IG Horowitz Stealth-Edits FISA Abuse Report to Cover-Up Discrepancy About FBI’s Use of Spies Into Trump’s Campaign


Michael Horowitz

The Inspector General’s report on FISA abuse was stealth-edited after its first publication in December of 2019 to cover-up a major discrepancy of the FBI’s use of CHSs [Confidential Human Source] into the Trump campaign.

The IG report on FISA abuse has two statements on the FBI’s use of CHSs into the 2016 Trump campaign that contradict each other.

In chapter 10 of the original report, the IG claimed that the FBI didn’t use any CHSs to infiltrate Trump’s campaign prior to the FBI opening Crossfire Hurricane in July of 2016.

However, in the next chapter of the original report, the IG contradicted itself and stated that the Crossfire Hurricane team “tasked several CHSs and UCEs during the 2016 presidential campaign, which resulted in multiple interactions with Carter Page and Papadopoulos, before and after they were affiliated with the Trump campaign, and an interaction with a high-level Trump campaign official…”

This means the FBI was running spies at George Papadopoulos prior to July of 2016, an admission that Joseph Mifsud, who approached Papadopoulos is March of 2016 was probably a CHS (spy).

IG Horowitz then stealth-edited this discrepancy to cover for the FBI and possibly cover for Mifsud’s role in spying on the Trump campaign because he approached Papadopoulos very early on.

In the edited version of Horowitz’s report, the IG claimed the Crossfire Hurricane team used CHSs on Carter Page and Papadopoulos during and after the time they were affiliated with the Trump campaign.

Our friends over at The Conservative Treehouse found the discrepancies:

In chapter ten of the report, on page #312 you will find the following information. The claim is that no-one in the FBI initiated any use of “Confidential Human Sources” into the campaign prior to opening the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. Read Carefully:

“In our review, we did not find any evidence that the FBI used CHSs or UCEs to interact with members of the Trump campaign prior to the opening of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.”…

However, in the very next chapter (#11, page #400), in the original IG report as released on December 9th, 2019, you will find the following statement:

The IG report was modified after publication to change this paragraph to:

“We determined that the Crossfire Hurricane team tasked several CHSs and UCEs during the 2016 presidential campaign, which resulted in multiple interactions with Carter Page and Papadopoulos, both during and after the time they were affiliated with the Trump campaign”…

Investigative reporter Paul Sperry called out Horowitz for quietly revising his key findings without any press releases and without notifying Congress and the public.

Did Horowitz stealth-edit his report to cover for Joseph Mifsud and the FBI’s early surveillance of Page and Papadopoulos?

Joseph Mifsud, the mysterious Maltese professor who approached Papadopoulos in the Spring of 2016 to plant a story that the Russians had Hillary’s missing State Department emails, is presumed dead….

Or is Mifsud in hiding somewhere?

The post IG Horowitz Stealth-Edits FISA Abuse Report to Cover-Up Discrepancy About FBI’s Use of Spies Into Trump’s Campaign appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

VA State Senator Goes Public 72 Hours Before Rally: ‘We Are Being Set Up’

A Virginia state senator has sounded a warning bell three days before a massive rally is set to coalesce in the commonwealth’s capital.

Conservative Sen. Amanda Chase of District 11 took to Facebook on Friday with a warning for every patriot who plans to attend the pro-Second Amendment rally Monday in Richmond.

Her warning came the same week that Democratic Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam issued an executive order temporarily banning firearms in the Capitol Square.

“Sadly, I am posting this, knowing that the Governor of Virginia has declared a State of Emergency in our state,” Chase wrote. “I want you to be aware of how we are being set up.”

“Does the Patriot Act ring a bell? Does the National Defense Authorization Act ring a bell?”

TRENDING: Northam Declares ‘State of Emergency’ as Militias Prepare To March on Richmond

Chase argued that these laws could be used to label pro-Second Amendment activists as “domestic terrorist[s].”

Specifically, she warned those who are planning to attend wearing military fatigues or rocking militia insignia.

