Facebook admitted the site is bad for your mental health. Here’s what they recommend.

Facebook, in a moment of surprising transparency, has admitted that the site is bad for people.

A couple of researchers for the social media site wrote that reading the News Feed too much makes people feel worse about themselves.

What they said

A blog post on Facebook written by Director of Research David Ginsberg and Research Scientist Moira Burke outlined the potential harms of Facebook use:

“In general, when people spend a lot of time passively consuming information — reading but not interacting with people — they report feeling worse afterward,” they wrote.

The post cited several academic studies from universities showing users reported worse-than-average mental health based on the number of Facebook links they clicked or how many minutes they spent on the News Feed without interacting with people online.

So, as counterintuitive as seems to their business, Facebook employees recommend that users don’t spend too much time consuming content on their website.

What they’re doing about it

As a potential solution, the post stated that Facebook is working to make the site “more about social interaction and less about spending time.”

They recommended that users intentionally become active with interactions rather than being passive consumers.

“Facebook has always been about bringing people together — from the early days when we started reminding people about their friends’ birthdays, to showing people their memories with friends using the feature we call ‘On This Day.’”

They also listed some features that they believe will help people manage their Facebook use more effectively, such as a tool limiting what they see from their ex, the ability to “snooze” users to hide their posts for 30 days, and suicide prevention tools.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.theblaze.com

Nikki Haley Shoots Down UN Resolution Condemning Trump’s Jerusalem Decision

They knew Haley would veto it, but they wanted to stick a thumb in Trump’s eye.

Via Daily Caller:

The U.S. vetoed Monday a United Nations Security Council resolution calling on President Donald Trump to “withdraw” his decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

Casting the lone opposition vote against 14 votes in favor, U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley called the resolution “an insult” that won’t be forgotten. She has repeatedly criticized the U.N. for anti-Israel bias and for holding what she calls “Israel-bashing sessions” in the guise of legitimate diplomatic business.

Haley’s rejection was the only one needed to defeat the symbolic measure. To pass, a resolution must have the support of nine members and no vetoes by the U.S., France, Britain, Russia or China.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2s3tLUa

Report: Obama ‘Derailed’ DEA Probe into Hezbollah in Latin America to Save Iran Deal

Former U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration “derailed” a DEA operation targeting Hezbollah’s multi-million-dollar drug trafficking activities in Latin America to secure approval of the controversial Iran nuclear deal, reports Politico.

Iran’s narco-terrorist proxy Hezbollah is involved in a plethora of criminal activities in Latin America, ranging from money laundering to massive drug trafficking.

“This was a policy decision, it was a systematic decision,” David Asher, a veteran Pentagon illicit finance expert deployed to combat the alleged Hezbollah criminal enterprise, told Politico, referring to the DEA operation, dubbed Project Cassandra. “They [Obama administration] serially ripped apart this entire effort that was very well supported and resourced, and it was done from the top down.”

For years, the U.S. military has been sounding the alarm on the threat against the United States posed by the presence of Iran and Hezbollah in America’s backyard — Latin America.

However, the Obama administration argued that Iran’s influence in the Western Hemisphere was “waning,” reported the Government Accountability Office (GAO), Congress’ watchdog arm, in late September 2014, months before world powers and Iran approved the nuclear deal in July 2015.

Politico now reports:

In its determination to secure a nuclear deal with Iran, the Obama administration derailed an ambitious law enforcement campaign targeting drug trafficking by the Iranian-backed terrorist group Hezbollah, even as it was funneling cocaine into the United States, according to a POLITICO investigation.

The campaign, dubbed Project Cassandra, was launched in 2008 after the Drug Enforcement Administration amassed evidence that Hezbollah had transformed itself from a Middle East-focused military and political organization into an international crime syndicate that some investigators believed was collecting $1 billion a year from drug and weapons trafficking, money laundering and other criminal activities.

Rep. Robert Pittenger (R-NC), the chairman of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, chastised the Obama administration for undermining the DEA operation.

