“Many of us accepted employment at Google with the company’s values in mind, including its previous position on Chinese censorship and surveillance, and an understanding that Google was a company willing to place its values above its profits,” the letter proclaimed. “After a year of disappointments including Project Maven, Dragonfly, and Google’s support for abusers, we no longer believe this is the case. This is why we’re taking a stand.”

“We join with Amnesty International in demanding that Google cancel Dragonfly. We also demand that leadership commit to transparency, clear communication, and real accountability,” the employees expressed. “Google is too powerful not to be held accountable. We deserve to know what we’re building and we deserve a say in these significant decisions.”

When Breitbart Tech reported on the open letter last week, just over 300 employees had signed it.

Project Dragonfly has also faced opposition from human rights organization Amnesty International, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), and Vice President Mike Pence, who claimed the project would “strengthen Communist Party censorship and compromise the privacy of Chinese customers,” and called on Google to end development immediately.

In September, a former Google research scientist called the company “unethical,” and claimed oversight of Google was “urgently needed.”

Charlie Nash is a reporter for Breitbart Tech. You can follow him on Twitter @MrNashington, or like his page at Facebook.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Snopes Rates Liberal Meme ‘True’ After Former Hillary Staffer Deletes Photo and Admits It’s Inaccurate


The Facebook and Google approved fact-checking service Snopes has once again made a serious error when weighing the factuality of a recent popular meme, claiming the “general idea” of the meme was “correct,” despite it having been debunked.

A new meme has been making the rounds across social media recently, featuring a photo of President Donald Trump alongside a group of Republican lawmakers and other members of his administration. The photo was taken following the House’s vote to repeal Obamacare in 2017, and in the meme, a red X has been placed over the faces of 33 individuals. The caption of the photo reads: “Everyone with an X has since been voted out of Congress.”

fake news meme

This, of course, is incorrect and has now been debunked by many across social media — but the popular fact-checking website Snopes has stated that the “general idea” of the meme was “correct.” The meme came to the attention of multiple high-profile Twitter users after being retweeted by former Hillary Clinton campaign staffer Nicholas Kitchel.

Business Insider reporter Joe Perticone pointed out that despite having a red X placed over her face indicated that she had been voted out of Congress, Seema Verma never actually served in Congress:

Politico reporter Jake Sherman tore apart the meme stating that it was “insane fake news” and was in fact “more incorrect than correct.”

Kitchel later deleted the tweet and admitted that it was inaccurate in a tweet:

Three weeks later, Snopes fact-checker Bethania Palma fact-checked the meme and decided that it was accurate — despite being proven to be wildly inaccurate by this point. Palma stated that it was “true” that “The Congressional seats of almost three dozen Republicans who voted to repeal Obamacare were lost to Democrats in 2018,” which is not the claim made in the meme.

Palma states in the fact-checking article: “In the meme, red ‘X’ marks were drawn through the faces of 33 lawmakers who purportedly were rejected by voters in the 6 November 2018 midterm elections,” but fails to note that not everyone in the photo was a lawmaker, and many lawmakers that were crossed out in the photo actually won re-election.

Palma inaccurately states: “Although memes are frequently grossly inaccurate, this one got the general idea correct. By our count, at least 34 Republican legislators who voted to repeal or partially repeal Obamacare will not be returning to Congress when the new session begins in January 2019.” The meme did not claim that 34 Republican legislators who voted to repeal Obamacare would not be returning to Congress, it claimed that “Everyone with an X has since been voted out of Congress,” which is demonstrably false.

Speaking to The Daily Caller, Snope co-founder David Mikkelson defended the websites fact-check stating: “The overall point offered by the meme in question is that some 33 Republican members of Congress who voted to repeal the ACA lost their seats. And as our fact check documents, that point is correct.” Mikkelson continued: “The meme isn’t really about the specific persons who appear in the accompanying photograph, as they weren’t identified by name and are largely unrecognizable to viewers as shown due to the small size of the photograph and the fact that their heads are obscured with red X’s.” Mikkelson stated: “Our audience is intelligent enough to understand the difference between a literal representation and a symbolic one.”