“The Governor, using the media has already set the stage for this to happen,” Chase wrote. “He has already laid the groundwork to make the entire movement look like insurrection.”

It’s not just militia members and those wearing camouflage who have reason to worry.

Is this rally a setup on the part of Northam and the Democrats?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

According to Chase, even some military veterans have been flagged as potential threats.

“They are kicking things into high gear,” Chase wrote. “Military veterans were/are even listed as potential domestic terrorist.”

“We were told not once, but several times by the current President, ‘It’s Not Me they are after, It’s You, The American People.’”

Northam indeed claims to have intelligence that some of the groups attending the Monday rally will be intent on insurrection.

However, this is the first time we have seen such a dire warning from a state official like Chase.

RELATED: Virginia 2nd Amend. Activists Make Last-Ditch Effort To Avoid Ugly Clash

Read her entire post below:

Although Chase’s post could be hyperbolic, there’s no doubt that the stakes are high for the Monday event.

Despite Northam’s emergency gun ban, it’s unclear how many of the tens of thousands of expected rally attendees will obey his decree.

The Virginia Citizens Defense League and Gun Owners of America, two groups behind the massive rally, attempted to battle Northam’s order in court.

They appealed all the way to the Virginia Supreme Court, where Northam’s gun ban was upheld on Friday.

Hopefully, violence can be avoided. But with many rallygoers almost certainly unwilling to bend on their right to bear arms and Northam seemingly intent on enforcing his order with state and local police, we can only wait and see — and pray.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Florida Senator To Introduce “Laura Loomer Inspired” Social Media Censorship Act

Joe Gruters, a prominent Trump ally and Chairman of the the Republican Party of Florida, will hold a press conference in Florida’s capitol on Tuesday afternoon to unveil the final version of his legislation that will allow Floridians to sue social media companies for censoring their political speech.

Last year, we reported on Gruter’s plans to file the bill, which you can read below.

Florida State Sen. Joe Gruters Files Legislation To Punish Twitter and Facebook For Conservative Censorship

Often referred to as the “most banned women in the world,” it’s not surprising that Loomer has been invited to his press conference at the Florida capitol discussing the bill and the effect it could have in reeling in the mass censorship of conservatives and Trump supporters in the Sunshine State.

As you are aware, this Gateway Pundit reporter has been banned from Facebook, Twitter, Paypal for criticizing Islam and supporting President Donald Trump’s America First agenda, much like journalists turned congressional candidate Laura Loomer.

Twitter blocks Jacob Engels after tweet on Islam

If passed, the law would take effect in July of 2020.

More from Breitbart’s Allum Bokhari, who first reported the press conference.

The bill, which can be read in full at the Florida Senate website, awards a minimum of $75,000 in damages against social media companies that: “Deletes or censors the user’s religious speech or political speech; or uses an algorithm to disfavor or censure the user’s religious speech or political speech.”

The bill also prohibits social media companies from using “the social media website user’s alleged hate speech as a basis for justification or defense of the social media website’s actions at trial.”

Damages may be mitigated if a social media company “restores from deletion or removes the censoring of a social media website user’s speech in a reasonable amount of time.”

The provisions of the bill only apply to religious and political speech. It will not apply to cases where a social media user has been censored for speech that “calls for immediate acts of violence, is obscene or pornographic in nature, is the result of operational error, is the result of a court order, comes from an inauthentic source or involves false impersonation, entices criminal conduct, or involves bullying minors.”

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE

The post Florida Senator To Introduce “Laura Loomer Inspired” Social Media Censorship Act appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

“Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful” — BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment — WITH FULL DOCUMENT

President Trump’s Defense Team filed its first official response to the sham impeachment on Saturday afternoon.

The six page document was filed by the 5 PM deadline on Saturday.

The President’s team called the sham articles of impeachment with zero criminal accusations a dangerous, brazen and unlawful attack on our election system.

The Trump attorneys alleged “a lawless process in the US House that violated due process and fundamental fairness.”

