Cruz, Rubio Push School Security Funding Bill


conceal 1

Firearm instructor holds handgun up as he teaches concealed-weapons training class to Utah teachers / Getty

BY:

Republican senators Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Ted Cruz (Tex.) introduced a bill designed to harden schools against potential attackers on Friday.

The legislation, named the School Security Enhancement Act, would ensure local schools are able to use federal Student Support and Academic Enrichment grants for school security projects. It would allow that federal grant money to be spent on hiring school safety officers, upgrading school security infrastructure, and upgrading school communications systems. It would apply to measures like installing bulletproof doors and windows, limiting access to school grounds, the use of metal detectors, and infrastructure to provide cover and concealment to students in the event of an attack.

“I’m proud to join Senator Cruz in introducing the School Security Enhancement Act,” Rubio said. “This legislation will give schools the option to improve security by using federal funds for measures such as hiring security officers, implementing technology and reinforcing safety equipment to respond to a potential crisis. I am steadfast in supporting measures that keep our schools safe and prevent tragedy.”

Cruz said the bill was an example of a real-world solution to a serious threat.

“Texas has not been exempt from the horror of school shootings,” Cruz said. “All of us have been horrified by the violent attacks on our students. These students, along with parents, local school boards, teachers, and communities across the country want a solution. Much like the majority of Texans, I believe the number one thing that makes schools safer is having more armed police officers on campuses. Expanding the use of these grants will empower our community leaders and education officials with the resources they need to strengthen our schools, hire school safety officers, and keep our children safe.”

The bill is a follow up to the Stop School Violence Act that Congress passed in May 2018 as part of omnibus legislation. That law provides another set of federal funding grants to implement many of the same school safety measures as well as funding for crisis intervention programs and funding to increase cooperation between school districts and local law enforcement. It was signed into law by President Trump the same month.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://freebeacon.com

Think Progress Editor Tweets Republicans Should Be Confronted In Their Homes. Shapiro Issues One Hell Of A Warning.

On Friday, Ian Millhiser, justice editor at the hard-left site Think Progress, who got his law degree from Duke University, decided to wax militant regarding Republicans, tweeting they should be confronted not only where they eat, but in their own bedrooms:

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Powerful Image Shows Army Vet Hanging American Flag Over Floodwaters


USA, USA.

Via WBTV:

It is said a picture can speak a thousand words, and we can think of a few for this powerful image.

Strength. Resilience. Freedom. Pride. Inspiring. America. Service.

These all come to mind when first looking at the image of a man on a kayak in flooded streets holding an American flag.

The moment captured by Laura Boehm shows her husband Todd Boehm, who served in the Army for 23 years before retiring, honoring the star-spangled banner.

Laura said as they were kayaking through the flooded streets on Rosewood Drive to check on their home, her husband noticed an American flag touching the water.

“We couldn’t let it fall,” Laura said.

Without hesitating, he paddled over to where the flag hung and adjusted it so it could continue to wave in the breeze over the devastation left behind by Florence.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

WALSH: The Real Reason Why Democrats Want An FBI Investigation Into Brett Kavanaugh

Jeff Flake flaked out and caved to the Democratic demand for an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh. There is a reason why Democrats so desperately want this investigation, and, like everything else they say, it has nothing to do with getting to the truth.
If Democrats were interested in the truth, they wouldn’t have held onto these allegations until the last minute.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Dennis Prager: ‘YouTube Is Misleading the Public’


YouTube is cracking down on conservatives content, according to one prominent conservative.

In a radio interview with The Jewish Press, PragerU’s founder and president, Dennis Prager, explained how big tech has censored PragerU. Prager attributed it to the left’s definition of “hate speech,” saying that “Leftists — unlike liberals — do not believe in free speech for speech they differ with.” Prager also said that there “was little rhyme or reason” for YouTube and Facebook to censor, restrict, and delete PragerU’s video content.

