BOOM! At 2018 Shareholders Meeting – Disney CEO Bob Iger Grilled on Company’s Far Left Bias (AUDIO)

BOOM! At 2018 Shareholders Meeting – Disney CEO Bob Iger Grilled on Company’s Far Left Bias (VIDEO)

This was amazing!
Hopefully this video will be up for a few days before YouTube pulls it down.

Justin Danhof, General Counsel at the National Center for Public Policy Research, attended the 2018 Annual Meeting of Disney shareholders today in Houston on Thursday.

During the meeting Danhof grilled CEO Bob Iger about the far left bias across Disney’s properties.

Danhof specifically asked about “The View”‘s anti-Christian bias and ESPN’s noxious Trump-bashing.

Justin Danhof posted his question online:

At the annual meeting of Disney shareholders on 3/8/18, I’m Justin Danhof of the National Center for Public Policy Research. I want to talk about the company’s commitment to honesty.

We filed a shareholder resolution asking the company’s media platforms to tell the truth or, alternatively, to provide evidence that the company already has such a policy in place. The company responded by using shareholder money to hire a white shoe law firm to petition the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the right to block our resolution.

Trust in the American news media is at historic lows. Spending shareholder resources to fight against a basic request for an honesty policy will only cause distrust in Disney’s media to grow.

And the distrust of Disney’s media divisions is well-earned.

For example, ESPN has seemingly become a 24/7 anti-Trump tirade network which reached its pinnacle last fall when host Jemele Hill called President Donald Trump a white supremacist. Mr. Iger, you admitted to intervening to make sure that ESPN’s leadership didn’t fire her for these defamatory remarks. What kind of message does that send to other company employees? Just 1 last month, Hill again publicly declared that President Trump and his supporters are white supremacists.

Also consider the February 13th broadcast of ABC’s “The View.” Co-hosts Joy Behar and Sunny Hostin – in an effort to bash Vice President Mike Pence – suggested that Christianity is “dangerous” and that faithful Christians suffer from a “mental illness.” In response, the show’s advertisers have come under tremendous pressure to sever ties with these anti-Christian bigots.

This pattern shows that the company is willing to take a reputational and financial hit, just so long as it is in service to bashing conservative or religious Americans. That’s shameful.

What do you have to say to the tens of millions of Christians and President Trump supporters that your networks have so blatantly offended and ascribed hateful labels?

Specifically, do you think that having a Christian faith is akin to a dangerous mental illness? And do you believe that President Trump and his supporters are white supremacists?

CEO Bob Iger responded to Justin Danhof’s questions about bias across Disney’s media properties — specifically, Joy Behar’s mockery of Christians on “The View” and ESPN host Jemele Hill’s characterizations of President Trump as a white supremacist.

Here is Bob Iger’s response:

“I don’t know where I start. First of all, Joy Behar apologized to Vice President Pence directly. She made a call to him and apologized, which I thought was absolutely appropriate. I happen to take exception with what she said. I don’t think it was right and I was glad to hear she apologized. On the Jemele Hill issue, the only thing I have to add to that, because I have said some things publicly, is that Jemele Hill was spoken with and disciplined for the things that she said or the things that she Tweeted. I’m going to leave it at that. And in terms of your depiction of ESPN and a variety of other things you said: I know you’ve been to other meetings in the past. You and I have agreed to disagree on these issues, not that some of the things that you’ve raised don’t have some validity, but I don’t agree with everything that you said. Thank you. I respect your right to say them.”

That was a pretty lame answer.

Apparently Iger is not so concerned about his company’s far left bias.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

EXCLUSIVE–California Sanctuary City Laws Likely Responsible for 5K Crimes by Released Criminal Illegal Aliens

EXCLUSIVE–California Sanctuary City Laws Likely Responsible for 5K Crimes by Released Criminal Illegal Aliens



The state of California and the sanctuary city laws that make it a safe-haven for criminal illegal aliens is likely responsible for at least 5,000 crimes that were committed by criminal illegal aliens released by local authorities rather than being handed over to federal immigration officials.

