SARA CARTER=> Nunes’ Russia Report: Leaks “Potentially Endangered Lives” and “Damaged National Security”

SARA CARTER=> Nunes’ Russia Report: Leaks “Potentially Endangered Lives” and “Damaged National Security”

On Thursday, Chairman Nunes submitted the House Intel Committee’s Russia report to the Intelligence community for a declassification review in order to provide a redacted version to the public.

According to Nunes’ Russia report, leaks to the press “potentially endangered lives” and “damaged national security.”

Sara Carter reports:

The committee’s findings revealed that classified leaks alleging the Trump campaign may have colluded with Russia dramatically increased after the election and some of those leaks “correlate to specific language found in the Intelligence Community Assessment,” which had not been released at that time. It also noted that former Obama Director of National Security James Clapper, who is now an analyst at CNN, provided inconsistent testimony about his contacts with the media, specifically CNN, as previously published by this reporter.

The Russia report is based on interviews of over 70 witnesses and 300,000 documents, according to Chairman Nunes.

From the Intelligence Community’s assessment of leaks to the press, including from James Clapper via Sara Carter:

  • Leaks of classified information regarding Russian intentions to sow discord in the U.S. presidential election began prior to the election day – Nov. 8, 2016.
  • Leaks of classified information alleging Russian intentions to help elect candidate Trump increased dramatically after election day – Nov. 8, 2016.
  • The leaks prior to the classified Intelligence Community Assessment’s publication, particularly leaks occurring after the U.S. presidential election, correlate to specific language found in the Intelligence Community Assessment.
  • Continued leaks of classified information have damaged national security and have potentially endangered lives.
  • Former Director of National Security James Clapper, now a CNN national security analyst, provided inconsistent testimony to the committee about his contacts with the media, including CNN.

The story about Obama officials briefing Trump about the dossier which was published by CNN propelled the story to the public. Shortly after CNN ran the story about the briefing, Buzzfeed published the entire 35-page Hillary-funded Russia dossier.

Clapper subsequently released a statement wringing his hands over the media leaks claiming the leaks are “extremely corrosive and damaging to our national security.”

Clapper also said of the dossier:

 “We also discussed the private security company document, which was widely circulated in recent months among the media, members of Congress and Congressional staff even before the IC became aware of it. I emphasized that this document is not a U.S. Intelligence Community product and that I do not believe the leaks came from within the IC.”

Fast forward to 2018 and we have reports James Clapper indeed relied on Hillary’s phony dossier to compile his joint IC report.

House Intelligence Committee members are accusing former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper of providing ‘inconsistent testimony,’ about his contacts with the media. 

Now it looks like Clapper was the leaker all along. If there is any justice left in this country, Clapper, Brennan, Comey and other corrupt criminals from the Obama administration will be locked up for their lawlessness.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

RYAN-PELOSI UNIPARTY Easily Passes Record $1.3 Trillion Omnibus That Spits in Face of GOP Voters

RYAN-PELOSI UNIPARTY Easily Passes Record $1.3 Trillion Omnibus That Spits in Face of GOP Voters

The Paul Ryan-Nancy Pelosi Uniparty easily passed the record $1.3 trillion omnibus bill on Thursday.

The final vote was 256 to 167.

A majority of Democrats helped Paul Ryan pass the bill.

The bill funds all of the Democrat pet projects and spends less than .1% on the border security barriers and no wall.

Conservative Mark Meadows and the Freedom Caucus voted against the outrageous Republican Omnibus.

Meadows pointed out the giant flaws of the plan:
– Record spending levels
– No wall/border security
– Obamacare intact
– Funds Planned Parenthood
– Sanctuary Cities funded
– Barely 24 hours to read a 2,300 page bill

Rep. Meadows then encouraged President Trump to veto the bill.

This will likely be the end of the GOP majorities.
You can’t continue to spit on the voters and expect them to keep coming out to support you.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

These Charts Will Blow the Mind of Anybody Saying the US Is Racist, Bigoted, and Intolerant

Narratives are incredibly powerful. The decisions that people make and the politics they choose to support are deeply influenced by what they believe — and a narrative repeated over and over can sway elections and impact culture, even if it’s completely untrue.

If you listen to liberals, their big-government policies are direly needed because of how terrible and unjust America has become.

You know the claims: Crime is out of control, so we need sweeping gun control laws. Mass shootings are sweeping the nation, so we must ban common rifles. Racism and intolerance are rampant, so we need government enforcers to level the playing field.

