Christian Post Decries NY Mayor de Blasio’s ‘Reckless’ Threat to Close Churches

A leading Christian journal has accused New York Mayor Bill de Blasio of overstepping his authority by threatening to permanently close synagogues and churches that fail to comply with his ban on public gatherings.

Writing for the Christian Post Tuesday, seminary professor Michael Brown appealed to the mayor to withdraw his threat, insisting it was “reckless” and could “actually provoke people of faith to defy you.”

“What on earth prompted you to say what you said?” Dr. Brown writes. “Mr. Mayor, what gives you that authority?”

Insisting that he has personally urged pastors and Christian leaders to comply with the mayor’s bans on public gatherings, Brown nonetheless takes issue with de Blasio’s abuse of power and needless harshness.

“Yet when you specifically threaten to permanently close synagogues and churches that do not comply, you immediately raise concerns,” Brown writes. “This certainly does look like religious discrimination.”

Brown also wonders aloud why the mayor threatened only Jews and Christians while making no such threat against Muslims who worship.

“I want to say to all those who are preparing for the potential of religious services this weekend: If you go to your synagogue, if you go to your church, and attempt to hold services after having been told so often not to, our enforcement agents will have no choice but to shut down those services,” de Blasio said.

“The NYPD, Fire Department, Buildings Department, and everyone has been instructed that if they see worship services going on, they will go to the officials of that congregation, they’ll inform them they need to stop the services and disperse,” the mayor added. “If that does not happen, they will take additional action up to the point of fines and potentially closing the building permanently.”

“You’ve been warned, you need to stop services, help people practice their faith in different ways, but not in groups, not in gatherings that could endanger people,” he concluded.

You “seriously overstepped your bounds” when you also said this, Brown writes, by threatening an action that is “both illegal and unconstitutional.”

“With all respect, sir, and meaning no insult, this sounded to me like a frustrated parent, upping his threat to his kids when they do not obey,” he notes.

Brown urges the mayor to not “needlessly provoke religious leaders and believers” who have actually done a great job of complying with the bans.

From our perspective as lovers of God and lovers of life, Brown adds, “your harsh threats are all the more hypocritical and glaring when we realize that you have allowed abortion facilities to remain open during the crisis.”

“The elective slaughtering of babies in the womb is considered an essential service, but Jewish and Christian believers who would dare gather together to pray are threatened with permanent closure of their buildings,” he observes.

Dr. Brown was not alone in his consternation over the mayor’s threats.

“I don’t care how bad the Wuhan virus gets, there’s no legal authority for government officials to permanently shut down worship services,” wrote Red State contributor “Bonchie.”

“None at all. They can make requests and set guidelines, but it’s a gross violation of the Constitution to shut down the use of private property for religious services,” he said. “There are some things that are more important than short term measures to fight a health crisis and religious freedom is one of those things.”

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Mitch McConnell to Pelosi: ‘Stand Down’; We’re Not ‘Taking Advantage of the Crisis’

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) told House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to “stand down” as she prepares to position Democrats to use the next economic relief bill to pursue progressive agenda items, also warning Republicans that she is “looking for a way to jam us.”

“She needs to stand down on the notion that we’re going to go along with taking advantage of the crisis to do things that are unrelated to the crisis,” McConnell said during an interview with the Washington Post this week.

Pelosi has signaled a desire to move quickly to the next stage of economic relief. The newfound sense of urgency follows Democrats delaying the recently passed $2 trillion emergency relief package to pursue their own version filled with a host of progressive pet projects like ballot harvesting and Green New Deal initiatives.

While Democrats lost that battle, Pelosi is gearing up, eagerly anticipating the next phase of relief and using the severity of the coronavirus pandemic as her catalyst.

“The victims of the coronavirus pandemic cannot wait,” Pelosi said in a statement. “It is moving faster than the leader may have suspected, and even he has said that some things should wait for the next bill.”

“I hope that we can work in a four corners manner for the common good,” she added.

While McConnell remains open to bipartisan discussions and solutions, he reemphasized that Pelosi’s first proposal remains a nonstarter moving forward and effectively warned the GOP that Pelosi is “looking for a way to jam us.”

