Pennsylvania school classrooms equipped with ‘large buckets of rocks’ to fend off would-be killers

A schools superintendent in northeast Pennsylvania is arming students with buckets of large rocks in case a would-be killer enters a classroom.

David Helsel, superintendent of the Blue Mountain School District in Orwigsburg, north of Harrisburg, outlined the plan before a recent legislative education committee, WNEP-TV reported.

The discussion comes during a national debate about school violence after a man killed 17 people at a Parkland, Florida, high school. Congress has not introduced new legislation, but President Donald Trump has suggested arming teachers with guns.

How does this work?

“Every classroom has been equipped with a five-gallon bucket of river stone,” Helsel said. “If an armed intruder attempts to gain entrance into any of our classrooms, they will face a classroom full of students armed with rocks, and they will be stoned.”

Helsel’s idea came from a national school safety program called Alert, Lockdown, Inform, Evacuate or “ALICE.” ALICE emphasizes barricading classroom doors for students unable to safely evacuate. Another part of the training is teaching students to distract or fight off intruders.

Helsel admits the rocks are a “last ditch” effort. But it’s better than students cowering in fear and doing nothing, he said.

A bucket of rocks is kept in every school classroom. Along with the rocks, classroom doors are outfitted with devices that make it very difficult for intruders to enter, Helsel said. Students are also taught how to barricade doors.

“At one time, I just had the idea of river stone,” Helsel told the TV station. “They’re the right size for hands, you can throw them very hard, and they will create or cause pain, which can distract.”

The rocks are called “go buckets,” and the district has trained students on their use for about two years.

Are rocks effective against armed killers?

“Obviously a rock against a gun isn’t a fair fight, but it’s better than nothing,” Helsel said in a Fox News report. “I’m not sure why some people feel that it’s more appropriate to be a stationary target under a desk in a classroom rather than be empowered to defend yourself and provide a response to deter the entry of an armed intruder into their classroom.”

Some students and parents told WNEP they support the idea.

“At this point, we have to get creative. We have to protect our kids first and foremost,” parent Dori Bornstein told the TV station. “Throwing rocks, it’s an option.”

But not everyone agrees.

Kenneth Trump, president of the National School Safety and Security Services, a K-12 security consulting firm, called the idea illogical and possibly life-threatening.

Susan Spicka, executive director of Education Voters of Pennsylvania, told BuzzFeed she attended the hearing.

Spicka said a lawmaker responded to Helsel’s bucket of rocks plan by asking, “Can I come out and watch?” Laughter ensued.

“School districts in Pennsylvania are so underfunded, then they joke about kids having to defend themselves,” Spicka told BuzzFeed.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com

Trump Pushes Pentagon With New Transgender Ban… With a Few Small Changes

A revised version of the blanket transgender military ban issued by the president last summer was released by the White House on Friday which would restore a ban on transgender individuals “except under certain limited circumstances.”

According to CBS News, that ban cannot go into effect immediately because of court challenges to the blanket ban that was announced last summer on Twitter.

The proposed ban was based off of a memorandum prepared by Defense Secretary James Mattis, which was presented to the White House in February but not officially released to the public until Friday.

“Among other things, the policies set forth by the Secretary of Defense state that transgender persons with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria — individuals who the policies state may require substantial medical treatment, including medications and surgery — are disqualified from military service except under certain limited circumstances,” the White House memo read, according to Fox News.

The Department of Justice later released a statement saying it found the Pentagon’s findings to be consistent with the law and asked the courts to remove the ban.

Conservative Tribune Daily Email

Thanks For Subscribing!

“After comprehensive study and analysis, the Secretary of Defense concluded that new policies should be adopted regarding individuals with gender dysphoria that are consistent with military effectiveness and lethality, budgetary constraints, and applicable law,” the DOJ statement read.

“The Department of Justice will continue to defend DOD’s lawful authority to create and implement personnel policies they have determined are necessary to best defend our nation.

“Consistent with this new policy, we are asking the courts to lift all related preliminary injunctions in order to ensure the safety and security of the American people and the best fighting force in the world.”

The long-standing ban on transgender individuals serving in the military was reversed by the Obama administration in 2016.

Do you think Trump’s new transgender military ban is a good idea?

The memorandum stated that Defense Secretary Mattis, “in the exercise of his independent judgment,” had formulated the new policy which would prohibit most transgender individuals from serving.

