NY Times Accused Of Anti-Israel Bias In Coverage Of Mideast Violence

NY Times not acknowledging that Hamas is behind the violence in an attempt to breach the wall into Israel.

Via Fox News:

Critics on social media accused The New York Times of anti-Israel bias in the newspaper’s reporting on riots in the Gaza Strip that left dozens of Palestinians dead Monday.

At the height of the violence, the headline on the Times’ website read: “Israel Kills 58 and Injures Over 1,300 by Gunfire at Gaza Border.” As of Monday evening, the slightly edited headline read: “Israeli Soldiers Kill Scores at Gaza Border; Thousands Hurt.”

A subhead described “[a] mass attempt by Palestinians to cross the border fence” that “quickly turned violent, as Israeli soldiers responded with rifle fire.”

An Israeli military spokesman said protesters carried out “concerted, coordinated” attacks on the border fence separating Gaza from Israel, causing “significant damage.”

Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus also told The Associated Press that Hamas militants disguised as protesters tried to infiltrate, and there were at least three instances of armed Hamas gunmen trying to carry out attacks. The Times did not mention those claims until the 42nd paragraph of its main story Monday night.

Some Twitter users accused the Times of ignoring the Hamas angle. One user tweeted that “Hamas organized and sacrificed these poor people. They are pawns who the Palestinians [sic] powers give less than a damn about.”[…]

“The New York Times can and should provide excellent journalism, but unfortunately its coverage of Israel right now is often marred by errors, bias, and significant omissions,” CAMERA senior research analyst Gilead Ini told Fox News at the time. “In the recent Gaza violence driven by Hamas, to mention just one instance, the Times termed the barrages of fire bombs, rocks and attempts to tear down the border fence an ‘experiment with nonviolent protest.’”

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Google Employees Quit Over Controversial Pentagon Work

Taking a stand for social justice.

Via NY Post:

There’s something eating at Google employees.

Roughly one dozen employees of the search giant have resigned in the wake of reports that the Mountain View, Calif., company is providing artificial intelligence to the Pentagon, according to a report on Monday.

The employees resigned because of ethical concerns over the company’s work with the Defense Department that includes helping the military speed up analysis of drone footage by automatically classifying images of objects and people, Gizmodo reported.

News of the Google-Pentagon agreement, which involves the controversial Project Maven, surfaced roughly three months ago.

Many of the employees who quit have written accounts of their decisions to leave the company — and their stories have been gathered and shared in an internal document, the contents of which multiple sources have described to Gizmodo, which first reported on the Google exits.

Google executives have become less transparent with their workforce about controversial business decisions and seem less interested in listening to workers’ objections than they once did, according to several of the exiting workers who discussed their decision to leave with Gizmodo.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

TN-Sen: Republicans could actually lose a key US Senate seat in GOP-dominated Tennessee

President Donald Trump won 92 of 95 counties in Tennessee during the 2016 presidential election, a state that is increasingly becoming more conservative.

It would conceivably be a no-brainer that Republicans are a virtual lock to maintain control of the Senate seat being vacated by Sen. Bob Corker (R), who announced his retirement last year.

But that would be incorrect. In fact, national observers believe the race for the seat will be uncomfortably close for Republicans. That begs just one question: How is that possible in a GOP-dominated state?

Who is the Democrat running for the seat?

The Democratic Party’s “secret weapon” of sorts is former Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen, a popular Tennessee politician with crossover appeal as a moderate Democrat. He also served two terms as mayor of Nashville in the 1990s.

In fact, during his time in Nashville, Bredesen was more than just popular. During his re-election for governor, he won each of Tennessee’s 95 counties, an inconceivable feat in modern politics.

Bredesen’s powerhouse name, impressive portfolio, and status as an “outsider” — he has never served in Washington — will certainly make him a formidable challenger to Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R), who most believe will win the GOP primary in the race. She enjoys support from President Trump and Gov. Bill Haslam (R).

How can Bredesen win?

He’s popular and has a strong track record. During his time as governor in the mid-2000s, Bredesen’s approval ratings soared to 65 percent, securing the landslide victory for his second term.