Snopes has a long history of leftist bias, and the fact-checker of this meme, Bethania Palma, has even contacted Breitbart News directly in the past to ask a number of odd questions about factually accurate articles. Breitbart News Editor Matthew Boyle published his correspondence with Palma recently after receiving an email relating to an article about the Black Panther organization campaigning for Democrat gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams in Georgia.

Boyle writes in his article:

Over the weekend, Breitbart News–among other media outlets–published explosive photographs of armed Black Panthers campaigning for Abrams, holding up her campaign sign while also holding up various guns. In the story, Breitbart News included a quote from the campaign of her GOP opponent, Brian Kemp, calling on her to denounce the radicals campaigning for her.

The story went viral. Many other national outlets and outlets across Georgia, including a local CBS News affiliate, picked it up and carried the damning images of Abrams’ radical supporters. Since then, President Donald Trump held a rally in Macon, Georgia, for Kemp and the latest polls in the race show Kemp leading Abrams by as many as 12 points.

On Monday, a self-identified “reporter” for Snopes, Bethania Palma, reached out to Breitbart News with a series of questions about the Black Panther report. None of the questions implies anything was inaccurate about the report Facebook relies on Snopes as an official “fact checker” to detect fake news and misinformation on the platform, along with a small group of other primarily left-wing organizations including Politifact.

In her email, Palma asked a number of questions about the story stating:

The story says Breitbart “obtained” images of the Black Panthers. Where did Breitbart obtain the images from?
– Why does Breitbart quote the Kemp campaign with no obvious effort to get comment from the Abrams campaign?
– Why did Breitbart use the term “lobby” in the headline?
– Breitbart normally takes a pro-gun stance. Does Breitbart maintain that stance when the gun owners are black?
– Did anyone at Breitbart make an effort to contact the New Black Panther Party for comment?

In the article, Boyle gives a brief background on Palma and her “fact-checking” credentials, stating:

Just a quick glance at Palma’s Twitter account or at her history of writing for radical leftist outlet Alternet shows a hard leftist mentality, one quick to accuse Trump of being “racist” (the latest is a series of tweets attacking the president’s campaign ad on the migrant caravan as such) or linking Trump to the Ku Klux Klan any way she can–a history dating back years, as Breitbart News has reported about Palma before.

Breitbart News responded to Palma’s questions with a number of our own, asking:

1.) Why can anyone trust Snopes to be an independent authority on fact-checking when you personally are so clearly biased in favor of leftists?
2.) You implied in your questions to us that our story had something to do with race. The story clearly did not. What made you think that? Please be specific.
3.) In your questions to us, you did not indicate that there was anything even close to inaccurate in our story. So, again, please be specific: what exactly are you “fact checking”?
4.) Do you send similar lists of questions to outlets like the New York TimesWashington Post, CNN, and others on their reporting?

Palma did not respond to Breitbart News’ questions.

Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan_ or email him at lnolan@breitbart.com

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

‘Rudolph’ Actor Speaks out After Leftists Target Holiday Classic


Around the end of November, CBS aired a beloved holiday special on television. While some look forward, with fond memories, to watching it each year, others had a different take on it, particularly this year.

In fact, the left went wild with criticism over the story of acceptance, making charges of things such as bullying and bigotry. For some, such reactions over pretty much everything nowadays is why we can’t have anything nice anymore.

TRENDING: Apple CEO To Ban ‘Sinful’ Conservative Speech. Leaves ‘F*** White People’ and ‘Suck My D*** H**’ on iTunes

Now, an actor who voiced one of the characters from the TV special has spoken out after the left attacked the holiday classic. TMZ spoke to Corinne Conley, who was the voice of “The Dolly for Sue.”

Should ‘Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer’ be banned from television?

The doll was on the Island of Misfit toys because like the rest of them, she was different, too. She was missing a nose.

