Trump Forces CNN to Eat Crow… Admits He Could Be a ‘Great President’

It might be more rare than Halley’s Comet or a Clinton telling the truth: CNN has actually complimented Donald Trump, and had a stunningly positive reaction to the president’s apparent win on the North Korea situation.

The words that nobody thought they’d hear came from CNN host Erin Burnett on Thursday, as the network that has had a particularly hostile relationship with Trump discussed a recently announced diplomatic meeting between the president and Kim Jong Un.

“Just an extraordinary evening and, of course, opening the door to the big question,” Burnett said to a group of CNN panelists, according to Mediaite.

“If President Trump could truly solve this problem, that would be going down as a great president,” she declared. “There is no getting around that.”

Yes, a CNN host just said Trump could go down as a “great president.” You’re not dreaming. This really is planet Earth.

Conservative Tribune Daily Email

Thanks For Subscribing!

Kim Jong Un’s willingness to sit down with Donald Trump would mark the first time a president meets with a North Korean national leader, and likely vindicates Trump’s tough-talking strategy against the nuclear-armed and reclusive nation.

“It’s huge, quite frankly,” admitted CNN guest Major General James Marks. “There might be something real here,” he explained about the prospect of a peace agreement that benefits the U.S. and the entire world.

Other journalists from CNN and competitor networks had similarly shocked and positive words about the promised meeting between Trump and Kim.

Will Trump go down in history as a great president?

“Totally unprecedented. Kim Jong Un seems to be fully committed and ready to deal with the US,” admitted Will Ripley, a CNN international correspondent who has visited North Korea many times.

“Absolutely STUNNING news. (President Trump) to meet with NoKo’s Kim Jong Un,” echoed John Roberts of Fox News.

Let’s be clear: A lot has to happen before the promised Trump-Kim meeting actually happens … and even though that is itself historic, it is no guarantee that the volatile North Korean situation can be defused with a handshake.

With that said, it is incredible that the same outlets who thoroughly mocked Trump for tough talk on Korea are now openly admitting that he might know what he’s doing. Donald Trump spent decades building a reputation as a high-stakes deal-maker and negotiator. Most Americans know this, but it seems the liberal media has just figured it out.

RELATED: Proof There’s a Real Problem: Mex. Pres. Candidate Campaigns… in California!

You cannot negotiate anything from a position of weakness, putting everything on the table and letting your opponent know that you’re desperate.

Instead, Trump sent a clear message to Kim Jong Un: Two can play this game. You launch a missile, we send a carrier. You do a nuclear test, we fly an entire bomber wing off your coast.

Then, from a position of strength, the president has room to negotiate. Once the two leaders actually sit down, he can step back from the “extreme” talk and promise to take some pressure off … if Kim makes concessions that benefit America, that is.

Liberals and the media — but we repeat ourselves — underestimated Trump in the primary. They underestimated him against Hillary Clinton. Now, as always, they have underestimated him on North Korea … but one victory at a time, even the media can’t ignore reality.

Press “Share on Facebook” if you agree that Trump’s meeting with Kim Jong Un could make him a great president!

What is your reaction to the planned US-NK meeting? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

College Student Barred From Class For Claiming There Are Only Two Genders

College Student Barred From Class For Claiming There Are Only Two Genders

A student who attends Indiana University of Pennsylvania was barred from a religious studies course that he needed to complete in order to graduate after stating the fact that there are only two genders.

The student, Luke Ingle, was barred from class after objecting to claims made in a video featuring a transgender individual, countering with the argument that there are only two genders.

In a since-deleted Facebook post, Ingle commented:

“Later this week I will be defending myself and my FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS in front of the Academic Integrity Board (AIB) of the Indiana Univ. of Pennsylvania (IUP) against allegations of Classroom Conduct violations. The decision made by the AIB that day will determine whether I will be able to continue participating in my full course load, as well as graduate this May as scheduled. This is not transgender, woman’s rights, or wage issue. This is about free speech and the constant misuse of intellectual power in universities.”

The video Ingle and the other students were made to watch was a TED talk by Paula Stone, a transgender individual, who went on to talk about “mansplaining” “male privilege” and “systematic sexism”. The professor, Alison Downie, opened the floor to “WOMEN ONLY” after the video ended.

