Posted on

BREAKING: Rosenstein Discussed Wearing a Wire in Plot to Take Down Trump — A SECOND TIME


BREAKING: Rosenstein Discussed Wearing a Wire in Plot to Take Down Trump — A SECOND TIME

Jim Hoft
by Jim Hoft
September 21, 2018

As Cristina Laila reported earlier on Friday —

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein last year spoke with DOJ and FBI officials about wearing a wire and secretly recording President Trump to be able to build a case that Trump is unfit to hold office.

DAG Rosenstein began plotting Trump’s removal shortly after FBI Director Comey was fired.

James Comey was fired on May 9th, 2017 and DAG Rosenstein appointed Special Counsel Robert Mueller to investigate Trump-Russia collusion a week later.

Rosenstein has been acting as Attorney General since Jeff Sessions recused himself from his duties after he was sworn in.

Rod Rosenstein denied that the earlier accusations that he was discussing wearing a wire to take down Trump.

Rod Rosenstein signed a FISA warrant to spy on Trump in June 2017.

Rosenstein signed the final FISA Renewal – sometime around June 29, 2017. After Mueller’s appointment as Special Counsel on May 17, 2017.

Now this…

New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt tweeted out late this afternoon the NY Times learned since their breaking report that Rosenstein discussed wearing a wire a SECOND TIME!

Oh my. The New York Times is getting the dirt on Rosenstein from a Lisa Page memo.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

Announcement: We have disabled the ability to post graphics after experiencing an attack of inappropriate image spam over the last several days. Thanks for your understanding.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Posted on

Michigan mom charged with larceny for taking away daughter’s phone as punishment

Jodie May of Grandville, Michigan, was forced to appear before a district judge earlier this week on a larceny charge for taking away her daughter’s cellphone as punishment.

May took the iPhone 6 from her 15-year-old daughter in April after the teenager got in trouble at school, according to reports.

“I was just being a mom, a concerned parent and disciplining my daughter,” May told WOOD-TV.

How did this happen?

What began as discipline became a criminal matter after May’s ex-husband reported it to Ottawa County Sheriff’s Office and claimed she committed a crime.

After the mom’s arrest in May, she was immediately released on $200 bond. May was facing a misdemeanor larceny charge, which carries a punishment of up to 93 days in jail, the TV station reported.

Shortly before the bench trial began on Tuesday before Ottawa County District Judge Judy Mulder, prosecutors added another charge to the case: larceny by conversion. That charge was also punishable by up to 93 days, according to the report.

But before the first witness was called, yet another twist was added.

“I’ve had an opportunity to discuss this case with the victim in this case, or at least the person we believed owned the property,” Ottawa County assistant prosecutor Sarah Matwiejczyk told the judge.

The prosecutor said she determined the phone is in fact owned by the daughter, not the ex-husband.

“The mother defendant being the mother of the minor child, I believe that changes the case significantly,” Matwiejczyk reportedly said. “Therefore, we’re requesting that the charges be dismissed.”

How did the mom react?

May called the entire situation “ridiculous.”

“I think it’s ridiculous,” May told the TV station. “I can’t believe I had to be put through it, my daughter had to be put through it, my family. I’m very surprised, but I’m very happy with the outcome.”

May’s court-appointed attorney, Jennifer Kuiper-Weise, said she was ready for a court battle.

“We knew this was parental discipline,” said Kuiper-Weise, a former assistant prosecutor in Ottawa County. “We knew that it would come across that way.”

She also questioned why the charges were ever filed.

“The case was authorized on a probable-cause basis, and unfortunately at times there are misdemeanor cases that are not thoroughly vetted, and unfortunately Miss May was a victim of that,” Kuiper-Weise told WOOD.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com

Posted on

Wanna See How Fast Democrats Flipped Over Kavanaugh Accuser Hearing?


When Christine Blasey Ford made an unfounded accusation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her sometime in the 1980’s, the Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee immediately tried to set up a hearing for her to tell her story. Initially Senate democrats also favored a hearing, but because the only point of Ford’s accusation is to delay and untimely terminate Kavanaugh’s nomination, they have flipped faster that a sizzling burger on a McDonald’s grill.

Here’s a perfect example of just how full of shit democrats are. On Monday Illinois Senator Dick Durbin said this about a hearing for Christine Blasey Ford:

“I think [a public hearing is] the only way to go at this point. She has agreed to do it and it’s going to be very difficult, otherwise, to satisfy all the different things that have been said, contradictory things, as you noted, between judge Kavanaugh and Dr. Ford,” said Durbin.

By Wednesday, this was Durbin’s take on a hearing:

On Monday New York Senator Kristen Gillibrand was all for a hearing:

“I’m hopeful the Senate will at least have some measure of review, maybe a hearing, some measure of analysis of this accusation, and have some measure of clarity on whether this is disqualifying. I believe it is disqualifying, given what we know,” said Gillibrand.

Sure, Gillibrand has already convicted Kavanaugh, but she was at least in favor of a hearing. But that was so Monday because by Wednesday she was attacking Republicans for scheduling a hearing.

On Tuesday Delaware Senator Chris Coons was in favor of a hearing for Ford to testify:

“It is my hope that the Senate Judiciary Committee will demonstrate that we are today capable of treating an alleged victim of sexual assault with the respect and thoroughness that her allegations deserve. It is important that this hearing be informed first by experts,” said Coons.

But by Wednesday he was all…

On Monday Hawaii Senator Mazie Hirono was expecting a good hearing with Ford and Kavanaugh:

“I expect to have both witnesses come if they are willing to – and they both have expressed their willingness – and that everyone should be heard,” said Hirono.

On Wednesday Hirono was decidedly against any kind of hearing, calling Republican’s efforts to set it up “bullshit.”

Obviously whatever Republicans want, democrats will oppose and the GOP should use this to their advantage. They should call for a full FBI investigation into the allegations and put Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote on hold indefinitely. At that point democrats will call the FBI investigation an attempt to bully Christine Blasey Ford and immediately vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh. Democrats are insane but predictable.

Follow Brian Anderson on Twitter

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com