Acosta’s Integrity Scorched by Fed-Up Former MSNBC Host


Breaking what is generally regarded as a cardinal rule of journalism — if perhaps unwritten — CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta has made himself the center of the story on multiple occasions this week instead of simply reporting the story in an objective manner.

Townhall noted that Acosta became the central story on Tuesday after he attempted to cover President Donald Trump’s rally in Tampa, Florida, but was confronted by a crowd of Trump supporters who loudly chanted “CNN sucks” and “fake news” — among other things — while he delivered a live report ahead of the rally.

Acosta became the center of attention again on Thursday when he clashed with White House press secretary Sarah Sanders during the daily briefing over his indignant insistence that she retract statements from the president that labelled some individuals and outlets in the “fake news” media as being “enemies of the people,” which Sanders declined to do.

He later claimed in a tweet to have left the briefing early because he was “saddened” by Sanders not saying what he wanted her to say, but it appears that at least one veteran member of the mainstream media has had enough of Acosta’s “antics,” and let him know via social media.

TRENDING: Antifa Says Time for Direct Confrontation, Worse They Say ‘Bring…Guns’

Long-time journalist David Schuster tweeted, “Hey Jim @acosta, the job of a true journalist is not to be sad or happy by what happens in a press briefing room. It is to ask questions and report facts about what was said/not said. Your feelings, antics, + self promotion are hurting journalism, not helping it. Enough.”

Schuster, an Emmy Award-winning veteran investigative journalist and anchor who has worked with CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, Current TV and even Al Jazeera-America, is currently the managing editor of i24 News in America, and certainly knows what he is talking about.

While there were many who agreed with Schuster’s take on Acosta’s behavior in the comments, there were also plenty who defended the CNN reporter as some righteous American warrior fighting for the truth against the current administration, whose early exit from the briefing was a display of true patriotism. A few of those comments drew a reply from Schuster himself, who insinuated in one response that he is no fan of the administration either, but nevertheless holds journalists to a higher standard than has been seen recently.

Schuster tweeted, “So you think the others who stayed in the briefing room were being un-american? Many journalists are sick of being lied to and insulted. But they have the guts and integrity to stay there, report the facts, + not become part of the story. @acosta gave #trump a victory today.”

Do you agree that Jim Acosta’s “antics” are doing more harm than good for the liberal media?

It would be nice if Acosta — along with his defenders in the media — received this chastisement from an actual journalist with an open mind and took this constructive criticism to heart.

Alas, that appears unlikely at this moment, as Acosta seems to relish the publicity he receives when he becomes the central part of a story instead of merely reporting on a story.

Indeed, Acosta and the handful of other incredibly biased reporters like him in the White House press pool are possibly already planning their next line of insistent questioning about relatively marginal issues for Sanders and other representatives of the administration instead of preparing to ask substantive questions about the economy or policies that have an impact on American citizens.

As such, there is now a renewal of a previous call by former press secretaries — Mike McCurry of the Clinton administration and Ari Fleischer of the Bush administration — to remove the cameras from the daily briefing room in order to lessen the likelihood of confrontational showboating by publicity hounds like Acosta.

RELATED: Always Remember: ‘Down to Earth’ Michelle Had WH Staff Twice as Big as ‘Spoiled’ Melania’s

It remains to be seen if that will ever happen, and until it does or the attention-seekers like Acosta have their White House credentials revoked, scenes like what played out on Thursday are bound to happen again.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Twice Deported Illegal Alien Charged in the Brutal Murder of a Defenseless Woman


The left is busy protesting for Immigration and Customs Enforcement to be completely dismantled … but a disturbing case in New York just confirmed exactly why ICE has an important role to play in law enforcement.

Last week, a woman in New Rochelle, New York was beaten to death and left behind as garbage — literally.

The body of 66-year-old Nurten Seljuk was found on the morning of July 27 in a driveway, covered under a pile of trash. According to WABC TV, the woman’s head was bashed in from serious blunt force trauma.

Now, ICE has confirmed that the suspect behind the brutal murder is an illegal alien from south of the border, who has already been deported from the United States … not once, but twice.

“Jose Olmos-Torres, an illegally present citizen and national of Mexico, was previously removed from the U.S. as an expedited removal on two separate occasions in 2009,” said Rachael Yong Yow, Public Affairs Officer for ICE New York.

TRENDING: Antifa Says Time for Direct Confrontation, Worse They Say ‘Bring…Guns’

“At some point thereafter, Olmos-Torres illegally re-entered the U.S. in violation of immigration law for the third time,” she continued.

That illegal alien has been charged with second-degree murder, which is a “class A” violent felony in New York.

“Olmos murdered Nurten Seljuk in the vicinity of 270 Main St., New Rochelle,” alleged the district attorney who is prosecuting the case. “She died from multiple blunt force trauma injuries.”

For what it’s worth, ICE has also placed a detainer on Olmos-Torres, which will hopefully allow him to be removed from the country after any prison sentence. His trial is still pending.

Do you believe tougher immigration enforcement would help decrease crime?