In a statement, Pittenger, the vice chairman of the House Financial Services Committee Task Force to Investigate Terrorism Financing, declared:

The nexus between terrorists organizations, including Hezbollah, and Latin American drug cartels is a subversive alliance which provides hundreds of millions of dollars to global jihad. “The witnesses providing account of the Obama administration derailing and stonewalling the prosecution of this illicit funding investigation has resulted in the most serious consequences of the misguided and injudicious actions of President Obama and his team.”

In June 2016, Michael Braun, a former DEA agent, told lawmakers that Hezbollah is generating hundreds of millions from a “cocaine money laundering scheme” in Latin America that “provides a never-ending source of funding” for its terrorist operations in the Middle East and elsewhere.

Iran has deployed thousands of Hezbollah militants to fight on behalf of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, a move that has allowed the ruthless leader to remain in power.

Both the U.S. military and State Department have warned against the menace that Hezbollah and Iran’s presence in Latin America represents.

Politico reveals:

As Project Cassandra reached higher into the hierarchy of the conspiracy, Obama administration officials threw an increasingly insurmountable series of roadblocks in its way, according to interviews with dozens of participants who in many cases spoke for the first time about events shrouded in secrecy, and a review of government documents and court records. When Project Cassandra leaders sought approval for some significant investigations, prosecutions, arrests and financial sanctions, officials at the Justice and Treasury departments delayed, hindered or rejected their requests.

The Justice Department declined requests by Project Cassandra and other authorities to file criminal charges against major players such as Hezbollah’s high-profile envoy to Iran, a Lebanese bank that allegedly laundered billions in alleged drug profits, and a central player in a U.S.-based cell of the Iranian paramilitary Quds force. And the State Department rejected requests to lure high-value targets to countries where they could be arrested.

Soon after U.S.-led world powers and Iran approved the nuclear pact, Obama predicted that Iran would use sanction relief funds to boost its terrorist proxies, namely Hezbollah, saying in August 2015:

Let’s stipulate that some of that money will flow to activities that we object to … Iran supports terrorist organizations like Hezbollah. It supports proxy groups that threaten our interests and the interests of our allies — including proxy groups who killed our troops in Iraq.

A day after the deal’s approval, Obama also said:

Do we think that with the sanctions coming down, that Iran will have some additional resources for its military and for some of the activities in the region that are a threat to us and a threat to our allies? I think that is a likelihood that they’ve got some additional resources. Do I think it’s a game-changer for them? No.

They are currently supporting Hezbollah, and there is a ceiling — a pace at which they could support Hezbollah even more, particularly in the chaos that’s taking place in Syria. So can they potentially try to get more assistance there? Yes.

According to the Jerusalem Post, Iran has dramatically increased its financial support to Hezbollah from $200 million to $800 million per year, two years after the nuclear deal was signed by Iran and world powers.

In 2010, John Brennan, Obama’s top counterterrorism adviser and then CIA director, confirmed that former president’s administration was trying to build up “moderate elements” within Iran’s terror proxy Hezbollah.

“Hezbollah is a very interesting organization,” Brennan told a Washington conference, saying it had evolved from “purely a terrorist organization” to a militia and, ultimately, a prominent Shiite political party in Lebanon, reported Reuters.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Chick-fil-A Opens On Sunday to Feed Stranded Atlanta Airport Passengers

Nice!

Via Daily Caller:

After Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport experienced a major blackout Sunday, Chick-fil-A stepped up to feed thousands of stranded passengers despite being closed on Sundays.

Georgia Power is working to restore electricity after a fire at an underground facility caused the power outage early Sunday afternoon, according to WSBTV.

Atlanta’s Mayor Kasim Reed tweeted a status update Sunday night, and thanked Chick-fil-A for providing over 2,000 meals to the weary travelers.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2s3tLUa

Nets Cover for Obama, Omit ‘Sabotage’ of Anti-Terror Efforts for Iran Deal

In a demonstration of their unwavering devotion to the former president on Monday, all three of the major network news outlets (ABC, CBS, and NBC), and the Spanish-language networks (Univision and Telemundo), had a blackout on the revelations uncovered by Politico: The Obama administration sabotaged efforts to damage the financial operations of the Hezbollah terrorist group all so he could have his precious Iran nuclear deal.