According to data conducted for Breitbart News by the Center for Immigration Studies’ Director of Policy Jessica Vaughan, the state of California — which refuses to hand over criminal illegal aliens to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency — makes up about half of all non-cooperation with federal immigration officials in the U.S.

For example, roughly 50 percent of the ICE detainers — the hold that federal immigration officials place on a criminal illegal alien — ignored by local sanctuary city authorities across the U.S. occurred in California.

In mid-2017, ICE Director Thomas Homan revealed that about 10,000 criminal illegal aliens had been released by sanctuary cities across the U.S. and went on to commit more crimes. This figure, though, could be even higher for the year of 2017.

Based on this data, Vaughan told Breitbart News that it is “reasonable to assume” that about half of those crimes committed by released criminal illegal aliens occurred in the state of California.

“That is 5,000 crimes that occurred that could have been prevented if they had cooperated with ICE as federal law provides,” Vaughan told Breitbart News. “What is the cost to Californians for that crime spree?”

“Surely it is a lot more than the cost of the few minutes of a California jail officer’s time to notify ICE, or to keep the offenders in custody for ICE for a few hours,” Vaughan said. “But California politicians like Gov. Brown, Xavier Becerra, and Libby Schaaf would rather have the crime, apparently.”

This estimate was gathered by provided ICE data, as the agency says it has no way of tracking the figure of how many exact criminal illegal aliens have been released into the public by California’s sanctuary laws.

“Lack of cooperation from sanctuary jurisdictions means that they do not notify ICE when they release an individual on whom we have filed a detainer, so we have no way of knowing exactly how many such individuals they have released,” an ICE official told Breitbart News. “We often become aware of an alien’s release from a jurisdiction when we re-encounter the alien later during targeted enforcement.”

As Breitbart News reported, Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf recently warned criminal illegal aliens ahead of a regional raid by ICE, helping convicted illegal alien sex offenders, armed robbers, and drunk drivers escape deportation.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ Department of Justice is now investigating Schaaf for obstruction of justice. About 47 percent of likely voters say the DOJ should prosecute Schaaf for obstruction of justice, while only 36 percent of likely voters say the DOJ should not prosecute the mayor.

Sessions announced a DOJ lawsuit against the state of California, challenging three of its sanctuary state laws that protect criminal illegal aliens from deportation by ICE.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

Mark Levin Rips Into ‘Praetorian Guard Media’ for Protecting Obama Unmasking, Spying

On his radio show Thursday night, Mark Levin grew angry at how the “Praetorian guard media” are protecting the Obama team from the emerging story of how they unmasked Trump campaign officials — as well as Blackwater founder Erik Prince, he charged — and leaked word of their meetings with Russians to their media buddies. It becomes major “news” whenever it’s deemed that special counsel Robert Mueller is “looking into” it.

He said it was an “absolute disgrace” that the media protect Obama, not report on him. “They’re not upholding the First Amendment and free press — they’re destroying the First Amendment and the free press!”

“Never in American history … you can bring up Watergate, you can bring up whatever you want — have we seen anything like this!” Levin said. “It’s appalling that the press in this country is a part of the Democrat Party’s propaganda machine. It is appalling — the unequal treatment of a Republican president versus a Democrat president.It is appalling that the FBI and the intelligence agencies can be used the way they were used.”

He reminded his audience that the Obama administration spied on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Jewish organizations in its push for an Iran arms deal, and even meddled in the 2015 Israeli elections by having the State Department fund a group organizing against Netanyahu (which even hired a political consulting firm with ties to President Obama’s campaign). 

He continued: “This is the same FBI, the same Department of Justice, the same President of the United States who spied on the Associated Press, who spied on James Rosen of Fox News, who spied on his parents. They’re quite capable of this. And you bastards in the media sit on your fat asses attacking people like me who have the guts to point it out!” Levin said. “You clowns at CNN! You clowns at MSNBC! You clowns at the networks! You are disgusting! You’re a disgrace. You’re not journalists.” Audio from Conservative Review below: 

 

 

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

Anti-Gun Leftist’s Plan For Dealing With An Armed Robber Is Simply INSANE

I suggest this guy prepare his will TODAY, because I got a hunch he’ll be needing it sooner rather than later. ………………………………………………. …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………

A discussion on Twitter that reportedly occurred sometime last weekend perfectly encapsulated the mind-boggling inanity of the average gun-control zealot’s thought processes.