According to the Post:

Beyond infrastructure, Pelosi has also pushed this week to include a repeal of the cap on state and local tax deductions as part of upcoming legislation, which its supporters say would help Americans who pay tens of thousands of dollars each year. The Republican-authored 2017 tax law capped the amount that households could deduct at $10,000.

“That’s an example of something that has nothing to do with the pandemic,” McConnell said, pledging to oppose the idea in the weeks ahead. “What’s really happening here is, she’s looking for a way to jam us.”

Pelosi has publicly admitted she is looking to pack the next phase of relief with agenda items that have little to do with the crisis at hand, including changes to the way the U.S. conducts elections — a longterm goal Democrats have continued to slowly chip away at over the years.

“In terms of the elections, I think that we’ll probably be moving to vote by mail,” Pelosi said during an appearance on MSNBC’s Morning Joe on Tuesday.

“That’s why we wanted to have more resources in this third bill that just was signed by the president to get those resources to the states to facilitate the reality of life that we are going to have to have more vote by mail,” she continued.

The majority leader is already rejecting those suggestions — particularly the Democrats’ desire for election changes.

“For goodness sake, I’ve got a list, too,” McConnell told the Post.

“How about national right to work? How about Davis-Bacon reform? How about ending junk lawsuits against doctors and hospitals? You get the drift,” he said. “We both have agendas we’d like to see pass — and can’t pass in this current environment.”

McConnell also addressed the mounting questions over the GOP and its on-paper stance of fiscal responsibility. While he described “ideological mooring” as “important,” he stressed that “there are times when you throw ideology out the window and attack, in a very pragmatic and aggressive way, unanticipated problems.”

“And this is the biggest unanticipated problem I’ve ever seen,” he said.

“I was thinking about it with this eerie feeling descending over the country, of the fear that every mother had, according to my mother, of sending their kids out to play in the summer,” the majority leader, who contracted polio at the age of two, said.

“We do have to be mindful of how to pay for it. There has been a lot of fantasizing on both sides about massive packages,” McConnell told the Post. “We’d all love to do it, but there is the reality of how you pay for it.”

“We just passed a $2 trillion bill, and it would take a lot of convincing to convince me that we should do transportation in a way that’s not credibly paid for after what we just passed last week,” he added.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

FDA Goes After Distilleries Over Hand Sanitizer Production

Government regulations are hampering private businesses’ ability to aid in the fight against the novel coronavirus.

Scott Harris, co-founder of Catoctin Creek Distilling Co. in Purcellville, Virginia, has been converting his distillery’s alcohol supply into hand sanitizer out of a feeling of “moral responsibility.”

Unfortunately for Harris, the Food and Drug Administration is not making this process an easy one.

Distilleries across the U.S. are facing rigid FDA opposition to their efforts to aid in fighting COVID-19.

TRENDING: House Republicans Push Bill To Take Back the $25 Million Kennedy Center Received in Coronavirus Bill

The FDA guidelines getting in the way require that sanitizer not be made with drinking alcohol.

American distilleries wanting to convert their alcohol reserves are required to add a “bitterant” in order to prevent children from drinking it, according to The Washington Times.

Other distilleries have voiced their concerns regarding these federal guidelines.

“We appreciate the FDA’s concerns, but there’s got to be a way to do this,” said Chris Swonger, president of the Distilled Spirits Council of the U.S.

Should the FDA loosen its regulations?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

“We do have to find a path with the FDA to come up with a practical guideline for undenatured alcohol so distillers continue to fulfill the demand out there in the marketplace.”

While these distilleries voiced their willingness to compromise, the FDA is remaining stringent in its request, according to The Times.

“The FDA’s guidances explain that FDA does not intend to object to the manufacture of denatured or undenatured alcohol for use in hand sanitizers, so long as a denaturant (bitterant) is added prior to the final production of the hand sanitizer,” the agency said.

“Adding these denaturants to the alcohol renders the product less appealing to ingest.”

The FDA’s unwillingness to bend this rule is preventing many private organizations from filling a massive void in the American market.

RELATED: 104-Year-Old WWII Veteran Recovers from Coronavirus, Among the Oldest To Do So

Hand sanitizer has become so scarce that prices for a box of small bottles went as high as $400 on Amazon early last month, Reuters reported.

With resources so scarce, it is unfortunate that government bureaucracy is hampering these private organizations’ efforts.