PragerU has been embroiled in a lawsuit with YouTube alleging that the company was putting PragerU’s videos in restricted mode. Recently, PragerU discovered that Facebook was deleting and blocking nine of its videos. Facebook claimed that the censorship was “a mistake.”  

Dennis Prager told The Jewish Press, “YouTube seems to target: a) videos that defend America; b) videos that defend Israel; c) videos that criticize the Islamic world; and d) videos that make the case for God and religion.” Prager also accused YouTube of “misleading the public” because the platform markets itself as an “open forum.”

YouTube has put dozens of PragerU’s videos under a restricted filter, meaning that if someone put a filter on their YouTube feed, the videos disappeared. Facebook, however, had a much bigger problem: PragerU’s videos were flagged as “hate speech” by users, then a Facebook employee moved the entire page into a “feature block.”

In reference to PragerU’s lawsuit, Prager said, “If Google, the owner of YouTube, would announce it is a left-wing advocacy group, that would make a lawsuit harder to defend.” YouTube’s sister organization, Google, was just on the Hill today meeting with conservatives to address issues of bias against the right.

 

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

Armed Leftists Call for Mass Violence if Brett Kavanaugh Confirmed to SCOTUS


Armed Leftists Call for Mass Violence if Brett Kavanaugh Confirmed to SCOTUS

Jim Hoft
by Jim Hoft
September 28, 2018

Far left activists are already plotting their next move if Judge Brett Kavanaugh is confirmed to the Supreme Court.

Following yesterday’s Judiciary Committee hearings, prominent activist Emily G called for a violent general strike if Judge Kavanaugh is confirmed.

Accordiing to Far Left Watch
Emily G is no random leftist kook. She is one of 3,641 people followed by Twitter CEO, Jack Dorsey and one of 503 people followed by the Southern Poverty Law Center‘s “Hate Watch” account.

On Thursday leftists on Twitter began discussing the need for a “violent general strike” if he were to be confirmed. This comes just days after a violent antifa group confronted Senator Ted Cruz and his family at a restaurant and then made credible threats against the lives of Senator Cruz, Judge Kavanaugh, President Trump, and others from their Twitter and Facebook accounts.

The original Twitter thread (archived here) came from Data Scientist and left-wing activist, Emily Gorcenski.

Read more on the left’s plans for violence at Far Left Watch.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

Announcement: We have disabled the ability to post graphics after experiencing an attack of inappropriate image spam over the last several days. Thanks for your understanding.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Must See=> Updated Timeline of Christine Blasey Ford’s Contacts with Democrats

Judge Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford first reportedly contacted Democratic lawmakers on July 6th.

Since then there have been several communications between Ford and leading Democrats.

Here is the latest timeline of Christine Ford’s numerous contacts with Democrats.

UPDATED TIMELINE OF CHRISTINE FORD’S CONTACTS WITH DEMOCRATS

The information below is from the charts listed above with the links to the sources.

 

The post Must See=> Updated Timeline of Christine Blasey Ford’s Contacts with Democrats appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Date Event Description/Notes Citation
July 6 Ford speaks with Eshoo’s staff. Ford called Eshoo’s office and requested a meeting. A staffer spoke with Ford in advance of the meeting.

 

In her letter to Feinstein, Ford wrote, “On July 6 I notified my local government representative to ask them how to proceed . . . .”

