Federal Judge Strikes Down Regulation Requiring Doctors To Perform Gender Transition Surgeries and Abortions

A federal judge struck down a regulation that would have required medical providers receiving federal funding to perform abortions and gender transition surgeries regardless of their personal beliefs, a major victory for religious liberty advocates.

A federal court in Texas said that an Obama-era rule that would have required doctors to perform procedures contrary to their consciences violated federal law. District Court Judge Reed O’Connor said the regulation put forward by the Obama administration in 2016 "substantially burdens" the rights of health care staffers under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

"The Court holds that the Rule, which expressly prohibits religious exemptions, substantially burdens Private Plaintiffs’ religious exercise in violation of RFRA," the ruling said. "Though the Court maintains that Plaintiffs were entitled to the preliminary injunction granted in its December 31, 2016 Order, it now concludes that the proper remedy at this stage is vacatur of the Rule."

The decision follows a three-year dispute between the federal government and a coalition of several states and religious health care providers. The court issued a temporary injunction against the rule in December 2016, giving the Department of Health and Human Services two years to reform the regulation. While he acknowledged that the agency had made progress in safeguarding religious liberty, O’Connor said the regulation needed to be struck down entirely.

"Despite HHS’s better efforts, the rule remains on the books," he wrote in his decision. "Accordingly, the Court finds that principles of equity and judicial economy favor ruling on the pending motions, allowing the other parties in this case to conclude two years of litigation on these issues."

Religious freedom advocates welcomed the ruling. The Becket Fund, a nonprofit law firm, represented the Franciscan Alliance in the case. Becket senior counsel Luke Goodrich said the existing regulation would have hindered care by forcing physicians and nurses to bow to political pressure, rather than their medical judgment and conscience.

"It is critically important that doctors are able to continue serving patients in keeping with their consciences and their professional medical judgment, especially when it comes to the personal health choices of families and children," Goodrich said in a statement. "Doctors cannot do their jobs if government bureaucrats are trying to force them to perform potentially harmful procedures that violate their medical and moral judgment."

The Trump administration has attempted to advance religious liberty for medical providers by rolling back Obama-era regulations. In May, HHS proposed a new rule securing conscience protections for doctors and other caregivers.

The post Federal Judge Strikes Down Regulation Requiring Doctors To Perform Gender Transition Surgeries and Abortions appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://freebeacon.com

California to allow illegal aliens to serve on government boards

The sanctuary state is at it again. California Governor Gavin Newsom has been burning through pens signing a raft of new bills into law at the close of his first legislative session. In addition to dozens of new gun laws, he also signed a bill further undermining federal immigration laws. This took the form of a bill that will allow illegal aliens to serve on government boards and commissions. A second measure claims to ban federal immigration officers from making arrests in courthouses. They seem to have missed the one where each illegal alien gets a free house and a lollipop after they cross the border. (LA Times)

California lawmakers continued the state’s expansion of rights and protections this year for immigrants who enter the country illegally, with laws signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom allowing them to serve on government boards and commissions and banning arrests for immigration violations in courthouses across the state.

The efforts by Newsom and Democrats in the California Legislature to provide refuge to immigrants stand in sharp contrast to the policies of President Trump, who continues to push for a new wall on the U.S.-Mexico border and also crack down on asylum seekers.

“Our state doesn’t succeed in spite of our diversity — our state succeeds because of it,” Newsom said in a written statement on Saturday after signing some of the bills into law.

The clown show continues on the left coast. The first element of the new legislation detailed above is probably legal, but relatively meaningless, and could very well backfire on them. If state or local governments begin publicly appointing illegal aliens to sit on boards and commissions, they can probably invite them to attend meetings. Of course, if it’s a paid position, then the government is in violation of federal law and should be eligible for prosecution because it’s illegal to hire an illegal alien for any paid position. It’s conceivable that offering them such a position could run afoul of the bringing in and harboring statues, but that’s less clear.

