America is currently facing a massive border crisis, and House Democrats, along with seven Republicans, responded to it Tuesday evening by voting to pass an amnesty bill with absolutely no border security money or asylum system reforms. The final vote was 237-187.
“The Dream, and now Dream and Promise Act, is urgent for our country,” Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said at the bill’s introduction in March, before trying to sell the legislation under a few lines from a Ronald Reagan speech.
However, critics point out that the legislation would do absolutely nothing to address the border enforcement problems and legal loopholes that created the current crisis in the first place.
Conservative Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, took to social media on Tuesday to say the bill would cost the American taxpayer $34.6 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office, while providing “$0 (ZERO) dollars for border security” and no asylum reforms.
“What is it?” Roy pondered: “A complete dereliction of our constitutional duty to #SecureTheBorder and address the ongoing humanitarian crisis at our southern border.”
What does it do? Costs $34.6 billion, according to @USCBO, while providing $0 (ZERO) dollars for border security. It does not close immigration loopholes, #FixOurBrokenAsylum laws, and constitutes a 2.7 million+ amnesty deal.
According to a summary sheet from House Judiciary Committee Republicans, the total cost of the bill comes from the combined estimated costs of the two bills that make up the legislation in its current form. The summary goes on to explain that “time constraints” kept the CBO from being able to calculate the potential public cost of aliens who could seek citizenship by violating the terms of their visas and then become eligible for green cards: “That cost is unknown.”
Other critics say that the bill’s barriers against applicants with criminal histories are too low. Briefing materials about the bill from the office of Republican Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., say that “applicants with several misdemeanor convictions can obtain a green card, even if the misdemeanors were violent and resulted in death or bodily injury.”
The bill’s language bars illegal immigrants who have been convicted of a felony or three separate misdemeanors involving total jail time over 90 days from getting green cards. It also disqualifies those who have been convicted of a “crime of moral turpitude” and those convicted of domestic violence.
Furthermore, the bill bars the DHS from using state and federal gang databases as the determining factor in disqualifying potential beneficiaries.
“The Democrats are making us consider a bill that will worsen — give a green light — to the border crisis, incentivizing more people to cross our borders illegally in hopes of getting a piece of the amnesty pie,” said House Judiciary ranking member Doug Collins, R-Ga., on the House floor Tuesday. “No doubt at this very minute, the smuggling cartels are getting the word out. … Congress is going to legalize millions, just get there.”
The unhinged Democrat led House has invited one of the key participants in the government who helped remove Richard Nixon from office in the 1970’s, John Dean, to speak before Congress.
Dean is a far left NeverTrumper who was a participant in the silent Deep State coup to remove Nixon decades ago. Yeah, this will go over really well…
The Democrat led House of Representatives has done nothing since January when they took over the House. Now they think that far-left CNN hack John Dean can talk the country into a Trump impeachment. Far left Trump hating CNBC reported –
The House Judiciary Committee on Monday announced a “series of hearings” related to special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report, beginning with a June 10 hearing featuring President Richard Nixon’s former White House counsel, John Dean.
The Democrat-led committee revealed its new schedule as calls to impeach President Donald Trump grew louder from a growing list of Democratic lawmakers and presidential candidates.
The hearing with Dean, titled “Lessons from the Mueller Report: Presidential Obstruction and Other Crimes,” was announced less than a week after Mueller, in his first public remarks since becoming special counsel in May 2017, said that he would not go beyond the details in his 448-page report if he is forced to testify before Congress.
Dean has been vocal on CNN demeaning and slandering President Trump. If this is all the Democrats have to impeach Trump (which it may very well be) then there is no legal cause to impeach this great American President and the Dems are more ignorant than is commonly believed.
Hannity showed videos of crazy Dean on CNN last night –
Dean is no stranger to Deep State coups like the one attempted against President Trump.
In the 1970’s Dean was a participant in the attempt to remove Richard Nixon from the Presidency. This was all detailed in the book “Silent Coup: The Removal of the President” which discussed Dean’s actions in the coup that led to Nixon’s demise. The authors of this book were on CSPAN in 1991 to talk about their research covered in their book –
…the authors said that White House aide John Dean was responsible for the cover-up of the 1973 Watergate break-in, that General Alexander Haig was attempting to unseat President Nixon, and that General Haig was also “Deep Throat.”