That support remains today, despite his absence from politics for most of the 2010s. A poll conducted by Middle Tennessee State University last month showed that Bredesen commands a solid 10-point lead over Blackburn. The poll found that 45 percent of registered voters would support Bredesen, with 35 percent vowing to support Blackburn, and 17 percent saying they’re undecided.

The RealClearPolitics polling average shows Bredesen with a slimmer lead — just 5 points — over Blackburn. However, the lead is still significant, yet one Blackburn could easily overcome.

Bredesen also has popular Democrats, such as former Vice President Joe Biden, in his corner ready to strengthen his war chest. Just last month, Biden was in Tennessee to boost the former governor.

Bredesen’s brand of politics might also give him a boost this November. He is seen more as a pragmatic leader as opposed to Blackburn, who is highly supportive of Trump and is seen as a hardline ideologue in Congress. Politico said “Chamber of Commerce-type Republicans” will support Bredesen, giving him crossover appeal that reaches moderate Republicans.

What has Corker said?

Since Corker is the one willingly giving up his seat at the close of his second Senate term this November, what does think of the race? He’s been slow to voice support for Blackburn while seemingly supporting Bredesen.

Corker said last month he believes Bredesen has “real appeal” to Tennessee Republicans, but cautioned that it may not be enough to secure victory in November.

“I think he’s got real appeal — I don’t think it, I know it. The question is, in a state like ours that is still a red state, is it enough? I don’t know the answer to that,” he said, according to the Tennessean.

What are outcome predictions?

Despite Bredesen’s current lead in the polls, political expert Larry Sabato still believes the GOP nominee, whomever it may be, will likely find victory in November. According to his current “Crystal Ball” Senate map, he predicts Tennessee is a “lean GOP” state.

However, that prediction is a departure from just one month ago when he listed the Volunteer State as “likely Republican.”

Why is Tennessee so important?

If Republicans want to maintain their majority in the Senate, they will need to retain control of Corker’s seat. Republicans currently hold just a one seat majority in the Senate: 51 seats are held by Republicans, 47 by Democrats and two by Independents.

This November’s election will see 33 Senate seats up for grabs, 23 of which are currently held by Democratic incumbents. Of the remaining 10 seats, Republicans control eight and Independents hold two.

That means if Republicans are to maintain their slim majority, they cannot afford to lose any seats. What’s worse: If Democrats are able to flip Corker’s seat in the heart of the GOP, then they likely have the enough support nationwide to flip the Senate back to their control.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com

WATCH: ‘Historic/Controversial’ Supercut Shows That Two Simple Words Can Change The Way We See World Events

On Monday, Andrew Kugle of "The Washington Free Beacon" released a rather brilliant video showcasing the differences in news coverage between the Jerusalem embassy move and the Obama administration announcing normalized relations with Cuba.
Take a look:

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

WATCH: Shapiro On Fox Rips Media’s Israel/Hamas Coverage: ‘They Are Playing Propaganda Wing For A Terrorist Group’

Appearing on Fox & Friends Tuesday morning, Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief Ben Shapiro was asked about the media coverage of the confrontation between the Israeli Defense Forces and the Palestinians egged on by the terrorist group Hamas to breach the border with Israel. Shapiro pointed out how the media were acting as the emissaries of the terrorist group, stating that Hamas was “not hiding the ball here, and the media are hiding the ball.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Twitter Defends Having Terrorist Group Hamas on Website

A Twitter spokesperson defended Hamas’ ability to maintain a presence on the site, despite Twitter’s rule against supporting and perpetuating violence. According to the spokesperson, the group’s alleged commitment to peace and status as a democratically-elected organization exempts Hamas from the explicit rule banning terrorist organizations from the platform.

The Hamas Movement Twitter account, known as HamasInfoEn, claims to be the “official account” of the Hamas Movement in its banner on Twitter. While it is possible the account is not actually affiliated with Hamas, it has been cited in reporting by Haaretz, the Jewish Press, and the Times of Israel, and others.

As recently as March, Hamas called for participation in a “Friday of Rage” on its Twitter account.