The way that part could backfire is just as clear. If I’m the local ICE supervisor and I see on the local news that an illegal alien has been appointed to a particular commission, I’m probably going to consider having some agents stop by the next time the commission meets. I mean, that’s just serving up dinner on a tray. And for many ICE offices, I wouldn’t put it past them, if only to prove a point.

The provision making it illegal for federal agents to take an illegal alien into custody at a courthouse is preposterous. That’s an attempt at nullification, which has never been supported in federal courts or at the Supreme Court. Also, attempting to interrupt a federal law enforcement official in the performance of their duties is a felony. I’d love to see Governor Newsom try that one personally.

But this is the form of insanity currently gripping the Golden State. Flee while you can.

The post California to allow illegal aliens to serve on government boards appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

Rutgers Professor Blames Black Female Obesity On Trump, Racism

Good grief. “I hate when people talk about Black women being obese. I hate it, because it becomes a way to blame us for a set of conditions that we didn’t create.” – @ProfessorCrunk. Watch full episodes of #BlackWomenOWN the Conversation and more on the OWN app or https://t.co/NeZ9hnezAR. pic.twitter.com/pRKukjqbnV — Black Women OWN the […]

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

‘Historic’ Blizzard Ruins Crops of Same Farmers 2020 Dems Blame for Global Warming

Many American farmers are likely to face some tough times as a historic blizzard ruins crops across our country’s heartland, all after some 2020 Democratic presidential candidates insultingly placed at least part of the blame for climate change on them.

Farmers’ tractors, trucks and other fossil fuel-powered machinery are targets of many Democrats’ plans for sweeping climate reform.

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, for instance, wants to “decarbonize the agriculture sector.”

Carbon, of course, is one of the main causes for rising global temperatures, according to those pushing climate change talking points.

Former Texas congressman and failed Senate candidate Robert “Beto” O’Rourke promises radical changes in many sectors, including the agricultural industry.

TRENDING: CNN Didn’t Disclose That Audience Member Who Set Warren Up for Viral Soundbite Was Maxed Out Donor

He wants to meet Green New Deal-style goals of net-zero emissions in order to curb the worldwide temperature increases.

If victorious, O’Rourke plans to invest billions in taxpayer money into “research with the most promise to dramatically and rapidly achieve net-zero emissions while growing our economy. This will include funding for a new constellation of DARPA-style efforts into agriculture.”

New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, meanwhile, claims American farmers are “uniquely positioned” to reduce their own carbon emissions, thus alleviating the greenhouse effect as part of an effort to keep temperatures down.

While all of these candidates are pushing different plans, the message is the same. Rural farmers, through their job-essential equipment, are a major force of climate change, carbonization and global warming.

Should Democrats stop blaming farmers for climate change?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

Unfortunately for farmers in North Dakota, not only are they being blamed for catastrophic temperature increases, but they’re also having to deal with a massive cold weather event that threatens to make entire crops fail.

According to Agweek, the “historic October blizzard” of 2019 comes after monumental September rains, creating a perfect storm of plant-wrecking weather in central North Dakota.

The blizzard is both earlier and stronger than is normal for the region.

It’s believed that the extreme weather will cause quality issues for soybeans and other crops, forcing farmers to sell a lower-quality product — if they can harvest it at all. Snow and ice over already wet ground is proving to be a nightmare for the operation of heavy machinery.

“Would you drive your combine on a lake with 2-3 inches of ice?” one farmer said. “Fields will be no different.”

RELATED: One Climate Activist ‘Glued’ Himself to Jet, Another Sparks 2-Hour Delay of Flight

Photos posted by the National Weather Service in Bismark show the destructive magnitude of this snowfall.

While some claim climate change could lead to worse blizzards, it seems like earlier and colder weather is the complete opposite of what Al Gore and other climate fanatics have predicted for years.

The reality for farmers in North Dakota is much worse than starving polar bears and melting ice caps.

As they deal with the fallout from a record blizzard, they now risk becoming guinea pigs for any Democrat who might win the presidency.