That wording was key, in part because the president’s surprise implementation of the ban via Twitter announcement last summer — an announcement that caught the Pentagon off guard — has played a part in many of the court rulings blocking the ban from taking effect.

Just this week, a judge in Seattle denied a motion to remove an injunction prohibiting the ban from going into effect, noting that the president has failed to produce evidence that the decision was made with the “consultation with my generals and military experts,” as he stated in his tweets.

The memo, however, would seem to provide a strong basis for evidence of consultation.

RELATED: Biden Gets Testy After Reporter Starts Pushing His Buttons on Trump Fight

“Based on the work of the Panel and the Department’s best military judgement, the Department of Defense concludes that there are substantial risks associated with allowing the accession and retention of individuals with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria and require, or have already undertaken, a course of treatment to change their gender,” the memorandum from Mattis read.

“Furthermore, the Department also finds that exempting such persons from well-established mental health, physical health, and sex-based standards, which apply to all Service members, including transgender Service members without gender dysphoria, could undermine readiness, disrupt unit cohesion, and impose an unreasonable burden of the military that is mot conductive to military effectiveness and lethality.”

In terms of the “limited exceptions,” the 48-page memorandum states that individuals who “have been stable for 36 consecutive months in their biological sex prior to accession,” have been “diagnosed with gender dysphoria after entering into the service” and “do not require a change of gender and remain deployable within applicable retention standards” or who are “currently serving Service members who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria since the previous administration’s policy took effect and prior to the effective date of this new policy” that require medical attention may still be retained.

However, individuals who “require or have undergone gender transition are disqualified from military service.”

“Transgender persons without a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria, who are otherwise qualified for service, may service, like all other Service members, in their biological sex.”

Gender dysphoria is a diagnosis which replaced the old diagnosis of gender identity disorder in the DSM-5, the official diagnostic handbook of the American Psychiatric Association, back in 2013. According to the APA’s website, it “involves a conflict between a person’s physical or assigned gender and the gender with which he/she/they identify.

“People with gender dysphoria may be very uncomfortable with the gender they were assigned, sometimes described as being uncomfortable with their body (particularly developments during puberty) or being uncomfortable with the expected roles of their assigned gender,” the APA states.

“People with gender dysphoria may often experience significant distress and/or problems functioning associated with this conflict between the way they feel and think of themselves (referred to as experienced or expressed gender) and their physical or assigned gender.”

What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

Notorious Anthem Kneeler Gets Dealt Brutal Dose of Justice After Allegedly Pushing Elderly Paraplegic

Michael Bennett, the defensive end and national anthem protester who made headlines last year when he accused Las Vegas police of racial discrimination after a chase, has been indicted with pushing an elderly disabled woman in an incident at the 2017 Super Bowl, according to KHOU-TV.

A Harris County grand jury indicted the defensive back on Friday on a felony charge of injury of the elderly. Prosecutors allege that he shoved a 66-year-old paraplegic worker at Super Bowl LI in Houston’s NRG Stadium in February of 2017.

Bennett, now with the Philadelphia Eagles, was in the stadium to watch his brother Martellius Bennett, a tight end with the New England Patriots.

When the Patriots won the game in overtime over the Atlanta Falcons, Houston Police Chief Art Acevedo says that Bennett tried to force his way onto the field even though officials saw no more room for anyone to enter safely. There were also questions over whether Bennett had the proper credentials to enter the playing field.

Officials tried to stop the the 6-foot-4 Bennett, but he barged through locked doors and then accosted two female security workers, including one paralyzed from the waist down.

Conservative Tribune Daily Email

Thanks For Subscribing!

As was making his way onto the field, the 274-pound Bennett allegedly pushed the 66-year-old paralyzed security worker so hard she sprained her shoulder.

When a police officer tried to intervene, Bennett reacted with the same dignity and respect for authority that one might expect from such a gentleman.

“(Bennett) said, ‘F*** you,’ and walked past (the officer) on the field,” Chief Acevedo alleged. “’Y’all must know who I am, and I can own this m***** f*****. I’m going on to the field whether you like it or not.’ Those are quotes.”

Alas, Bennett’s ability to own that, ahem, playing field didn’t stop the jury for indicting him on the charge of injury to the elderly, which involves intentional bodily injury to an individual 65 or older. While the possible $10,000 fine probably isn’t too much of a worry for Mr. Bennett, the 10-year jail sentence it can carry definitely may be.