“A very serious charge tonight against the Obama administration. A bombshell report alleges the government deliberately sabotaged its own efforts to fight terrorist drug and money laundering operations,” announced Fox News anchor Bret Baier during Special Report before handing the report off to Doug McKelway.

At the beginning of his report, McKelway rhetorically asked: “At what cost was the nuclear deal with Iran reached?” “In an effort to reach the agreement, [the Obama administration] drastically curtailed efforts to interdict cocaine shipments in the U.S. by Hezbollah, a terrorist organization closely allied with Iran,” he answered himself.

According to the Politico report, the federal and international effort to root out Hezbollah’s crime network predated the Obama administration:

The campaign, dubbed Project Cassandra, was launched in 2008 after the Drug Enforcement Administration amassed evidence that Hezbollah had transformed itself from a Middle East-focused military and political organization into an international crime syndicate that some investigators believed was collecting $1 billion a year from drug and weapons trafficking, money laundering and other criminal activities.

 

 

“In 2016, a DEA official told a congressional panel that Operation Cassandra, a massive law-enforcement effort to stop the Hezbollah drug trade, was inextricably curtailed,” McKelway noted in his report.

In a clip played by McKelway, former DEA Chief of Operations Michael Braun testified before Congress that “for some unknown reason, we seem to have missed out on one opportunity after another. We seem to have forgotten about the importance of disrupting the supply chain.”

Politico spoke with a former CIA officer who confirmed that the Obama administration’s efforts to stifle their investigation were tied to directly to the nuclear deal with Iran:

DEA operations in the Middle East were shut down repeatedly due to political sensitivities, especially in Lebanon, according to one former CIA officer working in the region. He said pressure from the White House also prompted the CIA to declare “a moratorium” on covert operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon, too, for a time, after the administration received complaints from Iranian negotiators.

“[Obama] really, really, really wanted the deal,” the CIA officer added.

The dead silence by the networks on this issue is made even more concerning when their fawning coverage of Iran is taken into account. They all refuse to report when Iran threatens U.S. Navy vessels in the Strait of Hormuz and ignored the sentencing of an American citizen jailed on trumped-up charges. CBS acted like their state ran TV while NBC sat down and sympathized with their radical president against Trump. And NBC’s Andrea Mitchell recently suggested claims that Iran is an international threat were just a ploy made up by Trump.

Transcript below:

<<< Please support MRC’s NewsBusters team with a tax-deductible contribution today. >>>

Fox News Channel
Special Report
December 18, 2017
6:29:55 PM Eastern

BRET BAIER: A very serious charge tonight against the Obama administration. A bombshell report alleges the government deliberately sabotaged its own efforts to fight terrorist drug and money laundering operations. Doug McKelway tells us why.

[Cuts to video]

BARACK OBAMA: Today the United States, together with our allies and partners, has reached a historic understanding with Iran.

DOUG MCKELWAY: At what cost was the nuclear deal with Iran reached? A Politico investigation alleges the Obama administration, in an effort to reach the agreement, drastically curtailed efforts to interdict cocaine shipments in the U.S. by Hezbollah, a terrorist organization closely allied with Iran.

For years it’s been known Hezbollah have been active in the Latin American drug trade. In 2016, a DEA official told a congressional panel that Operation Cassandra, a massive law-enforcement effort to stop the Hezbollah drug trade, was inextricably curtailed.

MICHAEL BRAUN: For some unknown reason, we seem to have missed out on one opportunity after another. We seem to have forgotten about the importance of disrupting the supply chain.

MCKELWAY: Politico reports, quote: “When Project Cassandra leader sought approval for some significant investigations, prosecutions, arrests, and financial sanctions, officials at the Justice and Treasury Departments delayed, hindered, or rejected their request.”

