Influential Liberal Sites Caught With People Outside US Managing Their Pages


As soon as the tears began drying on the floor of the Jacob Javits Convention Center in New York City in 2016 — the place where Hillary Clinton’s bacchanalian victory party on election night was to take place — the lachrymose and angry started to come up with who had stolen this election.

Because indeed it had been stolen — there was no doubt about that among the Hillaristas and the rest of the assorted left. The only question among the left was what malefactor took the electoral victory that was so rightly theirs and gave it to … you know, that thing. Supposed ballot irregularities were the first culprit, but several recounts did nothing to change the results. Then came “fake news,” but reporting seemed to confirm it would be of limited impact.

Then came foreign interference — most notably from the direction of the Kremlin — and it all fit together.

Since the perfidious Russians and their satellites became the focus of all efforts to delegitimize the Trump administration, anything conservative with foreign ties has come under intense scrutiny, particularly when it comes to social media.

That even includes us. The Western Journal has been asked by both Facebook and BuzzFeed why one of the administrators of our Facebook page is from overseas. (That administrator, incidentally, is myself; I’ve lived in America for most of my life but reside abroad at present for reasons too lengthy to discuss here.) I’m sure other conservative websites have received similar treatment.

TRENDING: Huge: FL Dem Gillum Took FBI Corruption Bait, Used Family as Excuse When Caught

This is all, apparently, in the name of ferreting out foreign interference in journalism. A noble cause, to be sure — unless, of course, the same questions can be asked of you.

Take ThinkProgress. Please. </henny_youngman> The left-leaning website seems to have a minor obsession with Russian collusion, although any sort of foreign interference seems to suit its fancy.

Some sample headlines: “Former FBI agent details how Trump and Russia team up to weaponize fake news,” “Meet the newest country behind fake Facebook accounts: America” and “Why do all these Daily Caller reporters keep appearing on Russian propaganda channels?

So, given that ThinkProgress is an American politics website, all of its social media administrators are in America — right?

Yes, one of its administrators is from the United Arab Emirates. What does this mean in practical terms? Probably zilch. Could be an expat, could be a contractor — there are a panoply of possible reasons for it.

However, were I a headline writer for ThinkProgress, I could probably get away with: “Is a top liberal website spreading fake news from a repressive Middle Eastern regime?”

Sure, I’d have to say the answer to that question would probably be no, but who cares?

Or let’s take Wonkette, that wonderfully potty-mouthed left-wing commentary website last culturally relevant when you could post links to the commentary from its writers on your MySpace wall. It still has a following, I guess, but it also has some <cue spooky music> strange foreign ties.

RELATED: Facebook Continues Censorship, Removes Pro-Life Stories Because of ‘Graphic Content’

Argentina? Serbia?* Is there a shadowy cabal of Eastern European/South American ultranationalists pumping vulgarity into our national polity? Almost certainly not! But that’s the thing about these stories — once you get going you only need to connect an entity with a country and you’re off to the races.

Or take a look at the Democratic Socialists of America webpage — or should I say the Democratic Socialists of Canada and the Ukraine?!

This one is a bit more suspect than the rest, considering that they’re an American political party and everything.

Do you think that foreign interference in our political process is overstated?

Still, given the fact that Americans can live abroad in this day and age, it might be nothing. However, the party’s Facebook page notes that they do “run ads related to politics or issues of national importance.”

Are those ads coming from the Ukraine? Could they be from … Russian-aligned rebels?! Of course not, but this claim is as evidence-free as the whole bag of Russian collusion stories and/or the DSA’s platform.

Now, does all this mean anything? As I said, probably not — but that still hasn’t stopped Facebook or BuzzFeed from questioning us about it. It’s a minor thing, granted, but given that some or most of these entities have complained about foreign meddling in the 2016 election and the role Facebook may have played, they don’t seem particularly circumspect about it themselves.

Nor should they be. There are plenty of good American workers who live abroad (I’m probably talking myself up a bit here) who can contribute to any organization remotely. However, that doesn’t have quite the tocsin of danger that foreign agents trying to inject propaganda into American discourse has.