Do you think Michael Bennett is guilty?

“I’m grateful that a guy who decides to push a 66-year-old black female paraplegic little old woman that’s trying to make a living making a fraction of what he’s making not only did they have to put up with his verbal abuse but had to put up with his physical assault,” Chief Acevedo said.

You may perhaps not be surprised that this is not Bennett’s first run-in with the police. Back in September of 2017, Bennett claimed he was the victim of police brutality after an incident in Las Vegas “for doing nothing more than being a black man in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

The incident happened after another major sporting event, the Floyd Mayweather-Conor McGregor fight on Aug. 27. Body cam footage released by Las Vegas Metro Police quickly proved Bennett was little more than a social justice fabulist; Bennett was apprehended by police after running from a casino where they were searching for an active shooter.

As for Bennett’s claim that an officer threatened to blow his head off, there seems to have been absolutely no evidence to back this up.

RELATED: Grocery Chain Announces Ban on Gun Magazines Featuring ‘Black Guns’

Bennett was also one of the higher-profile anthem protesters during his time with the Seattle Seahawks. In September of 2017, the 32-year-old Bennett said that he was doing so because he was “challenging people spiritually.”

In January, Bennett also announced he would be co-authoring a book to be released in April called “Things that Make White People Uncomfortable.” Given that it’s co-authored by The Nation’s very white Dave Zirin, one assumes the target audience was the kind of self-important white liberal who finds a book called “Things that Make White People Uncomfortable” hilarious and buying it an act of #resistance.

I have a good idea for a sequel, should the book be successful: “Things that Make Everyone Uncomfortable.” Number one: pushing paraplegic 66-year-old women, which his new team — the Philadelphia Eagles — seem awfully uncomfortable with.

Number two: Losing lots of money. That’s probably what Bennett stands to do if things go very badly for him. He’s in the midst of a five-year, $40 million contract, according to The Daily Caller. If he gets convicted, even if he somehow avoids prison, there’s a pretty good chance the Eagles can get out of paying most of it. Sports and Entertainment Law Insider notes that Section 11 of the standard NFL player contract states that “if Player has engaged in personal conduct reasonably judged by Club to adversely affect or reflect on Club, then Club may terminate this contract.” Pushing elderly paraplegics again seems to fall under the aegis of this.

If you think that clubs aren’t wont to exercise this out clause, just ask Ray Rice.

Oh, and brings me to number three: prison. While plenty of spiritual revivals have occurred and/or good books have been written from within the walls of penitentiaries, most people tend to find them a drag. And Michael Bennett could be facing 10 years in one.

While I have doubts he’ll end up serving that long, I’m guessing there’s a good shot he’ll have plenty of time to write that follow-up.

What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

Taylor Swift Latest Liberal Elite to Politicize Tragedy… Promotes March for Our Lives

Culture

Taylor Swift Latest Liberal Elite to Politicize Tragedy… Promotes March for Our Lives

If it’s a day ending in “y,” there’s usually a celebrity out there trying to politicize controversy or tragedy, almost always on the liberal side of things.

Friday, that celebrity was Taylor Swift.

In a post on Instagram, Swift promoted the “March for Our Lives,” the political movement that seeks gun control legislation in response to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting that killed 17 individuals.

“No one should have to go to school in fear of gun violence. Or to a nightclub. Or to a concert. Or to a movie theater. Or to their place of worship,” Swift said in the post.

Conservative Tribune Daily Email

Thanks For Subscribing!

“I’ve made a donation to show my support for the students, for the March For Our Lives campaign, for everyone affected by these tragedies, and to support gun reform,” Swift continued.

“I’m so moved by the Parkland High School students, faculty, by all families and friends of victims who have spoken out, trying to prevent this from happening again.”

The March for Our Lives movement has essentially been borne out of the political activities of the vocal liberal survivors of the Parkland shooting — survivors of an unspeakable tragedy who have been astroturfed by Michael Bloomberg’s anti-gun group Everytown for Gun Safety and promoted incessantly in the media.

Do you think Swift’s politicization of tragedy was uncalled for?

As it so happens, Everytown is also the primary driving force behind the marches on Saturday.

“On March 24, the kids and families of March For Our Lives will take to the streets of Washington DC to demand that their lives and safety become a priority and that we end this epidemic of mass school shootings,” the website for the movement reads.