GENERAL JACK KEANE (RET): There is clearly a huge pattern. We pull out of Iraq largely because the Iranians want us out of there. And President Obama has no political and moral commitment to in the Iraqi end state that’s in the United States interests. From 2009, January to the tire eight years of the Obama administration, hands off anything to do with the Iranians and their proxies.

MCKELWAY: Several Obama administration officials did not respond to our requests for comment. A spokesman for Mr. Obama told Politico the administration was hard on Hezbollah, quote: “Through tough sanctions on law enforcement actions.”

[Cuts back to live]

The Trump administration has taken an entirely different tack in its Iran policy. That course change reflected in some sober comments from Secretary Mattis here on Friday to reporters when he told them, quote: “Everywhere you find turmoil you find Iran’s hand in it.”

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2v7eUfC

Cotton Applauds Trump’s National Security Strategy: It Is a ‘Clear-Eyed Assessment of the Threats We Face’

Sen. Tom Cotton (R., Ark.) on Monday praised President Donald Trump’s national security strategy, calling it a "clear-eyed assessment of the threats we face" in the United States.

Trump delivered a national security speech Monday afternoon at the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center that, tying his domestic policies to the country’s safety.

"A nation that does not protect prosperity at home cannot protect its interests abroad," Trump said. "A nation that is not prepared to win a war is a nation not capable of preventing a war. A nation that is not proud of its history cannot be confident in its future. And a nation that is not certain of its values cannot summon the will to defend them."

Cotton’s office released a statement shortly after Trump’s speech applauding Trump’s commitment to rebuilding the U.S. military.

"The president’s national-security strategy is a clear-eyed assessment of the threats we face and what it will take to confront them. I also applaud the president for committing to rebuild our military," Cotton said.

"Any strategy, to be successful, will depend on our having a military that’s second to none," he added. "After eight years of neglect, there’s much we need to do, but I’m confident the president is determined to build the best-trained, the best-equipped, and the best-led military in the world."

Cotton, a member of the Senate Committee on Armed Services, has been an outspoken supporter of Trump’s national security policies.

The post Cotton Applauds Trump’s National Security Strategy: It Is a ‘Clear-Eyed Assessment of the Threats We Face’ appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

Jason Chaffetz: It’s Time for Sessions to Go – I Don’t Believe He’s Up for the Job – He Looks Like Some Prisoner (VIDEO)

Jason Chaffetz: It’s Time for Sessions to Go – I Don’t Believe He’s Up for the Job – He Looks Like Some Prisoner (VIDEO)

Former US representative and FOX News contributor Jason Chaffetz on Monday once again called on failed Attorney General Jeff Sessions to resign.

Chaffetz joined Judge Jeanine Pirro and Attorney Gregg Jarrett on Hannity on Monday night.

Jason Chaffetz: Some people suggested there be a second special counsel. How’s that first one working out? I wouldn’t do a second one. I really do believe that it’s time for Attorney General Sessions to go. I don’t think he’s up for the job. Every time I see him he looks like he’s some prisoner. And the only reason we have a special counsel is because we have an Attorney General who can’t do his job.

We have been writing for several weeks now that Jeff Sessions is compromised.
He is NOT the same person he was when he was in the US Senate.
Jeff Sessions needs to step down for the good of the country.

Via Hannity:

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

REPORT: Strzok-Page “Insurance Policy” Text Was Reference to Russian Collusion Witch Hunt

REPORT: Strzok-Page “Insurance Policy” Text Was Reference to Russian Collusion Witch Hunt

As previously reportedFox News published a portion of the approximately 10,000 texts messages sent between FBI agent Peter Strzok and lawyer Lisa Page. Among the messages is an exchange revealing Strzok and Page discussed an ‘insurance policy,’ against a Trump presidency.

The kicker? Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe may have not only been privy to the conversation, but a part of it.

The discussion took place in his office.

The Wall Street Journal is now reporting the “insurance policy”text was a reference to the Russia investigation.

Fox News’ Brett Bair tweeted, “Text-from Peter Strzok to Lisa Page (Andy is Andrew McCabe): “I want to believe the path u threw out 4 consideration in Andy’s office-that there’s no way he gets elected-but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk.It’s like an insurance policy in unlikely event u die be4 you’re 40.”