There’s only one problem with those narratives: They’re untrue. A vast amount of liberalism is based on assumptions that are either false or deceptively exaggerated… and we have the data to prove it.

“Even as we mourn the victims of hatred and violence, it is worthwhile to remind ourselves that, historically speaking, Americans live in very safe and tolerant times,” stated journalist Marian L. Tupy in Human Progress, a project that tracks advances in society.

Conservative Tribune Daily Email

Thanks For Subscribing!

That premise — America is actually safe and tolerant — is the complete opposite of what the left and mainstream media constantly parrot, but the facts back it up.

Look at crime and gun control. According to opponents of the Second Amendment, guns are deeply evil and responsible for spiking death rates. If only we could go back to a time without guns, everything would be perfect.

But would it?

No. Contrary to the narrative, the introduction of firearms is closely connected to a dramatic decrease in homicide.

Do you believe the left-leaning media is purposely spreading fear and distrust?

In the centuries before guns and the Second Amendment, murder was dramatically more common… and even in the last several years, more firearms in the hands of civilians correlate with dropping crime rates.

Let’s look at history. “In 1450, for example, Italian homicides averaged 73 per 100,000 people,” reported Human Progress, citing a Harvard University psychologist named Steven Pinker. “England was relatively safe, with just over 13 homicides per 100,000 people.”

And in the modern world, even with widespread civilian gun ownership? The homicide rate is a fraction of what it was in pre-Second Amendment times.

RELATED: Watch: Dad Questions Principal on Anti-Gun School Walkout, Gets Chilling Answers

“In 2011, in contrast, homicides in Great Britain and the United States averaged 1 and 4 per 100,000 people respectively,” explained Human Progress.

But what about mass shootings? The last month has seen countless demonstrations and student walk-outs. Surely based on all that outrage and news coverage, mass shootings must be extremely common and American schools must be some of the most unsafe places in the world.

Actually, no. It’s another false narrative.

“Overall, the homicide trend in America has been positive – mass shootings notwithstanding,” Human Progress continued.

“Between June 18, 2015, when a suspected white supremacist killed 9 people in a historically black church in Charleston, South Carolina, and June 12, 2016, when a suspected Islamic extremist killed 49 people in a gay club in Orlando, Florida, 89 Americans died in mass shootings in the United States.”

Let’s be clear: 89 Americans dying in a year is tragic and we should strive to lower that number… but we should also make decisions based on logic and facts, not raw emotion and hysteria.

“The population of the United States is approaching 324 million, which made the likelihood of dying in a mass shooting over the last 12 months 1 in 3.6 million,” the report pointed out.

“The likelihood of being struck by lightning in 2014 was 1 in 1.2 million, by comparison. Such statistics are of no comfort to those who died and to their families, but they do put the evolution of violence in America in proper context.”

Yes, you have a much higher chance of being struck by lighting than being killed in a mass shooting in America — yet you don’t see this being acknowledged in the news. Fear sells, while facts do not.

The numbers are even lower for school shootings. There were about 51 million kids attending school in the United States as of 2017, according to data from the Department of Education.

“Over the past quarter-century, on average about 10 students are slain in school shootings annually,” stated criminology Professor James Alan Fox in USA Today. Bad? Yes. An out-of-control crime wave? The facts say “no.”

Around ten times the number of students are killed every year walking or riding their bicycles to school, than in school shootings. Again, this fact is buried by the liberal media.

“Compare the school fatality rate with the more than 100 school-age children accidentally killed each year riding their bikes or walking to school,” expert James Fox pointed out.

How about intolerance, then? Much liberal rhetoric is based on the assumption that America is deeply racist and bigoted, and that intolerance is getting worse.

It isn’t.

“In 1942, 68 percent of white Americans thought that blacks and whites should go to separate schools,” stated the Human Progress report.

“By 1995, only 4 percent of American whites thought that. In 1958, 45 percent of white Americans said that they would ‘maybe’ or ‘definitely’ move if a black family moved in next door. That number fell to just 2 percent in 1997,” it continued.

Here’s the real kicker. “So rare were segregationist attitudes by the mid-1990s that the federal government discontinued collection of such statistics.”

One only has to look at the turnout to elect America’s first black president in 2008 to see the amazing progress that the nation made in just a few short decades.

Considering that only 13 percent of Americans are black, it was mathematically impossible for Barack Obama to win without support from every race in the country. Obama’s actual presidency may have been a disaster, but his election was without a doubt a sign that the landscape had changed since Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous dream.