Without the red tape, many more companies would be able to follow in the footsteps of outspoken conservative Mike Lindell, who has allocated the resources of his company, MyPillow, toward creating masks for health care workers, according to Fox News.

Even with all the regulations, America’s private industry is stepping up to the plate and helping lead the fight against COVID-19.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

90-Year-Old Woman Refuses Ventilator, Eyes Next Generation: ‘Save It for Younger Patients’

In the modern world, social media has helped foster a society of self-centeredness. Many people today are more concerned about good-looking selfies than they are with the well-being of their neighbors.

For one compassionate, elderly woman in Belgium, that was certainly not the case.

Ninety-year-old Suzanne Hoylaerts, a coronavirus patient, reportedly refused to be put on a ventilator earlier this month, asking her doctors to save it for younger patients.

She died March 22, two days after being hospitalized, according to the U.K. Daily Mail.

TRENDING: House Republicans Push Bill To Take Back the $25 Million Kennedy Center Received in Coronavirus Bill

“I don’t want to use artificial respiration. Save it for younger patients. I already had a good life,” Hoylaerts reportedly told doctors, who later relayed her words to her daughter Judith, according to the Daily Mail’s translation of an article on the Belgian news site 7sur7.

Hoylaerts wasn’t the only one affected by her decision to refuse care. Her death was quite hard on her daughter as well.

Judith told 7sur7 her elderly mother “took the lockdown seriously” and had been in isolation before her admittance to the hospital, according to Complex.

Judith also said her mother spoke to her shortly before being admitted, saying, “You must not cry. You did everything you could.”

“I can’t say goodbye to her, and I don’t even have a chance to attend her funeral,” Judith added.

This stunning show of self-sacrifice from Hoylaerts comes amidst the devastating coronavirus pandemic, which has left hospitals around the world short on supplies.

Her choice to forgo treatment may give one more patient a fighting chance to survive.

While the virus is known for its effect on the elderly, Hoylaerts’ concern for younger patients is not unwarranted.

RELATED: Prince Charles Breaks Silence While Battling Coronavirus, Encourages People To Live with Hope and Faith

In the very same country of Belgium, a 12-year-old girl reportedly became the youngest known European to die from COVID-19, according to Reuters.

At a time when the world seems to be falling apart, it can often be hard to appreciate the beauty of life.

Suzanne Hoylaerts didn’t have any problem seeing that beauty. With her final act, she only hoped to give others a chance to see it as well.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Amazon Bans Sale Of N95 And Surgical Masks To General Public

Amazon Bans Sale Of N95 And Surgical Masks To General Public

Amazon has banned the sale of N95 and surgical masks to the general public, claiming it would restrict sales to hospitals and government organizations dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic.

The ban took effect April 1, according to Recode, after the company said in a forum for Amazon sellers that the ban includes "facial shields, surgical gowns, surgical gloves, and large-volume sanitizers."

Hospitals and governments can qualify to purchase said items by filling out a form, while Amazon will be eliminating the commission it usually charges sellers in order "to encourage our selling partners to make additional inventory of these products available at competitive prices to these customers with the greatest need."

The move is the latest drastic change Amazon has made to its business practices amid the global pandemic that has upended billions of lives and economies across the globe. Amazon has become a lifeline to essential goods during this time for millions of customers ordered to stay at home and those fearful of shopping in stores during the crisis.

In mid-March, faced with merchandise shortages in the United States and Europe due to the pandemic, Amazon instituted sweeping changes on which products it will store and ship from its warehouses, in a move it said was aimed at keeping essential items in stock and speeding up orders. –Recode

Two weeks ago, the Seattle-based e-retailer said that it would be "temporarily prioritizing household staples, medical supplies, and other high-demand products coming into our fulfillment centers so that we can more quickly receive, restock and deliver these products to customers," meaning it will no longer accept new shipments to warehouses for discretionary items through at least April 5.

The company will continue to sell products on its websites, however sellers listing discretionary items will have to wait to ship them on their own if they aren’t already in – or on their way, to an Amazon warehouse. Products which can be shipped include: "baby products, health and household, beauty and personal care, grocery, industrial and scientific, and pet supplies."

Third-party resellers who participate in the Fulfillment by Amazon program, as well as wholesale vendors who sell directly to the company were notified of the changes.

