Former FB pres unloads on social platform: ‘God only knows what it’s doing to our children’s brains’

Former Facebook President Sean Parker told Axios on Wednesday that he’s become a “conscientious objector” on social media. He said he believes social networking is changing the way we relate to one another and doing damage in its ever-expanding wake.

Axios writer Mike Allen wrote, “Sean Parker, the founding president of Facebook, gave me a candid insider’s look at how social networks purposely hook and potentially hurt our brains.”

What did Parker say?

Parker, who is now founder and chairman of the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, told Allen:

I don’t know if I really understood the consequences of what I was saying [in promoting social media], because [of] the unintended consequences of a network when it grows to a billion or 2 billion people and … it literally changes your relationship with society, with each other … It probably interferes with productivity in weird ways. God only knows what it’s doing to our children’s brains.

“The thought process that went into building these applications, Facebook being the first of them, … was all about: ‘How do we consume as much of your time and conscious attention as possible?” he added.

Parker explained, “That means that we need to sort of give you a little dopamine hit every once in a while, because someone liked or commented on a photo or a post or whatever. And that’s going to get you to contribute more content. … It’s a social validation feedback loop.”

He added that he, as well as Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook CEO, were well aware of the results that would be produced as a result of the constant social validation.

“The inventors, creators — it’s me, it’s Mark, it’s Kevin Systrom on Instagram, it’s all of these people — understood this consciously,” Parker admitted. “And we did it anyway.”

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.theblaze.com

Barneys Selling Antifa-Inspired Jackets For $375

Edgy! For the wealthy wannabe Antifa.

Via NY Post:

This isn’t the first time fashion and politics have come together, but this may be the least successful.

Over the weekend, apparel company Alpha Industries launched an Antifa-influenced M-65 Anarchy Cotton-Blend Field Jacket on high-end retailer Barneys’ website.

Now the $375 military-style canvas zip-up with “stand collar” and “snap flap patch pockets,” is getting slammed by the demographic it was trying to market to – Antifa members and anarchists.

The olive green jacket, which is posed with designer distressed jeans and Doc Marten boots – a symbol of punk fashion – features a bold “Revolution” printed across the front, along with a sloppy anarchy symbol and other “edgy” phrases and quips.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2s3tLUa

DHS Investigation: More than 70 Percent of TSA Screenings Missed Test Weapons, Bombs

A recent undercover investigation by the Department of Homeland Security revealed that Transportation Security Administration screenings at airports around the country fail most of the time.

The House Homeland Security Committee was told Wednesday that DHS investigators found that undercover officers were able to pass TSA checkpoints over 70 percent of the time with mock knives, guns, and explosives, CBS News reported.

Just two years ago, testing found a 95 percent failure rate, reports CBS News correspondent Kris Van Cleave.

The hearing was supposed to be closed but was opened to the press after members of Congress decided the findings were too urgent to be kept under wraps.

"We found that briefing disturbing," said Michael McCaul, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee.

The DHS Office of Inspector General made eight classified recommendations based on the undercover operation. In a statement, the TSA said it took the "OIG findings very seriously and are implementing measures that will improve screening effectiveness at checkpoints."

The TSA and members of Congress support replacing old check point scanners with new CT technology.

"In this system, we use high power algorithms to detect explosives," said Mark Laustra, a vice president at Analogic, the company developing the technology."

TSA administrator David Pekoske told Congress on Wednesday that the CT technology is the most effective way that his agency can keep passengers safe, but stressed that the cost is a hurdle.

"To invest in the CT technology requires funding above what TSA currently has," Pekoske said.

Frank Cilluffo, a former director of the Homeland Security advisory council, said the TSA cannot be complacent as long as terrorists target airports.

"They’re looking for vulnerabilities that can be exploited, and we need to make sure that we can push that as far as we can to minimize the risk," Cilluffo said.

The TSA this summer was a year behind schedule in launching a pilot program with the CT scanners. The agency announced last week that it is investing an additional $4 million into the technology.

American Airlines bought some of the scanners for the TSA to speed up the limited deployment of CT technology.

The post DHS Investigation: More than 70 Percent of TSA Screenings Missed Test Weapons, Bombs appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

PragerU: What Happens When Google Disagrees With You?

Author of the famous “diversity” memo, “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber,” James Demore, talks online censorship in the latest PragerU video.

In the video, Demore describes how he experienced firsthand the way in which Google uses its massive influence to harass, intimidate, and even censor people who present views that do not align with their politically correct ideology.