Whether or not that deportation attempt makes any difference is hard to answer. Despite two previous removals from the United States, the allegedly violent man was still able to cross the border due to lax immigration enforcement and a southern border that is under-protected.

While Democrats call for ICE offices to be “occupied” and others demand that the agency be completely disbanded, they are missing the disturbing reality: Actions have consequences, and ignoring the truth about unchecked immigration leaves citizens like Nurten Seljuk at risk.

This fact is even more important given the ignorance that some liberals have shown about the issue.

Take Democrat Senator Mazie Hirono, for instance: She apparently didn’t even realize that illegal aliens, er, break the law, and are not being arbitrarily rounded up out of spite.

Perhaps she and others on the left would like to explain to the family of the recent murder victim in New York — and the families of countless other people with similar tragic stories — why disbanding ICE for political points is more important to them than keeping unvetted repeat offenders out of the country.

RELATED: Federal Judge Attacks Trump, Rules in Favor of Illegal Aliens

It would be nice if every alien who crossed the border illegally was noble and good, and only wanted to better themselves while staying out of trouble. But reality is not always nice, and the people repeatedly breaking America’s laws are not always model citizens.

Maybe if the voices who call for open borders and almost no enforcement see the very human and often disturbing results of those policies, they would re-think their stance.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

MYSTERY=> FBI Logged Cyber Intrusion Analysis Request to Hillary’s Email Investigation ONE DAY After 2016 Election

On Friday, the FBI released a tranche of documents on Hillary Clinton’s email investigation thanks to a FOIA lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch.

The documents reveal the FBI logged a cyber intrusion analysis request to Hillary’s email investigation one day after the 2016 election–the FBI had already closed the investigation.

Why??

Via researcher Katica: “Why did the FBI log a cyber intrusion analysis request to Hillary’s Email Investigation the day after the 2016 election when the case was closed in July? Part 24, pgs 15-19”

In mid-2016, according to Rep. Louie Gohmert, a government watchdog told Peter Strzok that 30,000 of Hillary Clinton’s emails went to a foreign entity–UNRELATED TO RUSSIA.

Now we find out the FBI logged a cyber intrusion analysis request to Hillary Clinton’s email investigation.

As TGP previously reported:

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX), a member of the House Judiciary Committee, revealed in the hearing with Peter Strzok a couple weeks ago that the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found that nearly all of Hillary Clinton’s 30,000 emails were sent to a foreign entity and the FBI did nothing about it.

The ICIG found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Gohmert said to Strzok during the hearing.

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” Gohmert continued.

Gohmert revealed the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker met Peter Strzok and presented the anomaly to him, yet he did nothing about it.

Peter Strzok only admitted to meeting with Rucker, however he claimed he could not recall “specific content” discussed.

Inspector General Horowitz was also notified about Hillary’s emails going to a foreign entity, however he did nothing about it either.

“Mr. Horowitz got a call four times from someone wanting to brief him about this, and he never returned the call,” Gohmert said.

Watch Gohmert reveal Hillary’s emails went to a foreign entity:

The post MYSTERY=> FBI Logged Cyber Intrusion Analysis Request to Hillary’s Email Investigation ONE DAY After 2016 Election appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Cory Booker Poses For Picture With Group That Endorses Terrorists

Democratic Senator Cory Booker posed for a picture with members of a Palestinian group that approves of terrorists and has endorsed the BDS movement targeting Israel for more than a decade. Booker held up a sign from the US Campaign For Palestinian Rights that read, “From Palestine to Mexico, all the walls have got to go.”

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Facebook post sparks violence in Egypt: Copts suffer

Facebook post sparks violence in Egypt: Copts suffer
In Arab-Muslim countries limited-free speech is the norm due to political and religious constraints. Tunisia and Morocco are not as severe as others. Middle East governments often speak highly of liberty and democracy especially when addressing the West. However, in reality, these regimes are totalitarian and dictatorial.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/

Protesters Blockade ICE Facility In Colorado, Then SWAT Shows Up

Via Daily Caller: A group of protesters in Colorado were arrested Thursday after blocking Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials from entering or leaving its facility in Centennial. The demonstrators had been camped out at the ICE field offices since the previous Sunday when a handful of the protesters stepped up opposition by causing a […]

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel Faces Backlash For Prioritizing Illegal Aliens Over Citiens

Via Daily Caller: Democratic Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel received backlash, on “Fox & Friends” Friday, for favoring illegal immigrants over American citizens. Fox News political analyst Gianno Caldwell attended a Thursday protest in Chicago, where citizens marched against gun violence and demanded Emanuel’s resignation. “Honestly, the residents of Chicago are fed up with Rahm Emanuel’s […]

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Poll: Black Support For Trump Nearly Doubles Since Last Year

Nothing beats seeing the economic results. Via Daily Wire: Rasmussen’s daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday showed a significant spike in support from the black community, nearly doubling President Trump’s support among that demographic from this time last year. Trump hit a 29% approval rating among blacks, up from just 15% in August of 2017. […]

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Dinesh D’Souza: ‘Bigotry’ Is ‘Unifying Glue’ for ‘Progressives and the Democratic Party’


Filmmaker and author Dinesh D’Souza described “bigotry” as a “unifying glue” for “progressives and the Democratic Party” during an interview with Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow on Friday’s edition of SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Daily.