“The collective voices of the March For Our Lives movement will be heard. Join us in DC or march in your own community.”

Over 800 marches are planned across the world, although the primary march will be in the nation’s capital, where celebrity performers like Ariana Grande, Miley Cyrus and Common will continue to vulgarize tragedy for political purposes.

RELATED: David Hogg Gets Upset When His Rights Are Taken Away Because of One Person

And, at the end of the day, when the marchers have gone home, when the celebrities are done Snapchatting and Instagramming in solidarity, when the sanitation workers are cleaning up the mess, we will be no closer to a solution to school violence, we will be no closer to a consensus on public policy on gun rights and we will be no closer as a people.

However, the coffers of Everytown will be fuller, the profiles of those who want to profit off of this tragedy will be higher and the celebrities in the Hollywood Hills can continue to bask in the social media goodwill as they bask in the sun. Nice work.

What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

This Week in Media Bias History: Just a ‘Fantasy’ That Press Was Pro-Obama

<p>Sometimes it’s an understatement to say journalists live in a bubble. On the one hand, they thrill over Barack Obama as “God.” Yet, on March 23, 2009, MSNBC anchor David Shuster called it a “fantasy” to say that the press was pro-Obama. Other examples from This Week in Media Bias History: That time Ted Turner created a slobbering propaganda film on the Soviet Union, a country that “belongs to the people.”</p>

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

Shocking! Celebrities Don’t Care Much For Our Constitutional Rights

As you know, today is National F*ck The Constitution Day being celebrated by thousands of teenagers and freedom haters across the country. The March for Our Lives rallies nationwide are protesting our 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms in reaction to a criminal breaking the law. Because nobody says, “Hey a bad guy did a bad thing, let’s punish the good people” like celebrities, they are out in full force supporting the suppression and eventual elimination of our most important civil right.

George Clooney, Oprah Winfrey, and whole host of leftist entertainers have donated massive sums of money to this anti-gun movement. They have been joined by none other than Taylor Swift.

She doesn’t say how much she donated, but this is people marching and that doesn’t seem like an activity that requires funding so any amount is too much.

Selena Gomez couldn’t afford to part with any dollars, nor could she be bothered to work up a coherent note of support.

And then the Twits came out:

Finally, nothing gives credibility to a movement like the wit and wisdom of Kim Kardashian:

Considering that celebrity support for Hillary Clinton is directly responsible for Donald Trump being President, I think it’s safe to say that their anti-gun hysterics will lead to the deregulation of fully automatic weapons and a general loosening of gun laws. Thanks Hollywood!

Follow Brian Anderson on Twitter

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

Family of Murdered Parkland Student NOT ALLOWED TO SPEAK at DC #MarchForOurLives Rally — They Aren’t Anti-Gun

Family of Murdered Parkland Student NOT ALLOWED TO SPEAK at DC #MarchForOurLives Rally — They Aren’t Anti-Gun

The family of slain Parkland student Meadow Pollack was disinvited from speaking at the March for Our Lives rally in Washington, DC. The family is not pushing gun control, but rather securing our schools and protecting our children.

Meadow’s brother, Hunter Pollack, had prepared a touching and thoughtful speech — which he instead shared in a Facebook Live video online.

“We need to be on a mission to stop these monsters before they take action inside our schools. We must demand our leaders to help those that who are sick, but we must also demand that they protect those of us that are not,” Hunter’s speech began. “In closing I ask you to say my sister’s name to yourself. It’s such a beautiful name. Meadow. If you say her name it’s impossible not to feel the beauty of who she was and who she will always be. Meadow. It makes me think of a sunny day like this one, a day when the sun shines on our youth and on our desire to live a safe and happy life.”

Meadow was an 18-year-old senior when her life was tragically cut short along with 16 of her fellow students on Valentine’s Day. The Pollack family believes that her death was because the school was not secured properly and action was never taken despite all the glaring warning signs about the shooter.

Meadow’s father Andrew has organized a motorcycle ride in honor of his daughter that will take place on March 31.

“We are calling for Motorcycle Riders from South Florida to join as one to ride for the memory of the 17 victims of the Stoneman Douglass School Shooting. The ride will take us from Palm Beach Harley-Davidson to the home of Andrew Pollack, father of Meadow, in Coral Springs,” the website rideformeadow.com states.