Already crippled by a bad year, possible forced replacement of reliable farm equipment with expensive “green” alternatives and methods would likely be a death blow to many American farms.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

More Undercover CNN Footage Emerges, Appears To Show Network Picking Favorites Among Democratic Field

Project Veritas has released part two of its undercover video of CNN, and it shows the network’s leaders talking about the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates and appearing to pick favorites.

The audio and videos were secretly recorded and provided to Project Veritas by Cary Poarch, a contractor who was working for CNN at the network’s bureau in Washington, D.C.

“I just want us to have a free and fair election,” Poarch said. “We get the information presented to us and we can pull the lever for whoever we want.”

But from the footage Poarch captured over a series of months, there is rampant bias all over the company, starting from the top.

In a 9 a.m. rundown call, CNN President Jeff Zucker and CNN Vice President and Political Director David Chalian talked about Democratic candidate Andrew Yang.

Zucker asked Chalian if they were taking Yang seriously enough.

TRENDING: CNN Didn’t Disclose That Audience Member Who Set Warren Up for Viral Soundbite Was Maxed Out Donor

“We should definitely be looking at why Andrew Yang is resonating,” Chalian replied. “Do I think he’s a likely nominee? No, I don’t.”

According to CNN Media Coordinator Christian Sierra, the network treats some presidential candidates differently, particularly “Yang and [Minnesota Sen. Amy] Klobuchar.”

Does this bias against certain candidates surprise you?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

“Just ’cause they’re going to talk about [former Vice President Joe] Biden more, [Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth] Warren and [Vermont Sen. Bernie] Sanders. They’re not going to mention others,” he said. “They want to cover the people who are on the top. They don’t want to cover the bottom.”

It is also clear who CNN does not like.

“I think the one they don’t like is Tulsi, they don’t like [Hawaii Rep.] Tulsi Gabbard,” Sierra said. “Because she supports [Syrian President Bashar] Assad and she is, she’s not taking a conventional route when it comes to one policy, stuff like that.”

Even though it is pretty clear Zucker wants a Democrat to be president, Sierra doesn’t know if the CNN president has a favorite.

“He donated before to Kamala Harris when she was running for Senate in California. Um, but, I think he kind of likes [South Bend, Indiana, Mayor] Pete [Buttigieg], but I can tell he also likes Biden and Warren,” Sierra said.

RELATED: CNN Employees Secretly Taped Confirming Zucker’s Hatred for Trump, Personal Vendetta, Orders To Push Impeachment

As Project Veritas reported, it seems that for Zucker, the election reporting is more about ratings and less about providing fair coverage.

In another phone call, the CNN president said the network should cover Harris’ call to suspend President Donald Trump’s Twitter account.

“It’s not going to happen, but I think it’s a good segment in the show,” Zucker said.

According to footage of CNN Media Coordinator Nick Neville, broadcasting Biden’s rallies would not be good for ratings.

“They probably think it’s boring. I mean, Biden rallies are like, ugh,” he said. “People would change the channel.”

As CNN is preparing to host Tuesday night’s Democratic debate, Poarch said the network should “just get back to the facts and get back to reporting news” if it wants to be a reliable news outlet.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

VIDEO: Hong Kong Protesters Torch Jerseys of Commie-Lover Lebron James, Sing US National Anthem

On Monday night NBA superstar Lebron James spoke out in defense of the Chinese Communists. The NBA star trashed Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey for tweeting his support for Hong Kong freedom protesters. And then Lebron lectured on the perils of free speech.

Lebron said Daryl Morey’s tweet was “uneducated” and could have hurt a lot of people.

Following Lebron’s remarks protesters torched Lebron James jerseys in Hong Kong.

Protesters also trampled on Lebron jerseys and gathered in a semicircle to watch one burn.

The post VIDEO: Hong Kong Protesters Torch Jerseys of Commie-Lover Lebron James, Sing US National Anthem appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

DEVELOPING: Flynn Attorney Sidney Powell Demands DOJ Produce Newly Discovered Brady Material – Two Phones Used by Joseph Mifsud

General Mike Flynn’s lawyer Sidney Powell on Tuesday filed a motion demanding the Justice Department produce Brady Material that has recently come into the DOJ’s possession which includes 2 phones (BlackBerrys) used by Deep State spy Joseph Mifsud. 