The dots are connecting. Top FBI brass were working with Hillary Clinton to make sure she was exonerated from her criminal investigation while simultaneously building a case against Donald Trump.

Comey, Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe made sure Hillary Clinton’s FBI investigation went smoothly as it was given ‘special status. McCabe also didn’t recuse himself from Hillary’s investigation until one week before the presidential election despite massive conflicts of interest.

The Wall Street Journal reported:

An FBI agent’s reference to “an insurance policy” in a much-debated text message was meant to convey that the bureau needed to aggressively investigate allegations of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, according to people familiar with his account.

The text came after a meeting involving Ms. Page, Mr. Strzok and FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, according to people close to the pair and familiar with their version of events. At the meeting, Ms. Page suggested they could take their time investigating the alleged collusion because Mrs. Clinton was likely to win, the people said.

If they move more deliberately, she argued, they could reduce the risk of burning sensitive sources.

Mr. Strzok felt otherwise, according to these people.

His text was meant to convey his belief that the investigation couldn’t afford to take a more measured approach because Mr. Trump could very well win the election, they said. It would be better to be aggressive and gather evidence quickly, he believed, because some of Mr. Trump’s associates could land administration jobs and it was important to know if they had colluded with Russia.

Although the sources didn’t reveal if the dossier prompted the whole idea of Russian collusion in the first place it is becoming increasingly clear everything hinges on the salacious document.

The FBI and DOJ have been corrupted by Deep State criminals.

Last week in a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee Deputy AG Rosenstein admitted to Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) whether he knew if the FBI paid for the garbage dossier, yet he smugly refused to answer the question.

First, Ron DeSantis asked Rosenstein, “The Russia investigation. Who started it? Who was the agent? Was it Strzok who started it? Who opened the case?”

Rosenstein fidgeted as he said, “That matter is under review by the Intelligence Committee and there is nothing that I can talk about publicly regarding the initiation of the investigation.”

Then DeSantis point blank asked rotten Rosenstein if the FBI paid for Hillary’s garbage dossier.

“I’m not in position to answer that question,” Rosenstein answered.

“Do you know the answer to the question?” DeSantis asked.

“I believe I know the answer but uh the Intelligence Committee is the appropriate committee-” Rosenstein smugly said.

No wonder why Rosenstein refused to answer the question. Fish rot from the head down; top FBI brass are guilty.

Also, Fox Business Network reported Monday afternoon that demoted Justice Department official Bruce Ohr unexpectedly ditched his hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

These corrupt Deep State criminals love to talk and act tough until they are exposed for who they really are. Now they’re ditching hearings and running scared.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

Pro-Gun Women Regularly Face Violent, Sexual Harassment

"It’s a fucking shame you weren’t killed when that scumbag raped you, you fucking despicable, lying, lowlife, Right-Wing, Neo-Fascist CUNT!" That was the message Kimberly Corban found waiting for her on Facebook early last year.

It was sent by a man upset about her gun-rights advocacy. Violent, sexual harassment and threats like the one Corban received are a common experience for many female gun activists.

In interviews with the Washington Free Beacon, four prominent pro-gun women detailed the deluge of vitriol and attempted intimidation they face. Each shared their own experience with death and rape threats as well as threats and hatred directed at their children. Each explained how they’d been forced to involve law enforcement during credible threats to their safety.

All the women who spoke to the Free Beacon have had to alter their daily lives in order to minimize the risk that someone angered by their advocacy might find their homes or where their children go to school. They guard their social media accounts, remain keenly aware of their surroundings, and train their children on what to do in the case of a home intruder. Some of the women have even made efforts to disassociate their names from their property records due to harassment.

And, of course, they train with and carry guns.

Corban first became involved in activism after surviving a rape as a college sophomore in 2006. As her rapist’s case was still making its way through the court system, Corban began speaking out about her experience. She said her desire to help other survivors is what drove her.