Some other shocking notes from the CSPAN interview about Watergate include:
John Dean Pulled Off a Hoax –
Because John Dean pulled off an incredible hoax. He pulled it off on the Watergate Committee and he pulled it off on the courts and he pulled it off on the American people, and in a sense he erased the election. If you take John Dean out of the story, it doesn’t matter what Woodward and Haig do because it will be a series of leaks that will mean nothing. There’s no Watergate. It will be traditional Washington leaks that may nick the president a little bit, but it’s not going to drive him out of office. It is the John Dean story that is just absolutely the most important story in the book.
The Deep State Included Members of the Military –
Our principal findings are that Richard Nixon came into the office intending to run a secret government, cut out the Joint Chiefs of Staff, among others. This caused an angry reaction which caused the military spy ring which Alexander Haig, long considered loyal to Nixon, was involved in. Haig had a secret relationship with Bob Woodward that continued through Watergate, leaked information to Woodward in an effort to tarnish Nixon because of distress over the foreign policy. A separate leg of our story is John Dean. Working independently, a young ambitious guy running a rogue intelligence operation in the White House ordered a break-in at the Democratic National Committee and when it failed, covered it up and tricked the president, who never bothered to find out the truth, into the coverup as well.
Howard Kurtz was used to defame the book Silent Coup –
The first shot out of the box they used their so-called media critic, Howard Kurtz. The idea was to poison the well. They put it in the Style section, they trashed the book, and then they sent it to all the wire services that they service around the country in order to poison the well. That was the whole purpose of that.
This leads us to today –
G. Gordon Liddy supported the central claims of Silent Coup, a book that says that John Dean was responsible for the Watergate break-in & advised Nixon to obstruct. Dean was a plant in the 1st Dem coup d’etat. They tried the same method on Trump.
It looks like CNN’s John Dean is well aware of how a Deep State coup works. The Democrat’s Nadler is wanting him to recreate his crimes but this time against President Trump.
When Barack Obama wasn’t promising to lower ocean levels and heal the planet, he was claiming that he’d be the last president to deal with health care.
”I am not the first president to take up this cause, but I am determined to be the last,” he said.
But as John Merline over at Issues & Insights notes, Obama only managed to make matters worse. A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll shows that health care is now the top priority for the public, with 24% saying it should be No. 1 on the priority list, and 42% saying it should be in the top two spots.
That’s up sharply from the public’s view of health care before Obamacare, when in 2006 only 14% ranked it as their top priority. Nine years after Obamacare passed, why do you think that might be?
An ongoing Gallup Poll, meanwhile, finds that people are, overall, less satisfied with their health coverage and the quality of their own health care than they were in 2007.
So muc for Obama’s promises. It means that, by Merline’s estimation, taxpayers and rate payers have coughed up more than $800 billion — so far — only to see health care get worse. File under promises of socialism.
So now it’s been up to Obama’s successor, President Trump, to “take up the cause” and repair the damage Obama did, while Democrats who are not on the impeachment train wreck are stating that health care is their big selling point with voters.
The question is, why does the public continue to trust Democrats on this issue? Merline’s piece is excellent insight about the false promises of Obamacare and the dangers of the Democrats’ new banquet of promises all right. Read the whole thing here.
When Barack Obama wasn’t promising to lower ocean levels and heal the planet, he was claiming that he’d be the last president to deal with health care.
”I am not the first president to take up this cause, but I am determined to be the last,” he said.
But as John Merline over at Issues & Insights notes, Obama only managed to make matters worse. A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll shows that health care is now the top priority for the public, with 24% saying it should be No. 1 on the priority list, and 42% saying it should be in the top two spots.
That’s up sharply from the public’s view of health care before Obamacare, when in 2006 only 14% ranked it as their top priority. Nine years after Obamacare passed, why do you think that might be?
An ongoing Gallup Poll, meanwhile, finds that people are, overall, less satisfied with their health coverage and the quality of their own health care than they were in 2007.
So muc for Obama’s promises. It means that, by Merline’s estimation, taxpayers and rate payers have coughed up more than $800 billion — so far — only to see health care get worse. File under promises of socialism.
So now it’s been up to Obama’s successor, President Trump, to “take up the cause” and repair the damage Obama did, while Democrats who are not on the impeachment train wreck are stating that health care is their big selling point with voters.
The question is, why does the public continue to trust Democrats on this issue? Merline’s piece is excellent insight about the false promises of Obamacare and the dangers of the Democrats’ new banquet of promises all right. Read the whole thing here.