According to Brandon Morse of RedState, who captured a screenshot of the discussion, an unnamed pro-gun advocate had asked a gun-control zealot by the name of Andrew Fallows what he would do if an armed robber broke into his home.

Get between them and my loved ones, try to talk them down, and die with a clean conscious if they kill me,” Andrews replied.

That’s just plain retarded.

Morse explained why:

Fallows just essentially said that he would die, and then leave his family to whatever horrors the armed criminal or criminals have in store for them, all with a clean conscience.

This guy is so enveloped in the leftist narrative that guns are a pure form of evil, that his clean conscience is a result of being obedient to that narrative instead of putting the safety and well being of his family first.

Exactly.

It’s stunning as well because, even if one lacks a gun for whatever reasons (some of them perhaps legal), there are other options available: trying to hide, dialing 911, attacking the perpetrator with something else (a knife, a rake, pepper spray, whatever), attempting to flee the premises, etc.

The point is that “try[ing] to talk them down” and possibly dying in the process should be a last resort, at best. Yet here we have a staunch anti-gun zealot saying, “Buck it, I’ll try them first.”

It’s asinine, as was Fallows’s attempted follow-up defense of his own stupidity:

Fallows is among those vastly misguided and naive liberals who appear to believe that simply banning the ownership of guns would somehow eradicate crime.

In reality, it wouldn’t even eliminate gun crime. And shockingly enough, even the readers at World Star Hip Hop seem to comprehend this.

Responding to a story Wednesday about a bunch of kids skipping school this week to chant for gun control outside Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s office, one astute reader bluntly noted, “If a [criminal] wants a gun he can get one in 20 mins. Gun reform isn’t gonna do shit.”

Actually, nearly anything that’s illegal can already be obtained from the black market, including drugs, military weapons, you name it. But I’m not here to talk about prohibition.

I’m here instead to point out that Fallows — as well as the countless other liberals like him — lives in a fantasy world.

A very dangerous one, in fact, that could conceivably one day lead to not only his own murder, but the murder of his wife and children as well.

So if I were him, I’d reconsider immediately!

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

Grammys Install Social Justice Bureau to Ensure Music Diversity

If you thought the 2018 Oscars was an insufferable parade of identity politics complaints, wait until next year’s Grammys!

The Recording Academy has just announced it has hired Michelle Obama’s former chief of staff, Tina Tchen, as its own personal diversity consultant. The Buckley Sandler LLP partner will be reviewing and giving recommendations to the Academy to make sure it’s awards process is up the inclusivity code. By this time next year, we’ll be seeing a whole lot more indigenous women, gender non-binary dwarfs and Thai lesbian yodelers receiving Grammy nods for the sake of social justice.

The Recording Academy has had a rocky time in recent months. Asked about the paucity of women nominees at the 2018 Grammys, Academy President Neil Portnow stirred up controversy when he said that women needed to “step up.” Feminists all over the industry were outraged by his comments and calls for his resignation have since spread all over social media.

Portnow is still there, but now he’s got Tchen giving him cover.

Billboard reported Tchen’s team includes 15 to 20 experts on diversity in entertainment, and will be in charge of addressing “the various barriers and unconscious biases faced by underrepresented communities throughout the music industry and, specifically, across Recording Academy operations and policies.”

This group will scrutinize the “hiring practices, the Grammy Awards itself, and, most importantly, membership, which has up until now been largely a mystery because the Recording Academy does not publicly disclose the gender, race, and age breakdown of its voting body,” Billboard said.

While Tchen has no music background, she sure has a hefty background in the world of affirmative action-style bureaucracy. She was the executive director of President Obama’s White House Council on Women, and recently helped to set up the Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund. To be fair, she did help to organize the joint “In Performance” series with the White House and Recording Academy, so she knows something about getting politically acceptable performers some nice perks. But it’s her diversity industry cred that makes Tchen just what the Academy thinks it needs right now.

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

Poll: Five Senate Democrats Would Lose Re-Election Today Including Skunk McCaskill

Poll: Five Senate Democrats Would Lose Re-Election Today Including Skunk McCaskill

If elections were held today Democrats would lose at least five senate seats according to a recent poll by SurveyMonkey.