"I started speaking out on campuses before we even had sentencing," she said. "My attacker was found guilty at trial and I released my name to the media immediately following that because I just wanted to help one person not have to go through the same experience I did. That’s what my mission in life has been ever since then. So, when I would go and speak on campuses or to groups, I was well received. I didn’t get the negative commentary or backlash. It was telling my story."

Once she began sharing her view that women should be able to own and carry firearms for their own self-defense she was met with a different reaction.

"I’ve been speaking out about sexual assault and rape and victim trauma for 11 years now, and it really wasn’t until I ‘came out’ as being conservative or pro-gun that I started receiving any backlash," Corban said. "It’s horrifying. It reinforces why I carry. Nothing about my message or my experience changed. All that changed was how other people were interpreting that."

That’s also when the threats and harassment began.

In January 2016, Corban was invited to ask a question of then-president Barack Obama during a CNN townhall event. She asked him why he wanted to make it harder for her to carry a gun for her self-protection and the protection of her children. The backlash shocked her.

"After the townhall on CNN aired, I mean, I wasn’t prepared for the outreach to me as a person so I didn’t have my social media locked down nearly like I do now," she said. "I had people writing heinous things on a picture of my daughter with her first birthday cake. They’re writing terrible things about how they hope she gets my gun and shoots me. I had people direct message me saying my rapist didn’t finish the job, he should’ve just killed me.

"I had one guy actually look up where I work, find the address, and send me a postcard with disgusting words that didn’t quite reach the legal definition for probable cause but I turned that over to the authorities."

"You truly are a soulless, self-righteous, self-serving bitch with sick gun fetish. Do us all a favor & blow your own brains out," Twitter user Lou Aguilar said to Dana Loesch on Oct. 3.

In October, nationally syndicated radio host and National Rifle Association spokesperson Dana Loesch announced she was moving in part because of threats made against her and her family. She said the media reaction to her move was overblown. "The reaction by some media made me mad. ‘Dana Loesch Flees Her Home’ I think was one headline," she said. "Like I fled my house in the middle of the night or something."

The move, she said, had been planned for a long time and wasn’t done in a panic.

"I know that I’m from southern Missouri but we don’t pack in trash bags. I was like, ‘Seriously, come on, I’m going to hire movers for crying out loud,’" she laughed.

Still, threats did play a significant role in her family’s decision to move.

"We’d been talking about moving for some time just because it’s a security thing," Loesch said. "It just makes us feel better if we’re able to take our names off stuff to where people can’t just find your address. It makes the kids feel better. My youngest, he’s unnerved by it. He’s aware of it and it makes him uncomfortable."

At one point a harasser managed to figure out Loesch’s cell phone number and home address.

"In terms of threats, violence, at least every week there’s something and 99 percent of it I don’t take seriously. Then when they get your cell phone number—that’s different. I was public about that which maybe I shouldn’t have been but I always think the best disinfectant is sunlight. Someone opened up an account on Twitter and their handle was my cell phone number. Then they were posting pictures of my house and saying the craziest, awful stuff."

She filed a police report on the harasser, but the situation hasn’t yet been resolved. "We’re working with an investigator on that," Loesch said. "That’s an ongoing thing."

Loesch blames a certain segment of liberal activists, represented by groups such as Antifa and Occupy, for much of the harassment. "It’s the violent left," she said. "It just never made sense to me to denounce violence, violently. To violently denounce violence. To show you’re more peaceful using violence doesn’t make sense."

"Stick that gun in your cunt bitch and pull the trigger," Twitter user John T. McFarland said to Jenn Jacques in September 2015.

Jenn Jacques, a visiting fellow with the Independent Women’s Forum and editor at large for BreachBangClear.com who has been recognized by the National Shooting Sports Foundation for her work promoting gun safety, said she’s often stunned by the hypocrisy of the harassers and thinks online anonymity enables their behavior.

"I’ve heard a lot of ‘do us all a favor and swallow your gun,’" she said. "It’s just so bad. The thing is they all claim to be against gun violence. They all claim to be the tolerant left but they are literally the most violent, heinous people out there. I’m sure a lot of it is that they’re hiding behind a computer screen."