Casey Tolan, Congresswoman Anna Eshoo First To Hear Blasey Ford’s Story: ‘I Told Her I Believed Her, Mercury News (Sep. 18, 2018), https://‌www.mercurynews.com/‌2018/‌09/18/christine-blasey-ford-first-meeting-anna-eshoo-brett-kavanaugh/; Read the Letter Christine Blasey Ford Sent Accusing Brett Kavanaugh of Sexual Misconduct, CNN (Sep. 17, 2018), https://www.cnn.com/‌2018/‌09/‌16/‌politics/blasey-ford-kavanaugh-letter-feinstein/index.html.
Ford texts the Washington Post tipline using What’s App. Produced documents
July 9 Ford speaks with Eschoo’s staff on the phone. Transcript
July 10 Ford contacts the Washington Post again. “Been advised to contact senators or NYT. Haven’t heard back from WaPo.” Produced documents
At some point between July 10 and September 16 Ford speaks with Emma Brown, a Washington Post reporter. Transcript
July 18 Ford meets with Eschoo’s staff. Transcript
July 20 Ford speaks with Eshoo. Ford and Eshoo met for “more than an hour and half” in a “conference room.” Eshoo suggested that she write a letter detailing her claims to Senator Feinstein. Casey Tolan, Congresswoman Anna Eshoo First To Hear Blasey Ford’s Story: ‘I Told Her I Believed Her, Mercury News (Sep. 18, 2018), https://www.mercurynews.com/‌2018/‌09/‌18/‌christine-blasey-ford-first-meeting-anna-eshoo-brett-kavanaugh/.
July 30 The letter, dated July 30, is delivered to Feinstein’s D.C. office. “Eshoo said she hasn’t met with the professor since that July afternoon, although her staff has been in contact with her since she came forward.” Casey Tolan, Congresswoman Anna Eshoo First To Hear Blasey Ford’s Story: ‘I Told Her I Believed Her, Mercury News (Sep. 18, 2018), https://‌www.‌mercurynews.com/‌2018/‌09/‌18/christine-blasey-ford-first-meeting-anna-eshoo-brett-kavanaugh/.
Between July 30 and August 7 Ford speaks by phone with Senator Feinstein. Transcript
After July 30 Ford speaks with Feinstein’s staff, who recommends that she engage Debra Katz. Transcript
August 7 Ford takes a polygraph test after she engages Katz. Ford took a polygraph test administered by a former FBI agent. Katz provided the results to the Washington Post. They showed that she “was being truthful when she said a statement summarizing her allegations was accurate.” Emma Brown, California Professor, Writer of Confidential Brett Kavanaugh Letter, Speaks Out About Her Allegation of Sexual Assault, Washington Post (Sep. 16, 2018), https://‌www.‌washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html.
August 20 Feinstein meets one-on-one with Kavanaugh.   Michael Macagnone & Jimmy Hoover, Kavanaugh Meets Top Senate Dem Opposing His Confirmation, Law360 (Aug. 20, 2018), https://www.law360.com/‌articles/1075169/kavanaugh-meets-top-senate-dem-opposing-his-confirmation.
August 28 Feinstein’s staff participates in the first Background Investigation (BI) call. Phil and Gab from Feinstein’s staff participated on the call. Committee records
September 4-7 SJC holds a public hearing on Kavanaugh’s nomination.   Committee records
September 6 SJC gives Senators an opportunity to question Kavanaugh at a closed session.   Committee records
September 12 The Intercept reports that SJC Democrats have requested to view a “Kavanaugh-related document” in the possession of Feinstein The article reported that a letter in the possession of Feinstein “purportedly describe[d] an incident that was relayed to someone affiliated with Stanford University, who authored the letter and sent it to Rep. Anna Eshoo, a Democrat who represents the area.” Ryan Grim, Dianne Feinstein Withholding Brett Kavanaugh Document From Fellow Judiciary Committee Democrats, Intercept (Sep. 12, 2018), https://theintercept.‌com/‌2018/‌09/‌12/‌brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-dianne-feinstein/.
September 13 Feinstein refers the letter to the FBI.   Burgess Everett & Edward-Isaac Dovere, Feinstein Asks Feds To Investigate Kavanaugh Claims in Letter, Politico (Sep. 30, 2018), https://www.politico.com/‌story/‌2018/09/13/‌feinstein-kavanaugh-investigation-letter-822902
September 14 The New Yorker reports on an interview with Ford but does not identify her by name. The article described the incident in detail. Ronan Farrow & Jane Mayer, A Sexual-Misconduct Allegation Against the Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh Stirs Tension Among Democrats in Congress, New Yorker (Sep. 14, 2018), https://www.newyorker.‌com/‌news/news-desk/a-sexual-misconduct-allegation-against-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaugh-stirs-tension-among-democrats-in-congress.
September 16 The Washington Post reports on an interview with Ford. The article described the incident in detail. Emma Brown, California Professor, Writer of Confidential Brett Kavanaugh Letter, Speaks Out About Her Allegation of Sexual Assault, Washington Post (Sep. 16, 2018), https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html.
September 17 SJC has a follow-up BI call with Kavanaugh on the Ford letter. Feinstein does not participate. Feinstein’s staff did not show up. Committee records
September 25 SJC speaks with Kavanaugh about the allegations against him. Feinstein’s staff declared that they were present “under protest” and did not participate. Committee records
September 26 SJC speaks with Judge Kavanaugh about the allegations against him. Feinstein’s staff declared that they were present “under protest” and did not participate. Committee records

