On Friday, Fox News reported that articles of impeachment have been drafted for Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, although they have not yet been officially filed.
Fox News’ congressional reporter Chad Pergram reported that the articles of impeachment have been drafted although it is not clear which lawmaker drafted the articles and it’s not clear if they will go to a committee or to the floor.
If you are one of those people who believes the purpose of school is to educate children rather than indoctrinate them in the ways of liberalism, you probably went to one of those “stupid” schools that actually teaches. A school board in Maine just passed a gun control resolution because…I have no idea why. Seriously, for what reason would a school board pass a gun control resolution? It’s not even related to the debate around arming and training teachers, it’s just a typical liberal gun-grabbing/rights-stomping anti-2nd Amendment rant.
A resolution asking elected official at all levels to enact “common sense gun measures and other laws”…was adopted unanimously by the Mount Desert Island Regional School System (MDIRSS) board Monday night.
It urges passage of gun control measures including “universal background checks; increased regulation of gun ownership for those with criminal records, domestic violence, drug and alcohol convictions, and mental illness; increased research on the effects of gun violence on our society; and increased regulation of the civilian use of lethal, semi-automatic weapons and related devices that are weapons of choice in mass shootings.”
“It’s an opportunity to show our kids and the staff who work in our buildings that we really care, we really take them seriously, and we’re willing to take a stand on really hard issues,” said resolution sponsor Caroline Pryor.
No, it shows that the school board wastes its time pushing a liberal unconstitutional agenda.
And about that, the school board thinks they have their bases covered:
As part of the resolution, the school board affirmed the following: “We believe in and support the U.S. Constitution and all of its amendments, including the Second Amendment’s rights for sportswomen and men, hunters and others to own and use appropriate firearms.”
Let’s dissect the logic here, shall we? Saying you support the 2nd Amendment rights of only hunters and sportsman means you don’t support those rights for others. If you don’t support gun ownership rights for everyone, you don’t support the 2nd Amendment.
Also, since the the 2nd Amendment doesn’t say anything about gun ownership being limited to hunting and sporting purposes, claiming it does shows a complete lack of support for it. Plus, these nimrods want to put massive restrictions on gun ownership and ban weapons, which are 2 telltale signs that they may not be the biggest 2nd Amendment supporters on the block.
But let’s hear from an actual gun owner. Surely he would be against this resolution, right?
Board member Scott Grierson, a longtime gun owner who spoke in favor of the resolution at the school board’s March meeting, reiterated his support Monday.
Observing that he might be more comfortable with guns than many other members of the school board, Grierson said, “As someone probably from the other side of the spectrum, I applaud this resolution. Amen, I’m all for it.
He voted for a gun control resolution. I can assure him he’s on the same side of the spectrum as the non-gun owning liberals.
Now check out this weird little section:
“I don’t think this is about being anti gun or pro gun. This is trying to find some reasonableness, and I think this is a reasonable approach,” said Grierson.
Board member John Bench agreed that the resolution is reasonable.
As you can see, the consensus is that gun control is reasonable. It’s like these people have been brainwashed and programmed to repeat the same words. “Yes, we all agree on the reasonableness of the reasoning behind this reasonable reason.”
Let’s keep in mind that these people are members of a school board, responsible for the education of children, and they have changed the meaning of “unreasonable” to “reasonable.” Is it reasonable to restrict a Constitutionally protected civil right? Is it reasonable to strip a person of their ability to defend themselves? No, these things a are not reasonable.
On Friday, the Department of Justice’s inspector general released its report on former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe which accuses him of repeatedly misleading investigators. The New York Times reports:
On Friday, The New Yorker honed in on a serious threat to the lives of all New Yorkers: the arrival of Chick-Fil-A in their homey little corner of the universe. In a 1400-word diatribe titled “Chick-Fil-A’s Creepy Infiltration of New York City,” one Dan Piepenring wrote that New Yorkers should not accept the intrusion of a popular restaurant serving chicken because the owner happens to be a religious Christian. “The air smelled fried,” Piepenring wrote, ominously.