As we reported in mid-September, Sidney Powell gave us a clue regarding the Deep State’s actions in setting up members of the Trump team.

Powell requested that the US government provide her and her client, General Mike Flynn, documents related to Deep State spy Joseph Mifsud from an event in late 2015.

Powell referred to “302s” regarding the dinner event in 2015 that General Flynn attended, which means that the FBI was interviewing Mifsud as early as 2015 and knew EXACTLY who Mifsud was and was not before Papadopoulos ever met Mifsud.

Sidney Powell Tuesday demanded the DOJ “produce evidence that has only recently come into [the DOJ’s] possession. This evidence includes the data and metadata of the following two devices:”

“This information is material, exculpatory, and relevant to the defense of Mr. Flynn, and specifically to the “OCONUS LURES” and agents that western intelligence tasked against him likely as early as 2014 to arrange — unbeknownst to him — “connection” with certain Russians that they would then use against him in their false claims. The phones were used by Mr. Joseph Mifsud.” Powell said in a Tuesday court filing.

Powell added, “Mr. Flynn is entitled to this information under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963).”

The DOJ responded Tuesday: “If we determine that they contain information that is discoverable or that is relevant to sentencing, we will produce them to you.”

Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor, was also used by the Deep State to set up Trump’s former foreign policy campaign advisor George Papadopoulos.

Recall, Mifsud approached Papadopoulos in the Spring of 2016 to plant a story on him that the Russians had Hillary Clinton’s ‘missing’ State Department emails.

Joseph Mifsud and James Comey were both reportedly in Australia the week before the George Papadopoulos meeting.

James Comey straight up lied when he claimed Mifsud was a “Russian” and Mueller referred to him as a person with Russian links/contacts.

Mifsud lied to the FBI three times, yet Robert Mueller never charged him with making false statements — this is because Mifsud is a CIA/Western Intel asset.

Mueller refused to answer Congressman Jim Jordan why he never charged Mifsud with making false statements even though he charged several others with the same process crimes.

US Attorney General Bill Barr and US Attorney from Connecticut John Durham better get to the bottom of exactly who Joseph Mifsud is and how the US government used him to take down Trump and his associates, including General Flynn.

The post DEVELOPING: Flynn Attorney Sidney Powell Demands DOJ Produce Newly Discovered Brady Material – Two Phones Used by Joseph Mifsud appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

‘This is real third-world fascistic stuff’: Mark Levin unloads on the Democrats’ impeachment inquisition

Monday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin described the secrecy surrounding the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry as “fascistic.”

“This secrecy is really unbelievable,” Levin said. “From the Democrats who demanded grand jury information related to the Mueller investigation and who have subpoenas flying all over the place for all kinds of personal records and financial information involving the president and his family and business partners.”

“Here they’re conducting hearings, taking depositions … and the public may not participate. The public doesn’t have any idea what’s going on. This is real third-world fascistic stuff,” Levin said.

“That’s why I say, and have said, and spent a lot of time on this Friday, that the president of the United States shouldn’t give them anything.”

Listen:


Don’t miss an episode of LevinTV. Sign up now!

The post ‘This is real third-world fascistic stuff’: Mark Levin unloads on the Democrats’ impeachment inquisition appeared first on Conservative Review.

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com

YouTube’s Concerning Suppression of Conservative Speech

Dear Mr. Brin: Fifty years ago this week, when I was a 21-year-old
college senior, I was in the Soviet Union, sent by the government of Israel to
smuggle in Jewish religious items and smuggle out names of Jews who wanted to
escape the Soviet Union and could then be issued a formal invitation to Israel.

I was chosen because I was a committed Jew and because I knew Hebrew and Russian. I was no hero, but the trip did entail risk. The Soviets did not appreciate people smuggling out names of Soviet citizens who sought to emigrate, information the Israeli government and activist groups in America used to advocate on their behalf.