Campus Reform reports:

After some time had elapsed, Ingle stated he “took this opportunity to point out the official view of biologists who claim there are only two biological genders,” and refuted the “gender wage gap,” after which class resumed as normal.

“The floor was opened, and not a single woman spoke. Thirty seconds or so passed and still no woman had spoken. So, I decided it was permissible for me to enter the conversation, especially because I felt the conversation itself was completely inappropriate in its structure,” Ingle told Campus Reform. “I objected to the use of the anecdotal accounts of one woman’s experience to begin a discussion in which they were considered reality. It was during my objection that Dr. Downie attempted to silence me because I am not a woman.”

On February 29, Ingle met with his instructor, who he says gave him two documents—an Academic Integrity Referral Form and Documented Agreement. Photos of each document, along with a letter from IUP Provost Dr. Tomothy Moerland, were provided to Campus Reform.

View both documents below:

Below are statements found by Campus Reform via Ingle’s since-deleted Facebook post that touches on the documents:

“During my time as a Religious Studies major, I have had professors insult me for opposing views, call me names such as ‘racist’ or ‘sexist’, and have had my views discredited due my race, gender, and sexual orientation,” Ingle stated in his Facebook post.

“In short – this is not the first time an instructor and I have had a disagreement over course material or that I have objected to the views being pushed on the class,” he continued. “That being said, the wording in the documents is not only exaggerated, but more than one line is entirely untruthful and is done so purposefully to discredit my views and paint me as intolerant and ignorant.”

“It is my belief that the instructor’s decision to file these sanctions is an attempt to bully me into redacting my views, making it a matter of free speech,” Ingle concluded.

Ingle told Campus Reform that he will be defending his First Amendment rights to the university’s Academic Integrity Board, which will determine whether he will be allowed to resume attending class regularly, or be forced to graduate late.

“The censorship on college campuses is an issue I have tried to take head on in many of my courses as well as offering the opposing, conservative view that many classroom discussion beg for,” he said, adding that he is fighting less for himself than for the many other conservative students who endure similar experiences.

“With regards to my conflict with the university and instructor, I am fighting to make my voice heard. Not only my voice, but the voices of others that oppose popular university opinion,” he explained. “I am not battling my professor to prove that I am right about gender wage gaps or transgenderism, I am fighting to ensure that students may disagree with their professors and if they do, must speak up.”

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

HuffPo Normalizes Bestiality, Talks ‘Acceptance’ With Man Who Had Sex With Dolphin

Buckle up, bigots! The social justice Left has a new crusade: dolphin sex acceptance.

On Friday, HuffPost’s Ashley Feinberg took a stab at normalizing bestiality, posting a glowing interview with a man who considers himself a “heterosexual” who crosses “species lines” and infamously had sex with a dolphin.

That’s right. He screwed a dolphin.

Malcolm Brenner was the feature of a documentary called “Dolphin Lover,” wherein Brenner was “courted” by a dolphin named Dolly he eventually has sex with.

“She would rub her genital slit against me,” he says in the doc. “And if I tried to push her away, she would get very angry with me. One time, when she wanted to masturbate on my foot and I wouldn’t let her, she threw herself on top of me and pushed me down to the 12-foot bottom of the pool.”

Brenner has previously compared the taboo surrounding sex with an animal to interracial sex: “I’m hoping that in a more enlightened future, zoophilia will be no more regarded as controversial or harmful than interracial sex is today,” he said in “Dolphin Lover.”

Feinberg had Brenner watch the award-winning film “The Shape of Water,” which features a woman falling in love with and having relations with a fish-man, and asked him his thoughts.

Overall, the dolphin lover was unimpressed and thought the romance “developed much too quickly.”

“It was a very stereotypical romance,” he explained. “I thought it went more back to ‘Splash’ with Daryl Hannah and Tom Hanks, like a female version of ‘Splash.'”

The bizarre interview goes on to frame bestiality as taboo or immoral because of society’s dim view and closed-mindedness. In two separate questions, Feinberg searches for steps toward normalization of bestiality.

Feinberg’s questions are in bold text:

Does it bother you at all that people only seem to find this acceptable when it’s fantasy or an allegory? And do you think there will be a day when that changes?

Of course it bothers me. I don’t like people threatening to go Lorena Bobbitt on me because I made love with a dolphin.

