Posted on

7 Myths & Misconceptions About The Breonna Taylor Case

If you have a social media account, chances are your feed has been filled with misinformation about the death of Breonna Taylor. The 26-year-old black woman was shot and killed by plainclothes police officers who raided her Louisville, Kentucky, home in March. As local, state, and federal officials continue to investigate the shooting death, former first lady Michelle Obama has already concluded that Taylor was murdered. International pop icon Beyoncé wrote an open letter demanding criminal charges be brought against the officers involved but did not specify which crimes she thinks they committed. All the while, a single tweet from attorney Benjamin Crump, who represents Taylor’s family, has contributed to several false narratives that continue to be amplified by blue checkmarks on Twitter.

On May 11, the nationally known civil rights lawyer tweeted: “Louisville Police fatally shot #BreonnaTaylor. They had the wrong address AND their real suspect was already in custody. 2 months later, no one has been held accountable for her death…but we will change that! #JusticeForBreonnaTaylor #SayHerName

The tweet included an image of a press release from Crump’s law firm announcing that Taylor’s family had retained him as legal counsel. Together, the post contained at least four incorrect or misleading statements about the case that still influence the national discussion today.

Here are the seven most common misconceptions surrounding the death of Breonna Taylor:

1. Myth: The officers that raided Breonna’s home were at the wrong address.

Perhaps the most prevalent false belief held by the general public is that the officers who served the search warrant at Taylor’s home were at the “wrong address.”

Police had obtained warrants for multiple locations linked to Jamarcus Glover, an alleged crack cocaine dealer. One of them included Taylor’s apartment, where she lived with her younger sister. Law enforcement believed Glover was using Taylor’s apartment as his current address and had been receiving mail and packages there.

According to the Louisville Courier-Journal, “Taylor’s name, birth date and social security number are listed on the warrant.” The outlet also reported it “includes her street address, apartment number and photos of her apartment door, which police later broke using a battering ram.”

Still, the “fake news” continues to permeate social media. For example, Pennsylvania State Senator Katie Muth, a Democrat, is currently using the false claim to push police reform legislation.

2. Myth: It wasn’t necessary for law enforcement to raid Taylor’s apartment because the main suspect was already in custody.

Both Sen. Muth and Crump say law enforcement did not need to serve the warrant at Taylor’s apartment because police had already arrested Glover in an earlier raid carried out by a different team of officers. Glover was reportedly captured around midnight; then, authorities executed the warrant at Taylor’s home at 12:40 am.

“Their real suspect was already in custody,” Crump wrote in his tweet from May.

While that fragment of his post appears to be accurate, it is also misleading.

The purpose of the raid at Taylor’s apartment was to find evidence, not to arrest Glover. Police said they thought Taylor was home alone at the time and were unaware that her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, was visiting.

WAVE 3 News recently reported, “mail addressed to Glover was among the items seized from Taylor’s apartment following the shooting,” citing a document obtained by the outlet. Multiple reports indicate that no drugs were found inside the home.

According to the Louisville Courier-Journal, Taylor has no history of drug offenses.

3. Myth: Police raided Taylor’s apartment without knocking.

Even though police had obtained a no-knock warrant, they knocked before entering Taylor’s apartment. No one involved disputes that account.

“Our intent was to give her give plenty of time to come to the door because they said she was probably there alone,” said Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly, who was one of the three officers who discharged their weapons inside Taylor’s home.

As CNN reported:

Taylor’s apartment, according to police, was considered a less volatile, “soft target.” As such, police commanders decided in advance to have officers knock and announce their presence before entry. That decision was communicated in a pre-operational briefing, according to a source familiar with the details of the operation who requested anonymity due to the ongoing investigation…

When there was no answer after repeated knocks, Mattingly said, he announced he was a police officer there to serve a search warrant…

Taylor had been watching a movie in bed together with her boyfriend Kenneth Walker when she drifted off to sleep beside him. Walker told investigators he heard banging at the door after midnight and his first thought was that it was Glover. He said he knew Taylor had dated the accused drug dealer during their on-and-off seven-year relationship. He was concerned there might be trouble.