The actor who voiced the doll, Conley, specifically addressed the topic of bullying. It was a “problem” with the tale that was pointed out often on social media.

Conley defended the message of the “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” story. She also pointed out how relevant the moral of the story is in today’s society.

RELATED: Kevin Hart Bows Out as Oscar Host After White PC Liberals Unite Against Him

“I would say it’s more relevant now than ever, because there is so much bullying going on. But it’s all reconciled in ‘Rudolph.’”

“And surely people wouldn’t love it so much if it left a resonance of bullying. It wouldn’t be so indelible on people’s hearts.”

Conley noted that even with 60 years of credits to her name, when people find out she was part of “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer,” it is that credit that stands out to them the most, and in a tender way. To her, that is a clear sign that the holiday story is very much a treasured tale.

She added that now, more than ever, the message from the story is relevant. “There is quite a bit of bullying that is going on now, at this time.”

“And so perhaps we’re all getting a little more sensitive to it, but that’s good. I don’t think by getting sensitive to bullying that you want to copy it. You want to get rid of it.”

“I don’t think people are tempted to bully so much if they watch nice, warm-hearted shows like ‘Rudolph.’” She added, “If they do (watch it), they might learn a lesson.”

Conley also had a message for the haters. “I just can’t imagine it affecting anyone in a negative way. They must be like Scrooge. Tell them to watch ‘Scrooge.’”

Score one more point for common sense. Merry Christmas, leftists!

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

TRUMP UNLEASHED: ‘Force Leakin James Comey to Answer Questions Under Oath!’


TRUMP UNLEASHED: ‘Force Leakin James Comey to Answer Questions Under Oath!’

Cristina Laila
by Cristina Laila
December 7, 2018

President Trump lashed out at former FBI Director James Comey Friday evening over Comey’s refusal to cooperate and answer pertinent questions about FISA abuse and Russiagate in a closed-door interview on Capitol Hill.

Comey was not cooperating with GOP lawmakers on Friday and was told by his DOJ attorney not to answer many pertinent questions on FISA abuses and Russiagate.

Rep. Darrell Issa told reporters that James Comey is not answering questions – on issues like the start of the Russia investigation and the Carter Page FISA – at the direction of a Justice Dept. attorney who is accompanying Comey

“We absolutely need to get answers,” Issa said

President Trump was furious with the “bias and corruption” and immediately called for Comey to be forced to answer the questions under oath.

TRUMP: It is being reported that Leakin’ James Comey was told by Department of Justice attorneys not to answer the most important questions. Total bias and corruption at the highest levels of previous Administration. Force him to answer the questions under oath!

Comey remained defiant after his deposition and told reporters that accusations of FISA abuse are “nonsense.”

James Comey will be back for a second interview by the House Judiciary Committee on December 17th.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Revealed: Clinton Foundation whistleblowers have been working with FBI and IRS since last year


The reckoning for the Clintons I have dreamed of for a quarter of a century finally approaches with whistleblowing and documents about the slush fund known as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.  The ability of the Clintons to blow off charges of criminality will be crippled by the latest evidence revealed to be in the hands of prosecutors.  With the former first couple humiliated by their inability to draw a decent crowd anymore, and plenty of other Democrats anxious to move on and put this embarrassment behind them, it is starting to look as though karma finally is catching up with them.


John Solomon of The Hill reveals the story that has been percolating for a long time but kept tightly under wraps – because that is what serious prosecutors do, especially when grand juries are poring over evidence and issuing indictments that remain sealed until the right moment comes.  The trigger for the story coming out now probably is a House subcommittee hearing scheduled next week by Mark Meadows, chair of the House Freedom Caucus, while the GOP still can set the agenda of House hearings.  



[A] GOP-led congressional subcommittee, led by Rep. Mark Meadows (N.C.), is planning to hold a hearing next week to review the work of John Huber, the special U.S attorney named a year ago to investigate all things Clinton.