"We are seeing increased online shopping, and as a result, some products, such as household staples and medical supplies, are out of stock," said an Amazon spokesperson in a statement, adding "We understand this is a change for our selling partners and appreciate their understanding as we temporarily prioritize these products for customers."

With governments across the globe recommending and even mandating that people stay inside during the pandemic, more shoppers are turning to Amazon to stock up rather than visiting brick-and-mortar stores. But the rush of shopping in select categories has meant frequent out-of-stock messages for items ranging from hand sanitizer and hand soap to face masks, as well as sellers taking advantage of low supply by attempting to price-gouge customers.

This restriction on which items it will store in warehouses — coupled with Amazon’s announcement that it was hiring 100,000 warehouse workers to keep up with surging demand — highlights the level at which consumers are relying on online shopping during the pandemic. At the same time, it’s also a realization that even the endless digital aisles of Amazon’s Everything Store, and Amazon’s logistics prowess, were not built to fully sustain the change in consumer behavior that the pandemic has forced essentially overnight. –Recode

News of the changes were greeted with panic – as third-party sellers logged in to find that their business was about to suffer a serious setback.

"Amazon just put tons of businesses out of business," said one seller on Amazon’s forum. "Destroyed thousands of jobs amidst a crisis. Horrible joke. Absolute joke. No warning. Expect major lawsuits coming from sellers who now will go bankrupt."

"It’s not doable," wrote another seller. "Most of us do not have the infrastructure in place. We do not have the boxes or packing material to do this."

Amazon said in the notice that they understand "this is a change to your business, and we did not take this decision lightly."

Others were ok with the move, such as Will Tjernlund, CMO of Amazon seller consultancy Goat Consulting – who think it was a good move, and that sellers will be able to weather the storm.

"I am happy Amazon is focusing on fulfilling essential items over figuring how to ship couches or flatscreen TVs," he said.


Tyler Durden

Thu, 04/02/2020 – 16:00

via ZeroHedge News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.zerohedge.com/fullrss2.xml

REPORT: Trump Campaign Ordering Food From Local Restaurants To Help Hospital Workers

Since the 2020 race has been placed on ice, the Trump campaign has used its resources to buy up food from local restaurants to donate to hospital workers fighting the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Since last Thursday, President Trump’s reelection campaign has been calling up local restaurants and ordering large amounts of food to be delivered to more than a dozen hospitals in New York, New Jersey, Washington state and Michigan,” a Fox News exclusive said.

The campaign had been making the orders anonymously until sources confirmed of the charitable operation with Fox News. One source said the effort was to kill two birds with one stone: support local restaurants while supplying medical workers with needed help. The campaign has already spent tens of thousands of dollars in the past few weeks, which they plan to continue to do in the coming days.

“They’re doing it as a donor who cares,” the source told the outlet. “So nothing politically is tied to it. … We’re just trying to, you know, show a thank you.”

“They’re trying to send things that are like, local restaurants that may need support [and] cool restaurant icons of the area that may need the business,” another source said.

As the source said, the orders were indeed placed anonymously, which several establishments confirmed. Giovanni’s Italian Deli in Secaucus, N.J., told the outlet that an anonymous individual placed an order for delivery to Hudson Regional Hospital. It included 40 platters of pasta, salads, and sandwiches.

“They only told us their first name,” a Giovanni’s employee told Fox News. “They called us, and they had us donate meals for the nurses and doctors – an assortment of things, 40 platters of pasta, salads, sandwiches. We’re happy to do it. Trust me.”

Fox News provided more evidence and confirmation of this anonymous charitable giving:

Sources told Fox News that the campaign also ordered from Nick’s Grill in Kirkland, Wash.; Chit Chat Diner in Morristown, N.J.; Turning Point of Long Branch, N.J.; and Antonio’s Trattoria in the Bronx, N.Y., among others.

The manager of Antonio’s Trattoria, in an interview with Fox News, said that a man called the restaurant Monday to have “100 individual orders” delivered to Lincoln Hospital in the Bronx.

“It was 20 penne vodkas, 20 pastas with tomato sauce, 30 chicken parmesans, and 30 house salads with grilled chicken,” the manager told Fox News. “He only gave his first name and said he wanted to remain anonymous.”

The Antonio’s Trattoria manager expressed thanks to the Trump campaign for using their business to help workers in need.