This trial should be exciting.
Democrats have liar Adam Schiff and a bunch of House nitwits against Trump’s legal team of seasoned lawyers.
It should be interesting watching Schiff and Democrats push their nonsense on the Trump Defense Attorneys.

NY Times reporter Maggie Haberman posted the full document on Twitter this hour.

The post “Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful” — BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment — WITH FULL DOCUMENT appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: Trump Legal Team Launches All Out Assault Against Democrats’ Partisan Impeachment

President Donald Trump’s legal defense team began their offensive against Democrats’ partisan impeachment on Saturday, accusng the Democrats of a “brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election.”

The remarks came in a letter to the U.S. Senate from Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow and White House lawyer Pat Cipollone, both of whom are on Trump’s legal defense team.

“The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President,” The letter begins. “This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away.”

The letter correctly states that Democrats’ impeachment was a “highly partisan” event as no members of the opposing party joined the Democrats and multiple Democrats broke ranks with their party over it and one Rep. Jeff Van Drew (NJ) left the Democrat Party over it and became a Republican.

“The Articles of Impeachment are constitutionally invalid on their face,” the letter continued. “They fail to allege any crime or violation of law whatsoever, let alone ‘high Crimes and Misdemeanors,’ as required by the Constitution. They are the result of a lawless process that violated basic due process and fundamental fairness. Nothing in these Articles could permit even beginning to consider removing a duly elected President or warrant nullifying an election and subverting the will of the American people.”

Trump’s legal defense team said the first Article of Impeachment must be rejected because it “fails on its face to state an impeachable offense. It alleges no crimes at all, let alone ‘high Crimes and Misdemeanors,’ as required by the Constitution. In fact, it alleges no violation of law whatsoever. House Democrats’ ‘abuse of power’ claim would do lasting damage to the separation of powers under the Constitution.”

This is a breaking news story, refresh the page for updates.

 

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

How MLK Channeled the Spirit of 1776

Martin Luther King Jr. Day became a federal holiday when it was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan in 1983.

As Americans celebrate MLK Day, it’s important to recognize the contributions of King and the tradition of ideas he espoused that put him in the pantheon of great Americans.

The federal holiday may have been created in 1983, but the true origin of King’s legacy reaches all the way back to 1776. 

Some of the loudest voices in today’s discourse insist that America’s origin is fundamentally flawed and broken. The New York Times’ recently-launched 1619 Project, for instance, aims to “reframe” America’s past to convince Americans that slavery and racism are the true heart of our civilization. The project’s headline essay declared that “our founding ideals of liberty and equality were false.”

One man who didn’t think our founding ideals were false: Martin Luther King Jr.

While the study of slavery is essential to understanding America’s past, it is also vital to recognize just how much of a connection King had to the Founding Fathers and the ideas that animated them.

Those ideas were born in the context of a world in which tyranny was the norm. Political rule of, by, and for the people was no more than an experiment.

Much like Frederick Douglass, King didn’t shy away from criticizing America for failing to uphold the “self-evident” truths cited in its founding documents.

In particular, as I explain in my book “The War on History: The Conspiracy to Rewrite America’s Past,” King followed a thread of ideas stemming from Thomas Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence, through Abraham Lincoln, and finally to his own time when the equal rights of black Americans were being denied by much of the country.

King was not so small-minded as to reject the ideas of the declaration because its writer, a slave owner, failed to live up to them. Instead, he embraced those ideas as fundamentally correct and recognized how they were the key to bringing about a “new birth of freedom” in his own time.

In his Mountaintop speech of 1968, given the day before his assassination, King said the black men conducting sit-ins at segregated lunch counters “were really standing up for the best in the American dream and taking the whole nation back to those great wells of democracy, which were dug deep by the Founding Fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.”

In his more famed “I Have a Dream” speech, King called the Declaration of Independence “the most eloquent and unequivocal expression of the dignity of man ever set forth in a sociopolitical document.”

He recognized the power and the truth encapsulated in that document, which laid the foundation for ending not only slavery, but laws that treated people unequally based on their skin color.

