Michelle Wolf: Comparing Trump to an Ape Is ‘Rude to Apes’

Netflix talk show host Michelle Wolf weighed in on the controversy surrounding Roseanne Barr’s “Ape” comparison to Valerie Jarrett by slamming President Donald Trump, who The Break host said isn’t as “accomplished” as apes.

Wolf’s Trump-bashing began with a new segment called “Internet Goofs,” which featured Barr’s “ape” tweet and the Roseanne star’s infamous photo of her dressed as Hitler posing in front of an oven holding baked “Jew cookies” (the photo was taken in 2009 for Jewish satire magazine, Heeb).

The third “goof” showed a Twitter post in which a user lamented the time HBO late-night host Bill Maher Compared President Trump to an orangutan.

“Don’t compare black people to apes,” Wolf said, “and also, don’t compare Donald Trump to an ape because that’s rude to apes.”

“Compared to Trump, apes are quite accomplished,” Wolf shouted. “They can ice skate, they’ve been to space, some of them know sign language, they’re not full of shit because they’re constantly throwing it.”

“So if you’re keeping score, it goes Ape, the guy who’s in charge of my goofs, and then Trump,” Wolf concluded.

Michelle Wolf’s Trump slams seem to be the going theme of her weekly talk show on the entertainment streaming giant. Last week’s installment saw the Comedy Central alum slam White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ “ugly personality.”

The latest episode of The Break With Michelle Wolf hits Netflix on Sunday.

Follow Jerome Hudson on Twitter: @JeromeEHudson

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

Cleveland family suing on claims CBP seized life-savings at airport

There is a new lawsuit in Ohio – spearheaded by Institute for Justice – claiming Customs and Border Protection seized the life-savings of an immigrant family at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport without charging anyone with a crime. The suit says Rustem Kazazi was headed to Albania to do work on a home when he was accosted by CBP for the $58K in his carry-on. Via IJ:

While going through security, Rustem was detained by a group of CBP agents, who took him to a small room. The agents questioned Rustem in English—a language he only partially understands—and refused his requests for a translator. They stripped him naked and searched him from head to toe, but found nothing illegal. As if these indignities were not enough, the agents then took every penny of the Kazazis’ savings and gave Rustem a receipt for “U.S. Currency” that did not state the amount seized. Rustem was not arrested—he had not broken any law. The CBP agents simply took his money and sent him on his way.

There are plenty of pejoratives to describe this situation: baseless, authoritarian, police state, and un-American. The fact Rustem, who is an American citizen, had his money stolen by the government for the simple reason he had it in his carry-one is asinine. It’s a clear violation of the 4th Amendment because CBP seized the cash without bothering to make a reasonable effort to find an interpreter to establish whether probable cause existed. It’s a major failure on the government’s part, which shouldn’t be surprising because it’s government.

A little background on Rustem Kazazi. He’s a former Albanian police officer who immigrated to the U.S. with his family in 2005. IJ notes he became a citizen in 2010. Why was he carrying $58K on his person? The suit says Kazazi and his family didn’t want to deal with banking fees and figured it was easier to just have cash on hand. You or I might find it a little weird to carry that much money in a carry-on (or anywhere else) but it was his choice.

The suit itself has more details on the bureaucratic idiocy Kazazi and his family are going through. It doesn’t paint the government in a good light. Remember…Kazazi was never charged with a crime or arrested. Via the suit:

While Rustem was still away in Albania, CBP sent him a Notice of Seizure on December 1, 2017 claiming that the amount taken from him had been $57, 330 ($770 less than the amount the agents had seized in October). This document also announced, for the first time, that the agents had seized the money for being “involved in a smuggling/drug trafficking/money laundering operation.” The notice informed Rustem that CBP intended to seek civil forfeiture of his money using an internal administrative process. And it appraised Rustem of his right to submit a claim to the money and request, instead, that civil forfeiture proceedings be referred to federal court. However, this initial seizure noticed included conflicting deadlines for responding. With [his son]’s help, the family contacted CPB about the conflicting dates, which the agency eventually corrected by sending an amended seizure notice, which set Saturday, January 13, 2018 as the deadline for receiving claims and any demand for federal court action.

So far, the Kazazis are following the process by which people can dispute any civil asset forfeiture seizures. Here’s where things get more fun – if by more fun you mean completely stupid. Court documents say the family didn’t want to go through the administrative process because they wanted a judge to decide on the cash. CBP didn’t want to play ball (which makes sense because better to trust bureaucrats than judges) and the suit claims things went further downhill (emphasis mine).

[O]n March 30, a CBP attorney in Chicago called [Rustem’s son] and left a voicemail, saying she wanted to discuss, “whether you want [the case] to go to court or if we could handle this administratively.” The attorney urged [Rustem’s son] to call back quickly because the agency’s deadline to begin the court process would expire “within the next week”- that is, no later than April 6, 2018. Three weeks later, when still no forfeiture complaint had been filed, [Rustem’s son] wrote to his contact at CBP to ask why the family’s money had not been returned. The response was distressingly bureaucratic: CBP had no idea. For the first, CBP told the Kazazis that it had no control over the case; instead, the U.S. Attorney’s Office was in control. When [the son] asked whom he could contract at the U.S. Attorneys’ Office, the agency claimed that it had no contact there and would not know who was handling the case until “a decision is made.”

Today, more than seven months since CBP agents unconstitutionally seized the Kazazis’ money and upended their lives, the government still has not begun civil forfeiture proceedings. It cannot do so now, as the deadline to seek forfeiture of the money expired no later than April 17. For the reasons explained below, the Court should order CBP to return the money.

This is why civil asset forfeiture has to be reformed on a federal level. I’ve written on the awfulness of civil asset forfeiture before and believe the Justice Department’s 2017 guidelines on the issue are obscene. I think it should be made illegal and the only asset forfeiture allowed is criminal asset forfeiture i.e. after a conviction.

Policing for profit needs to stop. Hopefully this case will force Congress to act on reform legislation.

The post Cleveland family suing on claims CBP seized life-savings at airport appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

HAH! The Crazy Never Stops: John Kerry Says Hillary’s Loss Was Her Own Fault Because She Upset Putin

Democrats are still running with the conspiracy that Russia stole the election.
Hah-Hah!

John Kerry has suggested that Hillary Clinton contributed to her own downfall in the 2016 presidential election by encouraging the Russians to hack America.

The former Secretary of State said that Russian President Vladimir Putin told him he was ‘incensed’ by a speech Clinton gave in 2014 comparing him to Hitler.

Kerry said Clinton’s comments made Putin feel he was under attack and that interfering in the US election was a way to even the score with America.

In an interview at the New York City BookExpo, Kerry also praised President Donald Trump and said that he would ‘applaud’ his engagement with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.

But he sharply criticized Trump for pulling of the deal with Iran on nuclear weapons – which Kerry brokered – and said he was ‘deeply, deeply, deeply concerned’ about his presidency.

Kerry made his comments at the major book industry conference while promoting his forthcoming memoir, Every Day Is Extra.

He said that he spent more time with Putin than anyone in President Obama’s administration and that he had personally been in his company for ‘hours’.

‘Putin believed that America and Hillary Clinton and the administration engaged in his election. Our advisor was meeting with people in Moscow and he believed those meetings were stirring up opposition to him,’ Kerry said.

‘On top of that Clinton gave a “very tough speech” at a private fundraiser in California where she compared his annexation in Ukraine to Hitler in the run up to WWII.’

Kerry said: ‘I know personally, because I heard from Putin about it, how incensed he was that his nation, which lost 30 million people fighting Hitler, was likened to him.

‘I’m not excusing anything, let me make that clear, no excuse for what he’s been doing with respect to Ukraine, Crimea, but you have to understand where somebody is coming from’.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

WaPo: President Trump Tells Aides He Wants Leaker-Liar James Comey “Investigated and Charged”

The Washington Post reported on the highly anticipated Inspector General report on the FBI Clinton email faux investigation.

A couple of lines stood out in the WaPo report.

The Washington Post admitted the use of a spy inside the Trump campaign could be problematic for Democrats. Ya think?

Most recently, after Trump demanded the Justice Department investigate possible political spying on his campaign, the department again turned to Horowitz, asking him to expand his review of the Page investigation to encompass the president’s request. Trump’s demand stemmed from the FBI’s use of a confidential source in the Russia investigation. The source interacted with three Trump advisers during the campaign, although it remains unclear to what extent the bureau directed those interactions.

And then the WaPo says President Trump wants fired leaker James Comey “investigated and charged.”

Trump also has repeatedly mused to associates and aides in the Oval Office about Comey being investigated and charged.

The Washington Post reported:

Those who know Horowitz say his findings will be as nonpartisan as they are thorough. But his work is almost certain to be weaponized by President Trump against federal law enforcement, and some question whether it will quell the tension gripping Washington.

“He’s going to be unflappable, he’s going to be apolitical, he’s going to call it like he sees it,” said Mary Jo White, a former U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York who supervised Horowitz when he worked there.

She added: “I think the public should have a very high degree of confidence in whatever he finds. Now, that’s a different question than, ‘How will it be received?’ ”…

…But more recently, the president has seemed to see the efficacy in using Horowitz’s findings to advance his line of attacks. After an inspector general report faulted former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe for misleading investigators about his role in a media disclosure, Trump tweeted, “DOJ just issued the McCabe report – which is a total disaster. He LIED! LIED! LIED! McCabe was totally controlled by Comey – McCabe is Comey!! No collusion, all made up by this den of thieves and lowlifes!”

Even before the report, Trump had been a frequent critic of McCabe. The former No. 2 FBI official has claimed the president’s attacks are meant to undermine the FBI and special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, who is leading the Russia investigation. The D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office is exploring whether McCabe should be charged with a crime.

Trump also has repeatedly mused to associates and aides in the Oval Office about Comey being investigated and charged, particularly amid the heat of his book tour, according to administration officials and advisers.

One of Trump’s lawyers, Rudolph W. Giuliani, said this week that the forthcoming Clinton email report could be a boon for the president — justifying his firing of Comey, and undercutting that as a piece of Mueller’s probe into whether the president obstructed justice. Giuliani said Horowitz is “not a guy who is known to play politics,” and his report “could lay out an overwhelming case.”

The post WaPo: President Trump Tells Aides He Wants Leaker-Liar James Comey “Investigated and Charged” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Establishment Media Caves: Forced To Make Major ‘Updates’ After Attacking Trump with Fake News

I always get amused when the media gets all riled up about being called “fake news” by the Trump administration.

It’s not because I didn’t expect them to; of course they have to. It’s an insult. No, the laughter instead comes from the way they do it, like an overly theatrical denial from a villain-of-the-week on “Columbo.”

To me, it’s kind of a tacit admission that they are a kind of fake news — not perhaps in the way the term originally came to prominence, as a small set of obviously counterfeit stories that the media thought might have actually had an influence on the election, but instead as an entity mostly interested in pushing a narrative as opposed to reporting the facts as they are.

If you needed an object lesson in what I’m talking about, just take a look at the outrage over President Donald Trump’s alleged immigration policies this past week or two — and the low-key apologies that eventually followed when the information that fueled the outrage proved to be less than accurate.

The whole kerfuffle began when The New York Times and USA Today — both frequent villains-of-the-week in media-“Columbo” complex — published stories which claimed that the Trump administration had “lost track” of 1,500 children who had been separated from their parents as they were apprehended crossing the U.S. border.

TRENDING: Watch: Kimmel Used Blackface, Mocked Black Man But Still Has ABC Show

First, liberals began circulating alleged pictures of these “children” being kept in cells.

As it turns out, those pictures were from 2014, when the Obama administration had to deal with a massive influx of unaccompanied minors crossing the southern border.

Then there were other forms of outrage, particularly over a tweet which showed Ivanka Trump with her child. This prompted a whole another round of Twitter outrage.

Uh-oh. Better watch out, White House. Ratatouille is on the case of the missing children.

Do you think the media is biased against the Trump administration?

Oh, and there was also a comment about that tweet by some comedienne on TBS you may have heard about, as well as conspiracy theories that the children might have been turned over to human traffickers.

As it turns out, the story at The Times’ website that in part fomented all of this is no longer there. It’s been replaced by a story called “How Liberals Got Lost on the Story of Missing Children at the Border.”

“Over the weekend, you may have seen a horrifying story: Almost 1,500 migrant children were missing, and feared to be in the hands of human traffickers. The Trump administration lost track of the children, the story went, after separating them from their parents at the border,” the new story by Amanda Taub reads.

RELATED: Trump Hits North Korean Officials with Power Move During Official White House Visit

“The news spread across liberal social media — with the hashtag #Wherearethechildren trending on Twitter — as people demanded immediate action,” Taub writes. “But it wasn’t true, or at least not the way that many thought. The narrative had combined parts of two real events and wound up with a horror story that was at least partly a myth.”

At the end of the story, there is a bit in italics, not identified as a correction: “This article has been updated to clarify that the Trump administration’s new policy is to prosecute all undocumented border crossers and that the result is to separate parents from children; the policy’s explicit purpose is not to separate undocumented parents and children.”

However, as Breitbart notes, an earlier version of this addendum was a bit more, well, honest: “Correction: An earlier version of this column mischaracterized the legal status of 1,475 undocumented migrant children who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border without their parents. Those children were placed in the custody of sponsors screened by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. They are no longer in federal custody.”

USA Today issued a similar retraction. The Washington Post and Seattle Times, meanwhile, claimed that the purpose of the Trump  administration policy isn’t to separate children from parents crossing the border by prosecuting the parents, but that it’s part of a wider, zero-tolerance policy for illegal border-crossers, a completely different thing.

In their kinda-apology piece, did The New York Times blame their own poor reporting for the misunderstanding? Please. They blamed Trump’s “harsh immigration policies,” which are a “departure from norms.” (By “departure from norms,” read “departure from the Obama administration’s policies,” since they’re basically talking about a new administration that’s actually made the “harsh” decision to enforce our immigration laws as written.)

“That departure from norms has caused tremendous suffering for immigrants and their communities. On a broader scale, it is revealing that the story of the missing children felt so true to so many people,” Taub writes. “It shows the ways that shattering norms also damages public trust.” (Emphasis ours.)

“Research shows that the loss of this trust — particularly when combined with extreme polarization — can weaken support for democracy over time. This story’s viral spread suggests that the administration’s treatment of immigrants could have far-reaching consequences for all Americans.”

Wait. The story spread because media outlets — led by The Times — got it wrong. Even if we were to assume the best of intentions on the part of The Times’ reporters, they still don’t get to blame the Trump administration for “shattering norms” for getting it wrong and thus eroding public trust in them. That’s not how it works.

How did liberals get lost on the story of missing children at the border? Because you led them astray, Gray Lady. This is legit one of the worst excuses I’ve heard that hasn’t come out of the mouth of Marion Barry or those around him. That’s next level excuse-making, particularly in a week that saw someone pin remarks that got them fired on taking Ambien.

It’s also legitimately fake news, not just fake news in the narrative-building sense. They said that children were missing. That was very much not true. The only way you get faker than that is either The Onion/Babylon Bee or worldnewsweekly2hourly24.com.ru.net route. And apparently, “shattering norms” is to blame for all of this. Right

There are so many other problems with this story and the rash of mea culpas it’s inspired that I could write a thesis on it (exactly what would it take to convince anyone writing this empurpled prose lambasting the new zero-tolerance policy that trying to illegally cross the border into the United States with your child could possibly make you an unfit parent, for example?), but it’s enough to just settle on the fake outrage their own mistakes have engendered.

Much like the crook who gives too much away by their reaction when Columbo asks just one more question before he leaves their mansion, the media has yet again given far too much away.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Our Future? Liberal Millenials Claim They Would Rather Date MS-13 Members Than Trump Supporters

You learn a lot of things doing this job. For instance, yesterday I learned you can say pretty much whatever you want about any of the Trumps and not get fired from your show, provided you’re suitably liberal. I previously thought there was a line, but nope. Thank you, Ms. Bee.

And today? I found out that some millennials would rather date MS-13 members than Donald Trump supporters.

That’s right, The Daily Caller went out on the town in Washington to find out whether or not our nation’s young people would prefer gang members or people who simply supported the president.

Not only was there a competition, it turns out MS-13 members came out ahead.

TRENDING: Watch: Kimmel Used Blackface, Mocked Black Man But Still Has ABC Show

As The Daily Caller noted, the MS-13 gang “operates by the motto of rape, control and kill. It’s one of the world’s most brutal street gangs and it’s responsible for many murders in the U.S.”

Trump made headlines by calling them “animals,” which aggrieved many liberals. However, I never thought I would see people saying they would rather date gang members than Trump supporters.

Among the reasons given? Well, one person said that Trump supporters “weren’t for them.” It makes one wonder whether they believe MS-13 is.

One of the guys who went with the MS-13 member said it wasn’t young girls’ fault that they’re Trump supporters because it’s not like women can think for themselves.

Do you think President Trump was right to call MS-13 members “animals?”

“A lot of Trump supporters were probably raised by rich white dads and people with lots and lots of money,” the guy said. “And they’re bred into being Trump supporters. I’m from Connecticut and I can tell you 80 percent of the girls in high school would say that they’re ‘Republican’ when they were in high school because their dads were rich white dads and had no idea what Republican even meant.”

So basically what you’re saying is that a) you’re a condescending rich, white liberal who b) doesn’t think that young women can make their own decision about whether or not they’re Republican because men pass on the political opinions.

That doesn’t sound terribly intersectional to me. But trust him. He’s from Connecticut.

Even the yes answers weren’t exactly convincing: “I guess a Trump supporter because I guess they stand for something,” one young woman said.

Well, MS-13 stands for something. It’s just that they stand for murdering anyone who gets in their way.

RELATED: Judge Hands Student Banned From Wearing Trump Shirt to School a Big Win

And then there was the guy who didn’t know what MS-13 was: “Could someone tell me what that is?” he asked. He ended up picking neither.

Now, granted, this isn’t exactly a scientific survey and it’s from a source that isn’t exactly unbiased. However, unless these were actors, this is beyond dispiriting. These people would literally rather be in a relationship with murderers than they would with someone who supported the president.

Thanks, millennials. You’ve now replaced Samantha Bee as the reason why I’m reaching for the Tums. Behold our future.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Millenials Answer: Would You Rather Date An MS-13 Member Or A Trump Supporter?

Full-blown TDS.

Via Daily Caller:

The Daily Caller’s Stephanie Hamill and Julia Nista recently hit the streets of Washington D.C. to ask millennials if they would rather date a Trump supporter or an MS-13 gang member.

Shockingly, the majority of respondents said they would rather date an MS-13 gang member, while some said they had never heard of MS-13 before.

MS-13 operates by the motto of rape, control and kill. It’s one of the world’s most brutal street gangs and it’s responsible for many murders in the U.S.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

After Years of Deep State Spying… James Clapper Admits No ‘Smoking Gun’ Evidence of Russian Collusion

After Years of Deep State Spying… James Clapper Admits No ‘Smoking Gun’ Evidence of Russian Collusion

Guest post by Mike LaChance at American Lookout:

Every week, the left’s narrative about Russia stealing the election for Trump gets weaker and weaker. Obama’s intelligence director James Clapper admitted recently that he still hasn’t seen any real evidence.

The Daily Caller reports:

Clapper: No ‘Smoking Gun’ Evidence Of Collusion

James Clapper, the former director of National Intelligence, said he has not seen “smoking gun” or “direct” evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government.

“I saw no smoking-gun evidence of collusion before I left the government, and I still haven’t,” Clapper told Vox in an interview Thursday to promote his new book, “Facts and Fears: Hard Truths From a Life in Intelligence.” “There is a lot of circumstantial evidence and reasons to be suspicious, but no smoking gun as of yet.”

Clapper did say he was interested in the number of contacts between members of the Trump campaign and people linked to the Russian government. He wrote in “Facts and Fears” that “the dashboard warning lights were all lit.”

“I certainly wondered about [collusion] when I saw the frequency of meetings between people in the Trump campaign and people with ties to the Russian government,” said Clapper, who now works as a CNN analyst.

This entire affair was about the inability of the Democrats to admit that they lost the 2016 election.
They had to make it about something bigger to explain their embarrassing loss.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Liberals to Roseanne: Do as I Say, Not as I Do

The self-righteous indignation of liberals lining up to demonstrate how much they are against “racism” can be seen with regard to Roseanne Barr’s comment.  ABC jumped at the chance to cancel her show (just as it did with Last Man Standing), something liberals within the network were slavering over.  Whereas liberals’ indignation knows no bounds in regards to Roseanne’s joke, acting horrified, as if she had committed mass murder at a school, a peep hasn’t been heard from these same self-styled morally superior liberals to Louis Farrakhan’s deadly serious call for genocide against white people (and don’t get me started on liberals’ racism against Asians!) – or, for that matter, the simultaneous scandal involving Tommy Robinson.  Their indignation is very selective.


Nor is this the first time that a black racist, or a white communist, called for genocide against whites.  Here is a sample – and note that none of the major players – not CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, Newsweek, etc. – has deigned to report on these instances, much less expressed indignation:



– University of Pittsburgh professor Shanara Reid-Brinkley, speaking at the University of Wisconsin, stated that democracy was built on “anti-blackness,” and white people are the cause of all the problems in the world because they are in charge.  (Presumably, all the problems would disappear the moment blacks were all in charge.  As in Africa.  Which has no problems.) 


– Professor Gregory Jay, a lily-white professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, is calling for the complete “abolition of whiteness.”


– Carmen Goséy, the chair of the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s student government, said “all white people are racist” – which in itself is a racist statement.  In this same university, one can enroll in the racist course “Problem of Whiteness,” taught by the African Cultural Studies Department’s Damon Sajnani, all at (white) taxpayers’ expense.


– Johnny Eric Williams, associate professor of sociology at Trinity College in Hartford, calls white people inhuman.  When members of Congress were shot at and wounded by a liberal, Williams wrote an article entitled “Let Them F‑‑‑‑‑‑ Die” instead of aiding the victims.  He was briefly put on leave, then Trinity College president Joanne Berger-Sweeney and Trinity dean and vice president Tom Cresswell came to his aid, embraced him, and reinstated him.


– Sunken-chested George Ciccariello-Maher, a white communist professor of politics and global studies at Philadelphia’s Drexel University, called for white genocide.  He later whined to a sympathetic CNN reporter because he had received nasty phone messages that suggested he should be the first on the white genocide list.  Ultimately, he resigned from Drexel, even though the president of the university had tried to shield him, and was instantly hired by the prestigious New York University, which is infested with Marxists.  He recently compared the American national anthem to – of course – the Nazi salute.


– At St. John’s College in Santa Fe, one racist, Maggie Reitz-Wells, working from the deadwood Office of Student Life, sent a system-wide invitation to attend an indoctrination group.  “The main topic for discussion will be an ongoing one: How do we deal with the depravity of whiteness and the brutality of masculinity?  How can we get to the root of this problem?”  White participants will be encouraged to confess their “white depravity,” as was the case during the Cultural Revolution.  When asked about this event, Assistant Dean Jan Arsenault became upset – not that this bizarre event was taking place, but that outsiders had learned of it


– Recently hired Preston Mitchum, a law professor at Georgetown University, ranted that all white people are racist and all men are sexist.  Furthermore, “I really, really, really, really, really, really hate cops.  Hate them.  The power.  The unfettered abuse.  The narcissism.  Hate, hate them.”  When he next goes on a demonstration, expect him to carry one of those signs that says “Love Trumps Hate.”


– Kevin Allred is an instructor at Montclair State University and Rutgers University who proclaimed, “There are no good white people.  There are only less bad white people.”


– Stanford University will be offering a class on how to abolish whiteness.


– Earlier this year, Portland Community College designated April as a month in which to attack white people.  It was organized by white liberals.


– According to Portland State University Professor’s Rachel Sanders’s “White Privilege” course, “whiteness” must be eliminated.  She, too, is lily-white, which makes you wonder…what is she thinking?


– Angie Wellman, associate director in the Student Life Multicultural Center at Ohio State University, led the “Interrupting Racism: Tips & Tools for White People” event, where white students were essentially insulted and asked to own up to their white shortcomings.


– A conference on Critical Race Theory hosted by Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis became an orgiastic expression of racism against whites by both blacks and white liberals.  Among other things, it was declared that the concept of intellectual diversity is “white supremacist b‑‑‑‑‑‑‑.”


– A St. Louis kindergarten-through-grade 8 school called College School, associated with Webster University, has a “Witnessing Whiteness” program, brainchild of (what else?) school director of equality and inclusion Vincent Flewellen.


– Meanwhile, the elementary schools in Edina, Minnesota are busy brainwashing children, even borrowing a page from Mao’s China by having self-criticism sessions.  An A-B-C book has some gems such as “A is for Activist.”  “F is for Feminist.”  “X is for Malcolm as in Malcolm X.”  The high school in Edina goes a step farther by having a mandatory brainwashing class to eliminate something called “white privilege.”  As usual, conservative and libertarian parents are too apathetic to do anything about it.


– Charles H.F. Davis, a black assistant professor of clinical education and chief strategy officer and director of research of the USC Race and Equity Center, has expressed his desire that whites be destroyed.  He also wrote that policies that punish student-protesters are a form of racism.


– Ekow N. Yankah, a law professor at Yeshiva University, wrote in The New York Times (of course) that he would be teaching his children to be racist towards whites.


– George Washington University, through its (what else?) Multicultural Student Services Center, held an indoctrination session against “Christian privilege,” especially white Christians.  This dovetails nicely with the anti-Christian, pro-Muslim religion rampant in universities.


– At the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, (only) white students can take part in an indoctrination experience in order to obtain a – suitable for framing – Graduate Certificate in Diversity, Social Justice, and Inclusion that will explain that they are scum because they are white.  And they have to pay only $486 for the experience!  Shelly Tochluk, a professor at Mount Saint Mary’s University (MSMU) in Los Angeles, is the organizer, and it is offered by the nonprofit AWARE-LA (Alliance of White Anti-Racists Everywhere).


But I ask you, what is more contemptible: that such blatant racism is voiced, that liberals applaud it, that the mainstream media keep a lid on it – or that people do nothing about it?


Image: Gustave Doré, “The Hypocrites address Dante.”










The self-righteous indignation of liberals lining up to demonstrate how much they are against “racism” can be seen with regard to Roseanne Barr’s comment.  ABC jumped at the chance to cancel her show (just as it did with Last Man Standing), something liberals within the network were slavering over.  Whereas liberals’ indignation knows no bounds in regards to Roseanne’s joke, acting horrified, as if she had committed mass murder at a school, a peep hasn’t been heard from these same self-styled morally superior liberals to Louis Farrakhan’s deadly serious call for genocide against white people (and don’t get me started on liberals’ racism against Asians!) – or, for that matter, the simultaneous scandal involving Tommy Robinson.  Their indignation is very selective.


Nor is this the first time that a black racist, or a white communist, called for genocide against whites.  Here is a sample – and note that none of the major players – not CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, Newsweek, etc. – has deigned to report on these instances, much less expressed indignation:


– University of Pittsburgh professor Shanara Reid-Brinkley, speaking at the University of Wisconsin, stated that democracy was built on “anti-blackness,” and white people are the cause of all the problems in the world because they are in charge.  (Presumably, all the problems would disappear the moment blacks were all in charge.  As in Africa.  Which has no problems.) 


– Professor Gregory Jay, a lily-white professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, is calling for the complete “abolition of whiteness.”


– Carmen Goséy, the chair of the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s student government, said “all white people are racist” – which in itself is a racist statement.  In this same university, one can enroll in the racist course “Problem of Whiteness,” taught by the African Cultural Studies Department’s Damon Sajnani, all at (white) taxpayers’ expense.


– Johnny Eric Williams, associate professor of sociology at Trinity College in Hartford, calls white people inhuman.  When members of Congress were shot at and wounded by a liberal, Williams wrote an article entitled “Let Them F‑‑‑‑‑‑ Die” instead of aiding the victims.  He was briefly put on leave, then Trinity College president Joanne Berger-Sweeney and Trinity dean and vice president Tom Cresswell came to his aid, embraced him, and reinstated him.


– Sunken-chested George Ciccariello-Maher, a white communist professor of politics and global studies at Philadelphia’s Drexel University, called for white genocide.  He later whined to a sympathetic CNN reporter because he had received nasty phone messages that suggested he should be the first on the white genocide list.  Ultimately, he resigned from Drexel, even though the president of the university had tried to shield him, and was instantly hired by the prestigious New York University, which is infested with Marxists.  He recently compared the American national anthem to – of course – the Nazi salute.


– At St. John’s College in Santa Fe, one racist, Maggie Reitz-Wells, working from the deadwood Office of Student Life, sent a system-wide invitation to attend an indoctrination group.  “The main topic for discussion will be an ongoing one: How do we deal with the depravity of whiteness and the brutality of masculinity?  How can we get to the root of this problem?”  White participants will be encouraged to confess their “white depravity,” as was the case during the Cultural Revolution.  When asked about this event, Assistant Dean Jan Arsenault became upset – not that this bizarre event was taking place, but that outsiders had learned of it


– Recently hired Preston Mitchum, a law professor at Georgetown University, ranted that all white people are racist and all men are sexist.  Furthermore, “I really, really, really, really, really, really hate cops.  Hate them.  The power.  The unfettered abuse.  The narcissism.  Hate, hate them.”  When he next goes on a demonstration, expect him to carry one of those signs that says “Love Trumps Hate.”


– Kevin Allred is an instructor at Montclair State University and Rutgers University who proclaimed, “There are no good white people.  There are only less bad white people.”


– Stanford University will be offering a class on how to abolish whiteness.


– Earlier this year, Portland Community College designated April as a month in which to attack white people.  It was organized by white liberals.


– According to Portland State University Professor’s Rachel Sanders’s “White Privilege” course, “whiteness” must be eliminated.  She, too, is lily-white, which makes you wonder…what is she thinking?


– Angie Wellman, associate director in the Student Life Multicultural Center at Ohio State University, led the “Interrupting Racism: Tips & Tools for White People” event, where white students were essentially insulted and asked to own up to their white shortcomings.


– A conference on Critical Race Theory hosted by Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis became an orgiastic expression of racism against whites by both blacks and white liberals.  Among other things, it was declared that the concept of intellectual diversity is “white supremacist b‑‑‑‑‑‑‑.”


– A St. Louis kindergarten-through-grade 8 school called College School, associated with Webster University, has a “Witnessing Whiteness” program, brainchild of (what else?) school director of equality and inclusion Vincent Flewellen.


– Meanwhile, the elementary schools in Edina, Minnesota are busy brainwashing children, even borrowing a page from Mao’s China by having self-criticism sessions.  An A-B-C book has some gems such as “A is for Activist.”  “F is for Feminist.”  “X is for Malcolm as in Malcolm X.”  The high school in Edina goes a step farther by having a mandatory brainwashing class to eliminate something called “white privilege.”  As usual, conservative and libertarian parents are too apathetic to do anything about it.


– Charles H.F. Davis, a black assistant professor of clinical education and chief strategy officer and director of research of the USC Race and Equity Center, has expressed his desire that whites be destroyed.  He also wrote that policies that punish student-protesters are a form of racism.


– Ekow N. Yankah, a law professor at Yeshiva University, wrote in The New York Times (of course) that he would be teaching his children to be racist towards whites.


– George Washington University, through its (what else?) Multicultural Student Services Center, held an indoctrination session against “Christian privilege,” especially white Christians.  This dovetails nicely with the anti-Christian, pro-Muslim religion rampant in universities.


– At the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, (only) white students can take part in an indoctrination experience in order to obtain a – suitable for framing – Graduate Certificate in Diversity, Social Justice, and Inclusion that will explain that they are scum because they are white.  And they have to pay only $486 for the experience!  Shelly Tochluk, a professor at Mount Saint Mary’s University (MSMU) in Los Angeles, is the organizer, and it is offered by the nonprofit AWARE-LA (Alliance of White Anti-Racists Everywhere).


But I ask you, what is more contemptible: that such blatant racism is voiced, that liberals applaud it, that the mainstream media keep a lid on it – or that people do nothing about it?


Image: Gustave Doré, “The Hypocrites address Dante.”




via American Thinker

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/