While the economy has certainly taken a hit during the pandemic, that does not mean businesses have stepped away from the challenge. In New York, for instance, a pizzeria earned itself free rent at its place of business after the landlord learned that they had donated hundreds of pizzas to hospitals around the city.

“All of the pizza getting made at Sauce Pizzeria – as many as 400 per day – are going straight to hospitals to feed health care workers pulling 14- or even 18-hour shifts as they remain on the front lines of the COVID-19 fight,” reported NBC New York. “Many of those nurses, doctors, and other medical staffers are so swamped helping patients every single day, many don’t have a moment to spare to grab something to eat.”

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

So Trump was right all along about medical equipment ‘going out the back door’

A couple days ago, Democrats and their media allies had a full-blown Victorian gentleman–style cow when President Trump merely raised the question of whether New York hospitals, which are short on personal protective equipment, might be victims of medical equipment ”going out the back door.”

Perfectly legitimate question, and doubly so in light of the anecdote he spoke of from a hospital executive.

They all harrumphed umbrage, in unison. A sample:

No evidence for Trump’s suggestion that masks are ‘going out the back door’ of New York hospitals -NBC News

De Blasio: Trump’s suggestion face masks are being stolen is ‘insulting’ -Politico

Cuomo and New York hospitals reject Trump’s claim masks ‘going out the back door’ -ABC News

Trump could help solve the mask problem. Instead he’s making baseless attacks on New York nurses. -Vox

Trump blames hospitals for mask and ventilator shortages -Washington Post (and note that the original headline, since modified, stated ’bizarrely blames’).

TRUMP COMMENTS ABOUT HOSPITAL MASK THEFTS SPARK BACKLASH FROM DOCTORS -Newsweek

‘Insulting’ Frontline Health Workers, Trump—Without Evidence—Accuses Hospital Staff in New York of Stealing Protective Gear -Common Dreams

Oh, spare us.  Here’s the latest news from WNBF in upstate New York affirming exactly what Trump was saying:

One Cooperstown hospital employee has been charged and more arrests are possible in connection with the theft of medical supplies during the coronavirus pandemic.

Authorities say 33-year-old Josie Wright of Morris has been accused of stealing face masks and alcohol prep pads from Bassett Medical Center.

According to the Otsego County Sheriff’s Office, Wright was a contracted employee at the hospital. She was arrested Monday morning and ordered to appear in Otsego town court.

Human nature being what it is, it’s not ridiculous to ask whether some people will attempt to monetize desperate situations for their own personal gain.  That’s why corruption exists; that’s why a black market is there.  It happens everywhere; there is no reason not to think hospitals are not exempt, even as we generally praise medical staff right now, and even as most really are heroic.  To say one profession is exempt from bad guys is ridiculous, and now we know that yes, there are mask thieves taking supplies “out the back door” and causing tremendous havoc and distress.

Trump’s statement sounds exactly like the kind of wariness that a hotel executive steeped in real-world realities would have by raising questions about internal theft, which can have steep consequences for a business even without a crisis.  It’s not unreasonable to think his own experience drew his curiosity about missing equipment in that direction, given that hospitals should have equipment after his swift actions.  The left is trying not only to throw mud on Trump for asking, but also to push a narrative about Trump being incompetent and unprepared, which isn’t true.  Long ago, I used to work as a private detective in San Francisco for clients exactly like Trump, and my exact job was to find what was going “out the back door” at places like hotels, airports, and hospitals, working undercover.

Trump, it turns out, was right all along.

And it’s worth noting that Cuomo in particular, who was one of Trump’s loudest critics in this, less than a month earlier was openly complaining about thieving hospital personnel for exactly the same thing.  Here’s what he was saying on March 6.

People are stealing masks and other medical equipment from hospitals, New York Gov. Cuomo says —CNBC

So Cuomo knew about this stuff all along before he put on his outrage mask?  Can you say “hypocrite”?

Image credit: YouTube screen shot, Guardian News.

A couple days ago, Democrats and their media allies had a full-blown Victorian gentleman–style cow when President Trump merely raised the question of whether New York hospitals, which are short on personal protective equipment, might be victims of medical equipment ”going out the back door.”

Perfectly legitimate question, and doubly so in light of the anecdote he spoke of from a hospital executive.