Even in the most tumultuous moments of racial tension in the late 1960s, according to historian Peter C. Myers, King “was deeply grateful for America itself, for its original and enduring promise, and its native propensity for reform.”

Regardless of its faults, King recognized that America stood as a unique bastion of freedom in a world in which liberty and justice were rarities.

He ultimately succeeded because he spoke in the natural rights language that the American people instinctively knew to be true.

King’s legacy is that he helped expand the founding promise of liberty and equal rights to all Americans. More than any other figure, he helped cash in that “promissory note” of liberty and justice for all, which the Founding Fathers had left.

In that legacy, King stands athwart today’s radicals who wish to tear America up by its roots.

As is the case with many great men, King was not without his flaws. He flirted with and even embraced failed socialist economic ideas, and fell short in his treatment of women, if recently unearthed FBI documents alleging gross misbehavior are true.

As with many great but complicated individuals of our past, King is worth celebrating in spite of his faults and limitations—as is America.

Life, much like history, can be messy and full of wrong turns, for man is fallen and imperfect. We aspire to be a shining city upon a hill, but that shining city will always appear dim in light of heaven.

Even still, King had faith that the American people, derived from all races and backgrounds, were attached in mind and heart to the ennobling legacy of 1776—the mystic chords of memory, as Lincoln would call it.

As the late historian and political philosopher Harry Jaffa wrote of King: “He dreamed of a day when the principles of the Declaration of Independence would be fully realized, not only in the institutions of American government, but in the spirit of American society.”

Contrast King’s ethos to those who today deplore “colorblind racism,” or target the Founders—including the man who wrote the declaration—for historical erasure. It would be a shame if we allow the noxious pull of identity politics to undo the work of King and others.

The American system allows us to preserve what is best about ourselves, while occasionally correcting our deepest faults.

King deserves enduring recognition from all Americans for his role in bringing civil rights to fruition and, in some ways more importantly, convincing the majority of Americans that racism stood in opposition to our founding and Biblical principles.

Our challenge today, as in King’s, is to preserve and further the legacy of 1776, and to inculcate informed patriotism among future generations so that they may have a fuller understanding of the right and wrong paths in their own time.

The post How MLK Channeled the Spirit of 1776 appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Faith, Family, Football: Why Patriots Tight End Benjamin Watson Champions Life

Benjamin Watson is not only a starting tight end for the New England Patriots—he’s also the father of seven children, a man of faith, a commentator, and an advocate for life.

The 39-year-old football player, who formerly played for the Baltimore Ravens, the New Orleans Saints, and the Cleveland Browns, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an exclusive interview that his faith informs his political stances, which pushes him to speak out in defense of the truth.

dailycallerlogo

“The person who says their faith doesn’t influence how they vote or their faith doesn’t influence how they govern is lying,” he said. “Your faith is part of you.”

For Watson, faith is the “essence of who you are.”

“It’s not something you carry alongside of you,” he explained. “You live out your faith in everything you do.”

Watson’s faith inspires him to publicly stand up for the truth in an age where football players often come under fire for speaking up on political issues, He pushes back at those who say NFL athletes should keep quiet and play football.

“It’s really demeaning,” he said. “You’re taking the humanity out of the person and turning them into simply a vehicle of entertainment.”

“You’re stripping them of what makes us all human beings—our emotions, our intellect, our spirituality … all those complex things are in all of us whether we play football, whether we are journalists, whether we are politicians or doctors or stay-at-home dads or moms,” he continued. “We all have those things.”

He met his wife Kirsten through the Fellowship of Christian Athletes while they were both playing sports at the University of Georgia. The two married after Watson’s rookie year with the New England Patriots.

“She’s a visionary,” he said with a laugh. “She’s like the ‘why not.’ ‘Why not do this? Why not expand your horizons?’ She sees the vision.”

“I’m the ‘why’ person,” he added. “I need everything to be analytical. ‘Why should I do this? This isn’t going to work.’ So we really balance each other out.”