It also responded to Israel killing six Hamas terrorists with a threat: “We thwarted a dangerous Israeli scheme, retaliation to follow.”

Even if the Hamas Movement Twitter account is not a real Hamas-affiliated account, its existence would seemingly still violate Twitter’s rule against “[v]iolence and physical harm,” which claims to ban users based on their support for a terrorist organization:

Violence: You may not make specific threats of violence or wish for the serious physical harm, death, or disease of an individual or group of people. This includes, but is not limited to, threatening or promoting terrorism. You also may not affiliate with organizations that — whether by their own statements or activity both on and off the platform — use or promote violence against civilians to further their causes.

Hamas is considered a foreign terrorist organization in the United States, where Twitter operates. It was designated a terrorist organization in 1997 by former President Bill Clinton.

However, a spokesperson for Twitter told the Media Research Center there is actually a different set of rules that applies to Hamas, covered under the policies for “[v]iolent extremist groups.”

While the Twitter spokesperson said she could not comment on specific accounts, the spokesperson directed the Media Research Center to this specific passage of the rules against violent extremist groups:

Exceptions will be considered for groups that have reformed or are currently engaging in a peaceful resolution process, as well as groups with representatives elected to public office through democratic elections.

The exemption goes on to claim that the policy also “does not apply to military or government entities.”

Therefore, even though Hamas violates all of the determining factors Twitter uses when deciding whether a group is a violent extremist group, it is still able to be on Twitter because of its status as a democratically-elected government and its alleged commitments to peace.

Twitter appears to apply an arbitrary double-standard when it comes to enforcing its rule against belonging to organizations that promote violence off the website. While non-violent right-wing organizations and users have gotten purged as a result of Twitter’s offline behavior rule, Hamas is reportedly the driving force behind the violence at the Gaza border that has led to a claim of 60 deaths just this week, and 116 overall since the protests began on March 30 (pictured above).

 

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

Massive Asteroid Will Nearly Buzz Earth at Half the Distance to the Moon

Massive Asteroid Will Nearly Buzz Earth at Half the Distance to the Moon



Asteroid 2010 WC9 will pass even closer to the Earth than the moon on Tuesday — closer than it has been in 300 years.

The catchy-named 2010 WC9 is somewhere between 200 and 400 feet in diameter, “as big across as a city block” according to Goddard Space Flight Center asteroid expert Dr. Erin Ryan. It is expected to pass 126,000 miles from the Earth — about half the distance to the moon — at a blistering 29,000 miles per hour at 6:05 PM EDT on Tuesday.

You might think this encounter would make for quite a show, but 2010 WC9 is also relatively demure; it was too faint to be visible to the naked eye. London, England’s Northolt Branch Observatories began live-streaming its approach at about 7 PM on May 14.

For all its proximity and speed, NASA is certain the asteroid presents no real danger. “We knew enough not to be worried,” said Dr. Paul Chodas, director of the Center for Near-Earth Object Studies at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, after the object was discovered in 2010.

Chodas said an asteroid of 2010 WC9’s size hits Earth about once every 6,000 years, but luckily for us, it does not appear that we will have to personally confirm that any time soon. As of December 2017, Dr. Amy Mainzer — an asteroid expert at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory — reported that “there are no objects that have been identified that are known to be on a collision course with Earth.”

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

Five GOP Governors Who Surrendered Ground on Gun Control in 2018

Five GOP Governors Who Surrendered Ground on Gun Control in 2018



The post-Parkland gun control push may have netted zero action in Congress but it has certainly found takers in one of the most unlikely of places—five Republican Governors who have surrendered ground on gun control or made clear their intentions to do so.

The state-level slide toward gun control began in Florida, where Gov. Rick Scott (R) signed a $400 million gun control bill into law. Breitbart News reported that the gun controls included firearm confiscation orders, waiting period for long gun purchases, and an increase in minimum purchase age from 18 to 21.

The Los Angeles Times reported that the measure Rick Scott signed also banned bump stocks, which were not even used in the Parkland school shooting.