After Bob Owens, a respected gun writer who worked closely with Jacques at BearingArms.com, took his own life in May, Jacques said she received a wave of harassment. While most reacted to Owens’s passing with grace and compassion, a group of gun-control activists reacted by tormenting his friends and family through vile messages on Twitter and Facebook. Jacques said some even encouraged her to kill herself.

"After Bob died, people would be like ‘one down, one to go,’" she said. "How could you say that to anyone?"

"This bitch needs to get off the Internet, she’s an embarrassment to black people. This sill coon lives in a pink and fluffy world where there is some sort of equality. I hope that the kkk lynches," commenter SR posted on a YouTube video by Stacy Washington.

Stacy Washington, a nationally syndicated radio show host who had her column suspended by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch after penning a column criticizing comparisons of the National Rifle Association and ISIS, said her position as a pro-gun black mother adds a racial aspect to the hate she receives.

"I had this one guy who used to email me all the time and post on my YouTube videos," she recalled. "He once accused me of being married to a white man and he wanted to rape me and my daughters."

She said she, like the other women the Free Beacon spoke to, has had to involve the police on a number of occasions.

"I had one where it was like, ‘Okay, this person lives in St. Louis, this person is advertising on Facebook for somebody to beat me up or to find where I live and hurt me,’" Washington said. "I was really kind of rattled by that one because of the things that he posted online. It seemed like he was basically just sending out an APB to any crazy person in St. Louis to look me up, which means it could just be going on forever."

The women who spoke with the Free Beacon said they were often specifically targeted for being women, and they believe the harassment they receive is designed to intimidate them.

"I think it is, partly, being a woman because I felt that it’s their intention to intimidate us into thinking that we’re wrong," Jenn Jacques said. "Like, ‘Oh, well, this stupid woman, she doesn’t know what she’s talking about. I’ll let her know in this way and then she’ll stop being an advocate for the Second Amendment.’ They’re essentially trying to bully us into staying quiet."

"The hate, the vitriol, that we see spewed at us for being a female that someone doesn’t agree with is sickening," said Kimberly Corban. "It shows just how sick and twisted people are and that there is real evil in this world. I always like to say that ‘I don’t carry because I’m scared of what could happen, I carry because I already know.’"

"When you think about it, to try to make people afraid of speaking out about their beliefs and to make them fear some sort of retribution in doing so is a form of terrorism," said Dana Loesch. "It really is. No one should have to live their life like that, regardless. Even across the political aisle from me. It applies the same way."

She posted about her death and rape threats in the #MeToo hashtag on Twitter because she feels the stories of pro-gun women are often ignored or rationalized when they should be treated the same way as others.

"I noticed all this stuff with the ‘Me Too’ thing," she said. "And I just noticed it always seems that whatever conservative women experience, it’s immediately discounted. It’s almost like they’re asking for it because of their politics. It should just all be bad. People should learn how to speak with a civil tongue in their head. People should repudiate all of that."

Matt Vespa, an associate editor at Townhall.com, said he hasn’t faced the same kind of harassment despite his pro-gun writing.

"While I have written extensively on the Second Amendment, I have never received any death threats for my pro-gun rights positions," he said. "I guess can consider myself lucky that I’ve never had to get the police involved due to my political activities. I can advocate for the Second Amendment without fear of retribution from the hordes of progressives who take to social media to harass and, yes, issue horrible threats to people who are supportive of gun rights, specifically the women in the conservative movement."

All of the women who spoke with the Free Beacon are mothers and said attacks on their children were the hardest to stomach.

"You kind of get numb to them a little bit until they bring in your kids," Jacques said. "I would never say that about my worst enemy. The one that really hurts, that I get often, is ‘Well, someday you’ll shoot one of your kids and then you’ll see how wrong you are.’ Or say, ‘Someday your kid will have an accident and shoot themselves. Then you’ll know.’ And it’s like, ‘Are you kidding?’ That’s why I teach gun safety. That’s why I am a huge advocate for the Eddie Eagle program."