“I used to be a senior software engineer at Google,” says Demore. “Until they fired me. For doing something unforgivable. Something so controversial that it was the number one news story for days. My crime: I wrote an internal document that, among other things, suggested that men and women, on average, are different. Like I told you: Unforgivable.”

He explains, “The politically progressive viewpoint, which is dominant at Google and in the media, is that all disparities in society are due to injustices. Or, in this case, that the gender gap in tech is solely due to some form of sexism.”

“But is this true?” he dares to ask.

Demore points out that Google’s loyalty to the far-left views of gender disparity are actually hurting morale, stifling innovation, and becoming exclusionary. This led him to research these issues and eventually write the memo that included his findings.

“What did I discover?” he says. “That not all of the male-female disparity in tech may be the result of sexism.That at least some of it may be attributed to men and women having different goals for their careers and their lives.”

The executives immediately condemned his memo and quickly fired him.

“Will Google force upon its users the same politically correct views that it forces upon its employees?” Demore asks.

Watch the video below:

PragerU has filed a lawsuit against Google in response to YouTube’s restriction on dozens of the organization’s educational videos.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/1TJbF1r

What?! Rather: GOP Ran ‘Dirty’ Divisive Ads, Dems ‘United’ Voters With ‘Old-Fashioned’ Campaigns

If the media genuinely wants to turn around their reputation for reporting fake news, here’s an idea: Stop turning to disgraced news anchors, fired for essentially lying, as your experts on “truth-telling!” But as per usual Wednesday night, CNN predictably brought on Dan Rather to give his words of wisdom on Tuesday night’s election results.

As is his standby target, Rather blamed Trump for the big Democrat wins, saying voters had rejected Trump’s “divisiveness.” Even better, Rather laughably claimed that in Virginia in particular, the GOP had ran a “very dirty” campaign, while Democrats had run a campaign based on unity.

After talking about the Russia investigation, anchor Don Lemon asked Rather “what happened, in his view” Tuesday night:

“It was supposed to be very tight in Virginia. What happened in your view?” he broached.

Rather gushed the election results were a “big deal,” before making some truly ludicrous claims about how each party ran their campaigns in Virginia.

Well, I think what happened — first of all, this is a big deal. This was a big win for the Democrats. No other way to read it. They among other things particularly in Virginia, the Republicans found out that running a Trump-ism kind of campaign without Trump himself campaigning directly for you doesn’t work. And also this campaign in the end the Republican candidate for governor, thinking he was behind, began to run a very dirty campaign. As I said before, this campaign was nasty enough to gag a buzzard. That didn’t work.

As Newsbusters has noted, the Democrats ran an ad through the Latino Victory Fund, that showed a voter for the Republican candidate, Ed Gillespie, running over minority children with his truck. But Rather doesn’t see that as a “dirty” smear campaign(to say the very least)?

I guess it should come as no surprise since Don Lemon’s show actually defended the nasty ad that painted Republicans as racist murderers the morning following the election.

Regardless, the woefully obtuse Rather continued praising Democrats for running “old-fashioned” campaigns, that provided a positive “climate” that “united” the country:

So by any reasonable analysis coming out of last night, good news, very good news for the Democrats in not only Virginia but New Jersey and other places. They did it the old-fashioned way. They really got organized and they got people out to vote…

But hope and optimism, they only work if people are willing to act. So it’s a very old story. What counts the most is the vote. And in this case the Democrats worked hard to get their vote out. They were in a climate I think generally speaking that people want the country to be united.

 

 

And then he brought up Trump, because of course Trump is to blame for everything, ignoring the media’s role in causing division with their partisan and sometimes unfactual reporting:

“And much of the rhetoric and the tone coming from the Trump administration has been to divide us. You know, race against race, in some cases religion against religion. And that’s contrary to our history and the natural American spirit. And I think that’s some of what moved these ballots to go democratic last night. But any reasonable reading of those results, a lot of Republicans who are up for re-election next year, their fingernails will begin to sweat now given these returns,” Rather stated.

He went on to blame Trump some more, saying his lack of “nobility” was “beginning to show at the polls.” (Because voters didn’t know what kind of candidate Trump was until after he was elected?)

DON LEMON: Let me ask you because I’m going to put our poll up. It’s a very troubling numbers for President Trump here. Only 34% of Americans say the president is honest and trustworthy. 64% think he is not. One year in, I think that’s pretty astonishing. What forces are at work here?

DAN RATHER: Well, you know, general speaking with the Trump administration his problem, and it’s a growing problem with the electorate and I think for the country as a whole is the tone of his administration. You know, with some policies you can see well, he’s not that far out of the mainstream but it’s the whole tone of the presidency that I think what he says, what he tweets. People want a president to be strong, but they want him to be noble or at least have some noble instincts. And these are pretty hard to find with this presidency and it’s beginning to tell at the polls.