* As of publication on Thursday, Wonkette no longer lists a manager in Serbia but has added one in Greece.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Democrats Spending $6 Million To Save Sen. Bob Menendez’s Seat. It’s Working.

If New Jersey Republicans cannot manage to unseat a senator credibly accused of 18 counts of corruption, then somebody needs to be fired. As Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) continued to slip in the polls against his GOP challenger, the Democrats were dishing out big dollars to save his seat; $6 million later, polls show him between 5-7 points ahead of Bob Hugins.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Lefty SPLC, Soros Foundations Build Coalition to Ban ‘Hate Speech’ Online


The anti-conservative hate group, Southern Poverty Law Center, wants to censor people it disagrees with and it’s asking the top social media companies to help.

On Thursday, October 25, the liberal organization announced that it had formed a coalition with five other groups to encourage the prohibition of so-called “hate speech” online. SPLC partnered with four George Soros funded organizations: the Center for American Progress, Color of Change, Free Press and Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, as well as the National Hispanic Media Coalition.

The groups called for restricting a wide range of content, video, advertising, fundraising and domain/website services. The restrictions even cover “targeting an individual or group based on their actual or perceived race.” Those activities even limit actions users may take “whether online or offline.”

The SPLC has marked conservative organizations, including the Family Research Council, ACT for America, American Family Association, and Alliance Defending Freedom as hate groups. The group has also targeted conservative and classical liberal individuals for hate speech, such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Christina Hoff Sommers. Conservative groups are usually filed under “anti-LGBTQ hate speech” or “anti-Islam hate speech.”

In addition, the SPLC created a “hate map,” updated to show the locations of 917 groups and organizations it deemed “hateful.” This map was used by shooter Floyd Lee Corkin forming a plan s to attack the Family Research Council in 2012, injuring one.

These standards should now apply to online media, writes the SPLC. It stated, “Online tools have been used to coordinate attacks, including violence against people of color, immigrants, religious minorities, LGBTQIA people, women and people with disabilities.” Sounds simple, but when a person argues that they support traditional marriage between a man and a woman, the SPLC determines that to be hate speech.

In the 11-page report, the SPLC and its partners wrote several recommendations for corporate companies in social media. The report stated, “Using the service to engage in hateful activities on the service or to facilitate hateful activities off the service shall be grounds for terminating the service for a user.” The SPLC warns that government actors should not be allowed to flag content on social media, since apparently that falls under free speech limitations.

Center for American Progress, Color of Change, and Free Press are all given major donations from liberal billionaire George Soros on a regular basis. Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law is part of the non-profit Alliance for Justice, which is a coalition of 100 organizations. This coalition is also funded by Soros.

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

Republicans Push Ahead With Conservative Trump Judicial Nominees


Putting an end to legislating from the bench.

(Reuters) – A Republican-led U.S. Senate panel on Wednesday held the second of two unusual hearings during a congressional recess in an aggressive push to confirm President Donald Trump’s conservative judicial nominees including to a liberal-leaning California-based court he often criticizes.

Democrats, who mounted an unsuccessful effort to block Senate confirmation this month of Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, have slammed the president’s fellow Republicans for holding the hearings. Only two senators on the 21-member Judiciary Committee, both Republicans, showed up for the hearing in Washington on Wednesday in which four judicial nominees were considered.

Democratic Senator Patty Murray, who had asked Republicans to postpone the hearing while the Senate is in recess ahead of the Nov. 6 congressional elections, criticized “the shameful partisan path they have taken on what has always been a bipartisan process.” She accused the Republicans of a “mad dash” to secure confirmation.

Two of the nominees considered on Wednesday – Bridget Bade and Eric Miller – were picked by Trump to serve on the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which handles cases arising from several western states including California. […}

The part of the hearing focusing on Bade, a magistrate judge from Arizona, and Eric Miller, an attorney in Seattle, lasted only 20 minutes. The two senators present were Orrin Hatch and Mike Crapo, who presided over the hearing and quizzed Bade about the proper role of judges and asked Miller about Native American tribal sovereignty.