Similar to other survivors who disagree that the answer to school violence is disarming the population, the Pollack family has been shunned by much of the mainstream media outside Fox News. It is hard to imagine that this is unrelated to their lack of willingness to shill for Democratic policies.

Her grieving father was previously subjected to disgusting and hateful backlash online after being pictured wearing a “Trump 2020” shirt.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Jesse Watters Goes Nuclear After Omnibus Passes – ‘No Way to Spin It’

If you don’t like the new omnibus bill voted on by Congress and signed by the president, you’re not alone.

In spite of the president’s apparent reluctance and concerns about national security, there are plenty of people who have gone nuclear over the omnibus bill, and one of them is Fox News Channel’s Jesse Watters.

In a scathing statement on the Friday edition of “The Five,” Watters said there was “no way to spin” the bill as anything else but a complete disaster, particularly given the fact that President Trump caved on border security while simultaneously approving so much spending.

“Well I know one thing,” Watters began, “Mexico’s not going to pay for the wall, and neither are we. Because it says there’s gonna be only 1.6 billion for the wall and you can’t even use the new concrete wall prototypes that he just surveyed.”

Conservative Tribune Daily Email

Thanks For Subscribing!

“And it’s only supposed to be for 93 miles, the border is 3,000 miles. And the only fencing that is gonna be done is backup fencing and repairs.”

“This was a huge defeat for the president on a signature issue,” Watters added.

“It’s really really bad, there’s no way to spin it. I know he wanted more money for the military and that’s incredibly important but he sacrificed everything else to get it.”

“And I hate to do this, I hate to quote Rand Paul, but Rand Paul said something … he said there’s an unholy alliance between Republicans and Democrats in Congress.”

Do you think the omnibus was a disaster for Trump?

“The Republicans want to spend like crazy on the military,” he continued,

“And the Democrats say, ‘OK we’ll give you the military spending, if we can spend whatever we want on domestic spending, and they get together and they just run deficits.”

“But the border is a mess, and crying Chuck Schumer gets all the money he wants for a tunnel from New Jersey to New York and there’s no border wall funding?

“I saw some of this other pork, I mean Planned Parenthood a half a billion dollars, the John F. Kennedy Center is getting forty million? Stuff that is, they wanted to cut the budget for the EPA, the EPA budget is at a historic high.

RELATED: After Enacting Tough Penalties Against China, Trump Deploys US Military to Deliver Brutal Message

“It’s really insulting. And he says it’s never gonna happen again?” he added. “I don’t see how he’s going to change the dynamic in Congress to have this never happen again. Democrats are never gonna work for border wall funding and Republicans aren’t gonna go to the mattresses for it.

“Maybe he should have his rich billionaire friends pony up, maybe they can privatize it.”

Watters, sadly, is right. This is a major defeat for conservatives, particularly on border security and spending. How are conservatives, who have already seen major losses, supposed to trust Trump (or the GOP) going into the midterms?

Yes, we understand the importance of the military. We understand the fact that it was gutted under Obama. That doesn’t justify this faustian deal to keep the government open. This was the kind of thing that a non-politician like Donald Trump was supposed to avoid. Maybe he’ll get another shot at it, but this omnibus is not a good omen.

What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

CNN Has Just Gone Full Propaganda – Not Even Trying to Hide It

When it comes to propaganda, it’s the full-court press.

With major mainstream media giving wall-to-wall coverage of Saturday’s “March for Our Lives” demonstration for gun control in Washington and throughout the country, Americans were being told this weekend the latest liberal cause celebre is at the top of the country’s mind.

And the master manipulators of “fake news” at CNN were leading the way.

The notoriously liberal network’s coverage of the anti-gun movement has been virtually non-stop since the shootings in February at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.

But a glance at its homepage on Saturday showed the choreography of outrage being taken to a new level.

Conservative Tribune Daily Email

Thanks For Subscribing!

The entire top was turned over to the march coverage, with pictures and texts designed to elicit maximum sympathy for the cause – and nary a mention that there are millions of American with equally valid viewpoints who aren’t supporting the demonstration’s goal of greater government control over a supposedly free people.

For CNN and its fellow travelers in the mainstream media, the image really is everything.

And the images from this screen grab early Saturday say it all:

Do you think CNN has the most biased coverage of any major network?

One is a survivor of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012. Another was paralyzed in her legs by a drive-by shooting outside her high school in Aurora, Colorado, in 2010.