Conservative street artist Sabo has been permanently suspended from Twitter.
Sabo, who ran the @UnsavoryAgents account, was banned from the platform on Friday.
“Was not told why or for how long. I just saw I no longer have my 32,000 followers and I’m no longer following anybody,” claimed Sabo in an email to Breitbart Tech. “They want nothing less than to completely destroy us on the Right.”
Sabo has frequently criticized the power that large tech companies and social networks, and this month the street artist plastered New York City with posters targeting Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. He also mocked Zuckerberg’s potential political aspirations last year.
Last year, Sabo also posted anti-Google advertisements outside of the company’s offices in Los Angeles.
Social justice warrior ex-NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick may have just blown his best shot at landing a pro football job.
The polarizing athlete has been working out as he tries to launch a comeback and reportedly was being brought in by the Seattle Seahawks for a workout to be Russell Wilson’s backup.
The Seahawks are a team that is so liberal that Rolling Stone magazine called them the “social justice warriors of the NFL” and would have been a perfect spot for Kaepernick to land.
Only one minor concession on his part was needed and he could start drawing a paycheck again.
All he had to do was agree to stop kneeling during the national anthem.
It was a no brainer but to a man without a functional brain it was too much and after reportedly refusing, the team called off the meeting.
After arranging for Colin Kaepernick to work out for the Seahawks this week, Seattle postponed the trip when the quarterback declined to stop kneeling during the national anthem next season, league sources tell ESPN.
After arranging for Colin Kaepernick to work out for the Seattle Seahawks this week, team officials postponed the trip when the quarterback declined to say he would stop kneeling during the national anthem next season, a league source told ESPN on Thursday.
Seattle still is considering bringing in Kaepernick for a tryout, and no decisions are final, a source said.
The Seahawks had contacted Kaepernick about two weeks ago to arrange a visit to the team’s headquarters, but after tentative arrangements were made and travel was planned, the trip was unexpectedly scuttled over the Seahawks’ last-minute stipulation regarding Kaepernick’s anthem stance, a source told ESPN.
The source said the Seahawks wanted to know that Kaepernick wouldn’t kneel this season, and he was unwilling to give that assurance to them.
So there you have it. Being a “race messiah” SJW without a real job is Kaepernick’s own personal choice. He was all but handed an offer of gainful employment on a silver platter and he chose not to agree to one simple request from his prospective employer.
There is no blackballing, collusion or racism involved, it’s only the guy’s own stubbornness and stupidity.
In slamming the door on this clown, Seattle went out and signed the immortal Stephen Morris who has never appeared in an NFL game but will stand for the anthem.
After canceling a workout with Colin Kaepernick, the Seahawks have signed a quarterback who has never appeared in an NFL game https://t.co/mzVS0CGPFm
Matthew Schoenecker — a freshman at Markesan High School in Wisconsin — was more than happy to show WISN-TV his collection of witty T-shirts depicting guns and other weapons.
One spells the word “Love” using a handgun, grenade, knives and a rifle. Another declares “Celebrate Diversity” underneath an image of 12 different firearms. And then there’s the one that announces, “2nd Amendment: America’s Original Homeland Security.”
Image source: YouTube screenshot
“I enjoy shooting, and I enjoy the Second Amendment, like the right to keep and bear arms,” Matthew told the station.
Image source: YouTube screenshot
But according to Matthew, his principal doesn’t much enjoy his T-shirts — and banned him from wearing them to school, WISN reported.
In fact, the station said Matthew and his parents were told before spring break that he could no longer come to school wearing the T-shirts. But when Matthew went to school last Friday wearing the “Love” T-shirt, he got in trouble, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.
Image source: YouTube screenshot
“It was his choice whether he wears it or not,” Matthew’s father, Brian Schoenecker, told the station. “He decided, ‘I’m gonna wear this. It’s my right.’”