Will it change? Who knows? I would like to think that society will become less religious, because the prohibitions in Leviticus are the only conceivable basis for any laws against bestiality. I can’t see that my boffing my dog has any effect on society, good or ill, as long as I’m not hurting her or abusing her. Laws against animal cruelty ought to be sufficient without criminalizing the act of interspecies sex, which organizations like PETA are trying to do.

Do you see this movie as a step toward acceptance at all?

I don’t see it as a step toward acceptance. It’s so obviously a fantasy that most people won’t carry the goodwill over to zoophiles like me. Ask me again when I’ve signed a film contract for Wet Goddess. But I want to be clear about one thing: I didn’t write Wet Goddess for zoophiles. I wrote it for dolphins.

This is the next frontier for the social justice Left, ladies, gentleman, and dolphins.

Stunning. Brave. I want to vomit.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml/favicon.ico

FLASHBACK: Billionaire Gun Grabber Shows He Knows Nothing About Guns

Former New York City Mayor and billionaire leftist Michael Bloomberg, who has spent tens of millions of dollars to attack the Second Amendment, is helping gun-grabbing activists push for more gun control in the wake of last month’s shooting in Parkland, Florida –– and with the renewed attention on Bloomberg comes a resurfaced video that shows he knows nothing about firearms.

In a December 2012 interview with “Nightline” host Cynthia McFadden, Bloomberg made multiple absurd remarks about firearms showing that he knows next to nothing about the very thing he is trying to ban.

In one particular exchange, Bloomberg responded to McFadden’s assertion that he wanted to ban handguns by saying, “No, but pistols are different. You have to pull the trigger each time. An assault weapon, you basically hold it and it goes, bllaalaalap.”

McFadden replied: “No, those are fully automatic weapons,” to which Bloomberg said, “Okay.”

Bloomberg went on to dismiss the thoughts of people who hunt using rifles, saying, “If that’s what they’re using, for God’s sakes, why don’t they use dynamite?”

WATCH:

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Heller: Justice Kennedy To Retire Early This Summer

Would rather it was Ginsburg, but if true, could be another opportunity to put a real conservative on the Court. Kennedy was a swing vote on a lot of cases.

Via Daily Caller:

Republican Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada told a group earlier in March that Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy will likely retire in the coming months, Politico reports.

“Kennedy is going to retire around sometime early summer,” Heller told a group in Las Vegas. “Which I’m hoping will get our base a little motivated because right now they’re not very motivated. But I think a new Supreme Court justice will get them motivated.”

Rumors have floated around Washington since June 2016 that Kennedy would retire, but the justice hasn’t addressed those rumors publicly.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

NRA Files Suit Against Gov. Rick Scott’s Gun Control

NRA Files Suit Against Gov. Rick Scott’s Gun Control



Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) signed a massive gun control bill on March 9 and later that same day the NRA filed suit against Scott’s gun control.

The bill comes in response to the February 14 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School and features waiting periods for long guns, firearm confiscation laws, and a ban on bump stocks – although bump stocks were not even used in the Florida shooting.

Moreover, the gun control bill raises the minimum purchase age for long gun purchases from 18-years-old to 21. And this is point on which the NRA seized and filed a federal lawsuit the same day the gun control was signed.

Marion Hammer, who was the first female president of the NRA (1995-1998), informed Breitbart News that the NRA “filed a lawsuit in federal court against the State of Florida for violating the constitutional rights of young adults between the ages of 18-21.”

She added, “The gun control provisions in this bill do not enhance school safety. They merely punish law-abiding citizens for the actions of a mentally ill murderer as well as the failure of government officials who did not do their jobs.”

The Tallahassee Democrat reports that the NRA filed suit one hour after Gov. Scott signed the gun control.

AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News, the host of the Breitbart podcast Bullets with AWR Hawkins, and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com. Sign up to get Down Range at breitbart.com/downrange.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

Act of simple kindness by a Texas waitress goes viral – and she got a big surprise

An act of simple kindness by a waitress in Texas to her ailing customer was caught on camera and went viral on Facebook. Then it caught the attention of a nearby college.

Here’s what happened

Eighteen year old Evoni “Nini” Williams is being praised for helping a customer at her job as a waitress at a Waffle House in La Marque, Texas.

A customer overheard an elderly man say he was struggling to cut his ham – he was on an oxygen tank and was having trouble with his hands.