They all harrumphed umbrage, in unison. A sample:

No evidence for Trump’s suggestion that masks are ‘going out the back door’ of New York hospitals -NBC News

De Blasio: Trump’s suggestion face masks are being stolen is ‘insulting’ -Politico

Cuomo and New York hospitals reject Trump’s claim masks ‘going out the back door’ -ABC News

Trump could help solve the mask problem. Instead he’s making baseless attacks on New York nurses. -Vox

Trump blames hospitals for mask and ventilator shortages -Washington Post (and note that the original headline, since modified, stated ’bizarrely blames’).

TRUMP COMMENTS ABOUT HOSPITAL MASK THEFTS SPARK BACKLASH FROM DOCTORS -Newsweek

‘Insulting’ Frontline Health Workers, Trump—Without Evidence—Accuses Hospital Staff in New York of Stealing Protective Gear -Common Dreams

Oh, spare us.  Here’s the latest news from WNBF in upstate New York affirming exactly what Trump was saying:

One Cooperstown hospital employee has been charged and more arrests are possible in connection with the theft of medical supplies during the coronavirus pandemic.

Authorities say 33-year-old Josie Wright of Morris has been accused of stealing face masks and alcohol prep pads from Bassett Medical Center.

According to the Otsego County Sheriff’s Office, Wright was a contracted employee at the hospital. She was arrested Monday morning and ordered to appear in Otsego town court.

Human nature being what it is, it’s not ridiculous to ask whether some people will attempt to monetize desperate situations for their own personal gain.  That’s why corruption exists; that’s why a black market is there.  It happens everywhere; there is no reason not to think hospitals are not exempt, even as we generally praise medical staff right now, and even as most really are heroic.  To say one profession is exempt from bad guys is ridiculous, and now we know that yes, there are mask thieves taking supplies “out the back door” and causing tremendous havoc and distress.

Trump’s statement sounds exactly like the kind of wariness that a hotel executive steeped in real-world realities would have by raising questions about internal theft, which can have steep consequences for a business even without a crisis.  It’s not unreasonable to think his own experience drew his curiosity about missing equipment in that direction, given that hospitals should have equipment after his swift actions.  The left is trying not only to throw mud on Trump for asking, but also to push a narrative about Trump being incompetent and unprepared, which isn’t true.  Long ago, I used to work as a private detective in San Francisco for clients exactly like Trump, and my exact job was to find what was going “out the back door” at places like hotels, airports, and hospitals, working undercover.

Trump, it turns out, was right all along.

And it’s worth noting that Cuomo in particular, who was one of Trump’s loudest critics in this, less than a month earlier was openly complaining about thieving hospital personnel for exactly the same thing.  Here’s what he was saying on March 6.

People are stealing masks and other medical equipment from hospitals, New York Gov. Cuomo says —CNBC

So Cuomo knew about this stuff all along before he put on his outrage mask?  Can you say “hypocrite”?

Image credit: YouTube screen shot, Guardian News.

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

America Still a Global Leader Even in a Time of Crisis

A current global myth alleges that America under the Trump administration is not leading the world fight against the coronavirus in its accustomed role as the postwar global leader.

Yet the U.S. was the first major nation to issue a travel ban on flights from China, with President Donald Trump making that announcement on Jan. 31. That was a bold act. It likely saved thousands endangered by Chinese perfidy and soon became a global model. None of the ban’s loud critics are today demanding it be rescinded.

In typically American fashion, as we have seen in crises from Pearl Harbor to 9/11, after initial shock and unpreparedness, the U.S. economic and scientific juggernaut is kicking into action.

Already the U.S. is transitioning from a long, disastrous reliance on Chinese medical supplies and pharmaceuticals. In ad hoc fashion, companies are gearing up massive production of masks, ventilators, and key anti-viral supplies.

The number of known deaths from the virus—for now the only reliable data available—shows a fatality rate of about 7-8 per million people in the United States. That per capita toll is analogous to Germany’s and one of the lowest in the world among larger nations.

The U.S. economy in 2019—with its near-record-low unemployment, inflation, and interest rates—was the most robust in the world. It will soon be the key to rebooting global production and trade.

Confronting China over patent and copyright theft, technological appropriation, dumping, and currency manipulation was not just in the U.S. interest, but for the global good.

A reckless and disingenuous China poses an existential threat to countries across the globe. The only world bulwark against Chinese propaganda and bullying remains U.S. economic and military power.

