53percenter's Blog

Donald Trump Jr. hit back at actor Peter Fonda late Wednesday morning after the Oscar-nominee publicly called for a mob to kidnap his 12-year-old brother, Barron Trump, and throw him in a cage with pedophiles.

“You’re clearly a sick individual and everyone is an internet badass but rather than attack an 11 year old like a bully and a coward why don’t you pick on someone a bit bigger.,” Don Jr. closed with “LMK,” which means “let me know.”

You’re clearly a sick individual and everyone is an internet badass but rather than attack an 11 year old like a bully and a coward why don’t you pick on someone a bit bigger. LMK. https://t.co/8OhiQ0aZmO

— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) June 20, 2018

Don Jr. was responding to a tweet from Fonda, where urged a mob to kidnap Barron so he could be thrown in a cage and raped by pedophiles.

“We should rip Barron Trump from his mother’s arms and put him in a cage with pedophiles and see if mother will …stand up against the giant asshole she is married to,” Fonda’s tweet read.

After Don Jr. fired back, another off-the-rails leftist, undoubtedly fueled by the media’s ongoing misinformation campaign regarding children being separated from adults at the border, threatened the president’s son with, “Don’t worry we’re coming for Chloe, too.”

Chloe is Chloe Trump, Don Jr’s. three-year-old daughter.

Hey @Twitter are you going to do something about demented leftists threatening @DonaldJTrumpJr‘s children?

This is what the left is. Completely filled with hate. pic.twitter.com/ZcW0WwLwzF

— Andrew Surabian (@Surabees) June 20, 2018

During his Tuesday night tirade, Fonda also launched sexist attacks against Press Secretary Sarah Sanders and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen. He referred to both with the sexist slur “gash” an called on Nelsen to be publicly stripped naked and whipped.

Nancy Sinatra and left-wing documentary filmmaker Josh Fox both praised Fonda for his tweets.

As of now, there is no indication that Twitter is enforcing its own policies that calls for penalties, including banishment, for promoting violence, most especially against women and children.

Fonda was active on Twitter Wednesday morning. He deleted one of his sexist tweets, but he chose not to respond to Don Jr’s offer to “pick on someone bigger.”

Fonda’s new movie, Boundaries, is set to be released Friday and is produced by Sony  Classics.

As of yet, Sony Classics has not tweeted or commented on their star’s call to have an 11-year-old boy kidnapped raped. The company has not responded to a request for comment from Breitbart News.
Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC. Follow his Facebook Page here.

Two mothers whose sons were killed by illegal immigrants are speaking out against the left and those in the media who they believe use children to push their agenda.

Arizona resident Mary Ann Mendoza lost her son Sgt. Brandon Mendoza when he was hit head-on by an illegal alien who was driving drunk.

“My name is Mary Ann Mendoza and my life course has been changed forever,” she wrote on her website, the Sgt. Brandon Mendoza Memorial Foundation.

“My son, Sgt Brandon Mendoza, was killed on May 12, 2014 in a violent head on collision. He was killed by a 3 times the legal limit drunk and high on meth ILLEGAL CRIMINAL! He had driven 35 MILES the wrong way on four different freeways before slamming head-on into my son’s car. My son had just finished his shift and was heading home after working to keep Mesa citizens safe and his community crime free when his life was taken so tragically.”

TRENDING: Trump Destroys Establishment Media Lies, Reveals What Melania Did for His Birthday

In an exclusive interview with The Daily Caller, Mendoza took the media to task, calling them out for picking and choosing narratives that fit their political agenda, while ignoring the stories of those who have been hurt by those who have entered the country illegally.

“There is hypocrisy in many ways,” she said. “The total disregard for American families ripped apart because of illegal criminals, the total lack of concern for children in the U.S. being raped in North Carolina by illegals at disgusting numbers (some months over 400 child rapes by illegals), no concern (for) homeless American children or Veterans who would do anything to have what’s provided (to) these children. Yet, our politicians call it inhumane treatment. Would they rather these kids coming across our borders stay with the adults who aren’t their biological parents but have kidnapped them to get across the border as a ‘family unit?’”

Mendoza said that at the end of the day, the media is fueled by good ratings and disdain for Trump — not a genuine concern for immigrant children.

“It’s all about sensational headlines,” she said. “They have no real concern for these kids. It’s just another way to make this administration look bad.”

To prove her point, Mendoza noted that difference in media coverage during the Obama administration.

“Worse things happened to these kids was Obama was president and (the media) was crickets,” she said.

“In closing, the fact that my son was collateral damage and totally disregarded to support their agenda is hypocrisy at its best. My dead son, a fellow American, is nothing to them! This isn’t worth their time because it would disprove their theory that we need illegal aliens here and we don’t need a border wall.”

Sabine Durden, another mother who was killed by an illegal immigrant in a driving accident, thanked the president for his help to give her a voice and blasted the media for turning a blind eye to the stories they don’t want to hear.