My four weeks in the USSR were, of course, life-changing. This young American, lucky beyond belief to have spent his entire life in the freest country in the world, experienced what it was like to live in a totalitarian police state.

People feared merely being seen speaking with a Westerner, lest the KGB arrest and interrogate them. People arranged to meet me at a certain tree in a certain park and only spoke to me while walking to avoid eavesdroppers. I met with Jewish engineers, doctors, and professors who could find no work because they were known to the government to be “otkazniki,” or “refuseniks”—Jews who had applied for exit visas to leave the Soviet Union and been refused permission. I’m sure you know of them from your parents.

I left the Soviet Union angry and grateful—angry there are people who have the audacity to tell other people what they could and could not say, and grateful beyond measure to have been born in America, where no one could tell anyone what they could say. From that day to this, I have never taken freedom, especially freedom of speech, for granted.

Why I am writing to you about this?

Because, beyond my wildest dreams, two things are happening in America.

One is that for the first time in America’s history, free speech is seriously threatened.

In 1977, when Nazis sought to march in Skokie, Illinois—those terrible human beings chose Skokie because it was home to many Jewish Holocaust survivors—virtually every liberal and conservative organization, including Jewish organizations, defended the Nazis’ right to march. Because in America—and only in America—it was understood that even if the most loathsome speech was not protected, all speech was at risk.

That has changed.

Today, decent people—people who abhor Nazism and every other form of evil, left or right; people like Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, and Ayaan Hirsi Ali—are shouted down, threatened, disinvited, or never invited to speak at America’s universities.

The other thing that is happening is even more frightening. The company that you co-founded, Google, the greatest conduit of speech in world history, is also suppressing speech. I have asked myself over and over: How could the company founded by a man whose parents fled the Soviet Union do this?

It so boggles the mind that I have to hope you are simply not fully aware of what your company is doing.

So, in a nutshell, let me tell you what Google has done to one organization, Prager University (better known as PragerU).

Every week, PragerU releases a five-minute video on virtually every subject outside of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math). Some of the finest minds in the world have presented these videos—including professors from Harvard, Stanford, and MIT; four Pulitzer Prize winners; three former prime ministers; liberals; conservatives; Democrats; Republicans (including never-Trumpers); gays; and, of course, many women and members of ethnic and racial minorities.

Yet YouTube, which Google owns, has placed hundreds of our videos on its restricted list. In addition to the inherent smear of being labeled “inappropriate for children,” this means no family that filters out pornography and graphic violence, no school and no library can see those videos.

Among those restricted videos is one during former Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper defends Israel. Had someone told me 50 years ago that a company led by the son of Soviet Jewish refuseniks would suppress a video by a world leader defending the Jewish state, I would have told them they were out of their mind. That’s one reason I can only assume, or at least hope, that you are not fully aware of what your company is doing.

Or how about a video series I present on the Ten Commandments? YouTube is suppressing a number of those, too. When Sen. Ted Cruz asked a Google official why Google restricted one of my videos on the Ten Commandments, the official responded (it’s on YouTube) that it was because the video “contains references to murder.”

In fact, PragerU has repeatedly asked Google over the past several years why any of our videos are on the restricted list, and we have received either a runaround or silence. We have never received a substantive explanation.

We have no desire to see government intervene in private business to protect free speech. But your company has availed itself of protections under law that shield it from liability for defamation, copyright infringement, etc. Your company’s arrogance is such that a vast number of Americans—liberals as well as conservatives—are worried that the major conduit of speech in the Free World doesn’t care about free speech.

Mr. Brin, along with millions of other Americans, I fought to bring your parents from a land with no freedom to the Land of the Free. None of us has ever asked for anything in return. It was our honor to work for liberty in general and for Soviet Jewry specifically.

What Americans most want from immigrants is that they help keep America free. I never had any doubt that those leaving the Soviet Union would fulfill that mission.

Until now.

Freedom of speech is the most fundamental of all freedoms. It’s what your parents yearned for and bequeathed to you. Please don’t help take it away from those who made it possible—the people of America.