D’Souza discussed his latest book, “Death of a Nation: Plantation Politics and the Making of the Democratic Party,” and its accompanying film of the same name.

LISTEN:

D’Souza explained his latest book and documentary’s shared title and thesis: “The reason we did that title is a hundred years ago, a progressive Democrat, Woodrow Wilson, screened in the White House the movie Birth of a Nation, and the hero of the movie was the Ku Klux Klan. Basically, the progressive Democrats were saying, ‘We don’t like the American founding. Forget about all that. We’re starting the country all over again,’ and I guess it’s the thesis of my book and movie that if that logic is played out, America as we know it will be killed off. Certainly the America of the founding will be extinguished.”

D’Souza commented on the New York Times‘ recent hiring of Sarah Jeong: “The notion that the New York Times would hire a bigoted editorial writer is only surprising if you think that progressivism and the Democratic Party are somehow anti-racist. If you thought they were anti-racist, then this becomes an anomaly. On the other hand, if you actually know the history of progressivism and the Democratic Party, you realize that bigotry has actually been its unifying glue.”

D’Souza added, “I’m not surprised the New York Times hired a bigot. What’s interesting about the Democratic Party is merely that the targets of its bigotry shift, but the bigotry remains constant.”

D’Souza rejected the historically revisionist narrative of a “Southern Strategy”:  “The architect of this alleged switch is supposed to be Richard Nixon, and according to the progressive narrative put out by historians like Kevin Kruse of Princeton and others, basically Nixon went to the deep South, he courted the racists, he won the racist Dixiecrats over to the Republican Party, and so that’s when the parties switched. This narrative is, from start to finish, bogus.”

D’Souza remarked, “The whole notion that the Dixiecrats came over to the Republicans, it is factually, empirically, and logically a big lie.”

D’Souza explained how racial nationalism is a subset of left-wing ideology.

“These white nationalists are all leftists,” claimed D’Souza. “They have a deep background in the left. Jason Kessler, the organizer of the Charlottesville rally, is an Obama supporter. He’s an Occupy Wall Street guy. Now think about this, the idea that an Obama supporter could be quote a white supremacist is fishy on the face of it, and yet the media, which knew this at the time of Charlottesville, suppressed Kessler’s background [and] did not report on it.”

D’Souza described Richard Spencer as the news media’s “poster boy” for “white supremacy,” politically characterizing him as “on the far left.”

D’Souza said, “[Richard Spencer] does not believe that rights belong to individuals. He doesn’t believe that rights come from God. He believes that rights come from the state. He doesn’t think Reagan was a great president. Essentially, all his heroes are Democrats. He’s a Woodrow Wilson progressive from the early twentieth century.”

D’Souza continued, “His only problem is that, in a sense, his racism moves in the wrong direction. See, if he actually hated white people the way [the New York Times’s Sarah Jeong] does, they would love him. His problem is that … he hasn’t kept up with the changing contours of Democratic bigotry. He hates the wrong people.”

D’Souza reflected on parallels between the economic policies of Nazism and contemporary socialists among Democrats.

“What did the Nazis campaign on [in the early 1930s]?” asked D’Souza. “Why did people vote for them? What were they seen as promoting? So the Nazis had this 25-point platform. Most of it is about economics, and they laid it out. Amazingly, when you read through the Nazi platform, point by point by point, yes, there are some points that deal with Jews, but the economic thrust of the platform [was] state control of banks, state control of education, state control of health care, confiscation of war profits, redistribution of income, redistribution of land, and down and down the list you go, and you suddenly realize … this is not a surprise, these were national socialists, and so this is a socialist agenda, and large parts of it are eerily similar to themes that Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, [Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez], all the stuff that they talk about is hauntingly present, right there, in the Nazi 25-point program.”

D’Souza drew parallels between the political climates following the elections of Abraham Lincoln and Donald Trump in explaining the cover of his latest book and the similar poster of his latest film.

“I’m not saying that Trump and Lincoln are the same person,” said D’Souza. “Temperamentally, they’re kind of opposites. Lincoln was brooding. He was philosophical. He was melancholy. Trump is not any of that. But, their situations are actually quite similar.”

D’Souza continued, “In 1860 an outsider, a Republican wins the presidency very narrowly, and the moment he does, all hell breaks loose. The other party, which happens to be the Democratic Party, refuses to accept the results. There was all this craziness going on, and it all hinged on the failure of a major party to accept the results of a lawful election.

D’Souza added, “Here we are again in 2016, and now two years later, the same craziness is going on in this party. The same party, the Democratic party, won’t accept the fact that Trump won a lawful election. THey’re trying to get rid of him by any means necessary. … Will they stop at nothing? Is there a line beyond which they won’t go? We don’t really know.”

Marlow concurred with D’Souza’s analysis: “You really make a pretty apt comparison to the tenor of the country at the time. I really think we could be as divided now as we were at that point; at least close to it. I don’t think we’ve seen a level of division in the country [like this] since the Civil War.”

Follow Robert Kraychik on Twitter.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com