How progressive. Via Campus Reform: The Young Democratic Socialists of America (YDSA) chapter at Texas State University boasted on Twitter about not having any straight members on its E-Board and Coordinating Committee after calling to “guillotine bourgeoisie traitors.” The YDSA chapter of Texas State University published a “happy pride month” post on its Twitter account […]
On Tuesday, Alabama legislators passed a bill that would punish child sex offenders by requiring them to be chemically castrated before they are released from prison. HB 379 was introduced by GOP Rep. Steve Hurst, who told WIAT-TV:
“If you openly support BDS in Florida, you’re dead, politically.”
That was Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’s conclusion from the surprisingly large role the issue of the antisemitic “boycott, divestment and sanctions” (BDS) campaign against Israel played in his close race against Tallahassee mayor Andrew Gillum in Floridan’s gubernatorial election last November.
DeSantis edged out the hardcore progressive Democrat by a mere 0.4 percent, or 32,000 votes.
DeSantis made the remark during the course of his official visit to Israel last week. He led a massive trade mission of Florida business leaders, cabinet secretaries, and university presidents on a five-day trip to the Jewish state. During the course of the mission, Florida universities signed collaboration agreements with Israeli universities spanning a vast spectrum of undertakings from water purification to space research.
The mission merged the twin goals of increasing Florida-Israel economic, academic and commercial ties; and fighting anti-Semitism generally, and the BDS campaign against Israel specifically. Its success was a stunning expression of DeSantis’s state government’s friendship with Israel. It also placed the sharp contrast between progressive Democrats — like his opponent, Gillum — and DeSantis in stark relief.
Throughout his three terms in Congress, DeSantis distinguished himself as one of the most active defenders and promoters of the U.S. strategic alliance with the Jewish state. In contrast, in the years preceding Gillum’s general election run for Florida governor, he cultivated and benefitted from close ties with BDS groups.
DeSantis made his remark about the negative effect his opponent’s support for Israel’s worst opponents in America had on Gillum’s election prospects during a visit Wednesday to the Etzion Hub in the Gush Etzion industrial park. The Hub is a flexible work office space and a central meeting place for the growing hi-tech, small business and self-employed community of Gush Etzion and Efrat in Judea and Samaria.
During the course of his visit at the Etzion Hub, DeSantis held a roundtable discussion with Israeli officials to discuss the BDS movement and the reasons that Israel is being targeted for discrimination. He also held a joint press conference with Gilad Erdan, Israel’s Minister of Strategic Affairs, responsible for Israel’s efforts to combat the global BDS campaign being waged against it.
DeSantis’s visit to the Etzion Hub marked the first time a Florida state official made an official visit to Judea and Samaria. He was accompanied by his cabinet secretaries and members of his delegation.
DeSantis’s decision to visit Gush Etzion, and hold his anti-BDS roundtable discussion in Judea, was a means to attack the BDS movement at its foundation.
The BDS campaign calls for social ostracism of Israelis and Jewish supporters of Israel outside of Israel. It also calls for the boycott of Israeli businesses and citizens, divestment from Israeli firms, and sanctions against Israel and firms that do business with Israel.
The BDS campaign has various permutations. One of them is a selective boycott of Jews and Jewish commercial enterprises in Judea and Samaria. President Barack Obama supported the BDS campaign in that permutation. For example, during Obama’s visit to Israel in 2013, the White House explicitly excluded Israeli students from Ariel University in Samaria from a speech Obama gave before an audience of Israeli students from all of Israel’s other universities.
In its final weeks in power, the Obama administration refused to veto, and indeed insisted on, the passage of UN Security Council resolution 2334. The radically anti-Israel resolution called for states to discriminate against Jews in Judea and Samaria, calling for “all states…to distinguish, in their relevant dealings, between the territory of the State of Israel and the territories occupied since 1967.”
Beyond its false interpretations of the Fourth Geneva Convention from 1949, there is no legal basis for the resolution to deem Israeli communities and neighborhoods in Judea, Samaria, and united Jerusalem illegal.
Aside from the speciousness of the legal claim, the assertion that Israeli communities in Judea and Samaria and unified Jerusalem should be targeted from discriminatory treatment is problematic for two reasons. First, it targets Israelis based on the fact of their Jewishness. Palestinians and Arab Israelis who work in Judea and Samaria are not targeted for discriminatory treatment and boycott. Only Jews are.