The hearing advanced Trump’s goal of quickly filling judicial vacancies. Trump already has appointed 29 judges to federal appeals courts, an unusually quick pace, and has moved some regional appeals courts closer to conservative control in an ideological shift that could benefit his administration.

The other nominees considered on Wednesday were Karin Immergut as a federal district judge in Oregon and Richard Hertling for the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, which handles legal claims seeking monetary judgments against the U.S. government.

After facing a later vote in the committee, the nominees must be confirmed by the full Senate, controlled 51-49 by the Republicans.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

New York Times Published Trump Assassination Fantasy Before Mail Bomb Scare


The New York Times published a fictional story Tuesday that fantasized about President Trump’s assassination at the hands of the Secret Service and a Russian operative — one day before the nation was gripped by news of apparent mail bombs sent to prominent Democratic figures.

In an article published in the New York Times‘ Book Review, five writers conjured up fantasy scenarios about President Trump’s future with the Russia investigation.

One writer, Zoe Sharp (pictured), took liberal fantasizing to the next level and wrote a story that ends with President Trump being assassinated by a Russian agent. The Times’ editors illustrate the piece, titled “How It Ends,” with a Russian flag sticking out of a pistol barrel.

In the story, the Russian attempts to shoot the president, but his gun misfires. A Secret Service agent then offers his own pistol to the Russian:

The Russian waited until they were a few steps past before he drew the gun. He sighted on the center of the president’s back, and squeezed the trigger.

The Makarov misfired.

The Secret Service agent at the president’s shoulder heard the click, spun into a crouch. He registered the scene instantly, drawing his own weapon with razor-edge reflexes.

The Russian tasted failure. He closed his eyes and waited to pay the cost.

It did not come.

He opened his eyes. The Secret Service agent stood before him, presenting his Glock, butt first.

“Here,” the agent said politely. “Use mine. …” [emphasis added]

This assassination fantasy was published just one day before the media exploded with criticism for President Trump’s rhetoric after a series of apparent mail bombs sent to many Democrat political figures Wednesday, including one sent to CNN’s New York office.

Media and entertainment figures fantasizing about the assassination of President Trump has become disturbingly common.

Last year, actor Johnny Depp joked, “When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?” He later apologized. Rapper Rick Ross released a song in 2016 with the lyric, “Assassinate Trump like I’m Zimmerman.”

A Julius Caesar play in Central Park featured the assassination of a faux Donald Trump-figure. And pop star Madonna said at the Women’s March that she had fantasized about “blowing up” the White House.

“Yes, I’m angry. Yes, I’m outraged. Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House, but I know that this won’t change anything,” she said.

And the left’s violent fantasies are not limited to Trump–anyone they disagree with can be targeted.

Republican Sen. Rand Paul, who was at the GOP baseball practice when it was targeted by left-wing mass shooter James Hodgkinson, said that Hodgkinson was screaming, “This is for health care!”

“He also had a list of conservative legislators–Republicans–in his pocket, that he was going to kill,” Paul also said.

Corporate media’s role in this downward slide cannot be ignored, either.

MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace has repeatedly fantasized about violence toward people she disagrees with, previously talking on air about Sarah Sanders getting choked and Trump getting punched in the face.

Further, CNN has excused and whitewashed the violence of Antifa, time and time and time again.

Finally, as Breitbart News has meticulously chronicled, there are several hundred incidents of Trump supporting Americans being targeted for violence, harassment, and intimidation by the left.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Trump Threatens to Treat California Like He’s Treating Mexico, Honduras, El Salvador — Cut Aid


President Donald Trump is proving that he’s not afraid to take a tough stance by threatening to take away federal aid to California in the same way he’s recently threatened to take aid from countries like Honduras and El Salvador.

Last week, Trump threatened to take aid from Central American countries who refused to do anything about the caravan of migrants that was surging toward Mexico and inevitably the United States.

“We have today informed the countries of Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador that if they allow their citizens, or others, to journey through their borders and up to the United States, with the intention of entering our country illegally, all payments made to them will STOP,” Trump tweeted.