Image source: YouTube screenshot
Schoenecker said he was “a little upset” upon learning that his son was being disciplined and went there with Matthew’s mother, Pam Schoenecker, to “see what’s going on,” WISN reported.
What happened to Matthew?
Matthew’s parents found him in a small room known as “the cubicle” because he refused to cover his gun T-shirt, WISN said. He received no instruction while in the cubicle, the Journal Sentinel reported, adding that the principal sent Matthew there.
Image source: YouTube screenshot
Regarding her son’s T-shirts, Pam Schoenecker told WISN “there’s nothing in there saying he’s promoting violence whatsoever, which is what the principal said was the issue, that he was promoting violence at school.”
How is Matthew fighting back?
Matthew filed a federal lawsuit against the principal, the station reported, adding that gun rights group Wisconsin Carry is funding it.
“I didn’t think it would get this big, this bad,” Matthew told WISN.
What does the suit say?
The suit was filed Monday in Milwaukee and names principal John Koopman as the sole defendant, the Journal Sentinel reported, adding the suit claims Koopman violated Matthew’s freedom of expression and that his T-shirts depict guns and other weapons in “a non-violent, non-threatening manner.”
John Monroe — a Georgia-based attorney who’s successfully represented many Wisconsin gun owners — is representing Matthew, the paper added.
What does Wisconsin Carry have to say?
Nik Clark, Wisconsin Carry president, told the Journal Sentinel that Matthew’s parents are members of his group and that they said teachers were harassing Matthew about his T-shirts after the Parkland, Florida, shooting even though he’d been wearing them all year without an issue.
Image source: YouTube screenshot
Clark added to the paper that he doesn’t believe the case needs to drag on long and that the Markesan community supports gun rights. The suit, he said, seeks only a court order allowing Matthew to wear his T-shirts and costs for bringing the lawsuit, the Journal Sentinel reported.
There are no explicit school rules against T-shirts featuring guns, the paper added, but Koopman told Matthew’s parents at a meeting last month that he has discretion to restrict clothing at school he deems inappropriate.
Both WISN and the Journal Sentinel said the Markesan School District didn’t respond to their requests for comment.
The Seattle Seahawks reportedly postponed Colin Kaepernick’s trip to a pre-season camp with the team after the embattled quarterback told the team he would not stop his national anthem kneeling protests.
The team is thinking about allowing Kaepernick to try out for a spot on the team but they have not made any decisions, a source told ESPN.
Kaepernick, a former San Francisco 49ers quarterback, was contacted by the Seahawks around two weeks ago to make a trip to the team’s center and practice. A source told ESPN the trip was put off after the Seahawks argued about Kaepernick’s anthem protest.
It’s unclear what day the quarterback was supposed to practice with the team.
The team reportedly asked Kaepernick if he would continue his protest if he was signed to the NFL again and he was “unwilling to give that assurance to them.”
Not to mention it wasn’t his decision to make not to prosecute Hillary, he wasn’t the prosecutor and Lynch, whose decision it was, was never recused. So it was her decision or her deputy’s to make.
Lanny Davis, a longtime Clinton family ally, revealed he was interviewed by the Justice Department inspector general for its investigation into the FBI’s handling of the Hillary Clinton emails probe.
Moreover, Davis, who served as a special counsel to former President Bill Clinton, predicts Inspector General Michael Horowitz will come down “very hard” on Comey in its final assessment.
During an interview with Bill O’Reilly on the former Fox News host’s website, Davis explained why he thought Comey should have been fired by former President Barack Obama and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
“I was interviewed by the inspector general. I only told one reporter that and it was never written,” he said. “So this is my first to say that I was interviewed after my making a phone call researching my book that I considered James Comey to have acted unethically and that he should have been fired by Barack Obama and Loretta Lynch because he violated Justice Department policies by holding a press conference and expressing his opinion publicly on the evidence.”