 

 

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2v7eUfC

Republican senator won’t guarantee middle class families won’t see their taxes go up under GOP plan

Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, said Thursday during an interview on “CBS This Morning” that he couldn’t guarantee that no middle-class family will see their taxes go up under the Republican tax plan.

What did Thune say?

The Senate is expected to unveil its own version of the House Republican tax plan on Thursday. Thune said the Senate bill will “largely follow the House’s action.”

“The details are in some cases slightly different than what House did, we took a slightly different approach on some of the major issues but the contours of the bill will largely follow the House’s action,” Thune said, arguing that the bill will spur economic growth and lead to job creation.

Asked if he could guarantee that no middle-class family will see their taxes go up under the plan, Thune replied: “I don’t think you can guarantee every filer — that that’s going to be the case.”

“As we look at this, we’re trying to maintain the tax burden similar to what it is today, that the distribution of this flows through all the different brackets in a way that’s consistent with what Americans are seeing today in terms of their tax burdens,” he said.

Thune said the bill will keep “progressivity” in the tax code and make sure that people in all income brackets see “meaningful tax relief.”

“Can you guarantee that every single filer might have some different experience? I don’t think you can guarantee that,” Thune said.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.theblaze.com

Devin Kelley Went To First Baptist Church’s Fall Festival The Week Before He Shot Everyone

Horrible.

Via IJR:

It was just five days before gunman Devin Patrick Kelley opened fire on the congregation in Sutherland Springs, Texas, that the members of the small church welcomed him in under much different circumstances.

On Sunday, Kelley killed 26 people and injured 30 others. But less than one week before, he brought his children to First Baptist Church’s annual fall festival, the Houston Chronicle reported.

Though his attendance wasn’t expected given his past troubles with his mother-in-law, Michelle Shields, who attends the church, the congregation still welcomed Kelley with open arms — some even thought he and his family were turning a corner.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2s3tLUa

Judge Rules DACA Recipients Have Due Process Rights

A federal judge in Seattle, Washington, ruled that illegal aliens receiving amnesty under President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) cannot have their status revoked without due process.

Judge Ricardo S. Martinez, appointed by President George W. Bush, said illegal aliens have due process rights and that DACA cannot be canceled justification, The Washington Times reported.

“While the Court recognizes and acknowledges that DACA does not confer lawful status upon an individual, the Court also finds that the representations made to applicants for DACA cannot and do not suggest that no process is due to them, particularly in Plaintiff’s case where benefits have already been conferred,” Judge Martinez stated in his ruling.

The judge did not explain what that due process might be or how what reasons could be acceptable.

“What process is due, and whether Plaintiff received such process, are ultimately questions for another day. But at this stage of the proceedings the Court is satisfied that Plaintiff has raised a plausible due process claim that will not be dismissed,” Martinez explained.

Texas and nine other states announced they would sue the Trump Administration if it did not end the DACA program in June, Breitbart Texas reported. The states threatened to add DACA to an existing lawsuit that effectively ended Obama’s other amnesty program, Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA).

“We respectfully request that the Secretary of Homeland Security phase out the DACA program,” Texas Attorney General Paxton and the coalition wrote in a letter to U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions. “Just like DAPA, DACA unilaterally confers eligibility for work authorization and lawful presence without any statutory authorization from Congress.”

“For these same reasons that DAPA and Expanded DACA’s unilateral Executive Branch conferral of eligibility for lawful presence and work authorization was unlawful, the original June 15, 2012 DACA memorandum is also unlawful,” the letter continued. “The original 2012 DACA program covers over one million otherwise unlawfully present aliens.”

As the deadline for the threatened lawsuit approached, Attorney General Sessions announced the Trump Administration would end the DACA program, Breitbart News reported.

“I’m here today to announce that the program known as DACA that was effectuated by the Obama administration is being rescinded,” Sessions said. Later calling for an “orderly and lawful wind-down.”

President Donald Trump put the responsibility for a DACA replacement program in the laps of congressional leaders — giving them six months to act or he would revisit the program, Joel Pollack reported for Breitbart News.

Shortly after the administration’s announcement, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced the states would drop the threatened lawsuit.

Paxton and other officials from 10 states were hit with major pushback efforts by the open borders lobby to drop their lawsuit against DACA. Paxton refused to do so, Breitbart Texas reported.