TRENDING: Huge: FL Dem Gillum Took FBI Corruption Bait, Used Family as Excuse When Caught

Unfortunately, the caravan was not stopped, but Trump proved he was a man of his word by standing by his tough statement.

“Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador were not able to do the job of stopping people from leaving their country and coming illegally to the U.S.,” Trump tweeted on Monday. “We will now begin cutting off, or substantially reducing, the massive foreign aid routinely given to them.”

Do you agree with Trump’s tough stance on California?

Now Trump is giving California the same treatment — but not because of immigration.

Speaking at Tuesday’s White House State Leadership Conference, Trump brought up California’s mismanagement of its forests, which has led to forest fires.

“We’re tired of giving California hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars all the time for their forest fires, when you wouldn’t have them if they managed their forests properly,” Trump said.

Trump went on to talk about how environmentalists are stopping proper management.

“And the environmentalists are, you know, doing something very bad. They won’t let us take the logs. They won’t let us take the dead trees. It’s all a mess,” Trump said.

RELATED: Massive Anti-Dem Message Written in California Sky

This is a problem the Trump administration has talked about in the past.

Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke criticized “environmentalist terrorist groups” in August.

“We have been held hostage by these environmental terrorist groups that have not allowed public access — that have refused to allow (the) harvest of timber,” Zinke told Breitbart.

Trump said that California may lose federal aid if it doesn’t manage its forests properly.

“So, California, get on the ball. Because we’re not going to hand you any more money. It’s ridiculous, OK?” Trump said.

It’s great that we have a president who will take a tough stance when necessary.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Confirmed: Open Borders Group Behind Illegal Alien Caravan Is Linked to Soros’s Open Society


Confirmed: Open Borders Group Behind Illegal Alien Caravan Is Linked to Soros’s Open Society

Jim Hoft
by Jim Hoft
October 25, 2018


Pueblo Sin Fronteras Facebook page photo

The open borders group behind the illegal alien caravan marching to the US border is funded by several liberal organizations including Soros’s Open Society.

The Pueblo Sin Fronteras (“People Without Borders”) is a project of La Familia Latina Unida, a Chicago, Illinois-based 501(c)(4) illegal immigration advocacy organization formed in 2001 by Elvira Arellano, an activist for immigrants living illegally in the United States.

The group is part of the CARA Coalition and is funded by a number of major left-of-center grantmaking foundations, including the Open Society Foundations, MacArthur Foundation, Ford Foundation, and Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Via Jack Posobiec:

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Explosive Packages a False Flag?


Now the Democrats genuinely get to say “both sides”, with packages containing explosives sent to the Clintons, Eric Holder, George Soros and others conveniently two weeks before a possibly history-changing midterm election. The blame is already being put on those whom Hillary called “deplorables” and a package sent to CNN will be blamed on President Trump for those “CNN sucks” chants at Trump rallies.


Somehow it is all too convenient, this “October surprise”. None of the named targets were really in danger, although others could have been hurt touching, picking up, or opening a package.  The same could not be said when a Bernie Sanders supporter showed up at a baseball field in Alexandria determined to kill Republicans.



Back then we weren’t supposed to link that individual with the rhetoric of Sanders and other Democrats who warned that if the Republican agenda was enacted, millions would die.


As the liberals rise up in righteous condemnation of Trump’s “toxic” rhetoric, we will be asked to forget Rep. Maxine Waters’ call for nonstop harassment of GOP players, of key Republicans being hounded out of restaurants, confronted in elevators and even in their offices and at their homes. We will be asked to forget the violent riots on college campuses to keep conservative speakers from speaking.


A package was delivered to Eric Holder, who recently spoke of the virtues of a well-placed foot in the marketplace of ideas:


“Michelle [Obama] always says ‘When they go low, we go high,'” Holder told the crowd. “No. No. When they go low, we kick them,” Holder said at a campaign event for Georgia Democratic gubernatorial nominee Stacey Abrams in October.