Second, and perhaps more important, by insisting that there is something inherently criminal about Jewish existence in Judea and Samaria, the cradle of Jewish civilization, the partial BDS campaign legitimizes the Palestinian view that Jews are not a nation and have no right to self-determination.
The PLO itself made this point in its internal guidance to its officials. In 2011, the UK Guardian and Al-Jazeera published what became knowns as “The Palestine Papers.” They included a trove of documents from the Palestine Liberation Organization’s Negotiations Support Unit (NSU). Among the documents that were published was a November 2007 memo titled, “Strategy and talking points for responding to the pre-condition of recognizing Israel as a ‘Jewish state.’”
Explaining the Palestinian refusal to accept Israel’s demand to recognize that it is the nation state as the Jewish people, the memo asserted, “Recognizing the Jewish state implies recognition of a Jewish people and recognition of its right to self-determination. Those who assert this right also assert that the territory historically associated with this right of self-determination (i.e., the self-determination unit) is all of Historic Palestine. Therefore, recognition of the Jewish people and their right of self-determination may lend credence to the Jewish people’s claim to all of Historic Palestine.”
In other words, once you accept that the Jews are a people, you recognize their homeland is the land of Israel and that their national history unfolded in the land of Israel. That history and sovereignty took place largely in Judea and Samaria and Jerusalem. So if you admit that the Jews are a people, you necessarily admit that Judea and Samaria, like the rest of the land of Israel, is their native land.
Conversely, by rejecting those rights, and indeed if you criminalize Jews who breathe in and out while in Judea and Samaria and unified Jerusalem, then you effectively criminalize Jews who breathe in and out in Tel Aviv. The two are indivisible. So people who support limited BDS inevitably support the view that Israel as a whole has no right to exist.
State governments historically have not played a major role in foreign policy issues. But as the BDS campaign casts a wider net, seeking to intimidate U.S. firms, universities, cultural institutions, and individuals to boycott Israel, preventing extortion of U.S. citizens and entities that conduct normal relations with Israel and Israelis has become a domestic issue. As a result, nearly half of the state governments have passed anti-BDS legislation over the past several years.
Two months before DeSantis entered office, the online holiday rental giant Airbnb announced that it would delist Jewish-owned properties in Judea and Samaria from its website, thus denying Jews the right to use the service to advertise their properties in the areas, just because they are Jews.
Airbnb’s move was precipitated by a massive pressure campaign by anti-Israel, pro-BDS groups spearheaded by Human Rights Watch. Its announcement was heralded as a great victory for BDS groups and seen as a watershed event that would lead to a flood of companies announcing similar discriminatory policies to target Jews in Judea and Samaria.
DeSantis responded swiftly and effectively.
During his visit to Hub Etzion, DeSantis described what happened and its significance for the wider campaign to defeat BDS in America. He also made clear why it was important for him to hold the anti-BDS roundtable in Judea.
“One of the reasons we wanted to come here [to Judea] is because we were fighting this BDS movement [in response to] Airbnb,” he began.
“In the end of last year, [Airbnb] announced that they were going to target Israeli Jews in Judea and Samaria for disfavored treatment. That triggered our anti-BDS legislation in Florida so when I became governor [in January], we immediately placed Airbnb on the ‘scrutinized companies list.’ That would have triggered a number of different penalties particularly if Airbnb went public.”
DeSantis continued, “We have a very big pension system. And that would basically have made them persona non grata for us to invest in. So we took action early. We were the first state to do so. Other states started making noises and taking action. So I’m pleased to say that as we’re here today, Airbnb has reversed the policy.
“In Florida we welcome engagement with Israelis of all stripes. We are not going to discriminate against some Israelis or other Israelis and if people discriminate against Israel as a whole or try to find certain segments of Israeli society to discriminate against commercially, we view that as triggering our anti-BDS legislation and we will take action accordingly. So I’m glad that that has been addressed satisfactorily. And I really think that had we not done what we had done, I think that other companies would have followed Airbnb’s lead.”
In greeting DeSantis, Minister Erdan said, “Governor DeSantis has been one of the greatest and most consistent friends of Israel and of the U.S.-Israel alliance. Governor DeSantis promised that under his leadership, Florida would be the most pro-Israel state in America and he has kept his promise. In the name of the government and people of Israel, I want to thank Governor DeSantis for all that he has done.”