Despite accusations of growing isolationism at a time of a worldwide pandemic, the U.S. still stations 200,000-250,000 troops abroad. Those assets ensure that no hostile power in the present crisis will opportunistically threaten European and Asian democracies.

Record U.S. natural gas and oil production have helped lower global home heating and transportation costs. Among the biggest beneficiaries are Europe and Japan, the largest customers for Russia and the Middle East’s unreliable energy production.

The radical increase in American natural gas productions helps explain why the U.S. has made more progress in reducing carbon emissions than the signatories of the Paris climate accord. That voluntary agreement has had little success in curbing the planet’s largest carbon emitters.

Even as the U.S. registered robust economic growth of nearly 2.5%, it nonetheless reduced its carbon emissions by 0.5% in 2017 (the latest year for which data is available), which was the largest reduction in the world.

The truth is that the free world would be a safer and more secure place if Europe, not the U.S., acted more responsibly. Individual European Union countries have junked their utopian EU brotherhood and are reverting to nationalist self-interests.

Fracking natural gas, with less reliance of coal-fired power plants, might have allowed European nations to meet their Paris climate accord promises.

Italy and other European countries have been especially vulnerable to Chinese mercantile pressure and have mortgaged their economic futures to Beijing, with disastrous results.

If the European Union produced more of its own gas and oil, it would not empower Moscow and the Middle East through its colossal importation of their energy.

And if NATO countries just met their obligation to spend 2% of their gross domestic product on defense, then the West would not be so vulnerable in such times of crisis. NATO nations could more effectively draw on their military and health resources to fight the virus.

Nor has the United Nations been much help. Its World Health Organization simply parroted Chinese propaganda in the key initial weeks of the virus.

The organization claimed in mid-January that there was no human-to-human transmission, then suggested weeks later that a travel ban on Chinese flights would have little value in combating the spread of the virus. Both were lies but were welcomed by the Chinese government.

Where the West is deficient is in the current lack of imagination of its most hallowed institutions. Universities in the United States and Europe are in suspension. They currently have hundreds of thousands of empty dorm rooms. Why not offer them as temporary refuges to the vulnerable homeless and poor?

Given the epidemic of misinformation, millions need accurate data. But poor readers are barricaded from major news websites by expensive firewalls. Required subscriptions to The New York Times and The Washington Post, for example, could be temporarily waived—at least for any articles that offer key information concerning the coronavirus.

Throughout the outbreak, the media have promulgated sensationalism and helped fan the hysteria. They could better use their muckraking journalists to police themselves.

Any laxity in fighting the virus is not to be found with the U.S., but rather with its loudest and most opportunistic critics.

(C) 2020 TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.

The post America Still a Global Leader Even in a Time of Crisis appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Chinese Journalists Keep Disappearing. This Congressman Wants Answers.

Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., has sent a letter to the U.S. State Department requesting an investigation into the disappearances of three Chinese journalists who challenged the communist regime’s narrative in the coronavirus’ early stages.

“All three of these men understood the personal risk associated with independently reporting on coronavirus in China, but they did it anyway,” Banks wrote Wednesday in a letter to acting Undersecretary of State Nathan Sales, whose portfolio includes human rights abroad.

dailycallerlogo

“They decided that they had an obligation to do what the Chinese Communist Party would not—provide useful and accurate information to the Chinese public about the risks and potential consequences of coronavirus,” Banks continued. “For their service, the Chinese government imprisoned them—or worse.”

Fang Bin, Chen Qiushi, and Li Zehua—the three missing journalists—haven’t been seen since February.

Bin is a clothing salesman who began documenting the Chinese government’s response to the virus in Wuhan in videos that he published on YouTube. He hasn’t been seen since Feb. 9.

Qiushi is a citizen journalist who reported on the chaos at Wuhan hospitals and interviewed local residents before going missing.

Despite widespread attention on Qiushi’s reporting and subsequent disappearance, China’s ambassador to the U.S. claimed not to know anything about the missing journalist in an interview that aired March 22.

Zehua was an anchor on a Chinese state television channel before he resigned in February and began independently reporting on the virus. He hasn’t been seen since his arrest in late February.

Banks said Secretary of State Mike Pompeo should block the “individuals responsible for Li, Chen and Fang’s mistreatment” from entering the U.S.