Another package was delivered to the home of Hillary Clinton, whose non-toxic rhetoric included her famous “deplorable” remark, which arguably cost her the 2016 election along with the failure to obtain a Wisconsin highway map:


Addressing the issue of Trump’s popularity, Clinton said: “To just be grossly generalistic, you can put half of Trump supporters into what I call the ‘basket of deplorables.’ Right? Racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it…


She continued: “Now some of those folks, they are irredeemable, but they are not America but the other basket… are people who feel that government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures.


Hillary recently provided a timeline for a return to civility, namely when Democrats are in power and control everything:


“I would love to see us return to civility,” Hillary Clinton told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour on Tuesday. Unfortunately, she added, that won’t be possible until the Democrats return to power. “You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about,” she said. “That’s why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and/or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again.”


Of course, rhetoric does not justify a response with explosive violence, yet, as noted, for a so-called domestic terrorist attack, this scattering of suspicious packages seems too lame, too ineffective, too conveniently timed and doesn’t really pass the smell test, at least according to Rush Limbaugh:


Mrs. Clinton, it’s your party, forgive me, that is encouraging this kind of thing. It is the Democrat Party that’s home to all of these mobs. It’s the Democrat Party — Mrs. Clinton herself who said that being uncivil at this point in time is entirely proper and understandable. It’s — the time to go back to civility will be after the Democrats win. You’ve got bought and paid for operatives by Mrs. Clinton money showing up at Trump rallies trying to make them look like deranged Trump supporters. The Democrats are even paying people to draw swastikas on American flags and waving them around, made to look like deranged, lunatic Trump supporters.


And so, in the midst of this atmosphere, we have this series of bombs that were supposedly sent today, exclusively to Democrats. And it just — there’s a smell test that this stuff has to pass, and, so far, a lot of people’s noses are in the air, not quite certain of what to make of this. This is just — it’s not Republicans that show up, for example, at the offices of the Family — what is it, some pro-life group’s offices, some guy shows up with a gun and was going to shoot people, got caught before he was able to shoot anyone, Family Research Center (sic) I think, yeah.


Republicans just don’t do this kind of thing. Even though every event, like mass shootings, remember, every mass shooting there is, the Democrats in the media try to make everybody think right off the bat that some tea partier did it, or some talk radio fan did it, or some Fox News viewer did it. Turns out, it’s never, ever the case. Not one of these bombs went off. And if a Democrat operative’s purpose here is to make it look like, hey, you know, there are mobs everywhere, the mobs are not just Democrat mobs. I mean, look at this, you’ve got people here trying to harm CNN, and Obama, and Hillary and Bill Clinton, and Debbie blabbermouth Schultz. It just — it might serve a purpose here.


Indeed it does. It’s called a “false flag” — doing a terrible thing yourself in a way your opponent will be blamed for.


The Democrat’s genuinely toxic rhetoric had real consequences and if it were not for the fact that Scalise, as a member of the House leadership, was assigned a security detail, perhaps dozens of GOP congressmen would have been slaughtered by a deranged Democrat.


We cannot and should not forget that it was a Bernie Sanders supporter, inspired by what Illinois Republican Congressman Rodney Davis called “political rhetorical terrorism”, that inspired the leftist loon who set out to assassinate Republicans practicing for the charity  game.


Bernie Sanders rightly and correctly disavowed the crimes of a volunteer whose actions he could not envision or control. Yet he and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi have spent the time since President Trump’s reelection yelling fire in the political theater we call democracy, warning endlessly that people will die because of the Trump agenda, painting apocalyptic visions of planetary doom. With them claiming the Republican agenda is dooming the sick, the elderly, and the planet itself, was it so surprising that another liberal infused with the left’s messianic complex, would try to save us all by killing Republicans trying to implement Trump’s America First agenda?


Pelosi especially should remember her own words as reported by the Washington Examiner:


With less than one week until Obamacare enrollment concludes, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi used congressional Democrats’ inaugural weekly address to warn of the catastrophic effects repealing the law would have on the public. Tragically, repeal of the Affordable Care Act will lead to death, disability and suffering.