RELATED: First Photos from Inside Facilities for Illegal Immigrant Children Shatter Establishment Media Narrative

“The hypocrisy is astonishing,” she said. “The MSM has ignored many of us victims of illegal alien crime for so long. They avoid us like pests. If it weren’t for President Trump, no one would even know much about us. He gave my son a voice that was taken by an illegal. And I’m forever thankful to him for that and for bringing the issue of illegal alien invasion to the forefront. It’s deeply hurtful to see how MSM now ‘cares’ so much for children separated from their parents while continuing to ignore thousands of us separated by death, forever.”

She told The Daily Caller that Democrats’ show of compassion is fake, as demonstrated by their action — and lack of action.

“Not one of the Dems has reached out since they heard about my son’s death,” she said. Not one spoke publicly about American victims of illegals. Their fake grandstanding for children is for show and absent of compassion because they didn’t do any of this during Obama’s presidency. We have 1.6 million homeless children, inner cities destroyed and American children in need, homeless veterans and mentally ill people all on their own. No word about them from the left,” she continued.

“Yet they stumble over each other to get to a detention center with their camera crews behind them. They yell and show outrage over illegal aliens who placed themselves in this position. They call them immigrants, which is insulting to true immigrants like me,” she continued.

“They don’t go to jails and prisons where Americans who committed a crime are separated from their children. They didn’t go run and shown outrage when Obama had illegal alien kids in cages. The Dems are losing their voting base and need illegals to fill those spots. They are willing to step over dead Americans to get their amnesty. They continue to put out the welcome mat for more illegals to come by creating Sanctuary cities and states.”

Our prayers are with these women who have endured such horrific tragedy, and we wish them the best as they continue to tell their story — one the mainstream media may ignore but everyday Americans desperately need to hear.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

With the sudden interest of the national media in the families-separated-at-border storyline, the American immigration narrative is currently wound up in what’s happening to children caught crossing illegally with their families on the southern border.

But a look at a town in northeastern Pennsylvania, where immigrant families staying together have completely overhauled the population and atmosphere might have more lessons for country in the long term.

And they don’t paint the rosy picture immigration activists are trying to sell the American public.

During the 2016 campaign, Hazleton, Pennsylvania, and surrounding Luzerne County were occasionally in the national news because of the power of immigration as an issue. In October, The New York Times analyzed the area under the headline: “In a City Built by Immigrants, Immigration Is the Defining Issue.”

After Donald Trump’s unlikely victory in November, Newsweek published a December piece headlined, “Why did Donald Trump win? Just Visit Luzerne County, Pennsylvania.”

TRENDING: Trump Destroys Establishment Media Lies, Reveals What Melania Did for His Birthday

The premise still holds.

A lengthy piece published last week by the City Journal, a quarterly magazine of the conservative Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, is headlined “Chain Migration Comes to Hazleton.”

It describes how in less than 20 years – barely the space of a generation – a town with a population of 25,000 has “been radically transformed since the early 2000s by secondary chain migration, principally driven by Dominicans — immigrants, both legal and illegal, as well as second- and third-generation citizens arriving from the New York metropolitan area.”

The numbers tell the story:

  In 2000, Hispanics made up less than 5 percent of Hazleton’s population; they now account for more than 50 percent. Such rapid and dramatic demographic shifts are rare in U.S. cities. For Hazleton, the consequences have been profound, and the city is struggling to cope.”

That might be something of an understatement.

The changing demographics have changed the physical appearance of the Luzerne County town, which was incorporated as a borough in 1857 and became a city in 1891.

City Journal reported:

  Vinyl banners with loud graphics soon came to dominate the facades of sober nineteenth-century retail buildings. Pentecostal and evangelical congregations now fill former Catholic and Protestant churches. Blocks of duplex homes, uniformly encased with aluminum siding, crowd with families living in Section 8 housing or in subdivided rental units.

RELATED: Report: Illegal Immigrant Children Strangely Know Very Little About ‘Parents’

The public school system has been radically altered:

  In 2007, the district was 28 percent Hispanic and 69 percent non-Hispanic white. As of 2014, the district was 45 percent Hispanic and 51 percent non-Hispanic white… But Hazleton’s budget can’t keep pace with all the new arrivals, many of whom need special services. A district that had need for only one ESL teacher in the 1990s, for example, now has 2,298 English-language learners, nearly 20 percent of its student body; more than half the student body today live in low-income households. By 2017, the school district—encompassing over 250 square miles of southern Luzerne County, northern Schuylkill County, and western Carbon County—faced a $6 million deficit, in part driven by the demographic change.

And then there’s crime. As the City Journal reported, the town’s location near the intersection of Interstates 80 and 81 makes it an “ideal location” for cocaine and heroin operations run by drug rings dominated by immigrants from the Dominican Republic or their families.

When the town eventually tried to take action, it ended up on the losing end of a court case that went all the way to the Supreme Court (and also made Hazleton a national headline name for a time).