“If any of the three citizen journalists were murdered, I would urge Secretary of State Pompeo and Secretary of Treasury [Steven] Mnuchin to respectively administer visa and financial sanctions under section 1263 of the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act to the responsible individuals,” Banks wrote.

“We owe these journalists a debt of gratitude for their sacrifice. As part of our investigation into the origins of this outbreak and the subsequent cover-up by the Chinese Communist Party, the United States should apply diplomatic pressure on the Chinese government to learn these journalists’ whereabouts and ensure their safety,” the congressman said in a press release.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

The post Chinese Journalists Keep Disappearing. This Congressman Wants Answers. appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Idaho Becomes First State to Protect Women’s Sports From Transgender Agenda

Idaho Gov. Brad Little has given women athletes
renewed hope. Faced with a politically correct culture that is denying women
the right to a fair playing field in sports, the Republican governor signed
into law new protections for them.

Recognizing “inherent differences between men and women,” Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act provides that “athletic teams or sports designated for females, women, or girls shall not be open to students of the male sex.”

The measure, which Little signed into law Monday, applies
to all of the state’s interscholastic, intercollegiate, intramural, and club
teams at the high school and college levels.

Idaho is the first state to prevail against forces working
to stop similar bills across the country that seek to right the wrong girls
face when state policies force them to compete in women’s sports against
athletes who are biological males.    

Getting this bill across the finish line wasn’t easy.

Proponents led by state Rep. Barbara Ehardt, a former Division 1 athlete and coach, bucked powerful activists in the business community, including Chobani, Clif Bar & Co., HP Inc., and Micron Technology Inc. But legislators overwhelmingly sided with female athletes and all who support them—moms, dads, coaches, fans, and Idaho citizens, including my parents and extended family. 

Little and state legislators rejected the threats of corporate
activists who, in the name of “diversity and inclusion,” claim without proof
that laws recognizing birth sex as a biological fact will cost the state
business. 

What big business ignores is the opportunities lost in sports for women and girls. Its social justice agenda drowns out the voices of women who should be protected under sex discrimination laws, not exploited by them.    

To their enormous credit, Idaho leaders withstood the
pressure and have paved the way for other states to follow.  

Proponents should be emboldened by U.S. Attorney
General William Barr, who recently intervened in a related federal court case
to state emphatically that Title IX prohibits the injustice in women’s sports
condoned by corporate activists.

On March 24, the Justice Department filed a Statement
of Interest
in a Connecticut lawsuit challenging that state’s
participation rules in sports.

High school athletes Selina Soule, Chelsea Mitchell, and Alanna Smith have faced the sting of defeat and been denied state titles in girls track because they had to compete with biological males. The Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference requires schools to allow athletes to participate in sports according to the “gender” with which they publicly identify. 

For the past several seasons, Connecticut has allowed male
runners to compete and win as transgender athletes in girls track. In fact, female
athletes in every state in the Northeast region have been forced to compete under
the same circumstances and under similar rules. Many also have lost their
rightful place across the finish line and on the podium.         

Congress passed Title IX in 1972 to prohibit
discrimination on the basis of sex, in large part to ensure equal opportunities
in athletics and education for female students. It extends to programs
operated or sponsored by schools receiving federal funding, which includes every
K-12 public school and virtually all colleges and universities in the
country. 

In evaluating the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference’s policy, the Justice Department concluded:

CIAC’s construction of Title IX as requiring the participation of students on athletic teams that reflect their gender identity would turn the statute on its head. One of Title IX’s core purposes is to ensure that women have an ‘equal athletic opportunity’ to participate in school athletic programs. … Reading Title IX to compel schools to require biological males to compete against biological females in athletic competitions is precisely the type of interpretation that this Court should reject.

The Justice Department’s instruction to the Connecticut federal
court carries a warning for all states to heed. Inherent, physiological differences
between the sexes still matter. Title IX expressly prohibits discrimination on
the basis of sex and is being violated by schools and state policies that allow
male athletes to compete in women’s sports. 

The Justice Department’s action has dignified Little’s bold action
to enact the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act, which will protect equal
opportunity in sports for female athletes in Idaho.

Other states have the opportunity, and responsibility, to get
on track.   

The post Idaho Becomes First State to Protect Women’s Sports From Transgender Agenda appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/