It turns out that contrary to what liberals want everyone to believe, America is actually ahead of the curve when it comes to accepting other races and cultures. The 2014 World Values Survey asked people if they were opposed to racially different neighbors. The United States was much more accepting than many “progressive” nations, including some in the leftist paradise of Europe.

“The United States ranked better than the Netherlands, Germany, Estonia, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Ecuador and Peru” when it came to accepting neighbors of different races, Human Progress reported. Cross out another liberal talking point.

It looks like the America the left describes — ridden with hate and intolerance — simply doesn’t exist. They need people to believe that our nation is terrible and broken in order to snag votes and consolidate power. Don’t buy into the narrative.

America may not be perfect, but it is much more safe, tolerant, unified, and welcoming than the media would have you think. While bitter voices spread shame, there is actually much to be proud of in the United States.

What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

Justice Kennedy Calls Out Sotomayor for Breaking Very Basic Rule All Judges Know

The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in NIFLA v. Becerra, a case out of California centered around abortion that has big ramifications regarding the issue of free speech versus state-compelled speech, according to Fox News.

At issue is a 2015 statute passed by the state of California which requires all pregnancy-related facilities to conspicuously post a disclosure informing women of the state-provided “free or low-cost access” to various forms of prenatal care, such as abortion. The law also requires unlicensed, non-medical facilities to prominently inform their clients that they are not licensed medical providers.

However, the law was written with so many carveouts and exemptions that it ended up solely targeting a number of explicitly pro-life, nonprofit “crisis pregnancy centers,” which counsel women on options other than abortion, such as adoption. However, the law compelled these centers to inform the women of their abortion options.

David French of National Review noted that during arguments in front of the Court, Justice Sonia Sotomayor seemed to step outside the traditional norms of evidence submitted in the case and earned a rebuke for it from her colleague, Justice Anthony Kennedy.

In questioning the attorney representing the plaintiffs — Mike Farris of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates — Sotomayor referenced information she had obtained herself from the website of one of the unlicensed pro-life pregnancy centers, and asked several questions in regard to licensed versus unlicensed facilities providing what amounts to medical advice.

Conservative Tribune Daily Email

Thanks For Subscribing!

According to a transcript of the arguments (page 22), Sotomayor was followed by Kennedy, who began his line of questioning with a not-so-subtle criticism of Sotomayor for side-stepping the normal bounds of Court procedure.

Kennedy stated, “Well, in this case I didn’t go beyond the record to look on the internet because I don’t think we should do that, but I do have a hypothetical.”

French, who has a legal background, pointed out that court cases are fought over evidence that has been submitted ahead of time and placed into the record in such a manner that both sides have an equal opportunity to examine the same set of facts.

This is done so that unverified or misleading claims don’t end up deciding the outcome of a case.

Do you agree that Supreme Court justices should stick strictly to the evidence before them?

“Simply put, judges should not act as free-lance investigators in the cases before them. In fact, this is judging 101,” French wrote.

Sotomayor nevertheless took it upon herself to do some “free-lance investigating,” thus going above and beyond the set of facts already put forward through arguments and evidence in lower courts by questioning an attorney with whom she no doubt disagreed ideologically.

Of course, The Associated Press was quick to rush to Sotomayor’s defense after she was rebuked by Kennedy.

The AP noted that there have been a handful of previous instances in other cases where justices or their clerks will have looked something up online to better inform their line of questioning, and even cited examples where Kennedy and Roberts had done so, as well as Breyer, Justice Sam Alito and the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

RELATED: Nullification: Calif. Town Takes Massive Stand Against State’s Sanctuary Law

Yet, given the thousands of cases heard over the years by the Supreme Court that have strictly kept to the presented record, a mere five examples of a justice going outside the record in their questions or written opinions doesn’t give Sotomayor any excuse.

Kennedy was right to call out Sotomayor for stepping outside the record, and his rebuke should serve as a reminder going forward to all current and future justices.

They need to stick to the arguments and evidence before them, not whatever information they can pull up with a quick internet search.

What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

Facebook Refuses to Disclose Secret List of Media Outlets They Are Suppressing

Facebook Refuses to Disclose Secret List of Media Outlets They Are Suppressing

A Facebook spokesman refuses to disclose which media outlets the tech giant is suppressing and which outlets they deem “trusted” sources of news.

We already know Facebook is suppressing conservative media outlets.

Facebook has launched at all out assault on conservatives with their algorithm changes.

Conservative voices are being snuffed out on Facebook while liberal sites such as CNN are being boosted.

The Gateway Pundit has written extensively about this assault on conservative voices.