Sincerely yours,

Dennis Prager

COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM

The post YouTube’s Concerning Suppression of Conservative Speech appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Sen. Paul: Need To Investigate Democrat Letter Threatening Ukraine Over Mueller-Trump Probe

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.)

(Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) – Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said that a 2018 letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor general — written by three Democratic senators threatening Ukraine to “halt any efforts to impede cooperation” with Special Counsel Robert Muller’s investigation of President Trump – merits investigation.

The Democrats were doing the same thing they accuse Trump of doing, said Paul, interfering in Ukraine for political reasons and using foreign aid as a bargaining chip.

“I think what`s interesting about this is both sides seem to be doing the same thing,” said Sen. Paul on NBC’s Meet the Press on Oct. 13. “If anything is consistent here it`s that both parties are trying to involve themselves in Ukraine.

“So, for example, four senators, Democrats, wrote a letter to the Ukrainian government and said if you don`t keep investigating Trump, we may reconsider our bipartisan support for your aid,” said Paul.

The May 4, 2018 letter to Ukraine’s general prosecutor was sent by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.). The letter states, “We are writing to express great concern about reports that your office has taken steps to impede cooperation with the investigation of United States Special Counsel Robert Mueller.”

“If these reports are true, we strongly encourage you to reverse course and halt any efforts to impede cooperation with this important investigation,” state the senators.

“This reported refusal to cooperate with the Mueller probe also sends a worrying signal – to the Ukrainian people as well as the international community – about your government’s commitment more broadly to support justice and the rule of law.”

The letter goes on to ask the general prosecutor if he has restricted cooperation with Mueller’s investigation of Trump; whether any Trump administration officials advised him not to cooperate with Mueller; and whether the Mueller probe was discussed between U.S. and Ukrainian officials in any way.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), foreground, and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) (Getty Images)

Simply, Democratic senators were advising a foreign government on how it should interact with an investigation of President Trump being run by a special counsel that was under the oversight of the Department of Justice.

As columnist Marc Thiessen wrote in the Washington Post on Sept. 24, “So, it’s okay for Democratic senators to encourage Ukraine to investigate Trump, but it’s not okay for the president to allegedly encourage Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden?”

Thiessen added that Joe Biden in 2016, as vice president,  “threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees to Ukraine if the government did not fire the country’s top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin.” Ukraine complied, Shokin was fired, within six hours of Biden’s threat.

Biden has publicly boasted about this threat to Ukraine on video.

Commenting further to NBC’s Chuck Todd, Sen. Paul said, “Both parties seem to be doing this, and that`s why I think ultimately the American people are going to say — they`re going to throw up their hands and say, well, Biden threatened the aid, you know, Menendez threatened the aid.”

Todd replied, asking whether two wrongs make a right. Paul said, “Well, what I would do, I wouldn`t give them any aid. I wouldn`t give them any aid, because we don`t have any money. We are borrowing that money from China to send it to Ukraine. So I disagree with trying to manipulate them in anyway.”

(Getty Images)

“I just wouldn`t give them the aid, period,” said the senator.  “I wouldn’t say you get the aid if you do X for me. I would say we don`t have the money. Let`s take care of stuff at home. Let`s build roads and bridges in America, not over there.”

Todd continually tried to claim that what the Democrats did was somehow different than what they have accused President Trump of doing – do what I say on this investigation or you don’t get foreign aid.

“Democratic senators did the same thing,” stressed Paul. “Here`s the thing,  if you are going to condemn Trump you need to condemn the Democrat senators. It shouldn`t just be one-sided.

“Everybody is going after President Trump, someone needs to actually, in an objective way, evaluate a letter from four Democrats that said to Ukraine, if you don`t keep investigating Trump, we will reconsider our bipartisan support for aid,” said Paul.

“That`s a threat,” he added. “And that’s the same kind of stuff they`re accusing Trump of, but nobody is talking about that, the Democrats are doing exactly the same thing.”

via CNS RSS Feed Navbar

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.cnsnews.com/