Watson and his wife have welcomed seven children into their family—a large family by anyone’s standards, but especially for an NFL football player. He said one of the most beautiful aspects of having a big family is the friendship he sees his children have with one another.

“We have a lot of fun times together, sitting around the dinner table, talking. Sometimes it’s too loud,” he said with a laugh. “We have to tell them to be quiet. But we’re able to have a lot of great conversations and I can see that getting better as they get older.”

The Watsons did not set out to have a big family, he added. They were married for about three years before they began to have children—and then they had four children in about four and a half years.

“Really, the seven happened because we were trying to even out at six,” he explained, adding that the couple experienced two “awful” miscarriages. “Then we decided to try one more time and got identical twins.”

Now the Watson family has grown so large they had to upgrade from a Suburban to a 15-passenger van.

“One of the perks is that everybody is in awe and wants to see your car,” he said. “One of the downfalls is that you can’t pull into any parking space.”

Watson said he sees his big family as an opportunity to highlight core values: the value of life and the blessings that come from his children.

“Even though it’s tough, and it’s hard and there are sleepless nights, and sometimes you can’t do what you want to do, you want to make sacrifices,” Watson said. “I’ve never heard anybody say when they get older, ‘I wish I had less kids.’”

Having a big family does not come without some backlash. Watson said that often when his wife is out without him, she will receive comments such as, “You need a TV in your bedroom,” “You know how that happened,” or “Are they all yours?”

“Then they’ll proceed to tell her that they can’t be all hers because there’s seven of them, aged 10 and under,” he said. “And then there are people that think it’s great and are amazed by it and are just really pro-children.”

Watson carries his core beliefs with him from his home to the football field and to the locker room.

He’s unafraid to speak out about his beliefs to his teammates, and he spoke warmly of the deep conversations these football players have with one another about political issues. He described his teammates as “some of the most passionate” people he has met on a “plethora of different issues.”

“They’re educated on those things as much as any 25- or 26-year-old is educated on those things,” he said. “And they really do care.”

His past and present teammates have come from many different backgrounds, he said, whether this means a different ethnic, economic, geographical, or religious context.

“But we are able to have really deep conversations that I don’t think a lot of people have at their workplaces,” Watson said. “I don’t think people stand around the water cooler and are able to have a civil conversation about the president or abortion or mass incarceration or poverty.”

“We have those conversations,” he said. “And then we kiss and make up and go play football.”

The ability to converse respectfully despite holding different opinions is something Watson said he values deeply. He said people can have these types of relationships and hold dissenting viewpoints on different topics—“very controversial topics”—and still maintain a mutually beneficial relationship.

The NFL tight end spoke out against actress Alyssa Milano in May 2019 when she said banning abortions would cause poor and minority women of color to suffer. Watson responded to Milano’s comments over Twitter, saying her words revealed ignorance and racism.

“Alyssa Milano, to claim that giving MORE children of color the right to be born will negatively affect ‘women of color’ reveals IGNORANCE, RACISM or some combination of both,” Watson tweeted. “Our children and families are capable of greatness and lies like this harm our future. Don’t patronize us.”

Milano told Watson she “never meant harm,” and that both her door and “heart are always open.” Watson explained that the two engaged in multiple private and civil discussions on abortion and that he told Milano he shouldn’t have been so aggressive in his tweet.

“We don’t agree at all on these topics, but I appreciate her willingness to engage,” he said.

His point to Milano was that “protecting children is not suffering.”

Instead of saying women of color need abortion access, Watson wants to focus on addressing poverty, on systematic, government-mandated segregation. He wants to talk about what economic factors drive many women into having an abortion.

“Let’s talk about advertising,” he said. “Let’s talk about Planned Parenthood. Let’s talk about other abortion providers that are in these neighborhoods.”

At the end of the day, the actual issue of a child living is never something bad, he said.

“We shouldn’t be advocating for anyone to have to kill their children. Let’s support mothers that are making this decision. Let’s challenge fathers to stand in the gap and be there for the children that they create because they have a huge role in this too.”