"They go there because they know it really scares you," said Stacey Washington. "It keeps you up at night. The only time I really think hard about whether or not I’m doing the right thing about being out in the public with this stuff is when something comes through about the kids."

The women said they take a number of precautions with their kids’ safety in mind. They all go to great lengths to keep their home address and the location of their kids’ schools private. Many also teach their kids, especially the older ones, basic safety measures in case anyone ever did try to follow through on a threat.

"We have a safety code," Washington said. "If I yell a certain thing from anywhere in my house, my kids know to leave the building. They know, also, where to go in the house to lock themselves in to shelter in place. They’re all aware of how to use firearms."

Despite the torrent of violent, sexualized threats, and harassment these women have to deal with as a part of speaking out in favor of gun rights, they don’t let it dictate their lives. They refuse to live in fear or give up on their advocacy. They do, however, prepare for whatever dangerous situation might come their way and do what they can to avoid them.

"I never have my location on," Jenn Jacques said, echoing the other women. "I only tweet that I’ve been somewhere after I leave. I’m very, very guarded, especially when my kids are there. I’m very hyper aware. Even when I take pictures of my kids at school, when I post them on social media I make there are no logos. When I post a picture of my car, I make sure my license plate isn’t showing. You’re constantly aware of, ‘Okay, what am I posting? How could this affect me? Could somebody trace me to where I’m at?’"

Jenn Jacques at SHOT Show 2016

The women said it’s about taking precautions without letting them completely take over how they and their families live their lives.

"I don’t want my life dictated by fear," Loesch said. "I don’t want to be afraid. I’m not afraid. I’m not going to run my life by being afraid of threats or anything like that. That’s not how I’m going to operate, but you take precautions. You definitely do."

"The privacy settings on all of my social media had to be completely redone," Corban said. "I had to delete a lot of pictures that might have had any kind of information as to where I live or what my phone number might have been…. It’s not overreacting—it’s reacting normally to a not-normal situation."

She, and the rest of the women, said they simply refuse to be cowed by threats.

"I have worked so hard, through coming back from an assault, through therapy, through trying to become the person I was before and a better and stronger version," Corban said. "I’ve worked so hard to not live in fear. I won’t let these people intimidate me into living my life in fear once again."

The post Pro-Gun Women Regularly Face Violent, Sexual Harassment appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

Haley Vetoes U.N. Resolution Rejecting Recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s Capital: ‘We Do It With No Reluctance’

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley on Monday vetoed a Security Council resolution rejecting President Donald Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, saying she did it with no reluctance and slamming the "scandalous charge" that it set back peace efforts.

She also called the resolution an "insult" that would not be forgotten.

"The exercise of the veto is not something the United States does often. We have not done it in more than six years," Haley said. "We do it with no joy, but we do it with no reluctance."

Trump made the announcement on Dec. 6, saying it was a "long overdue step," and announced preparations to move the U.S. embassy in the Jewish state to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv.

The other 14 members on the council voted in favor of the resolution, which was drafted by Egypt. According to Reuters, it did not mention Trump or the U.S. but did express "deep regret at recent decisions concerning the status of Jerusalem."

Haley said it should be an "embarrassment" to the rest of the Security Council that the U.S. issued its veto in defense of its role in the Middle East policy process. She also said Trump had taken care to stay in line with previous U.N. Security Council resolutions on supporting a two-state solution and not prejudging final status negotiations.

"It is highly regrettable that some are trying to distort the president’s position to serve their own agendas," Haley said.

Haley said the U.S. will not be told by any country "where we can put our embassy," and she criticized the "scandalous charge" that the U.S. was setting back peace with its recognition of Jerusalem.

"What does it gain the Palestinian people for their leaders to throw up roadblocks to negotiations? A peace process that is damaged by the simple recognition that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel is not a peace process," Haley said. "It is a justification for an endless stalemate."

"It’s one more example of the United Nations doing more harm than good in addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," she added.

The post Haley Vetoes U.N. Resolution Rejecting Recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s Capital: ‘We Do It With No Reluctance’ appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com