It turns out that whistleblowers inside and outside the Clinton Foundation have amassed “6,000 pages of evidence attached to a whistleblower submission filed secretly more than a year ago with the IRS and FBI.”  Among that evidence can be found: 


… internal legal reviews that the foundation conducted on itself in 2008 and 2011.


Those reviews flagged serious concerns about legal compliance, improper commingling of personal and charity business and “quid pro quo” promises made to donors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of State.


The submission also cites an interview its investigators conducted with Andrew Kessel that quotes the foundation’s longtime chief financial officer as saying he was unable to stop former President Clinton from “commingling” personal business and charitable activities inside the foundation and that he “knows where all the bodies are buried.”


Their own investigation!  That’s hard to put down as politically motivated.


Having the chief financial officer of the Clinton Foundation turn informant is a nightmare for the Clintons.  The CFO has to process all the cash, and because that person usually is on the hook for any criminal violations, there is ample incentive to turn state’s evidence.


That evidence was assembled by a private firm called MDA Analytics LLC, run by accomplished ex-federal criminal investigators, who alleged the Clinton Foundation engaged in illegal activities and may be liable for millions of dollars in delinquent taxes and penalties.


In addition to the IRS, the firm’s partners have had contact with prosecutors in the main Justice Department in Washington and FBI agents in Little Rock, Ark.


MDA Analytics claims to be motivated by the prospect of reaping a substantial bounty from the IRS, as the agency pays informants a portion of the taxes it is able to recover.  The fact that they are not politically motivated is a huge plus, because they have invested their own resources in the investigation in the expectation of a financial return.  These experienced pros believe they have a strong enough case to yield many millions to the IRS and a portion of those millions for themselves.


As an outsider, it is impossible to know if the prosecutors have been stalled by Deep State bureaucrats and the Meadows hearing is lighting a fire under them, but this does look suspicious:


The IRS sent multiple letters in 2017 and 2018 to MDA Analytics, confirming it had received the submission and it was “still open and under active investigation.”  But, shortly before last month’s election, the agency sent a preliminary denial letter indicating it did not pursue the allegations for reasons that ranged from a lack of resources to possible expiration of the statute of limitations on some allegations. …


And last week, a federal prosecutor suddenly asked for documents from their private investigation.


There is considerable detail on the process so far.  Now that this information is public, it will be harder to avoid DoJ and IRS prosecutions, especially now that the clout of the Clintons has diminished.


This is very good news for those of us who have been frustrated at the ability of the Clintons to avoid prosecution over prima facie crimes while associates of President Trump are ensnared in process crimes and pressured to incriminate him with testimony some of them claim would be false.  The hysteria ginned up by the Mueller investigation can be harnessed to focus on the Clintons, using the same techniques that the left has embraced when used against Trump.


The reckoning for the Clintons I have dreamed of for a quarter of a century finally approaches with whistleblowing and documents about the slush fund known as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.  The ability of the Clintons to blow off charges of criminality will be crippled by the latest evidence revealed to be in the hands of prosecutors.  With the former first couple humiliated by their inability to draw a decent crowd anymore, and plenty of other Democrats anxious to move on and put this embarrassment behind them, it is starting to look as though karma finally is catching up with them.


John Solomon of The Hill reveals the story that has been percolating for a long time but kept tightly under wraps – because that is what serious prosecutors do, especially when grand juries are poring over evidence and issuing indictments that remain sealed until the right moment comes.  The trigger for the story coming out now probably is a House subcommittee hearing scheduled next week by Mark Meadows, chair of the House Freedom Caucus, while the GOP still can set the agenda of House hearings.  


[A] GOP-led congressional subcommittee, led by Rep. Mark Meadows (N.C.), is planning to hold a hearing next week to review the work of John Huber, the special U.S attorney named a year ago to investigate all things Clinton.