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of thisoriginal content, email licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

The post Faith, Family, Football: Why Patriots Tight End Benjamin Watson Champions Life appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Ukraine and China Knew Hunter Biden Was a Chronic Drug Addict, Paid Him Millions Anyway – Used It as Fodder to Blackmail Joe Biden

Hunter Biden’s first arrest may have been when he was 18. Hunter was arrested on Jersey Shore related to drug charges in 1988 and had his record expunged.

Many years later and after several stops into drug treatment facilities Hunter joined his father the Vice President on a trip to China in 2013 where Hunter — inexperienced and out of place — was able to secure a $1.5 billion from China for private equity fund which he was forming at the time.

A year later in early 2014 Hunter was discharged from the Navy for testing positive for cocaine.

Then in April 2014, just a couple months later, Hunter Biden Hunter joined the Board of Burisma Holdings in the Ukraine. Hunter served on the Board until early 2019. Hunter was paid approximately $50,000 a month in his position.

The largest oil and gas company in the Ukraine hired a chronic drug addict only a few months after the addict was removed from the US Navy for doing cocaine.

In 2016 Hunter Biden returned a rental car with a crack pipe with cocaine residue and a small amount of a white, powdery substance. Hunter was never charged with a crime.

In 2018 the IRS placed a tax lien on Hunter Biden seeking $112,805 in unpaid taxes from 2015.

And according to Page Six, Hunter Biden allegedly spent time at Larry Flynt’s Hustler Club in New York City in 2018. Hunter allegedly ordered pricey booze, was joined by several strippers in a private room while he did drugs and had strippers run to find him a dildo.

These are just a few of the allegations against Hunter Biden.
After years of drug abuse there are likely many more episodes not yet public.

Any foreign intelligence service worth their salt would have known Hunter Biden was a chronic drug addict.
China and the Ukraine, and likely others, hired Hunter Biden anyway.

Why was that?
Obviously, Hunter Biden was hired for access to his father in any pay-for-play schemes.

But it now appears likely that these countries were also using this as fodder to blackmail Joe Biden.

Joe Biden set up his tormented son with lucrative foreign contracts.
Joe Biden’s senseless and selfish actions also left him open to blackmail.

How many times was Joe Biden warned of his dangerous actions related to his drug addicted son?

Will the liberal media ever investigate this?  Do Americans really believe that this man and his son should be President?

Joe and Hunter Biden would destroy the American dream if Joe was elected President.  They would blow it away!

The post Ukraine and China Knew Hunter Biden Was a Chronic Drug Addict, Paid Him Millions Anyway – Used It as Fodder to Blackmail Joe Biden appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Fox Host Bolton Says Trump Should Plaster This Chart ‘Absolutely Everywhere’

At the Democratic presidential debate earlier this week in Iowa, several of the candidates made it clear they were ready to take on President Donald Trump regarding America’s economy.

Pete Buttigieg, the former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, declared, “I am ready to take on this president on the economy, because I am from the exact kind of industrial Midwestern community that he pretends to speak to and has proven to turn his back on — and guided that community through a historic transformation.”

Billionaire activist Tom Steyer, meanwhile, said the president was a phony when it came to economic issues.

“Whoever is going to beat Mr. Trump is going to have to beat him on the economy, and I have the experience and the expertise to show he’s a fake there and a fraud,” Steyer said. “Look, Mayor Pete has three years as an analyst at McKinsey. I have 30 years of international business experience. I can beat Trump on the economy.”

And, in a moment which should have evoked laughter in any other forum, former Vice President Joe Biden also said he could take Trump down based on the economy.

TRENDING: Northam Declares ‘State of Emergency’ as Militias Prepare To March on Richmond

“With regard to the economy, I can hardly wait to have that debate with him. Where I come from, the neighborhoods I come from, they’re in real trouble — working-class people, middle-class people,” Biden said.

“I’d love that debate because the American public is getting clobbered. The wealthy are the only ones doing well — period.”