Imagine that. Quite a call to arms for the assassination of the Congressional leaders who would impose “death, disability, and suffering” on the American people.  Similarly, Bernie Sanders can disavow the shooter, but he can’t disavow his own inflammatory rhetoric. As CNN Politics reports:


Sen. Bernie Sanders did not hold anything back Thursday when he condemned the House passage of the Republican-backed bill to replace Obamacare.


“If the bill passed today in the House became law, thousands of Americans would die, because they would no longer have access to health care,” Sanders told CNN’s Anderson Cooper on “AC360.”


The Arlington shooter no doubt saw this as a call to lock and load. And not to be outdone on the “people will die” list of GOP policies decried by Democrats is Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord. As California Gov. Jerry Brown proclaimed:


Thursday on CNN International, Gov. Jerry Brown (D-CA) reacted to President Donald Trump decision to withdraw from the Paris agreement on climate change by calling it a “crazy decision.”


Brown said, “Well immediate reaction is this is a crazy decision. It is against the facts. It is against science. It is against reality itself. We know we have to decarbonize our future. If we don’t, it is a horror. People will die. Habitat will be destroyed. Seas will rise. Insects will spread in areas they never have before.


Somehow shouting “CNN sucks” at a rally while complaining about documented instances of fake news does not compare to constant claims that people will die if you elect Republicans.


The packages may be found to be a real threat from an obviously unbalanced individual or individuals, but it may very well also be a false flag designed to reaffirm the Democrats’ continuous slander against the GOP.


Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications. 










Now the Democrats genuinely get to say “both sides”, with packages containing explosives sent to the Clintons, Eric Holder, George Soros and others conveniently two weeks before a possibly history-changing midterm election. The blame is already being put on those whom Hillary called “deplorables” and a package sent to CNN will be blamed on President Trump for those “CNN sucks” chants at Trump rallies.


Somehow it is all too convenient, this “October surprise”. None of the named targets were really in danger, although others could have been hurt touching, picking up, or opening a package.  The same could not be said when a Bernie Sanders supporter showed up at a baseball field in Alexandria determined to kill Republicans.


Back then we weren’t supposed to link that individual with the rhetoric of Sanders and other Democrats who warned that if the Republican agenda was enacted, millions would die.


As the liberals rise up in righteous condemnation of Trump’s “toxic” rhetoric, we will be asked to forget Rep. Maxine Waters’ call for nonstop harassment of GOP players, of key Republicans being hounded out of restaurants, confronted in elevators and even in their offices and at their homes. We will be asked to forget the violent riots on college campuses to keep conservative speakers from speaking.


A package was delivered to Eric Holder, who recently spoke of the virtues of a well-placed foot in the marketplace of ideas:


“Michelle [Obama] always says ‘When they go low, we go high,'” Holder told the crowd. “No. No. When they go low, we kick them,” Holder said at a campaign event for Georgia Democratic gubernatorial nominee Stacey Abrams in October.


Another package was delivered to the home of Hillary Clinton, whose non-toxic rhetoric included her famous “deplorable” remark, which arguably cost her the 2016 election along with the failure to obtain a Wisconsin highway map:


Addressing the issue of Trump’s popularity, Clinton said: “To just be grossly generalistic, you can put half of Trump supporters into what I call the ‘basket of deplorables.’ Right? Racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it…


She continued: “Now some of those folks, they are irredeemable, but they are not America but the other basket… are people who feel that government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures.


Hillary recently provided a timeline for a return to civility, namely when Democrats are in power and control everything:


“I would love to see us return to civility,” Hillary Clinton told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour on Tuesday. Unfortunately, she added, that won’t be possible until the Democrats return to power. “You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about,” she said. “That’s why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and/or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again.”


Of course, rhetoric does not justify a response with explosive violence, yet, as noted, for a so-called domestic terrorist attack, this scattering of suspicious packages seems too lame, too ineffective, too conveniently timed and doesn’t really pass the smell test, at least according to Rush Limbaugh:


Mrs. Clinton, it’s your party, forgive me, that is encouraging this kind of thing. It is the Democrat Party that’s home to all of these mobs. It’s the Democrat Party — Mrs. Clinton herself who said that being uncivil at this point in time is entirely proper and understandable. It’s — the time to go back to civility will be after the Democrats win. You’ve got bought and paid for operatives by Mrs. Clinton money showing up at Trump rallies trying to make them look like deranged Trump supporters. The Democrats are even paying people to draw swastikas on American flags and waving them around, made to look like deranged, lunatic Trump supporters.