It turns out that whistleblowers inside and outside the Clinton Foundation have amassed “6,000 pages of evidence attached to a whistleblower submission filed secretly more than a year ago with the IRS and FBI.”  Among that evidence can be found: 


… internal legal reviews that the foundation conducted on itself in 2008 and 2011.


Those reviews flagged serious concerns about legal compliance, improper commingling of personal and charity business and “quid pro quo” promises made to donors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of State.


The submission also cites an interview its investigators conducted with Andrew Kessel that quotes the foundation’s longtime chief financial officer as saying he was unable to stop former President Clinton from “commingling” personal business and charitable activities inside the foundation and that he “knows where all the bodies are buried.”


Their own investigation!  That’s hard to put down as politically motivated.


Having the chief financial officer of the Clinton Foundation turn informant is a nightmare for the Clintons.  The CFO has to process all the cash, and because that person usually is on the hook for any criminal violations, there is ample incentive to turn state’s evidence.


That evidence was assembled by a private firm called MDA Analytics LLC, run by accomplished ex-federal criminal investigators, who alleged the Clinton Foundation engaged in illegal activities and may be liable for millions of dollars in delinquent taxes and penalties.


In addition to the IRS, the firm’s partners have had contact with prosecutors in the main Justice Department in Washington and FBI agents in Little Rock, Ark.


MDA Analytics claims to be motivated by the prospect of reaping a substantial bounty from the IRS, as the agency pays informants a portion of the taxes it is able to recover.  The fact that they are not politically motivated is a huge plus, because they have invested their own resources in the investigation in the expectation of a financial return.  These experienced pros believe they have a strong enough case to yield many millions to the IRS and a portion of those millions for themselves.


As an outsider, it is impossible to know if the prosecutors have been stalled by Deep State bureaucrats and the Meadows hearing is lighting a fire under them, but this does look suspicious:


The IRS sent multiple letters in 2017 and 2018 to MDA Analytics, confirming it had received the submission and it was “still open and under active investigation.”  But, shortly before last month’s election, the agency sent a preliminary denial letter indicating it did not pursue the allegations for reasons that ranged from a lack of resources to possible expiration of the statute of limitations on some allegations. …


And last week, a federal prosecutor suddenly asked for documents from their private investigation.


There is considerable detail on the process so far.  Now that this information is public, it will be harder to avoid DoJ and IRS prosecutions, especially now that the clout of the Clintons has diminished.


This is very good news for those of us who have been frustrated at the ability of the Clintons to avoid prosecution over prima facie crimes while associates of President Trump are ensnared in process crimes and pressured to incriminate him with testimony some of them claim would be false.  The hysteria ginned up by the Mueller investigation can be harnessed to focus on the Clintons, using the same techniques that the left has embraced when used against Trump.




via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Billionaires Demand Fast-Track Green Cards for 400,000 Visa Workers


Internet billionaire Marc Benioff is urging the GOP Congress and President Donald Trump to fast-track 400,000 foreign visa-workers — plus 400,000 family members — to green cards, the U.S. job market, and the ballot box.

“This is good for our economy,” Benioff said in a Tuesday tweet that was applauded by Silicon Valley lobbyists. “We need to grow our workers to grow our economy.” 

Benioff’s comment is a tautology: Expanding the population by importing more than 800,000 people would obviously grow the nation’s economy, retail sales, government taxes, company profits, and Wall Street stock options. 

But Benioff’s cheap-labor importation plan would also shrink the income and careers sought by millions of American college graduates, many of whom will vote in 2020 for or against Trump. 

The planned giveaway is in a pending House bill, dubbed H.R. 392. It is also hidden in the House version of the 2019 funding package for the Department of Homeland Security. If Trump accepts that funding package, he will help companies import more cheap visa-workers from India and China an inflict more economic and career damage to the nation’s professional-status workforce of at least 55 million American college-graduates.

The nation’s workforce now includes roughly 1.5 million foreign college-graduate contract-workers who are imported via the H-1B, L-1, OPT, O-1, J-1, and other visa programs. These outsourcing workers are not immigrants, but instead, they are contract workers hired for one to six years, at lower wages, to take jobs that would otherwise go to American graduates.