On April 12, 2018, Vermont Gov. Phil Scott (R) signed a massive body of gun controls into law. Those controls included a ban on private gun sales and bump stocks, although neither private gun sales nor bump stocks were contributors to the Parkland attack.

Phil Scott’s gun controls also bar law-abiding citizens from owning “high capacity” magazines.

Ironically, Phil Scott was able to win the gubernatorial race by proclaiming he saw no need for more gun control in the state of Vermont. On June 22, 2016, he told Vermont Public Radio, “I don’t believe that we need more gun restrictions in Vermont at this time. I think we should enforce the ones we have. I think we should focus more on safety and gun education, but also addressing the violence problem that is systemic across the country – and I don’t have the answers for that, but that’s what’s driving this frustration, this outrage.”

On April 24, 2018, Huffington Post reported that Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) signed a bill which bans bump stocks and implements a law to allow police to confiscate firearms. The firearm confiscation law is described as a “red flag” law.

On May 14, 2018, Breitbart News reported that Gov. Bruce Rauner (R) proposed confiscation laws for his state, as well as a tripling of the 24-hour waiting period on gun purchases. Rauner wants law-abiding citizens to wait 72 hours before being allowed to pick up their guns at the store and take them home.

Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin (R) had the opportunity to roll back gun controls and regulations via permitless carry legislation that reached her desk last week. Instead she vetoed the measure, thereby preserving the requirement that law-abiding citizens obtain permission from their state government before being allowed to exercise rights that “shall not be infringed.”

NRA-ILA executive director Chris Cox responded to Fallin’s veto by saying, “Gov. Mary Fallin vetoed this important piece of self-defense legislation. … Make no mistake, this temporary setback will be rectified when Oklahoma residents elect a new, and genuinely pro-Second Amendment governor.”

AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News, the host of the Breitbart podcast Bullets with AWR Hawkins, and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com. Sign up to get Down Range at breitbart.com/downrange.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

Soros’s Hungarian Empire on Verge of Collapse as University Ready to Leave

Soros’s Hungarian Empire on Verge of Collapse as University Ready to Leave



George Soros’s Central European University is prepared to move out of Hungary after his Open Society Foundations announced Tuesday it was also leaving the country.

President and Rector of CEU Michael Ignatieff said that the university “can’t go into another academic year” if the Hungarian government did not sign a deal in the next few months.

“But I will say that if we get pushed, we will not go quietly, and I think they know that,” the former liberal Canadian politician told The Guardian.

The Hungarian government has maintained that the institution operates as an “offshore university”, offering both Hungarian and the U.S. diplomas despite not having an American campus, and is in violation of education laws.

CEU has since established a base at Bard College in New York State, with a Hungarian government spokesman saying that it was examining papers submitted by the Soros-founded institution but that “This inquiry is more complicated than those with other schools because there was no American mother institution originally.”

In April, Deputy Rector Éva Fodor said that the university had already sought a new location in Austria and that if an agreement was not met by mid-June academics “will start planning to move the entire university to Vienna”.

On Tuesday, Breitbart London reported that Soros’s progressive grantmaking Open Society Foundations is closing its Budapest office and will relocate to Germany in response to the government’s “repressive” crackdown on foreign-funded pressure groups.

Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s conservative-Christian Fidesz-KDNP coalition won a two-thirds supermajority in parliamentary elections on April 8th, and ran on a patriotic platform of sovereignty, protecting the country’s borders, and stopping intervention from large, foreign NGOs.

Ignatieff was astounded that Orbán, who has stood firm against European Union demands to open Hungary’s borders and accept migrants from the Middle East and Africa, ran on a platform of promises he intends to fulfil.

“I’ve been in politics. You say a lot of things to win elections,” the former liberal Canadian politician told the newspaper.

“I genuinely don’t know if this was just to win an election or is there something else. There’s no question this is a government with a very strong point of view. Is this an ideology? Is this a vision? How far are they going to go with that vision?”

The government’s vision for the country appears to be one that will strive to build a “Christian democracy” and protect the country’s borders, as per Mr. Orbán’s speech during his inauguration on May 10th.

Follow Breitbart London on Facebook and Twitter.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com