Walker said the couple had awoken but did not know who was at the door. As they scrambled to get dressed, Walker grabbed his gun, which he was reportedly licensed to carry.

“She’s yelling at the top of her lungs – and I am too at this point – who is it?” he recalled. “No answer. No response. No anything.”

4. Myth: Police shot Breonna while she was in her bed.

Walker said both he and Taylor were walking down a hallway of the apartment toward the front door when it flew off the hinges. He said he feared for his life and thought the plainclothes officers who broke down the door were intruders unlawfully entering his girlfriend’s home.

Police said they “forced entry into the exterior door and were immediately met with gunfire” at 12:43 am.

Walker shot Sgt. Mattingly in the leg, severing his femoral artery. Three cops returned fire, shooting more than 20 rounds into Taylor’s apartment. All of the officers who fired are white. More from CNN:

Inside the apartment, Walker was unharmed. But Taylor lay on the ground beside him, bleeding profusely. There were bullet holes everywhere, including in a neighboring apartment where a young child lived.

Walker punched 911 into his cell phone. His voice sounds distraught as he tells the dispatcher someone had kicked in the door and shot his girlfriend. As the operator peppered him with questions, Walker repeatedly moaned his girlfriend’s nickname – “Bre” – and the word “help.”

Multiple sources confirm Taylor died in the hallway of her apartment, but rumors still circulate alleging she was shot and killed by police while in her bed.

 

One of the officers, Brett Hankison, was fired in June for violating procedures, accused of demonstrating “extreme indifference to the value of human life” by “wantonly and blindly” shooting into Taylor’s apartment. He is appealing his termination. The other two have been placed on administrative leave.

Walker was arrested after the incident, then indicted by a grand jury six days later for the attempted murder of a police officer. However, the indictment was later dismissed.

“It’s possible there was no criminal activity on either side of that door because no one could hear what the other party is saying,” said Tom Wine, Louisville’s top criminal prosecutor, at a news conference in May.

The police incident report contained several errors, according to the New York Times.

5. Myth: The officer shot during the raid at Breonna’s home was hit by “friendly fire.”

Shaun King, an activist often associated with the Black Lives Matter movement, claims to be collaborating with Crump on the Taylor case. King has a massive social media presence with millions of followers on multiple platforms.

On May 14, three days after Crump’s erroneous tweet, King alleged: “It is now believed that the police officer who got shot in the leg in the shooting of Breonna Taylor was shot by ‘friendly fire’ from his own officers. His partners were haphazardly emptying their clips and fired shots into 3 different apartments. They shot him.”

A CNN investigation quoted Walker admitting to firing at the officers.

“So I just let off one shot,” he said. “I still can’t see who it is or anything.”

The outlet reported that Sgt. Mattingly “could make out a man and a woman in the darkened hallway” and saw the flash of the muzzle before the bullet struck his leg.

According to the Courier-Journal, “No evidence has been presented indicating that Mattingly was shot by anyone other than Walker, and attorneys for Walker and Taylor’s family haven’t disputed that it was Walker who shot Mattingly.”

6. Inaccurate claim: Police shot Breonna eight times.

In April, attorneys for Taylor’s family filed a civil lawsuit against the three policemen who fired their weapons inside Breonna’s home. The court document said Taylor had been “shot at least eight times by the officers’ gunfire and died as a result.” Crump’s tweet from May 11 repeated this claim, as has almost every news organization that covered the tragic episode.

But according to the Courier-Journal, Taylor’s death certificate from the State Registrar of Vital Statistics records her cause of death as “multiple (5) gunshot wounds of the body.”

The outlet noted that “neither ballistics reports nor Taylor’s autopsy have been released publicly.”

The coroner’s office listed her time of death at 12:48 am.