The reason that should have evoked laughter, for those of you who’ve already forgotten the history of the late aughts and early tens, is how the economy was doing under the Obama administration.

If you’ve forgotten that, you’ve also likely forgotten the what the economy’s looked like for the last 40 years.

Do you think Donald Trump has done a good job of managing the economy?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

That’s why Fox Business host Deirdre Bolton said Thursday on Fox Nation’s “Deep Dive” that there’s one chart the Trump administration should be plastering “absolutely everywhere.”

It’s the one thing that Democrats are loath to admit: Things are actually pretty copacetic, economy-wise, under the current administration.

The chart in question shows the average unemployment rate for the first 35 months of a president’s term.

The highest average rate during the first 35 months of a term was 9.3 percent under Barack Obama.

While this is somewhat to be expected — Obama took office in the midst of the Great Recession, after all — it doesn’t erase the fact his administration didn’t do much about it for the first few years.

RELATED: Trump Trade War Works as US Economy Sizzles & China Sees Weakest Growth in 29 Years

The next-highest average unemployment rate during the first 35 months of a term was under Ronald Reagan, who took over while the malaise hangover from the Jimmy Carter years was still in effect.

A worldwide economic slowdown in the early 1980s didn’t help, and while the United States managed to get out of the doldrums pretty early, that still led to a 9 percent average unemployment rate.

Overall, the lowest rate among non-Trump presidents was under George W. Bush, who managed a 5.5 average unemployment rate despite 9/11 and the economic downturn in its wake.

During the first 35 months of Donald Trump term?

A historically low 3.9 percent average unemployment rate, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

“If I were the Trump campaign, I would just be plastering that absolutely everywhere,” Bolton said.

And it’s not just the 1 percent, either.

As Fox Business host Charles Payne pointed out, workers’ wages are going up faster than the wages of those above them.

“The first time it happened was September of 2018,” Payne said.

(Fox Nation / screen shot)

“And it’s happened every single month, except one, where blue-collar workers’, not supervisory workers’, wages have grown faster than their supervisors’. It’s amazing.”

James Freeman, an editor with The Wall Street Journal, said this meant the Democrats would need a new line if they’re going to win in 2020.

“There needs to be, I think, a new Democratic economic message,” he said.

“They’re basically giving the same talking points from 2015 and 2016, when we talk about the average person’s wages are stagnating and the middle class doesn’t have the same opportunity.”

This all coincided with a Thursday report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia which showed rebounding numbers for slumping industrial production in the mid-Atlantic region.

“Fourty-four percent of firms questioned in the Philadelphia Fed’s survey said they were seeing increased demand for their products, while 30.5 percent reported falling demand,” Fox News reported.

“Of the businesses reporting higher demand, 25 percent said they were going to hire more workers and 33 percent said that they were going to increase hours.”

“For the first time in 26 years, according to census, and [BLS] data, we have seen income gains in all Metropolitan areas,” Fox Business host Elizabeth MacDonald said.

“Now, we’ve also seen 45 states seeing their state tax revenue back before pre-recession levels, according to Pew Charitable Trusts.”

“So are people buying the 2020 Democrats’ doom and gloom?”

Well, Biden, Buttigieg and Steyer are — and they want you to believe they can do a better job of handling the economy for the average American, even though the average American is doing much better under the Trump administration than they ever were under Obama, or, really, any president in recent memory.

If the Trump campaign wanted to decimate whoever the Democratic candidate is, this chart would be what they’d plaster everywhere — simply because no one in the field has an answer to it.

And remember, Trump was supposed to destroy the economy.

First it was that he was unhinged and inexperienced.

Then it was that trade wars would decimate us.

Then it was that a recession was just around the corner, talk that curiously seemed to disappear about the same time impeachment kicked into high gear.

Now it’s that Trump’s economic proposals have solely benefited the rich.

None of that is true.

Unemployment is low, the stock market and GDP are high, and economic indicators are good.

That’s going to be difficult for the Democrats to counter with the tired old lines about impending economic doom.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com