This massive level of middle-class outsourcing has suppressed the wage growth needed by many American graduates to repay their college debts, get married, buy homes, and raise children. For example, the salaries for 21 million “professional and business services” employees rose by just roughly one percent after inflation from the second quarter of 2017 to the second quarter of 2018, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Their after-inflation pay was flat from 2o15 to 2016.

The Americans’ salary loss, however, would be a gain for the CEOs who see their profits rise and their stock options spike as middle-class salaries decline. 

The MyVisaJobs.com site shows that Benioff’s company asked for 1,063 H-1B visa workers in 2018, up from 880 in 2017. The site also shows job titles and work locations. 

Benioff also sought 1,071 green cards for his contract workers in from 2016 to 2018. 

The company’s stock price has doubled since Trump’s election, but Benioff and most of his employees have strongly supported Democrats, including Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election. For example, only 5.2 percent of employee donations to candidates went to GOP candidates in 2018. 

Now Benioff and his fellow executives as asking Trump to raise their stock portfolios by fast-tracking green cards to roughly 400,000 foreign contract-workers — plus 400,000 family members — who sidelined hundreds of thousands of American college graduates. 

Benioff’s support for the visa workers was echoed by Todd Schulte, who is the director of a pro-migration lobbying group. The Democratic-aligned group, FWD.us, was formed and funded by Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Microsoft’s Bill Gates and numerous other CEOs and investors who prefer to import visa-workers instead of hiring Americans.

Without irony, Schulte’s website declares that “We believe that when every person has the opportunity to achieve their full potential, our families, communities, and economy thrive.” 

Amazon is also urging Trump to approve the green-card giveaway. Amazon’s founder, Jeff Bezos, also runs the Washington Post and supported Clinton.

In 2018, Amazon asked the government for almost 6,000 H-1B visa workers and almost 5,000 green cards. Facebook asked for almost 2,400 H-1B workers and 1,400 green cards. Those outsourcing requests add up to 15,000 white-collar jobs sought by U.S. graduates. 

Business lobbyists are trying to minimize publicity about their demand for a green-card giveaway and they are pressing GOP leaders behind closed doors to keep the giveaway in the 2019 DHS budget. 

But opposition is rising as Americans graduates have begun organizing to block the giveaway. For example, Protect US Workers helped defeat Rep. Kevin Yoder who used his authority as an appropriations chairman to insert the giveaway into the DHS budget. 

The American graduates are also using federal data to show U.S. legislators how many Americans’ middle-class jobs are being outsourced in their districts to the foreign workers. 

The managing director of Thiel Capital, Eric Weinstein, tweeted to Benioff to highlight his report which shows that the federal officials created the H-1B visa program to lower salaries paid to American technology experts:

The mass outsourcing also adding pressure to the lives of many American technology workers, many of whom have already lost jobs to cheaper contract-workers. An informal survey of tech workers shows that almost four-in-ten say they are depressed.

One of the leading advocates for the green-card giveaway is Leon Fresco, an immigration lawyer who helped Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer pass the disastrous 2013 “Gang of Eight” amnesty through the Senate. The bill was so unpopular that the GOP gained nine Senate seats in 2014, preventing Schumer from becoming Senate Majority Leader.

On December 6, Fresco suggested there is only a small chance that the giveaway will get into the final DHS bill:

Many Indian contract workers are lobbying to help pass the green-card bill:

In the United States, the establishment’s economic policy of using migration to boost economic growth shifts wealth from young people towards older people by flooding the market with cheap white collar and blue collar foreign labor. That flood of outside labor spikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor that blue collar and white collar employees offer.

The policy also drives up real estate prices, widens wealth gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high-tech careers, and sidelines at least five million marginalized Americans and their families, including many who are now struggling with fentanyl addictions.