7. Inaccurate claim: Breonna worked as an EMT at the time of her death.

A press release issued by Crump’s law firm identified Taylor as an “EMT,” an acronym for an emergency medical technician.

A fact-check from the Courier-Journal concluded that Crump’s description of Taylor was “partially true,” finding:

Taylor joined the city as an EMT recruit in January 2016, became a full EMT by June and left the Metro Government in November 2016. 

Local attorneys for Taylor’s family have clarified that she was working as an ER technician at two area hospitals at the time of her March 13 death, with aspirations of becoming a nurse.

More from Jeffrey Cawood: Everything You Need To Know About Prop 16 And The Anti-Discrimination Law It Repeals

The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a member.

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

Posted on

EXCLUSIVE: Kyle Rittenhouse Wasn’t the Only One Carrying a Gun in Kenosha – NUMEROUS BLM RIOTERS HAD GUNS THAT NIGHT TOO (Photos)

It looks like the atmosphere in Kenosha Wisconsin was more dangerous and volatile than has been reported to date on the night of the Kyle Rittenhouse shootings.  Numerous BLM rioters also were carrying guns. 

17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse was charged with 170 years in prison for his actions in Kenosha, Wisconsin on Tuesday night.  Rittenhouse killed two men and the question is whether it was in self defense.  Hopefully a fair court will come to an accurate judgement on his case. One charge against Rittenhouse is related to him carrying a gun that night in the streets.

We already knew that there were other individuals with guns who were protecting the streets of Kenosha from looting and destruction that night:

We also know that one BLM rioter who was chasing young Rittenhouse later that evening and who Rittenhouse shot in the arm was carrying a gun.  The man shot in the arm is reportedly a man by the name of Gaige Grosskreutz. He is connected to the far left group “People’s Revolution Movement” and he has been arrested previously and may be a felon.

Grosskreutz was carrying a gun when he was shot. He pulled out a gun from his pants and then his arm is nearly blown off by Rittenhouse.

But now we have uncovered pictures of other individuals in the BLM riot crowd who were also carrying guns that night.

One individual was wearing camo pants and had a beard – ‘Camo Man’ – was carrying a gun  He also appears to have an Antifa tattoo on his forearm:

Camo man was clearly carrying a gun that night in Kenosha:

Here is a better picture of Camo man.

Another BLM rioter in the streets of Kenosha was a man in a blue shirt and a Black Lives Matter mask:

‘BLM man’ was also carrying a gun:

The situation in Kenosha was very dangerous the night of the Rittenhouse shootings.  Many BLM rioters also had guns.  No doubt this is the same in other Democrat cities around the US where BLM rioters are looting and destroying these cities.  Why do Democrats want this?

The post EXCLUSIVE: Kyle Rittenhouse Wasn’t the Only One Carrying a Gun in Kenosha – NUMEROUS BLM RIOTERS HAD GUNS THAT NIGHT TOO (Photos) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Posted on

Many Corporations Are Betting On Marxism For The Culture War Win

Many Corporations Are Betting On Marxism For The Culture War WinMany corporations, including most professional sports, have frantically jumped on the Black Lives Matter train to virtue-signal their opposition to systemic racial oppression without consideration of the fact that the country has produced millions of black millionaires, billionaires, Senators, Congressmen, Attorney Generals, Judges, business owners and leaders, and of course, the historic election of President Obama.

Recently, Goodyear Tires thought it time to segregate its employees into two camps: acceptable and intolerable. Employees with a desire to endorse Black Lives Matter and LGTBQ issues would be allowed to voice that support while those who support President Trump and the police were allowed and expected to shut up. No exceptions. They quickly ran it back after President Trump tweeted about boycotting their tires and their stock price took an immediate hit.

via Canada Free Press

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com

Posted on

HAWORTH: Riots: The Democrats’ Strategy of Extortion

Since the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, violence has reigned. For months, cities have fallen victim to waves of clashes between rioters and police, the looting of businesses, government property, and homes, and physical damage to those who fall foul of the raging mob.