As the City Journal reported:

  For many Hazletonians, the city reached a grim tipping point in 2006, when two illegal immigrants from the Dominican Republic were charged with murdering a 29-year-old father of three. The killing shocked the community. Hazleton’s then-mayor, Lou Barletta, responded by introducing an ordinance, soon passed by the city council: the Illegal Immigration Relief Act, which fined and penalized employers and landlords for hiring and renting to illegal immigrants. The ACLU challenged the act, and the fight went to the Supreme Court. In 2014, the Court declined to review two federal appellate decisions that struck down the measure. The following year, a U.S. district court judge ruled that Hazleton had to pay $1.4 million to the attorneys who had sued the city over the act. The judge’s order was devastating for a cash-strapped city struggling to provide adequate services to its growing Hispanic population.

None of that is good news for the Democrat Party, or activists on the side of unchecked immigration.

And there’s a reason Donald Trump won Luzerne County with 77 percent of the vote, according to the City Journal.

However, Hazleton shouldn’t be seen as an example of why immigration should be opposed as a rule. One thing the liberals are right about is that immigrants have always played a key part of building the United States.

What Hazleton does show is the danger of unchecked immigration, based solely or even largely on the “chain” of relations to those immigrants who are accepted into the country.

America should be a nation that welcomes immigrants who are willing to assimilate into the country as a whole, not bunker themselves in ethnic enclaves for generations.

While liberals try to stage a tear-jerking soap opera about separating families in the Southwest part of the country, it might behoove the rest of us to look at a town in northeastern Pennsylvania for a bit, like Fox News host Tucker Carlson did in March.

Unchecked, chain immigration is not always a pretty picture.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

There is no denying that the liberal media have declared all-out war against the presidency of Donald Trump since before he even took office.

That “war” is evidenced by an almost weekly — sometimes near-daily — episodic freakout by purportedly unbiased “journalists” who set their hair on fire, crank the volume up to 11 and cry out in progressive leftist anguish over the latest executive action, policy implementation or even random tweet from Trump.

The latest absolute, end-of-the-world outrage that has supposedly neutral reporters comparing Trump and his supporters to Hitler and the Nazis — again — is the “zero tolerance” policy at the border with regard to illegal immigration, which has the unfortunate side effect of children being temporarily separated from their illegal immigrant parents while the parents are prosecuted for illegal entry or have their asylum claims adjudicated.

But if those liberal reporters thought their constant haranguing of Trump and skewed reports of the situation — which conveniently overlook similar situations under former President Barack Obama’s administration — would have a negative effect on Trump’s approval rating, they thought wrong, according to The Daily Caller.

GALLUP: Donald Trump’s job approval rating rises to 45%, tied for the highest of his presidency (which was January 2017); disapproval falls to 50%. pic.twitter.com/2O2V3Pb4vF

— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) June 18, 2018

TRENDING: Trump Destroys Establishment Media Lies, Reveals What Melania Did for His Birthday

Despite the constant drumbeat of negativity from the media — or perhaps because of it, ironically — the president’s approval rating has climbed to the highest height it has ever been, tied with the day he first took office, in the latest weekly tracking poll from Gallup.

That poll from Gallup showed that Trump’s approval rating as of June 17 was 45 percent, with a disapproval rating of 50 percent. For some perspective, consider that roughly three weeks prior, May 27, Trump’s approval sat at 40 percent while his disapproval rating was at 55 percent.

Interestingly, the above tweet from Bloomberg reporter Sahil Kapur also included the revelation from Gallup that 38 percent of Americans are satisfied with the current path the United States is on under Trump, the highest rating for that particular question in 12 years.

Of course, some liberals will scoff dismissively at Trump’s sub-50 percent approval, but in doing so they again display their historical and partisan ignorance of the striking similarities between Trump and his predecessors in spite of the vastly different media coverage they have received.

Business Insider senior political reporter Allan Smith noted on Twitter that Trump’s 45 percent approval on Day 513 of his presidency was essentially tied with Obama’s approval on a similar date, and was actually one point higher than former President Bill Clinton’s approval rating at the same time.

Trump is at 45% on day 513 of his presidency

Obama was at 45% on day 523 of his presidency

Clinton was at 44% on day 524 of his presidency https://t.co/NZX88n1K5U

— Allan Smith (@akarl_smith) June 18, 2018

To be sure, there are many factors at play when it comes to American voters approving or disapproving of the current president, such as the economy, jobs, foreign policy and wars.

That said, one would assume Trump’s numbers would be much lower when considering the constant negative coverage Trump receives in spite of ample good news with regard to the above issues — here’s looking at you, potential peace and denuclearization on the Korean peninsula.

In actuality, Trump’s approval numbers would be even higher than they are were he to receive even neutral media coverage, let alone positive coverage of his accomplishments instead of incessant attacks.

RELATED: More Americans Satisfied with Direction of Country Under Trump Than Under Obama

The truth is, partisan hack “journalists” can’t stand the fact that Trump is “winning” on many of the issues he campaigned on, and the American people are increasingly taking note of that reality, no matter how negatively his actions are portrayed.

As dismal as it can sometimes seem on a day-to-day basis, we can only encourage the liberal media to keep up with their negative drumbeat against Trump as it appears to be backfiring mightily on them and their Democrat allies in favor of Trump’s growing popularity.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.