Bob Price serves as associate editor and senior political news contributor for Breitbart Texas. He is a founding member of the Breitbart Texas team. Follow him on Twitter @BobPriceBBTXGAB, and Facebook.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

What GOP Must Learn from the 12 Reasons Virginia Went Democrat in 2017

Much of the commentary on Election Day 2017 is misinformed or only half of the picture. There are 12 reasons that Virginia went Democratic on November 7, and lessons the GOP can learn from them if they want to turn future wipeouts into victories.

Historical pattern: past five presidents, Virginia goes the other way. Ever since 1988, when one party wins the White House, Virginia swings the other way. It started when Bush 41 was elected president in 1988, followed by Democrat Douglas Wilder in 1989. Then Republican George Allen (1993) followed Democrat Bill Clinton (1992). Then Democrat Mark Warner (2001) followed Republican Bush 43 (2000). Then Republican Bob McDonnell (2009) followed Democrat Barack Obama (2008). Now Democrat Northam (2017) has followed Republican Donald Trump (2016).

Each time, the out-of-power national party declared the election results a sign of national rejection of the president’s agenda. But that has not been true for five consecutive presidencies. Instead, it has been a natural swinging back of the pendulum. However, people wonder if McDonnell’s 2009 win could be the last Republican victory in Virginia, regardless of which party wins the White House. That may be true unless the Trump administration can drain the swamp in Washington to dredge out the Virginia suburbs of the nation’s capital.

Virginia is an indigo state—in reality, two states. The Old Dominion was once reliably Republican. But with the growth of the federal government, NOVA (Northern Virginia) is now populated by hundreds of thousands of big-government employees, contractors, recipients of federal and state welfare dollars, and liberal devotees who vote overwhelmingly Democrat. Most Americans want to drain the swamp, but swamp creatures rather like their ecosystem. Virginia has gone from red, to purple, to now a midpoint between purple and blue—indigo.

Although not as bad as when deep-blue Chicago jerks the entire state of Illinois to the left in statewide elections, with Democrats’ massive and growing stronghold in NOVA, a Republican must post very strong wins in the western and southern parts of the states to take the whole state. Virginia has joined Pennsylvania, Illinois, Michigan, and Missouri as a state that is in reality two states. Fortunately for the GOP, though, President Trump proved that a Republican can win some of those states.

Targeting the swamp. In addition to NOVA’s general inclination to vote Democrat, President Trump has promised to drain the swamp. Nothing is more dangerous than a cornered animal. D.C.’s swamp creatures in NOVA know that the president is targeting their environment, explaining the record turnout of Democrats in NOVA precincts, giving Northam record turnout in those places.

Northam was not an inspiring candidate. Gillespie was a better campaigner and a smarter strategist. Democrats did not chant Northam’s name as they marched en masse to polling locations in the counties of Arlington, Alexandria, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William. Swamp creatures’ self-preservation instinct is what motivated them to vote.

Growth of the federal government masked Virginia Democrats’ terrible mismanagement of Virginia’s economy. Under three Democrats and one moderate Republican, the commonwealth has sunk to the bottom bracket in America for economic growth, job creation, stifling regulation, and losing young families to other states. But trillions of dollars in federal spending has included billions spilling over into Virginia, making many voters feel pretty good without realizing that their own state was making the situation worse, not better. They were living a subsidized lifestyle, so a factor that should have cost Northam votes was instead was a plus.

Felon voters. In 2015, Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe violated the Virginia Constitution by granting mass amnesty to 206,000 convicted felons in the commonwealth. Felons vote overwhelmingly Democrat. The Virginia legislature challenged McAuliffe’s actions as unconstitutional. The Virginia Supreme Court agreed, saying his actions violated by the Virginia Constitution. But when McAuliffe reissued 13,000 of those pardons months weeks later, implausibly claiming that he had personally considered each individual application, the Virginia Supreme Court denied the legislature’s follow-up motion to enforce the court’s decision. All those felons were added to the voter rolls, with many thousands more added since.

Gillespie ran on Bush issues, with Bush style. His campaign was taken straight from the Bush 43 playbook of moderate, soccer-mom issues with which Republicans could carry elections in 2000 and 2004, but not since then. Generic calls for economic growth and job creation through cutting taxes and regulations, improving education through teacher pay hikes, and safer neighborhoods through supporting law enforcement in feel-good tone are worthwhile issues, but do not carry the day anymore. The ads emphasized words like “compassion,” “pragmatist,” and “centrist,” and was soft on illegal aliens. That is not where the electorate is in 2017 if a Republican wants to win.