And, of course, there’s one of the many now-ubiquitous pictures of young people upset by February’s mass shooting in Parkland, Florida.

The stories are discordant.

The Newtown and Parkland shootings were the acts of depraved madmen. The 20-year-old killer at Sandy Hook shot himself in the head as police arrived, but there’s no doubt he was insane. The 19-year-old Parkland killer is currently in custody and virtually guaranteed execution by the state of Florida.

RELATED: CNN Pres. Calls Fox News ‘State-Run TV,’ Tucker Puts Him in His Place With a Bombshell

But the story of Karina Vargas, the Aurora victim, is different. According to a Vargas profile in Westword, an alternative weekly in Denver, the man who shot her was a reputed gang member, an illegal alien who was gunning for members of a rival gang at the time. Vargas (also an illegal alien at the time of the shooting) was collateral damage.

For propaganda purposes, though, the facts themselves aren’t important. What matters is that the pimps of pain at CNN could put youthful, female faces on its homepage to maximize the emotional impact of the moment.

Honest news coverage of the issue would include dissenting voices, like, for instance, Kyle Kashuv, a Parkland survivor with no time for the gun-grabbing antics of his mugging-for-the-cameras classmates.

But honest news coverage isn’t what CNN is selling these days.

From its constant, carping criticism of the Trump White House (that sometimes ends in embarrassment for the network), to its disgracefully stage-managed “town hall” meeting about gun control and the Parkland shooting, the network has gone full propaganda for the liberal left of American politics.

But Saturday’s “March for Our Lives” coverage was way too far, even for CNN.

What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

Heil Hogg: Teen Demagogue Fuels the Fire for Generational Warfare

Today is the day that patriots are getting a harrowing glimpse of what their futures will be if they don’t get up off of their asses and start fighting back against the neo-Stalinist uprising in America.

Anyone with even a moderately functional bullshit detector could have seen where the dangerous youth uprising that liberal groups and their media lackeys started with their glorification of the delusional little monster David Hogg.

Hogg has become the snarling attack dog of the left who are playing with fire by unleashing what is potentially the most perilous and potent form of identity politics of all – the young against their elders.

As I wrote earlier right here at DT:

Today is the day when budding megalomaniac and celebrity school shooting survivor David Hogg will have his already massive ego fed by the roar of the hundreds of thousands who will descend upon the nation’s capital to hear him speak.

The “March For Our Lives” will allow young Hogg, the who is being groomed as the future Führer of the left to feel as though he was addressing the masses at Nuremberg and you can count on CNN to record the event for posterity just like Leni Riefenstahl did with her historic propaganda film “Triumph of the Will.”

I guess that I was pretty close:

And just like Fräulein Riefenstahl and the Ministry of Propaganda did back in 1935, so are the modern descendants of Goebbels and his minions on the job today because that little salute that Hogg just snapped off shows that Nikolas Cruz wasn’t the only psycho who went to school at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High.

Just watch this little monster, he is out of control and one day he is going to turn on those who made him possible because the Night of the Long Knives is coming.

This is bad, the vengeful left’s ideology is hitting on all cylinders and now they are cultivating charismatic figures like this.

I close with just a few excerpts from Eric Hoffer’s “The True Believer”:

The sick in soul insist that it is humanity that is sick, and they are the surgeons to operate on it. They want to turn the world into a sickroom. And once they get humanity strapped to the operating table, they operate on it with an ax.

AND

Once the stage is set, the presence of an outstanding leader is indispensable. Without him there will be no movement.

AND

Those who see their lives as spoiled and wasted crave equality and fraternity more than they do freedom. If they clamor for freedom, it is but freedom to establish equality and uniformity. The passion for equality is partly a passion for anonymity: to be one thread of the many which make up a tunic; one thread not distinguishable from the others. No one can then point us out, measure us against others and expose our inferiority.

They who clamor loudest for freedom are often the ones least likely to be happy in a free society. The frustrated, oppressed by their shortcomings, blame their failure on existing restraints. Actually, their innermost desire is for an end to the “free for all.” They want to eliminate free competition and the ruthless testing to which the individual is continually subjected in a free society.

AND

Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an empty life. Thus people haunted by the purposelessness of their lives try to find a new content not only by dedicating themselves to a holy cause but also by nursing a fanatical grievance. A mass movement offers them unlimited opportunities for both.

To borrow from Leonard Cohen, I’ve have seen the future brother: it is murder.

 

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com