Immigration also pulls investment and wealth away from heartland states because coastal investors can more easily hire and supervise the large immigrant populations who prefer to live in the coastal states.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Survivors: Cuba Has Detained Half a Million Dissidents, Still Starving Prisoners to Death


WASHINGTON, DC — Cuba continues to employ starvation and dehydration as a mechanism to break political prisoners physically and mentally, Breitbart News learned from a former political prisoner on Friday.

The practice of starving detainees and limiting their access to water remains “a systematic and official practice,” Luis Zúñiga, a former political prisoner, declared during an event on human rights in Cuba hosted by the Organization of American States (OAS).

“You go today and ask a political prisoner who has just left jail what system of feeding he was subjected to and what he is going to say is a regimen of hunger, thirst, and malnutrition,” he added.

Echoing Zúñiga, Paulo Abrao, the chief of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) at OAS, noted that human rights abuses against political prisoners and the population as a whole “persist” in Cuba.

The Cuban regime’s practice of “harassment, threats, arbitrary detentions, detentions for the exit of the country, deportations, and the criminalization of freedom of expression, and human rights abuses” continue unabated, Abrao said, adding, “We can affirm that systematic abuse persists.”

During the event at OAS headquarters, the Justice Cuba international commission presented testimony from former political prisoners who have witnessed the torture and atrocities at the hands of the Cuban government first-hand.

The commission has compiled legal evidence against the Castro regime’s most prominent officials to bring them to justice at an appropriate tribunal.

According to the witnesses, the regime’s oppression is not confined to the political prisons and forced labor camps – it affects all citizens. They acknowledged that, just like political prisons, Cuba continues to operate forced labor camps.

Pedro Corzo, a former political prisoner and one of the investigators who assisted Justice Cuba in amassing evidence against the communist government, revealed that the regime has detained “over half a million people for political reasons” since it came to power nearly 60 years ago.

He noted that the communist government has also carried out “massive raids in which individuals are apprehended for their sexual orientation, for liking foreign music … and having long hair.”

Zúñiga testified that the Cuban regime continues to use malnutrition and dehydration as an oppression tool against dissidents, saying during the event, “Another of the physical and mental destruction mechanisms employed against political prisoners in Cuba has been … imposing a permanent system of hunger and malnutrition on political prisoners. All political prisoners know what extreme hunger is — the need to feed and especially malnutrition.”

It is likely that “political prisons in Cuba are responsible for the only cases in the world where there are prisoners who have died of malnutrition without going on a hunger strike, just by eating the food they gave them,” he proclaimed.

Zúñiga also noted that prisoners are subjected to “a permanent system of arbitrary beatings.”

“They are hit without reason and justification. In many cases, when the regime received adverse actions by the United Nations or the international community … the Cuban government immediately took revenge against the political prisoners with arbitrary beatings,” he said.

“I have a fractured cranium from one of those beatings,” Zúñiga continued.

Currently, there are between 150 and 180 political prisoners in Cuba, excluding those beaten and detained on a weekly basis for publicly expressing disapproval of the Castro regime.

On Friday, the OAS hosted an unprecedented day-long event offering an international platform to the victims of crimes against humanity and their families at the hands of the Cuban communist regime.

During the event, Justice Cuba announced that it had completed the investigation phase of its efforts to compile legal evidence against the Castro regime, noting that it is currently in search of a tribunal that can successfully try Cuban government officials accused of torture and other atrocities against the opposition.

Some U.S. lawmakers of Cuban descent have expressed support for indicting members of the Castro regime.

In March, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) urged U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration to indict former Cuban dictator Raúl Castro.

“In the spirit of Cuban Independence Day, we urge you to consider new, additional actions to hold the Castro regime accountable for its crimes,” the Cuban-American lawmakers wrote in a statement. “For that reason, within all applicable rules and regulations, we urge you to direct the Department of Justice to review whether Raúl Castro should be indicted for the illegal and heinous act of shooting down in international waters two American civilian aircraft flown by Brothers to the Rescue on February 24, 1996.”

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com