GOP voters noticed Gillespie did not embrace Trump, or Trumpism. These issues and style were a refusal to embrace President Trump and his agenda. The GOP nominee refused to campaign with the GOP president. Republican voters strongly support the president, and were turned off by the fact that Gillespie kept President Trump at arm’s-length. The Republican trailed Northam by up to 17 points in the polls.

Gillespie’s raising a couple Trump issues was too little, too late. A sophisticated and experienced political strategist (albeit running on the wrong strategy), Gillespie changed course in the final weeks of the campaign, hitting Northam hard on illegal immigration, sanctuary cities, and protecting historical monuments that Democrats were attacking. He closed the gap, with some polls showing him tied or possibly slightly ahead. But on Election Day too many voters were unpersuaded that these positions were heartfelt, or that they went far enough.

Northam adopted Trump positions. The Democrat candidate raced to the right to co-opt several Trump issues to neutralize Gillespie’s advantage there. Northam never reversed his call to tear down historical monuments and markers, but he denounced sanctuary cities, and toned down his support for amnesty for illegal aliens. That likely helped him claw back in the last few days some of the ground he had lost to Gillespie on those issues.

Republicans lost even in red states on November 7. While losses in Virginia and New Jersey were expected, there was a nationwide trend on Election Day, as Republicans lost some local races in solid GOP areas in other states. Part of this is the natural pushback against any new president, but there was much more. Namely …

Democrats are angry, but Republicans are not happy. There is currently a gross imbalance in enthusiasm. Democrats have mobilized against President Trump’s agenda, but Republican voters do not match that enthusiasm with positive energy, because Republicans in the U.S. House and Senate have failed to pass legislation enacting that agenda. The House has passed over 300 bills that are paralyzed in the 52-48 Republican-controlled Senate.

Republicans have not delivered on the Trump MAGA Agenda that Americans voted for. To his credit, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) understands this, using unprecedented tactics to block all things Trump to stifle Republican excitement. Judges are (slowly) being confirmed over Schumer’s objections, but enough moderate Republican senators have joined Schumer to kill Trump-agenda bills, keeping them from reaching the president’s desk for his signature into law. Some Republicans appear to be on a suicide mission, evidently oblivious to the severe consequences the GOP could suffer in 2018 if they fail to get things done.

Fortunately for the GOP, all is not lost.

The Left is already overreaching. Democrats are misreading the failure of establishment Republican candidates in blue states as a repudiation of President Trump’s agenda. Groups like the Latino Victory Fund promising to double down with extremist ads that people across the political spectrum denounce as despicable—showing a Gillespie supporter in a pickup truck trying to run down minority children—could chase voters by the droves into the GOP’s column.

Most Democrats’ 2018 and 2020 candidates will not resemble Northam. Although a liberal, he was challenged from the left in the primary. The Sanders-Warren wing of the Democratic Party is ascendant, and more stridently liberal candidates can be expected over the next couple years. The perfect illustration of Democrats’ problem and direction is that Northam was shouted down during his victory speech by advocates for sanctuary cities and illegal alien amnesty. Security had to escort Northam off the stage.

Republicans might be turning the corner. Since Tuesday, several establishment Republican elected leaders have told the media that they know voters are very unhappy with their failure to pass legislation enacting the president’s agenda. Their instincts for self-preservation may overcome their non-MAGA preferences, and rally a few crucial additional votes to pass legislation.

Election Day 2017 was a lousy day for Republicans. But it was not a repudiation of President Trump or his agenda, and it is possible that enough politicians are figuring out that the MAGA agenda that carried Election Day 2016 may be the key to their success in 2018 and 2020.

Ken Klukowski is senior legal editor for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter @kenklukowski.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Liberal Freaks Scream at Sky Like Mental Patients One Year After Hillary Went Down in Flames

Mental illness is a very serious thing and is no joke and it isn’t going to get better without seeking serious professional help.

That would be damned good advice for the pathetic liberal crybabies who still can’t wrap their minds around the very simple concept that elections have winners and losers and while losing sucks, that’s just the way that life is – especially in the system that exists in here in the USA.

But millennial brats and other low-information freaks have become so used to being rewarded for failure that one year after the worst day in their lives, they are still unglued that President Trump pasted the heavily favored Hillary Clinton right in her ugly kisser.

On Wednesday, many of them gathered across the country to pointlessly throw their stupid ongoing hissy fits, wave signs and scream like a pack of baboons, many doing so aimlessly at the sky that God didn’t see fit to give Mrs. Clinton a participation trophy.

Here is a sample, I don’t know whether to laugh my ass off or recoil in horror that these folks are out walking around instead of being securely locked up in mental institutions.




These people are just plain nuttier than squirrel turds.

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com