The latest algorithm changes by Facebook suppressed conservative publishers and boosted liberal propaganda.

Facebook told the Daily Caller News Foundation it will not disclose which outlets it is boosting and which media it is suppressing.

The algorithm changes also caused President Donald Trump’s engagement on Facebook posts to plummet a whopping 45%.

In contrast, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) do not appear to have suffered a comparable decline in Facebook engagement.

Top conservative Facebook pages with daily traffic in the millions have seen 75% to 95% drop in traffic.
Young Cons, Western Journalism, SarahPalin.com, Independent Journal ReviewRight Wing News, and several others have seen dramatic loss in traffic.

We already know The Gateway Pundit was hit the hardest by these changes.

Via The Outline:

Recently, Facebook actually admitted their liberal bias and actions to suppress the conservative America loving point of view –

Campbell Brown, a former anchor on NBC and CNN who now leads Facebook’s news partnerships team, told attendees at a recent technology and publishing conference that Facebook would be censoring news publishers based on its own internal biases:

“This is not us stepping back from news. This is us changing our relationship with publishers and emphasizing something that Facebook has never done before: It’s having a point of view, and it’s leaning into quality news. … We are, for the first time in the history of Facebook, taking a step to try to to define what ‘quality news’ looks like and give that a boost.” (Emphasis added.)

Many conservative media outlets have paid Facebook thousands of dollars in advertising only to have the tech giant hide their algorithms and secret lists of who they target for suppression.

We are way overdue for an internet bill of rights to make sure conservative voices aren’t silenced.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Congress Gives Itself a Bonus in Omnibus

The House and Senate increased their own budgets in the $1.3 trillion omnibus spending package.

The Senate increased its total salaries of officers and employees by $12.6 million in the 2,232-page bill that lawmakers had fewer than 48 voters to read and vote on. The bill avoids a government shutdown that would take place at midnight on Friday.

Aside from giving their own institutions a bonus, the omnibus also gives away millions to prevent "elderly falls," promote breastfeeding, and fight "excessive alcohol use."

The legislation increases the Senate budget to $919.9 million, up $48.8 million from fiscal year 2017, according to the congressional summary of the bill.

"The increase provides funding necessary for critical modernization and upgrades of the Senate financial management system and investments in IT security," the summary states.

Meanwhile, the House of Representatives increased its budget to $1.2 billion, which is $10.9 million above 2017 levels.

Salaries of staffers in the Senate are also set for an increase. Division I of the legislation breaks down the total salaries of officers and employees, which are being raised from $182 million in 2017 to $194.8 million in the final bill, an increase of $12.58 million.

The Senate also increased its expense account, as expense allowances are going from $177,000 to $192,000, an increase of $15,000.

The House, however, kept its budget for salaries the same at $22.3 million and lowered expenses by $4.4 million.

Committee offices got an increase of $22.9 million in salaries, from $181.5 million in 2017 to $204.4 million in the final bill.

The omnibus also boosts funding for health research, including a $3 billion increase to the ever-growing budget of the National Institutes of Health.

Health care spending in the omnibus includes $4 million to combat "excessive alcohol use" through a CDC prevention and health promotion program.

Another $15 million goes to study "high obesity counties" and an increase of $5 million for the CDC program that seeks to "address obesity in counties" by leveraging "the community extension services provided by land grant universities who are mandated to translate science into practical action and promote healthy lifestyles."

The bill also spends $2.05 million to prevent "elderly falls" and $8 million in the form of "breastfeeding grants."

The legislation also mandates the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau to improve "wine label accuracy."

The House passed the spending package Friday, and the Senate is expected to follow.

The post Congress Gives Itself a Bonus in Omnibus appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

YouTube Joins War On Second Amendment With New Anti-Gun Policy

Google’s video service YouTube has been one of the more active crushers of enforcing the totalitarian left’s unspoken mandate that all patriotic speech, support of Trump and dissent from the temporarily stalled globalist project and has now taken aim at pro-Second Amendment videos which are a target of opportunity for the thought police. What is going on as far as censoring conservative viewpoints by demonetizing websites that have become dependent on social media giants for advertising is nothing short of fascism and yet it continues to get worse by the day.

Now YouTube is going after certain gun videos and this is only the beginning of what is yet to come from corporations with mega-wealthy CEOS whose loyalty is to the Democratic party machine rather than to their own users. The ongoing purges are nothing short of liberal California tech oligarchs meddling in the 2018 and 2020 elections in order to give the Dems a majority and then prevent President Trump from winning a second term.