When Evoni cut his ham for him, she snapped a photo and posted it on her Facebook page.

“I don’t know her name,” the post read, “but I heard this elderly man tell her his hands don’t work too good. He was also on oxygen and struggling to breathe. Without hesitation, she took his plate and began cutting up his ham. This may seem small but to him, I’m sure it was huge. I’m thankful to have seen this act of kindness and caring at the start of my day while everything in this world seems so negative. If we could all be like this waitress & take time to offer a helping hand…”

The post was shared more than 55,000 times, and had more than 5,600 comments.


A great reward for a kind act

After the picture went viral, Texas Southern University in Houston took notice and awarded the young lady a $16,000 scholarship. Evoni had been working at the Waffle House to save up money for college.

The teenager had tears in her eyes as she accepted the check from a representative of the university.

“Your act of kindness is exactly the kind of student we want at Texas Southern University,” he said.

Evoni says she wants to study business.

Here’s a local news video about the great story:

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com

Press Fails to Disclose 70 Percent California Bullet-Train Cost Overrun

Friday, California’s High-Speed Rail Authority published its draft 2018 Business Plan. Its 800-mile bullet-train project’s estimated cost is now $77.3 billion, up from $64 billion two years ago, and its final completion has been pushed out another four years to 2033. The current estimate is now more than 70 percent above the $45 billion presented to voters in 2008.

The related Associated Press story failed to disclose that original cost estimate, as did three leading California newspapers.

The Authority’s draft discloses that “More than $3 billion has been expended to date on construction in the Central Valley and planning for the wider system,” so genuine progress towards theoretical completion is still well under 10 percent. The plan also presents a range of estimated completion costs from $63.2 billion to $98.1 billion.

The latest news confirms, as I wrote in a 2013 post, that this project will “make the $22 billion (make that $24.3 billion) ‘Big Dig’ in Massachusetts look like a petty cash disbursement.”

The Los Angeles Times did recount much of the horrid cost-estimate history, though not completely accurately:

The disclosure about the higher costs comes nearly a decade after voters approved a $9-billion bond to build a bullet train system. The original idea was that the federal government would pay about a third of what was then an estimated $33-billion project, with private investors covering another third.

But those assumptions proved faulty on numerous counts. In later business plans the projected price went to $43 billion, somewhere between $98 billion and $117 billion, down to $66 billion, and then $64 billion in 2016.

The San Francisco Chronicle incorrectly reported that voters were originally promised a $32 billion cost. The first paragraph at the San Jose Mercury News gave readers erroneously report that the 2016 estimate, at “roughly $13 billion more than planners anticipated,” represents the overrun from the original forecast.

Voters who barely approved the 2008 $10 billion bond proposition were told:

  • The the entire system’s cost “would be about $45 billion.”
  • The rail lines would run “generally along existing rail corridors.” Much of the project’s cost will be incurred digging tunnels through “mountain passages in Southern California and Northern California” in “the most ambitious underground transportation construction in the nation’s history,” as well as “other costly tunnels” in LA and San Francisco.
  • In uppercase letters, it would get done “WITHOUT RAISING TAXES.” Over $1 billion from the state’s carbon tax has already gone into the project.
  • Most importantly, “Matching private and federal funding (are) to be identified BEFORE state bond funds are spent.” A year ago, “the Authority successfully received permission to access $3.3 billion” for the project’s opening phase, even though it has admitted that future funding for the project is uncertain.

AP coverage failed to disclose the ballot measure’s original quoted cost, or the full extent of the project’s cost overrun. Of the four outlets reviewed, only the Chronicle mentioned Governor Jerry Brown, the project’s stubborn champion.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

“My Life Is Over”: Former Justice Department Official Caught Attempting To Sell Whistleblower Cases

“My Life Is Over”: Former Justice Department Official Caught Attempting To Sell Whistleblower Cases

A former Justice Department lawyer specializing in corporate-fraud was handed a 30-month prison sentence for attempting to sell stolen information to over 40 whistleblower cases in 2016.