Rather than tensions being “released” — based on the obscene assumption that giving people “space to riot” is a short-term method for handling unrest — tensions are rising day by day. Last night, after the conclusion of the Republican National Convention on the South Lawn of the White House, Senator Rand Paul and his wife were intimidated, threatened, and physically assaulted by “protestors.”

This shocking incident occurred on the same Washington D.C. streets where a guillotine was constructed to stage a mock assassination of Donald Trump.

Much has been said of the Democrats’ role in the violence gripping our streets. Most of us are aware of the recent history of figures in the Democratic Party flirting with the notion of violence with careful inflammatory language. For example, in 2018, Maxine Waters — who is no stranger to violence in our city streets — encouraged supporters to harass Trump administration officials, saying “if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them.”

While such incendiary language is nothing new, a morally significant line has now been crossed by both the Democrats and their mainstream media stooges. We no longer live in a partly imaginary world of inflammatory language and political hyperbole, but in a brutal reality of constant violence in our streets. The mainstream media have crossed a line by consistently denying that the violence is even occurring, providing us with the overnight clichés “mostly peaceful protests” and “otherwise unarmed.” The Democrats have crossed a line by justifying the riots as an “understandable” reaction to “justified” anger, or even refusing to acknowledge that violence has any impact on their own constituents. If “silence is violence” as they repeatedly claim, then surely some Democrats are the most violent among us?

The fundamental problem at the heart of this chaotic crisis has two elements. The first is the shameless and blatant dismissal of journalistic and ethical integrity in favor of furthering a political narrative. The Democrats and the mainstream media show no concern for the importance of the concept of evidence, and instead judge every instant in real-time based solely on the skin color of those involved. After Jacob Blake was shot by police in Kenosha, Wisconsin, the Left required no further information beyond the fact that he is black and the man who shot him was a white police officer before they assigned ultimate innocence to Blake and ultimate guilt to the police officer, and therefore, the law enforcement community in general. Details like Blake’s open arrest warrant, that he allegedly resisted arrest, and that he was shot as he reached inside his car where a knife was found are irrelevant if all you care about is skin color.

The mainstream media have sacrificed the patient and time-consuming quest for truth, instead favoring the instant gratification of political profit, leaving the Democrats free to lie with impunity. As a result, Kenosha now lies in ashes as insignificant collateral damage in the “battle for justice.”

The second element is that the Left views anarchist violence in the streets as a unique opportunity they hope to wield to their advantage. Much like the “ring of power” in “The Lord of the Rings,” they believe that, unlike their predecessors, they will be able to harness the power of the mob — a mob they themselves fear. Much like the businesses who place “Black Lives Matter” signs on their now broken windows in hope that they will be spared, politicians like Kamala Harris and Joe Biden see the violent mobs from beyond their barbed wire fences and security details as both a danger and an opportunity. The fact that violent revolution will consume them too is a long-term concern which is irrelevant in their short-term yearning for power at any cost.

Ultimately, this combination of violence and deceit proves the moral depravity at the heart of the Leftist platform in the United States to be one of extortion. Joe Biden has called the violence in our streets a symptom of “Donald Trump’s America,” and Democrats routinely state that the only solution to this violence is to elect Democrats into further power.

To defeat this notion, we must notice the Left’s reliable pattern. When Black Lives Matter riots engulfed cities like Ferguson under the watch of the Obama administration, the White House wasn’t to blame. It was “systemic racism,” for which the solution was further Democratic Party rule. When riots engulf cities today — cities run by Democrats for decades — it is now the fault of the White House, for which the solution is the return of Democratic Party rule.

For the Left, the Democratic Party is the solution to all of our problems, even those they themselves cause. The implicit (and sometimes explicit) threat is that if you don’t vote for Democrats, the violence will continue. Effectively, your ballot is a paper envelope stuffed with cash, handed over with the hope that it will temporarily prevent your neighborhood gangster from breaking your legs.

These particular gangsters come to collect every four years.