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

After Using Her, Feinstein Actually Threw Ford Under the Bus with Jaw-Dropping Accusation


If you had the stout constitution to sit through every moment of the Kavanaugh/Ford hearings Thursday, I’m both envious and curious. The envy stems from the fact that you could watch a room of craven politicians preen for the camera and donor-email clips and not lose interest. The curiosity stems from the fact that I get paid to do it, while most of our readership does not.

If you waited until the end, however, you got to glimpse the guiding spirit of the whole affair — or what a certain anonymous Op-Ed writer might have called the “lodestar” that directed the proceedings — in a line from Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

After being accused of leaking the letter that set this whole thing rolling, the California senator denied either she or her staff released it. Instead, she blamed the leak on a woman who was now utterly disposable to her — Christine Blasey Ford.

The exchange began after Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz questioned the leaking of the letter, which had been passed on to Sen. Feinstein.

TRENDING: Panicking NYT Deletes Source Name, Caught Hiding Game-Changing Facts on Kavanaugh

“We also know that the Democrats on this committee engaged in a profoundly unfair process,” Cruz said.

“The ranking member had these allegations on July 30th and for sixty days, that was sixty days ago, the ranking member did not refer it to the FBI for investigation, the ranking member did not refer it to the full committee for an investigation.

“This committee could have investigated those claims in a confidential way that respected Dr. Ford’s privacy,” Cruz continued.

“Dr. Ford told this committee that the only people to whom she gave her letter, were her attorneys, the ranking member, and her member of Congress.

Do you think Dianne Feinstein bears responsibility for the circus we saw Thursday?

“And she stated that she and her attorneys did not release the letter, which means the only people who could have released the letter were either the ranking member (Sen. Feinstein) and her staff, or the Democratic member of Congress, because Dr. Ford told this committee those are the only people who had it.

“That is not a fair process,” Cruz said.

There were two options for Sen. Feinstein in this situation: a) apologize or b) deny. If she chose option b), however, there wasn’t the obligation to take path c): throw Christine Blasey Ford under an entire Greyhound station of buses.

That’s what she decided to do, however.

“Mr. Chairman, let me be clear, I did not hide Dr. Ford’s allegations. I did not leak her story, she asked me to keep it confidential and I kept if confidential as she asked,” Feinstein said in response.

RELATED: Orrin Hatch and Lindsey Graham Deliver Proof That Dems Orchestrated Kavanaugh Hit Job

“She apparently was stalked by the press, felt that what happened, she was forced to come forward, and her greatest fear was realized,” Feinstein continued.

“She’s been harassed, she’s had death threats, and she’s had to flee her home.”

After blaming the Republicans for their investigation, which she called “a partisan practice,” she continued to talk up the possible imperilment Ford was in.

“I was given some information by a woman who was very much afraid, who asked that it be held confidential, and I held it confidential until she decided that she would come forward,” Feinstein said.