And so, in the midst of this atmosphere, we have this series of bombs that were supposedly sent today, exclusively to Democrats. And it just — there’s a smell test that this stuff has to pass, and, so far, a lot of people’s noses are in the air, not quite certain of what to make of this. This is just — it’s not Republicans that show up, for example, at the offices of the Family — what is it, some pro-life group’s offices, some guy shows up with a gun and was going to shoot people, got caught before he was able to shoot anyone, Family Research Center (sic) I think, yeah.


Republicans just don’t do this kind of thing. Even though every event, like mass shootings, remember, every mass shooting there is, the Democrats in the media try to make everybody think right off the bat that some tea partier did it, or some talk radio fan did it, or some Fox News viewer did it. Turns out, it’s never, ever the case. Not one of these bombs went off. And if a Democrat operative’s purpose here is to make it look like, hey, you know, there are mobs everywhere, the mobs are not just Democrat mobs. I mean, look at this, you’ve got people here trying to harm CNN, and Obama, and Hillary and Bill Clinton, and Debbie blabbermouth Schultz. It just — it might serve a purpose here.


Indeed it does. It’s called a “false flag” — doing a terrible thing yourself in a way your opponent will be blamed for.


The Democrat’s genuinely toxic rhetoric had real consequences and if it were not for the fact that Scalise, as a member of the House leadership, was assigned a security detail, perhaps dozens of GOP congressmen would have been slaughtered by a deranged Democrat.


We cannot and should not forget that it was a Bernie Sanders supporter, inspired by what Illinois Republican Congressman Rodney Davis called “political rhetorical terrorism”, that inspired the leftist loon who set out to assassinate Republicans practicing for the charity  game.


Bernie Sanders rightly and correctly disavowed the crimes of a volunteer whose actions he could not envision or control. Yet he and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi have spent the time since President Trump’s reelection yelling fire in the political theater we call democracy, warning endlessly that people will die because of the Trump agenda, painting apocalyptic visions of planetary doom. With them claiming the Republican agenda is dooming the sick, the elderly, and the planet itself, was it so surprising that another liberal infused with the left’s messianic complex, would try to save us all by killing Republicans trying to implement Trump’s America First agenda?


Pelosi especially should remember her own words as reported by the Washington Examiner:


With less than one week until Obamacare enrollment concludes, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi used congressional Democrats’ inaugural weekly address to warn of the catastrophic effects repealing the law would have on the public. Tragically, repeal of the Affordable Care Act will lead to death, disability and suffering.


Imagine that. Quite a call to arms for the assassination of the Congressional leaders who would impose “death, disability, and suffering” on the American people.  Similarly, Bernie Sanders can disavow the shooter, but he can’t disavow his own inflammatory rhetoric. As CNN Politics reports:


Sen. Bernie Sanders did not hold anything back Thursday when he condemned the House passage of the Republican-backed bill to replace Obamacare.


“If the bill passed today in the House became law, thousands of Americans would die, because they would no longer have access to health care,” Sanders told CNN’s Anderson Cooper on “AC360.”


The Arlington shooter no doubt saw this as a call to lock and load. And not to be outdone on the “people will die” list of GOP policies decried by Democrats is Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord. As California Gov. Jerry Brown proclaimed:


Thursday on CNN International, Gov. Jerry Brown (D-CA) reacted to President Donald Trump decision to withdraw from the Paris agreement on climate change by calling it a “crazy decision.”


Brown said, “Well immediate reaction is this is a crazy decision. It is against the facts. It is against science. It is against reality itself. We know we have to decarbonize our future. If we don’t, it is a horror. People will die. Habitat will be destroyed. Seas will rise. Insects will spread in areas they never have before.