Via Bloomberg “YouTube Bans Firearms Demo Videos, Entering the Gun Control Debate”:

YouTube, a popular media site for firearms enthusiasts, this week quietly introduced tighter restrictions on videos involving weapons, becoming the latest battleground in the U.S. gun-control debate.

YouTube will ban videos that promote or link to websites selling firearms and accessories, including bump stocks, which allow a semi-automatic rifle to fire faster. Additionally, YouTube said it will prohibit videos with instructions on how to assemble firearms. The video site, owned by Alphabet Inc.’s Google, has faced intense criticism for hosting videos about guns, bombs and other deadly weapons.

For many gun-rights supporters, YouTube has been a haven. A current search on the site for “how to build a gun” yields 25 million results, though that includes items such as toys. At least one producer of gun videos saw its page suspended on Tuesday. Another channel opted to move its videos to an adult-content site, saying that will offer more freedom than YouTube.

“We routinely make updates and adjustments to our enforcement guidelines across all of our policies,” a YouTube spokeswoman said in a statement. “While we’ve long prohibited the sale of firearms, we recently notified creators of updates we will be making around content promoting the sale or manufacture of firearms and their accessories.”

Additional information from Guns.com “Pending YouTube content changes sends gun vloggers scrambling”:

A new policy modification on how the video-sharing giant monitors certain content featuring guns has some feeling the pressure.

The new rules, announced Tuesday, include making it clear that YouTube will not host videos highlighting guns or some accessories such as bump stocks or magazines capable of holding more than 30 rounds for private sale by individuals. The Google subsidiary also said it won’t allow clips on manufacturing ammunition, guns, or suppressors or how to install or modify certain accessories.

“Their discriminatory policy would make at least half of the videos that I have produced prohibited,” notes The VSO Gun Channel, which as of Tuesday had 129,000 subscribers. Others, such as the suppressor-heavy NFA Review Channel, warned the policy would “effectively shut down all gun pages.”

The latest policy update because never forget that fascism is incremental:

YouTube prohibits certain kinds of content featuring firearms. Specifically, we don’t allow content that:

  • Intends to sell firearms or certain firearms accessories through direct sales (e.g., private sales by individuals) or links to sites that sell these items. These accessories include but may not be limited to accessories that enable a firearm to simulate automatic fire or convert a firearm to automatic fire (e.g., bump stocks, gatling triggers, drop-in auto sears, conversion kits), and high capacity magazines (i.e., magazines or belts carrying more than 30 rounds).
  • Provides instructions on manufacturing a firearm, ammunition, high capacity magazine, homemade silencers/suppressors, or certain firearms accessories such as those listed above. This also includes instructions on how to convert a firearm to automatic or simulated automatic firing capabilities.
  • Shows users how to install the above-mentioned accessories or modifications.

To quote historian Milton Mayer from his book on the life in Nazi Germany “They Thought They Were Free” and pay attention to this folks…

… what the whole thing was in principle, what all these ‘little measures’ that no ‘patriotic German’ could resent must some day lead to, one no more saw it developing from day to day than a farmer in his field sees the corn growing.

One day it is over his head

The next set of “new rules” will tighten the garotte around the necks of patriotic Americans even more.

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

Report: Navy Rejects Atheist Chaplain After Long Fight

Oxymoron – Atheist Chaplain.

Via Washington Examiner:

Sen. Roger Wicker said Wednesday that the Navy has finally denied the application of a man who sought to become a “secular humanist” chaplain for the service.

The application of Jason Heap, who was backed by the Humanist Society, was first rejected by the Navy in 2014, but a Navy chaplain advisory board recently recommended approving it.

The possibility of an atheist chaplain set off an outcry from both sides of Capitol Hill, and 45 House members and 22 senators sent letters of opposition this month to Navy leaders.

“The Navy’s leadership has done the right thing,” said Wicker, R-Miss., who chairs the Senate Armed Services seapower subcommittee. “The appointment of an atheist to an undeniably religious position is fundamentally incompatible with atheism’s secularism. This decision preserves the distinct religious role that our chaplains carry out.”

The service already has the authority to create programs to support atheists and humanists, senators said.

The Navy Chaplain Corps is manned by officers who promote religious and spiritual well-being among sailors and Marines. It represents a variety of religions including Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism.

House lawmakers said the reconsideration of Heap’s application raised concerns that the Navy was trying to expand the Chaplain Corps beyond its intended focus of serving religious sailors by including philosophical beliefs.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us