These Democrats are in big trouble come November.

Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.)
Jon Tester (D-Mont.)
Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.)
Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.)
Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.)

Claire McCaskill has consistently voted with coastal elites and against the people of Missouri.
It’s doubtful she’ll be able to squeak a win out this year as her Democrat party becomes more and more like the Marxists in Venezuela by the day.

And this was not a conservative poll — so it’s much worse than they are reporting.
The Hill reported:

Five Senate Democrats trail their GOP challengers and would lose their bids for reelection were the 2018 midterms held today, according to polls from SurveyMonkey.

New polls published Thursday morning in Axios show Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), Jon Tester (D-Mont.), Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.), and Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) would all lose reelection to GOP challengers if voters were heading to the polls this week.

ADVERTISEMENT
With the exception of McCaskill, who is squaring off against Missouri Attorney General Josh Hawley (R), the senators were polled against generic, unnamed GOP challengers.

President Trump’s approval rating hovers above 50 percent in those states, all states he won in 2016, while the five Democrats all suffer from approval ratings below the 50 percent line.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Radical Mayor Tackles ‘Visual Dehumanization’ Of Mugshots

In an executive order meant to “humanize individuals” and “foster systemic transformation,” the mayor of Jackson, Mississippi has forbidden the city’s police force from releasing mugshots of people engaged in officer-involved shootings.

“A mug shot is just one snapshot in time, and cannot be presumed to represent the sum total of any individual’s existence,” said Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba, who is affiliated with the black nationalist movement. “Removing the visual dehumanization that occurs when mug shots are used will be the first step we as a city take to engage in a truthful and honest conversation on violent crime.”

The mayor announced the policy change last Monday, following the recent death of a 37-year-old man who was shot and killed by Jackson police officers.

“The last image of any person should not be on the worst day of their life or the worst image that we could possibly provide,” he said.

Lumumba called on law enforcement to “go the extra mile and find an image that gives respect to those individuals who are no longer living on this Earth,” suggesting officials utilize social media or consult with families of the deceased.

There have been seven officer-involved shootings in Jackson, the largest city in the state, since Lumumba took office last summer. The 34-year-old criminal defense attorney won the mayoralty in a landslide, capturing 93 percent of the vote after promising to turn Mississippi’s capital into “the most radical city on the planet.”

Black residents constitute 80% of Jackson’s population.

Chokwe Antar Lumumba ran on the same platform as his father, Chokwe Lumumba Sr., who was elected mayor of Jackson in 2013 but died while in office less than a year into his term. Many of his supporters suspected foul play, including one local politician who speculated that Lumumba Sr. was “murdered.” Such theories prompted Louis Farrakhan to help pay for an autopsy, which determined that the 66-year-old had suffered an aortic aneurysm.

Lumumba Sr., the father of the current mayor, first came to Jackson in the 1970s as a leader with the Republic of New Afrika (RNA) – a revolutionary group that advocated for the creation of a separate, independent black-majority nation situated in the southeastern region of the United States.

Following Lumumba Sr.’s death in 2014, the New York Times reported:

Mr. Lumumba hardly moderated his views in recent years. In an interview last year he continued to defend the Republic of New Afrika. The day after his election, he raised hackles by questioning Columbus’s historical importance. And at his inauguration, he could not resist raising his fist in the black power salute and shouting an old slogan: “Free the Land!”

“Free the Land” is a motto that was often shouted by RNA members, then later adopted by the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement (MXGM) – another black nationalist group that Lumumba Sr. co-founded in 1990.

Since its formation, MXGM has been organizing the residents of Jackson, home of its first official chapter. By 2008, members were making plans to change the system from within. One leader had suggested the group “should run Lumumba and begin training Chokwe Antar – who was then finishing law school in Texas – to run for office in the future,” according to Vice.

Ten years later, Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba acknowledges being a “proud member” of MXGM, which maintains that “the collective institutions of white supremacy, patriarchy and capitalism” have been at the root of black oppression.

Lumumba’s mugshot directive asks the people of Jackson, and its majority-black police force, to reimagine a different criminal justice system.