Somehow shouting “CNN sucks” at a rally while complaining about documented instances of fake news does not compare to constant claims that people will die if you elect Republicans.


The packages may be found to be a real threat from an obviously unbalanced individual or individuals, but it may very well also be a false flag designed to reaffirm the Democrats’ continuous slander against the GOP.


Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications. 




via American Thinker

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/

Breaking: US military to deploy to southern border to confront caravan


NARRATOR: It wasn’t a bluff. Donald Trump had threatened to send the military to close the border when the immigrant “caravan” first formed in Honduras and Guatemala. Earlier this morning, he reiterated his warning:

Sure enough, the order went out — although for the moment, it doesn’t exactly look like a militarization of the border:

Hundreds of U.S. troops are set to make their way to the southern border to help Homeland Security and the National Guard as a caravan with thousands of migrants moves north, a U.S. official confirmed to Fox News on Thursday.

The official said roughly 800 soldiers will be sent to the area to offer “logistical support,” including providing tents and vehicles.

It’s not immediately clear which units are being tasked with the mission as details are still being finalized.

Defense Secretary James Mattis could sign the deployment orders as soon as today.

Eight hundred soldiers? The southern border between the US and Mexico runs for 1,954 miles. That works out to one soldier every 2.5 miles or so, which isn’t exactly an impassable barrier. For comparison, the Punitive Expedition a century ago involved 10,000 troops under General John Pershing to stop the forces of Pancho Villa from raiding American towns. Villa at the time had about 500 men at arms under his command, although Pershing eventually ran up against regular Mexican forces of about 22,000. Pershing managed to put a stop to the raids after almost a year in the field, but he never succeeded in capturing Villa.

The Border Patrol has just under 20,000 agents already, of course, but they’re also stretched across nearly 2,000 miles of border, too. An additional 800 military personnel — added to the 2100 National Guard soldiers already deployed to the border — will certainly help free some of those up from logistical duties to help with enforcement. However, it’s not a game changer, or nearly enough to close the border.

As a demonstration of political will, however, it will suffice, at least in the short run. Trump understands that voters expect action from a chief executive, and thus he’s giving them what they want. Trump wants to show that he takes border control seriously, and to demonstrate that Democrats don’t. A president has lots of opportunities to make that argument, and it helps when Democrats try to ignore the problem altogether.

David Leonhardt argued in the New York Times yesterday that Democrats are leaving that door wide open by failing to address the issues the caravans raise:

For the most part, Democrats have tried to avoid the issue. Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leaders in Congress, have essentially urged their colleagues to ignore it. “The president is desperate to change the subject from health care to immigration because he knows that health care is the number one issue Americans care about,” they said in a statement over the weekend. “Democrats are focused like a laser on health care and will not be diverted.”

This strikes me as wishful thinking. The caravan is a huge story. It led the NBC Nightly News broadcast yesterday, to take one example. Politicians in the final two weeks of a campaign can’t persuade people to ignore a huge story.

The smarter approach for Democrats would be a few simple statements of the obvious, meant to display both realism and decency, along the lines of: This is a country of laws. We are not going to admit thousands of undocumented immigrants traveling in a caravan. We do not have open borders. But we are and have always been a country of compassion as well, and we are working with Mexican authorities to protect the safety of these men, women and children.

The problem with ignoring the issue is that it plays into the Republicans’ midterm strategy. It makes Democrats sound squishy and insecure on immigration. It makes it sound as if Democrats aren’t really sure whether they believe that this country should have immigration laws.

That’s a gift to Republicans. It offers a reason for some dissatisfied Trump voters from 2016 to forget about their dissatisfaction and vote Republican again this year.

Why don’t Democrats follow Leonhardt’s advice? Maybe it’s because Democrats really have become the party of open borders, and they have every intention of admitting the caravan. That’s certainly been the drift of their policies over the last few years, refusing to limit DACA to current recipients in exchange for normalizing them, and refusing to build a wall that Congress authorized on a bipartisan vote in 2006.

So yes, it’s a gift to Republicans. And Trump is taking advantage of it, but in the least provocative way possible. At this scale, it’s no game-changer.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com