More from Ian Haworth: The Hidden Difference Between Absentee And Universal Mail-In Voting

The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a member.

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

Posted on

Dr Blasio’s New York: Two More Police Officers Brutally Beaten After Writing Parking Ticket for Blocking Fire Hydrant

For some reason this keeps on happening in commie Mayor De Blasio’s New York City.

Two police officers were brutally beaten in Brooklyn after they wrote a parking ticket for blocking a fire hydrant.

The goons in New York City no longer respect or fear the police.

And the mayor does not have their back.

This will only get worse.
Democrat De Blasio has ruined America’s largest city.

The post Dr Blasio’s New York: Two More Police Officers Brutally Beaten After Writing Parking Ticket for Blocking Fire Hydrant appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Posted on

Ninth Circuit Stays Injunction That Allowed Portland Rioters to Pose as Press


The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay Thursday against a lower court injunction that prevented federal law enforcement from arresting journalists during riots in Portland — which rioters abused by posing as “press.”

A July order by Judge U.S. Judge Michael H. Simon — a Barack Obama appointee — prevented federal law enforcement from dispersing journalists and “legal observers” during protests. The U.S. Department of Justice appealed the injunction.

Acting Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Ken Cuccinelli told the Senate Judiciary Committee earlier this month that rioters had abused the injunction by wearing signs saying “press” — and then launching violent attacks on federal officers.

In a district court filing, the Department of Justice provided several explicit examples:

For example, a protester carrying a shield that identified him as press was taken into custody for impeding federal officers who were attempting to control the crowd, and was found to be in possession of a gun. Another individual who self-identified as a reporter unlawfully entered federal property and, after refusing to leave, resisted arrest. A third individual wearing indicia of press membership and self-reporting as press, was arrested for failing to comply with lawful direction of a federal officer, and discovered to be carrying commercial grade fireworks, which, throughout the protests, have been used as a tactic to harass federal officers, and which are illegal in Oregon. On July 28, 2020, an officer observed an individual wearing a helmet bearing the word “PRESS” and using a power tool to attempt to breach the fence around the Courthouse. In the early morning on July 29, 2020, an individual wearing “press” identification on his helmet breached the security barrier around the courthouse by jumping over the perimeter fence. Most recently, on the night of July 29, 2020, an individual wearing “press” identification assisted another protester to breach the perimeter fence.

The local Portland Police Bureau likewise reported rioters wearing “press” insignia were throwing rocks at police officers.

Other — legitimate — journalists confirmed those reports.

In a 2-1 ruling, a panel of Ninth Circuit judges held: “Based on our preliminary review, appellants have made a strong showing of likely success on the merits that the district court’s injunction exempting “Journalists” and “Legal Observers” from generally applicable dispersal orders is without adequate legal basis.”

The panel left in place a portion of the lower court order that directed the government and the American Civil Liberties Union, which filed for the injunction, to work together to create football-style jersey numbers for officers to wear so that anyone using excessive force could be identified.

Attorney General William Barr celebrated the Ninth Circuit’s decision in a press statement:

As the Department of Justice explained in our briefing, federal officers in Portland – like law enforcement in other parts of the country – have confronted aggressive mob violence. Behind the veil of “protests,” highly organized violent operators have carried out direct attacks on federal personnel and property, particularly the federal courthouse in Portland. Shielded by the crowds, which make it difficult for law enforcement to detect or reach them, violent opportunists in Portland have attacked the courthouse and federal officers with explosives, lasers, projectiles, and other dangerous devices. In some cases, purported “journalists” or “legal observers” have provided cover for the violent offenders; in others, individuals wearing supposed press badges have themselves attacked law enforcement or trespassed on federal property. More than 200 federal officers have been injured in Portland alone.