“We owe it to ourselves to shift the paradigm around violence and crime, while simultaneously engaging in building relationships, examining, updating and creating policies that allow us to humanize individuals and foster systemic transformation,” he wrote.

At the signing of the executive order, Lumumba confirmed that city police would no longer release mugshots of juveniles, according to the Jackson Free Press. The mayor encouraged other municipalities to implement similar reforms.

Follow Jeffrey Cawood on Twitter @Near_Chaos.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

MILLER: We Already Know How To Prevent School Shootings

Five decades of dealing with political terrorism and hostage and barricade situations have produced a wealth of knowledge about how to prevent terrorist attacks. Some of that knowledge is applicable to dealing with school shootings. Surprisingly, it has not become a meaningful part of the public debate.

Terrorists, like mass shooters, choose soft targets that will generate a lot of casualties, a lot of publicity, and a lot of discussion. Want to deter them? Harden the target, tone down the Klieg lights, and put the shooter’s name on mute.

A target can be hardened in many ways, both physically and psychologically. They are not mutually exclusive, but different components of the same process.

Rather than arm teachers, it is easier to instruct them in how to profile potential perpetrators. The Israelis have become masters at profiling potential skyjackers. That information is known to our authorities and can be applied to instructional materials to equip teachers to identify potential school shooters.

Those teachers with military or law enforcement backgrounds can be trained to carry concealed weapons.

Satellite police stations can be set up in some schools so there is a constant and changing police presence in the schools. In addition, local police can run safety and drug prevention programs in the schools—which many departments already do—and use officers who can relate to and build rapport with students.

The idea here is one used by the British government at mass events. “Adopt a Bobby,” the British called it. Get to know the police officer near you. Become the eyes and ears of that officer. Extend the officer’s reach and ability to acquire information. See something, say something to your personal officer.

Monitor social media. Young people want to brag about past misbehaviors and predict future ones. Where’s the fun unless you can call attention to yourself?

The best armed security is the security you don’t see or even know about. The British have long used such methods in a variety of circumstances. Synagogues, with which I am familiar, have various levels of security, only some of which are visible, but all of which can be instantly mobilized.

Create physical barriers in the schools as part of hardening the target. From metal detectors to the way visitors enter the school, to doors that can’t be entered, schools can be made more difficult to attack.

Hostage negotiators have developed methods to build rapport with hostage takers. These psychological methods can be used to build rapport with and investigate potential violent actors.

Create a climate of inclusion. Exclusion, status hierarchies and bullying motivate outliers to seek vengeance. Anti-bullying policies must be more than a shibboleth.

Just as not all terrorist attacks can be prevented, neither can all mass shootings. And if schools are hardened, the attackers will simply search for another soft target.

At the same time, we can make schools safer. Hardening the target, using psychological profiling, and obtaining better intelligence are good starting points. In the collective memory of police agencies throughout the Western world, there is a lot of vital information that can be applied to mass shootings. It needs to be tapped.

There are more guns than people in America. Even if every semi-automatic weapon could be seized—which it can’t—a trained shooter with a bolt-action rifle can get close to the speed of a semi-automatic. Revolvers have interchangeable cylinders which with practice can be placed into a handgun as fast as a magazine.

Determined shooters will acquire weapons and master them.

The idea is to stop mass shooters by applying what we have long learned from fighting terrorists. First through psychological methods and then by hardening our schools so they are not soft targets.

Abraham H. Miller is an emeritus professor of political science, University of Cincinnati, and a distinguished fellow with the news and public policy group Haym Salomon Center. Follow him @salomoncenter

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Sessions announces DOJ will release ‘Fast and Furious’ documents withheld by Holder

Sessions announces DOJ will release 'Fast and Furious' documents withheld by Holder
You will no doubt recall that, back in 2012, Eric Holder was held in civil and criminal contempt after refusing to hand over documents related to the disastrous ‘Operation Fast and Furious.’  The clandestine program saw ATF agents facilitate the trafficking of illegally obtained firearms – including everything from simple pistols to full-auto AK-47’s – to the Mexican drug cartels. The guns were supposed to be tracked but weren’t.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/