She was then asked if her staff had leaked the letter by Sen. John Cornyn, another Texas Republican.

“I have not asked that question directly, but I do not believe — the answer is no,” Feinstein responded. “The staff, they did not.”

“Well, somebody leaked it if wasn’t you,” Cornyn said.

“I did not, I was asked to keep it confidential, and I’m criticized for that too!” she said.

“It’s my understanding that her story was leaked before the letter became public, and she testified that she had spoken to her friends about it and it’s most likely that that’s how the story leaked, and she had been asked by press.

“But it did not leak from us,” Feinstein concluded. “I assure you of that.”

Yes, the letter leaked because this woman, who thought she was in grave jeopardy, leaked the whole thing to the press by telling her friends, who were willing to put her in that grave jeopardy by passing it on.

It had nothing — nothing — to do with the Democrats who would have benefited most from this and would have had the motivation to pass it on.

Right.

Every single problem with this entire process can be, in some way, traced back to Dianne Feinstein. She’s the one who sat on the letter, refusing to bring it up when it should have been addressed. She’s the one whose cryptic statements helped stoke the embers of curiosity. She’s the one who would call for an FBI investigation even though the FBI added the letter to Kavanaugh’s background file and moved on. She’s the one who helped oversee the circus we witnessed Thursday.

And, once Christine Blasey Ford was finally disposable to her, she was tossed to the tigers as an encore.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Fiery Huckabee Says Any RINOs Who Vote ‘No’ on Kavanaugh Have ‘Crapped on the Constitution’


In the wake of the Christine Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh hearings on Thursday, former Arkansas governor and political pundit, Mike Huckabee, pointed out that any Republican who voted no on Kavanaugh wasn’t fulfilling their sworn duty.

Well, he put it rather more bluntly: He said they will have “crapped upon the Constitution.”

In a fiery tweet after Thursday’s day-long innuendo festival on Capitol Hill, Huckabee — better known these days as the father of White House press secretary Sarah Sanders — retweeted an equally fiery speech by Lindsey Graham in which he eviscerated Democrats for their treatment of the nominee and the allegations against him.

“These comments by @LindseyGrahamSC will be forever remembered as a seminal moment that defined what Democrats really care about,” Huckabee tweeted.

“And if ANY GOP Senator votes ‘no’ they have crapped on the Constitution and should slither home in disgrace.”

TRENDING: Panicking NYT Deletes Source Name, Caught Hiding Game-Changing Facts on Kavanaugh

Huckabee’s words, surprisingly, weren’t even as perfervid as Graham’s when it came to the Democrats and the RINOs.

“If you wanted a FBI investigation, you could have come to us,” the South Carolina senator said, addressing Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“What you want to do is destroy this guy’s life, hold this seat open and hope you win in 2020. You’ve said that, not me,” he continued.

Do you think the Democrats are a disgrace to our country?

“When you see Sotomayor and Kagan, tell them that Lindsey said hello because I voted for them. I would never do to them what you’ve done to this guy.

“This is the most unethical sham since I’ve been in politics, and if you really wanted to know the truth, you sure as hell wouldn’t have done what you’ve done to this guy,” Graham said.

“Boy, y’all want power. Boy, I hope you never get it. I hope the American people can see through this sham, that you knew about it and you held it.”

“To my Republican colleagues, if you vote no, you’re legitimizing the most despicable thing I have seen in my time in politics. You want this seat? I hope you never get it,” he added.

RELATED: After Using Her, Feinstein Actually Threw Ford Under the Bus with Jaw-Dropping Accusation

Both Huckabee and Graham are fairly reserved when it comes to politicians, which is what makes both of these astounding.

When something gets Graham to go full William Jennings Bryan and Huckabee — a Baptist minister — to talk about Republicans having “crapped on the Constitution,” you can wager it’s something that’s moved them rather strongly.

Kavanaugh and other conservatives can only hope the rest of the party feels the same way.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct