Right to Try Passes House, Trump Expected to Sign

The U.S. House passed Right to Try legislation on Tuesday that gives the terminally ill access to experimental drugs showing efficacy in clinical trials but not yet approved by the FDA.

The bill now awaits President Donald Trump’s signature and he has indicated he will sign it.

The House passed the legislation by a vote of 250-169, largely along party lines, though 22 Democrats voted with Republicans to pass the bill. All the no votes were Democrats.

"This legislation, introduced only last week, is an egregious attempt by a libertarian think tank to undermine the ‘gold standard’ drug approval process at the Food and Drug Administration," said Rep. Frank Pallone (D., NJ) on the House floor.

"The supporters of this bill claim to be helping desperate patients who are looking for hope.  If this is such a patient centered bill—why does every major patient organization overwhelmingly oppose it?" Pallone said.

Opponents of the bill include patient advocacy groups, which sent a letter on Monday that they strongly opposed the bill, saying it could "increase the likelihood of our patients being harmed by unsafe and ineffective experimental therapies."

Other lawmakers were elated that Right to Try passed Congress, saying it restores freedom and hope to the terminally ill.

"The House voted to restore just a little bit of freedom, a little bit of hope to terminal patients and their families," said Sen. Ron Johnson (R., Wis.) in a press conference last night. He called it a "really big day" and thanked numerous colleagues and the terminally ill who pushed for the passage of the bill. He called the terminally ill and their families the "real heroes."

Johnson was instrumental in the past several years in the push for Right to Try. The U.S. Senate passed the legislation in August.

Advocates indicated the legislation is common sense and gives those who have exhausted all other options another chance.

"This is an extraordinarily great day," said Sen. Joe Donnelly (D., Ind). "You can even hear the joy when this passed, and the excitement and the happiness." Donnelly indicated the "biggest stars on the team" to the bill’s passage were the families of the terminally ill.

"I feel humbled to be a part of this. This is what we’re supposed to do as legislators, is to listen to our folks, to try to make good legislation that makes people’s lives better and makes America stronger, and I was privileged to be a part of this," said Donnelly.

The House effort was led by Rep. Andy Biggs (R., Ariz) and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R., Pa.).

"After years of debate, discussion and negotiation, tonight, the House of Representatives showed what has always been clear to me and those I represent: that the Right to Try is a common sense, bipartisan measure that gives American patients and families facing an unimaginable situation the opportunity to fight for their lives or the lives of their loved one," said Fitzpatrick in a statement.

According to Fitzpatrick, "the benefits far outweigh the risks" for the terminally ill.

FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb in a tweet indicated he would implement Right to Try if passed as intended by Congress and will promote access and also protect patients.

The Goldwater Institute, the think tank which crafted the policy on both the state and federal levels, called the vote a "win" for patients.

"Millions of Americans who have been told they are out of options and it’s time to get their affairs in order, are closer to having the opportunity for one last treatment, without having to get permission from the federal government first," said Victor Riches, president & CEO of the Goldwater Institute, in a statement.

The post Right to Try Passes House, Trump Expected to Sign appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

AP Reveals Contempt for Texas in Post-Santa Fe Shooting Coverage

Two recent Associated Press dispatches have exposed how out of touch two of its reporters are with the dominant Second Amendment-defending views of voters and politicians in Texas.

They also are flummoxed that most of the students who survived Friday’s school shooting in Santa Fe haven’t turned into rabid gun-control advocates.

In an early Monday morning report, the AP’s Will Weissert and Jim Vertuno headlined and virtually decried how Friday’s school shooting in Santa Fe “may not bring change to gun-loving Texas”:

 

APonTexasGunControlProspects052018

 

The obvious undercurrent is “What’s wrong with these people in Texas”?

Addressing the underlined items individually:

  • The 1.2 million open-carry stat gives readers unaware of Texas’s decades of explosive population growth the impression that the state is still a 19th century Wild West culture, even though that number represents less than 6 percent of all Lone Star State’s adults.
  • Weissert and Vertuno appear to have borrowed verbiage from the New York Times, which, in a Sunday evening report appearing on Monday’s front page covered by NewsBusters’ Scott Whitlock, described Texas as “a place where guns are hard-wired into the state’s psyche.”
  • A later AP sentence grudgingly noted:

     

AP2onTexasGunControlProspects052018

 

Actually, as Powerline’s John Hinderaker observed on Monday, “Those measures certainly would have been ineffective.”

The sentence especially when corrected, begs an obvious question: Why should these roundtable discussions waste time on ideas that the AP reporters themselves acknowledged wouldn’t have worked? They’ve essentially admitted but still can’t fully process the idea that focusing on “boosting security” would make far more sense.

  • (Final two items) The contempt, rephrased, is now, “What’s wrong with these Santa Fe students?” As to Parkland, the idea that a group of high school kids “led” the gun-control lobbying campaign and acted entirely on their own is absurd. Of course, they were presented as the face of the campaign, but the far-left Buzzfeed acknowledged that they had the financial and PR backing of “some of the largest organizing groups in the country.”

Early Tuesday, Vertuno authored a similarly headlined but separate piece containing much of the same verbiage. Vertuno extended the quote from Cal Jillson, the prof cited in the Monday dispatch, who complained that “Even the young people from Santa Fe are not full-throated advocates of gun control to keep the children safe.”

Actually, as the Times story covered by Whitlock noted, they overwhelmingly oppose the gun-control measures being pushed by the left. While the Times quoted several students’ positions, Vertuno provided only one:

 

APstory2onTexasGunControlProspects052218

 

Vertuno’s lament:

 

APstory2Item2TexasGunControlProspects052218

 

Apparently the only “changes” the AP reporter would consider “major” are ones that restrict Second Amendment rights — even though they wouldn’t have done anything to prevent the Santa Fe massacre.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

President Trump Slams Nancy Pelosi for Her Embrace of MS-13 Gang-Bangers: “We’re Not Going to Release Violent Criminals Into Our Country”

President Trump Slams Nancy Pelosi for Her Embrace of MS-13 Gang-Bangers: “We’re Not Going to Release Violent Criminals Into Our Country”

President Trump slammed Democrat leader Nancy Pelosi for her embrace of MS-13 gang-bangers last night in his speech to the Susan B. Anthony List Gala.

This came after Pelosi defended the brutal animals for their “spark of divinity.”

President Donald Trump: Just the other day, Nancy Pelosi came out in favor of MS-13. That’s the first time I’ve heard that. She wants them to be treated with respect as do other Democrats. That’s not going to be happening. We’re not going to release violent criminals into our country.

Pelosi’s pals.
Via Jack Posobiec
Stronger Together

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

State Department Warns Americans In China After Possible ‘Sonic Attack’ on Embassy Staffer

On Wednesday, an American working at the US consulate in Guangzhou was reportedly injured by an “abnormal” sound directed at the embassy, according to Reuters:

An American citizen working at the U.S. consulate in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou has reported suffering from “abnormal” sounds and pressure leading to a mild brain injury, the U.S. embassy said on Wednesday. The embassy, which issued a health alert to Americans living in China, said it could not link the case to health issues suffered by U.S. government staff in Cuba dating back to late 2016.

The staffer reportedly suffered a “mild traumatic brain injury.” The embassy has now released a health alert:

While in China, if you experience any unusual acute auditory or sensory phenomena accompanied by unusual sounds or piercing noises, do not attempt to locate their source. Instead, move to a location where the sounds are not present.

This amounts to the second such incident in a Communist country – in January, State Department doctor Charles Rosenfarb reported to the Senate that Cuban embassy members had “suffered headaches, hearing loss, disorientation and some loss of cognitive ability.” That incident resulted in the United States withdrawing some embassy staffers from Cuba.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

‘End Capitalism, Don’t Enable It,’ And Other Crazy CA Candidate Statements

Here in California, our government gives welfare to illegal aliens, takes away citizens’ guns, teaches our sons they can be daughters, and our daughters, sons.

So it’s to be expected that many, if not most, of this state’s candidates for office are veritable crazy people.

I encountered this firsthand while reading the California Statewide Direct Primary Official Voter Information Guide. It’s a 95-page pamphlet that California voters receive in the mail before a statewide election, and we have one on June 5.

Candidates use the pamphlet as an opportunity to introduce themselves to voters via a “candidate statement.” These statements are amazing, hilarious — and often terrifying.

First, a little background on elections in California: They are no longer of any particular consequence. This is a state bluer than Tobias Funke auditioning for The Blue Man Group. This is a state in which the bounds of policy debate are “left” on the right and “lefter” on the left. This is a state in which a Democrat facing a Democrat is increasingly normal… in general elections.

The left’s newfound dominance in California (it wasn’t long ago that Arnold Schwarzenegger and Pete Wilson were governors and Ronald Reagan won it twice) is no small deal. California is the nation’s largest state in terms of population, gross domestic product, and electoral votes. But it also hasn’t come without a steep cost for California’s residents. The state is shrinking, increasingly impoverished, and broken.

Who’s to blame for this if not Democrats? But for Democrats there’s no personal responsibility, they blame the one man who’s to blame for everything: Donald Trump. He, along with “big business,” is somehow responsible for Democrats in Sacramento and San Francisco and Los Angeles governing the Golden State into the ground.

I can’t explain how, so, for that, let’s go to the candidates’ statements.

We start with U.S. Senate candidate Ling Ling Shi. Ling didn’t include a photo or even a party, but she’s sure that the “2016 U.S. Presidential Election should be nullified by the U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. should rehold 45th U.S. Presidential election.” Rehold?

Democratic Senate candidate Kevin de Leon says that “the President is hellbent on dividing our people and demeaning our California ideals.” He concludes by recounting his role in helping destroy California:

“I led historic efforts to improve the lives of everyday Californians by taking action on universal healthcare, pay equity, immigrant and civil rights, a $15 minimum wage, debt-free higher education, and making California a world leader in the fight against climate change.”

Candidate John Thompson Parker of the Peace and Freedom Party (red: Socialist) cuts to the chase real quick, “End capitalism — don’t enable it.” Hey, it worked for Sen. Bernie Sanders, who owns three house.

In the race for governor, there’s some interesting statements from Green Party Candidate Josh Jones, such as “Trans rights; not extra rights for corporations.”

Democratic candidate Michael Shellenberger wants you to know that Time Magazine recognized him as a “hero of the environment” for his views on climate change.

Peace and Freedom candidate Gloria Estela La Riva believes that “corporations, banks and the Pentagon have dominated society” for “too long.”

The #Resistance continues with another Democrat candidate who wants to make sure everyone knows he’s done his part. Cameron Gharabiklou says, “Because when history is written, it’ll say California rose up, resisted and led this country forward.”

Kevin Akin, another Peace and Freedom socialist wants to use his power as treasurer should he win, wants to promote socially-owned economic units like co-ops, unions, and open up a “State Bank.” Akin wants “democratic control and social ownership of our economy.” So, socialism.

Xavier Becerra is California’s current Attorney General and a flaming leftist. He brought charges against the pro-life undercover team that revealed that Planned Parenthood was selling baby parts.

He also wants voters to know he really doesn’t like the National Rifle Association. “I’ve been fighting for California values all my life and I will never back down whether it’s Big Oil, the NRA, or the Trump administration.”

Nathalie Hrizi Peace and Freedom Party wants to abolish health insurance companies. Hrizi states, “Healthcare is a right! Abolish health insurance companies. State must create non-profit provider for all required insurance. Vote Hrizi 2018!”

Democratic candidate Asig Mahmood wants you all to know that if you don’t elect him you must hate him. “As a Muslim immigrant from the state of California — I’m a triple threat to Donald Trump. I’ll be the first Muslim ever elected to statewide office in the country. Let’s send a clear message — it’s time to get tough on hate.

I’ll end with the most brief and best statement of them all:

Mr. Johnny Wattenburg has no party preference. He has no campaign website, no campaign headquarters. But he asks this simple question about whether to elect him: “Why not!”

Pray for us, America.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

ISIS is on Google Plus. Wait… Google Plus is still a thing?

Listening to the news out of Iraq and Syria these days, you’d be tempted to think that ISIS was pretty much a thing of the past. Their caliphate has been shattered and the few places where they still hold any territory are marginal at best. Despite persistent rumors that the terror group’s leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, was killed in an earlier missile strike, we’ve more recently heard that he’s not only alive but crafting a new strategy to allow his group to continue to thrive even after the physical destruction of the caliphate. (Washington Post)

Despite such rumors, U.S. counterterrorism officials are convinced that Baghdadi is alive and is helping direct long-term strategy for the dwindling numbers of Islamic State fighters defending the group’s remaining strongholds in eastern Syria. The U.S. view is supported by intelligence intercepts and detainee interrogations, as well as writings and statements by operatives within the terrorist group’s network.

The evidence, while spotty and difficult to confirm, depicts a leader who has opted to make himself invisible, even within his organization — a decision that has drawn complaints from followers and arguably undercuts his ability to rally his beleaguered forces, terrorism experts say.

The major thrust of Baghdadi’s new mission allegedly focuses on communication. He needs to reach out to children, specifically, and disaffected younger adult Muslims, inspiring them to continue with isolated terror attacks around the globe. But how can he best do that? I’m starting to wonder if this guy is really such a genius after all because he apparently decided on Google Plus as his platform of choice. (The Hill)

Scores of pro-ISIS accounts and communities have found a home on Google Plus despite being purged from other social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook, according to a review by The Hill.

The Hill found dozens of pages across Google’s social media platform that explicitly show Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) propaganda, give news updates directly pulled from ISIS media, spread messages of hate towards Jews and other groups or show extremist imagery.

The Google Plus accounts and communities sharing ISIS-linked content did little to hide their affiliation. Many openly professed their support of the terrorist group. In many cases, accounts featured the ISIS flag and pictures of ISIS fighters.

First of all, I didn’t think Google Plus was still active in the social media market. I know I had an account for a while but I barely used it. They supposedly stopped supporting it more than three years ago and Wired pronounced it dead at the time. But then again, maybe that’s what makes it ideal for ISIS. The platform is still out there, but not being supported. So there’s probably not many people (including at Google) looking at it. Is ISIS hiding in plain sight?

Let’s say this is true. (And from the look of some of the accounts they highlighted, it certainly looks plausible.) Rather than worrying solely about the remnants of ISIS, shouldn’t we be asking how Google didn’t pick up on this on their own? This basically means that they have enough free time to shut down conservatives with “dangerous views” but ISIS accounts don’t qualify as hate speech?

Get on the ball, Google. Solve some real problems rather than picking winners and losers in domestic politics. Oh, and you might want to bring back the “Don’t Be Evil” part of your mandate.

The post ISIS is on Google Plus. Wait… Google Plus is still a thing? appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

Honest FBI Agents Step Forward: Want to Testify Against Their Deep State Masters

Honest FBI Agents Step Forward: Want to Testify Against Their Deep State Masters

Well, what do you know? There are honest men and women in the FBI after all!

Several agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation want Congress to subpoena them so they can rat out fired Director James Comey and former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

They are sick of the public stain the immoral and criminal former leaders have placed on the FBI.

Via Kerry Picket at The Daily Caller:

Many agents in the FBI want Congress to subpoena them so they can reveal problems caused by former FBI Director James Comey and former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, three people in direct contact with active field agents tell TheDC.

“There are agents all over this country who love the bureau and are sickened by [James] Comey’s behavior and [Andrew] McCabe and [Eric] Holder and [Loretta] Lynch and the thugs like [John] Brennan–who despise the fact that the bureau was used as a tool of political intelligence by the Obama administration thugs,” former federal prosecutor Joe DiGenova told The Daily Caller Tuesday. “They are just waiting for a chance to come forward and testify.”

Ahead of the release of the Department of Justice (DOJ) inspector general report on how the FBI handled the Clinton email investigation, TheDC spoke with DiGenova, a former Trump official who maintained contact with rank and file FBI agents and a counter-intelligence consultant who conducted an interview with an active special agent of the FBI’s Washington Field Office (WFO)…

…These agents prefer to be subpoenaed to becoming an official government whistleblower, since they fear political and professional backlash, the former Trump administration official explained to TheDC.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

They’ve blown up the Boy Scouts. What next?

Minutes after awakening this morning, my wife Mary read me this disturbing headline from her phone, “Condoms Required at Scouts’ 24th World Jamboree.”  My mind immediately went back years ago to when LGBTQ activists demanded that the Boy Scouts of America accept openly homosexual leaders.  LGBTQ activists claimed that homosexuals did not intend to change the Scouts.  They simply wanted to be included.  I remember a deceived parent on Facebook saying if the Boy Scouts did not surrender to permitting openly gay Scout masters, she would remove her son from the intolerant, bigoted hate group.


Mary read out loud from the article that, outrageously, the rules demand that condoms be distributed to the underage kids during the 12-day camping event.  My thoughts went to the movie Planet of the Apes at the end, when Charleston Heston’s character said, “You maniacs!  You blew it up!  Damn you…damn you all to hell!” 



In 1910, Lord Robert Baden-Powell founded the Boys Scouts Association.  In his book, “Scouting for Boys,” Baden-Powell stated his purpose for the organization. 


“We aim for the practice of Christianity in their everyday life and dealings, and not merely the profession of theology on Sundays[.]”


All these years later, wimpy, spineless officials and administrators have allowed political correctness and LGBTQ activists to blow up Baden-Powell’s vision, corrupting yet another once great Christian organization.  Yes, I am extremely angry.


All who sounded the alarm that allowing promoters of homosexuality into the Christian-based organization would change the Boy Scouts were branded paranoid haters.  Meanwhile, LGBTQ activists have forced the Boy Scouts to change the original Scout Oath.


“On my honor, I will do my best to do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law; to help other people at all times; to keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight.”


What awesome and upright principles.  Imagine how wonderful our country would be if more men lived by this creed.  LGBTQ activists have intimidated the Scouts into removing “morally straight” from the Scout Oath.


LGBTQ activists have forced Baden-Powell’s organization to drop “boy” from its name and admit girls in 2019. 


Will someone please tell me what was hateful or mean about Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts having separate organizations?  Do y’all know that LGBTQ activists seek to erase the gender line between male and female?  Public school teachers are forced to address elementary students as “eagles” rather than boys and girls. 


Folks, I am so sick of mainstream people in power cowering to LGBTQ activists.  When will someone have the courage to tell these people no?  I vow to slap the next Christian who tells me we need to be more passive and loving.  I’m kidding.  But look where passivity has gotten us.


SOGI (Sexual Orientation Gender Identity) laws mandate that LGBTQ lessons be implemented in every grade (pre-K through 12) and every subject.  Math questions begin with “two guys enter a gay bar.”  In public schools, LGBTQ lessons include BDSM, anal sexual activity, asphyxiation, gender-bending, and rimming.  Does this sound as insane to you as it does to me?  And yet this vile brainwashing and robbery of our kids’ innocence continues unabated beneath the national radar.


Whitney Houston was correct when she sang, “I believe the children are our future.”  If we keep allowing leftists to confiscate our children, game over.  Our future as a great nation is lost.


Years ago, LGBTQ activists beat the crap out of me in the media for asking this question.  Rather than forcing the Boy Scouts to abandon its Christian roots, why wouldn’t homosexuals start their own youth organization?  What is stopping pedophiles who run NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association) from starting a scouting program?  LGBTQ activists branded me a hater for asking this logical question.


The truth is, LGBTQ activists are on a mission to destroy Christian institutions – to force Christians to “approve” their lifestyle.  LGBTQ activists seek to force Christians to betray Jesus by kneeling in worship to their false god of depravity.  Leftists are working to create a godless America in which anything goes sexually.  Everywhere you turn, you can see evidence of leftists’ removing traditional Godly principles and values that have made America great.  It sickens me whenever I see politicians and people in power caving to LGBTQ activists’ demands.


In 1962, we caved to leftists’ demand to remove prayer from public schools.  Schools have progressively transformed from institutions of discipline and learning to hellholes of violence, daycare for parents in middle school, drug abuse, disrespect for authority, and students graduating unable to read their diplomas.  Meanwhile, we keep allowing leftists to have their way.


What great Christian institution, traditional value, or principle will LGBTQ leftists target next for destruction?


The good news is, I am seeing signs of more Americans pushing back against LGBTQ leftist bullying. 


Oh, how I long to see the spirit of John Wayne reborn in an American leader with true grit.  Oh, wait – we have that in Donald Trump.  Still, America needs more leaders with backbone to tell LGBTQ leftists no.


Lloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated American

Help Lloyd spread the Truth: http://bit.ly/2kZqmUk

http://LloydMarcus.com


Minutes after awakening this morning, my wife Mary read me this disturbing headline from her phone, “Condoms Required at Scouts’ 24th World Jamboree.”  My mind immediately went back years ago to when LGBTQ activists demanded that the Boy Scouts of America accept openly homosexual leaders.  LGBTQ activists claimed that homosexuals did not intend to change the Scouts.  They simply wanted to be included.  I remember a deceived parent on Facebook saying if the Boy Scouts did not surrender to permitting openly gay Scout masters, she would remove her son from the intolerant, bigoted hate group.


Mary read out loud from the article that, outrageously, the rules demand that condoms be distributed to the underage kids during the 12-day camping event.  My thoughts went to the movie Planet of the Apes at the end, when Charleston Heston’s character said, “You maniacs!  You blew it up!  Damn you…damn you all to hell!” 


In 1910, Lord Robert Baden-Powell founded the Boys Scouts Association.  In his book, “Scouting for Boys,” Baden-Powell stated his purpose for the organization. 


“We aim for the practice of Christianity in their everyday life and dealings, and not merely the profession of theology on Sundays[.]”


All these years later, wimpy, spineless officials and administrators have allowed political correctness and LGBTQ activists to blow up Baden-Powell’s vision, corrupting yet another once great Christian organization.  Yes, I am extremely angry.


All who sounded the alarm that allowing promoters of homosexuality into the Christian-based organization would change the Boy Scouts were branded paranoid haters.  Meanwhile, LGBTQ activists have forced the Boy Scouts to change the original Scout Oath.


“On my honor, I will do my best to do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law; to help other people at all times; to keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight.”


What awesome and upright principles.  Imagine how wonderful our country would be if more men lived by this creed.  LGBTQ activists have intimidated the Scouts into removing “morally straight” from the Scout Oath.


LGBTQ activists have forced Baden-Powell’s organization to drop “boy” from its name and admit girls in 2019. 


Will someone please tell me what was hateful or mean about Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts having separate organizations?  Do y’all know that LGBTQ activists seek to erase the gender line between male and female?  Public school teachers are forced to address elementary students as “eagles” rather than boys and girls. 


Folks, I am so sick of mainstream people in power cowering to LGBTQ activists.  When will someone have the courage to tell these people no?  I vow to slap the next Christian who tells me we need to be more passive and loving.  I’m kidding.  But look where passivity has gotten us.


SOGI (Sexual Orientation Gender Identity) laws mandate that LGBTQ lessons be implemented in every grade (pre-K through 12) and every subject.  Math questions begin with “two guys enter a gay bar.”  In public schools, LGBTQ lessons include BDSM, anal sexual activity, asphyxiation, gender-bending, and rimming.  Does this sound as insane to you as it does to me?  And yet this vile brainwashing and robbery of our kids’ innocence continues unabated beneath the national radar.


Whitney Houston was correct when she sang, “I believe the children are our future.”  If we keep allowing leftists to confiscate our children, game over.  Our future as a great nation is lost.


Years ago, LGBTQ activists beat the crap out of me in the media for asking this question.  Rather than forcing the Boy Scouts to abandon its Christian roots, why wouldn’t homosexuals start their own youth organization?  What is stopping pedophiles who run NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association) from starting a scouting program?  LGBTQ activists branded me a hater for asking this logical question.


The truth is, LGBTQ activists are on a mission to destroy Christian institutions – to force Christians to “approve” their lifestyle.  LGBTQ activists seek to force Christians to betray Jesus by kneeling in worship to their false god of depravity.  Leftists are working to create a godless America in which anything goes sexually.  Everywhere you turn, you can see evidence of leftists’ removing traditional Godly principles and values that have made America great.  It sickens me whenever I see politicians and people in power caving to LGBTQ activists’ demands.


In 1962, we caved to leftists’ demand to remove prayer from public schools.  Schools have progressively transformed from institutions of discipline and learning to hellholes of violence, daycare for parents in middle school, drug abuse, disrespect for authority, and students graduating unable to read their diplomas.  Meanwhile, we keep allowing leftists to have their way.


What great Christian institution, traditional value, or principle will LGBTQ leftists target next for destruction?


The good news is, I am seeing signs of more Americans pushing back against LGBTQ leftist bullying. 


Oh, how I long to see the spirit of John Wayne reborn in an American leader with true grit.  Oh, wait – we have that in Donald Trump.  Still, America needs more leaders with backbone to tell LGBTQ leftists no.


Lloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated American

Help Lloyd spread the Truth: http://bit.ly/2kZqmUk

http://LloydMarcus.com




via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Coming attractions: FBI agents speaking out about the abuses of Comey and McCabe

President Trump this morning on Twitter applied the name  “Spygate” to the ongoing revelations about the FBI and intelligence community employing their technological and human agent tools to spy on the Trump presidential campaign and transition.


 




President Trump this morning on Twitter applied the name  “Spygate” to the ongoing revelations about the FBI and intelligence community employing their technological and human agent tools to spy on the Trump presidential campaign and transition.


 





It’s a good title for what is going to be a long form reality television program (as well as a political scandal and constitutional crisis, among other far-reaching consequences). Despite the best efforts of the Trump-hatting, Russia/Stormy Daniels-obsessed media to ignore it, the story is going to build into a major factor in the coming midterm elections and far beyond. And it will be driven by forces beyond the control of the combined might of CNN, The New York Times, NBC, and the other grandees of the mainstream media. For one thing, the POTUS is tweeting – a LOT, leading up to the Spygate moniker:


 



 



 



 



 



 



 



 



But beyond tweets, there will be a cascade of evidence coming our way. The DOJ Inspector General’s report is one source, and potential criminal referrals from that report could provide far more grist for the wheels of justice to grind. But the wheels of justice move slowly. Before that happens, there will other drama playing out.


Kerry Pickett of the Daily Caller has been in touch with sources who tell her:


Many agents in the FBI want Congress to subpoena them so they can reveal problems caused by former FBI Director James Comey and former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, three people in direct contact with active field agents tell TheDC.


“There are agents all over this country who love the bureau and are sickened by [James] Comey’s behavior and [Andrew] McCabe and [Eric] Holder and [Loretta] Lynch and the thugs like [John] Brennan–who despise the fact that the bureau was used as a tool of political intelligence by the Obama administration thugs,” former federal prosecutor Joe DiGenova told The Daily Caller Tuesday. “They are just waiting for a chance to come forward and testify.”


DiGenova is willing to go on the record, but another source for Pickett needs anonymity, at least for the moment:


…a counter-intelligence consultant who conducted an interview with an active special agent of the FBI’s Washington Field Office (WFO).


The DC independently confirmed the veracity of the consultant’s position and access, and reviewed detailed transcripts of his Q&A with the special agent, who requested the arrangement due to internal dragnets and fear of vicious retribution.


These agents prefer to be subpoenaed to becoming an official government whistleblower, since they fear political and professional backlash, the former Trump administration official [DiGenova] explained to The DC.


The subpoena is preferred, he said, “because when you are subpoenaed, Congress then pays…for your legal counsel and the subpoena protects [the agent] from any organizational retaliation…. they are on their own as whistleblowers, they get no legal protection and there will be organizational retaliation against them.”


So, once the subpoenas are issued – and they will be, the timing to depend on other evidence – probably the IG report — laying the predicate, expect a dam burst of testimony:


The special agent out of WFO alleged that rank and file FBI agents are fed up and desperately want action from the DOJ, according to the transcripts.


“Every special agent I have spoken to in the Washington Field Office wants to see McCabe prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. They feel the same way about Comey,“ the special agent said, according to transcripts provided to The DC (snip)


The special agent added, “Activity that Congress is investigating is being stonewalled by leadership and rank-and-file FBI employees in the periphery are just doing their jobs. All Congress needs to do is subpoena involved personnel and they will tell you what they know. These are honest people. Leadership cannot stop anyone from responding to a subpoena. Those subpoenaed also get legal counsel provided by the government to represent them.


Keep in mind that Watergate took a very long time to unfold. In today’s media environment of social media and cable news, the pace is faster, but still requires time. A vast transition in psychology is part of the reason for this pace. Potential whistleblowers need to feel safe, which requires a body of supportive evidence exist before they can take that risk. And the general public has to be acclimated to the notion that that something very wrong has taken place. Right now, conservative consumers of conservative media generally understand the magnitude of the scandal and have knowledge of some of the intricacies of the narrative – points like the changing timelines offered for when the investigation of the Trump campaign began. But this understanding requires time, energy, and a focus on the issue.


For the story to break out into the consciousness of casual news consumers, points of dramatic conflict are necessary. The presidential tweets and labels provide some of that, but more important will be testimony under oath that paints a picture of clear corruption. Such as FBI agents accusing well-known figures like Comey and McCabe of abusing their authority. Or maybe even former members of the cabal confessing their own roles and seeking mercy from the court.


If you are looking for a promising investment, consider popcorn futures.




via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/