ZeroHedge reports:

Jeffrey Wertkin, 40, was arrested in an undercover sting after an attorney for a Sunnyvale, CA tech company contacted the FBI in January following Wertkin’s offer to sell them a sealed federal lawsuit for $310,000, according to court documents. As he was taken into custody wearing a wig and fake mustache at a Cupertino, CA hotel by FBI Special Agent William Scanlon, Wertkin reportedly said “My life is over.”  […]

Wertkin – who specialized in healthcare fraud, planned his brazen scheme as he was leaving his job of nearly six years as a DOJ fraud prosecutor in April 2016 to join the law firm Akin Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld as a $450,000 / year partner in Washington. He began copying files for over a month before leaving the agency – including dozens of federal cases that weren’t assigned to him, according to court records.

From his position at Akin Gump, Wertkin attempted to net potential clients by dangling the stolen information. When that tactic bore no fruit, he stepped up his efforts – reaching out to a targeted Alabama company for $50,000, a New York company for an undetermined price, and an Oregon company to which he mailed a redacted copy of the cover sheet in their federal case as bait.

“Mr. Wertkin’s secret criminal life was not known to anyone at the firm. We were shocked when he was arrested and outraged when his bizarre, treacherous crimes were revealed,” said a spokesman for Akin Gump Thursday.

The disgraced lawyer has since resigned from the bar.

“I hope someday I will be able to understand how I could have abandoned my principles and my honor,” Wertkin said before his prior to sentencing.

“I often lay awake at night and think about these actions, and I weep at the tragedy that I have brought on myself.”

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

This Is the Greatest Manufacturing Jobs Boom in Twenty Years

This Is the Greatest Manufacturing Jobs Boom in Twenty Years



The American manufacturing renaissance is still defying expectations.

Over the last 12 months, manufacturers have added 224,000 jobs. That’s the biggest annual gain since 1998, according to Wall Street economist Joe LaVorgna. Since the 2016 election, the economy has added 263,000 manufacturing jobs. Last month, 31,000 new manufacturing jobs came online.

It wasn’t supposed to be this way, according to the Very Wise People. Donald Trump’s promises to bring back manufacturing jobs was widely derided as impossible, and his supporters were mocked as suckers.

“Trump won’t be able to ‘make American great again’ by bringing back production jobs,” Mark Muro, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution wrote.

“What happens when people realize they’ve been taken?” Wharton emeritus professor of management Stephen J. Kobrin asked. “When people realize that he can’t bring back jobs and that they are not better off than they were two years ago, how does he use it–who does he blame it on?”

“Manufacturing jobs are never coming back,” Ben Casselman of FiveThirtyEight declared in the summer of 2016.

Instead of focusing on reviving the manufacturing sector, politicians should focus on managing its decline, the Very Wise People insisted.

“[R]ather than play to that anger [over lost manufacturing jobs], candidates ought to be talking about ways to ensure that the service sector can manufacturing’s former role as a provider of dependeable decent-paying jobs,” Casselman wrote.

Why was it supposed to be impossible to revive manufacturing? Globalization couldn’t be reversed. Automation would make human manufacturing jobs redundant. Trump had offered “few specifics” about how he would change policies to benefit workers.

“The larger problem for Trump and his supporters is that there is very little reason to think that any set of policies could meaningfully reverse the long-term decline in U.S. manufacturing jobs,” Casselman wrote shortly after the election.

So how wrong were the Very Wise? Just about as wrong as they could possibly be.

“The manufacturing sector is adding jobs at a faster pace than the rest of the economy, which hasn’t happened much over the past half-century,” Justin Fox writes at BloombergView.

It’s clear that a number of the Trump policies and Trump-related phenomenon are helping:

  1. The massive tax cut on businesses appears to be helping a lot and may have even started helping before it was passed.
  2. The perception that the regulatory environment will no longer be a drag on businesses, particularly manufacturing businesses.
  3. The revival of domestic oil and gas, another key Trump campaign promise, contributes to manufacturing jobs.
  4. Consumers sentiment and business optimism are at or near decades-long record highs.
  5. Manufacturers know Trump has their back and will make efforts to aid their export efforts and fend off cheap imports.
  6. Foreign manufacturers are moving jobs into the U.S. in hopes of avoiding tariffs they fear are coming.

Of course, Trump is far from a place where he can fly a “mission accomplished” banner over the U.S. economy. As Alan Tonelson points out, wages remain flat for manufacturing. And manufacturing employment is still 8.24 percent below its pre-recession peak of 13.7 million jobs.

There’s more to do. But the revival of manufacturing does not look as challenging today as it did a few years ago.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com