The Portland city government has the ability to stop this. Instead, the city government has abetted the violence through action and inaction, neutered the ability of the police department to deal with the mobs, impeded the ability of police to coordinate with federal law enforcement, and refused to pursue charges against the rioters. By contrast, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Portland has charged 74 people with federal crimes arising from the Portland riots, including arson, assaulting federal officers, and destruction of federal property. The message should be unmistakable: The First Amendment protects the rights to speak and assemble, but not to attack people or property. The Department of Justice will continue to fully and fairly enforce federal law against these violent rioters.”

The two judges signing the majority opinion were Eric D. Miller and Daniel Aaron Bress, both appointees of President Donald Trump.

The dissenting judge was  M. Margaret McKeown, a Bill Clinton appointee.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). His new book, RED NOVEMBER, tells the story of the 2020 Democratic presidential primary from a conservative perspective. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

Photo: file

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Posted on

Scalise: ‘People Are Fed Up with Seeing This Kind of Mob Rule’


Friday on Fox News Channel’s “Your World,” House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) reacted to the mob that confronted Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) a day earlier outside the White House following the conclusion of the Republican National Committee.

Scalise said he detected a turning of the public’s attitude against the protesters and rejected the claim those demonstrations were “peaceful.”

“[I] mean, some of these — these mobs, when you see them out there throwing bricks at police, they’re injuring people, they’re killing some police,” he said. “They have blinded police, and yet they keep doing it. And this is where you have seen President Trump very vocal that we have got to stand up against it. And, for whatever reason, Joe Biden won’t stand up against it. I think people are fed up with seeing this kind of mob rule, anarchy in the streets.”

“I mean, you can peacefully protest,” Scalise added. “That was no peaceful protest. When you’re trying to hurt people, potentially even killing people, it has consequences, and it’s got to end.”

Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Posted on

Blackburn: RNC Showed a Contrast Between GOP and ‘Doom and Gloom’ Democrats


Friday, during an appearance on the Fox Business Network, Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) proclaimed the Republican National Convention held over the last week showed a contrast between Democrats and Republicans, with Democrats portrayed as the party of “doom and gloom.”

“I think it was very positive and a wonderful way to show contrast,” she said. “What the Democrats have done was depressing. We don’t believe in America as it exists today. We don’t like the Donald Trump version of America. We don’t want to change Washington, D.C. And here it was just kind of doom and gloom. And then there is all this positive. Here is what President Trump has done. Here is what he is going to do.”

Blackburn also discussed the confrontation her colleague Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) faced departing the White House in Washington, D.C. following the conclusion of the convention. She suggested it was indicative of the direction of the Democratic Party.

“This fear and intimidation tactic, this push by the Democrats to defund the police, underfund the militarily, abolish ICE — that is a part of their platform,” she said. “This is all — you know, I thought it was interesting Maria, that Bernie Sanders during the Democrat convention and Bernie Sanders is an admitted socialist, but he caucuses with the Democrat Party. He said to the movement, his movement, look our agenda has become mainstream. They have taken our agenda. And what an admission that the Democratic Party has gone this far left, that they’re for socialized medicine. They support this defunding the police. They never stood up and supported law enforcement during their convention.”

“And you don’t hear them pushing back against the rioting and the looting and the vandalism,” Blackburn added. “And indeed it was yesterday before Joe Biden had anything to say about this. So people have distinct choices. And when I talk to women across this country, they want safety and security for their families and their communities. They want their children to be able to go back to college. They want to go back to work. They want life to return to normal. And they are aghast when they see all this looting and rioting in the streets.”

Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Posted on

Maher: Democrats ‘Seem to Be Hesitant’ to Condemn Looting


On Friday’s broadcast of HBO’s “Real Time,” host Bill Maher stated that Democrats “seem to be hesitant, in some ways…to condemn the looting.”

Maher said President Donald Trump seems to be running for re-election as “the law and order candidate. And are the Democrats facing that right? They seem to be hesitant, in some ways, for example, to condemn the looting. Because they understand what causes people to have the rage that would make them loot. Although, I don’t know why looting is always associated with the rage. I mean, sometimes they’re just taking shit, and it’s not people you would even think would need the shit.”

Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com