DeSantis’s decision to include the trip to Judea in his itinerary demonstrated two key facts.
First, elections matter. While it is true that Gillum tried to distance himself from his ties to BDS groups once they became an election issue, the fact is that he enjoyed long-standing, close ties to these groups. Gallium also harshly criticized President Trump’s decision to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, and Israel’s steps to defend its border with Gaza from penetration by Hamas-organized mobs.
Had Gillum been elected, there is little chance Florida would today be leading the campaign to protect U.S. business, academic and cultural ties with Israel and defeating BDS campaigns to criminalize and discriminate Jews in the U.S. or in any part of Israel.
The second lesson from DeSantis’s visit is that the Palestinians are right about one thing: if Jewish life can be delegitimized in any part of Israel, then it will inevitably be delegitimized in all parts of Israel. You cannot defend Israel’s right to exist in general while claiming Jews are criminals for living or working or building in specific parts of the country.
Tuesday on Fox News Channel’s “America’s Newsroom,” Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) said he approved of President Donald Trump’s tactic of levying a 5% tariff on Mexico until there was a noticeable improvement on lowering the influx of illegal immigrants into the United States through the U.S.-Mexico border.
Tillis said if Mexico secured its southern border, 80% of the influx from the southern border would be eliminated. Therefore, he said Trump was right to use every device at his disposal.
“The president is trying to get done in a couple of years what administrations, both Democrat and Republican administrations failed to do over the past couple of decades,” Tillis said. “He’s using a lot of devices that were considered taboo in the past. I’m a free trader, but I do think we have to make it very clear: When you take advantage of our open economy, when you steal our intellectual property, when you don’t cooperate with us on things that are also important — like securing the border — then the president has to have those tools available to come to a good solution for the American people and our trading partners.”
Donald Trump may be the most hated president in Hollywood since…well…ever. In the last month celebrities from Bill Maher to Cher have wished the worst, most vile things on the current president. The following is just a sampling of the worst outbursts (this past month) from Hollywood:
A Catholic bishop has ignited a controversy by reiterating traditional Catholic doctrine. He claims that homosexuality is harmful for children. Children appear to be the main target of the homosexual community.
Bishop Thomas Tobin, in Rhode Island, recently tweeted, “A reminder that Catholics should not support or attend LGBTQ ‘Pride Month’ events held in June. They promote a culture and encourage activities that are contrary to Catholic faith and morals. They are especially harmful for children.” This is Catholic doctrine and common sense.
For this, Tobin was severely attacked. Martina Navratilova claimed, “Catholic clergy has been a lot more dangerous to kids than LGBT.” Tobin has been described as a “hate-filled hypocrite” spreading “poisonous thinking.” Mia Farrow tweeted, “This is pure ignorance & bigotry.” British comic Julian Clary said, “May God strike you down Bishop, at His earliest convenience.” The Boston Globe proclaimed in a headline that Tobin is guilty of sending out a “homophobic tweet.” Joe Lazzerini, the president of Rhode Island Pride, said, “He is like the Donald Trump of the Catholic Church, he goes on Twitter and spews out hate.” Lazzerini further said he ”calls on Bishop Tobin to do some self-reflection as the majority of Catholic Rhode Islanders in this state reject the idea that to be Catholic is to be complicit to intolerance, bigotry and fear.”
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) was asked if it would make a statement of support for Bishop Tobin, but it chose not to comment. The U.S. bishops’ silence in effect supports Tobin’s critics. The Church has been silent on this issue with the exception of Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas. Strickland tweeted, “Please stop labeling bishops who speak the truth of the Gospel as homophobic. Stating this truth is not homophobia, it is simply reality.”
The homosexual mafia knows that a massive reaction to any criticism will result in its critics backing down. In all, the bishop’s tweet has so far received more than 65,000 responses. This induced Bishop Tobin to offer something of an apology. He wrote, “I regret that my comments yesterday about Pride Month have turned out to be so controversial in our community, and offensive to some, especially the gay community. That certainly was not my intention, but I understand why a good number of individuals have taken offense. The Catholic Church has respect and love for members of the gay community, as do I. Individuals with same-sex attraction are beloved children of God and our brothers and sisters.”
Critics of Bishop Tobin have commented on the extensive abuse of children by clergy in the Catholic Church as if he were responsible for this. Tobin obviously opposes this behavior. The Church has been infiltrated by homosexuals. Any organization that has access to young children is attractive to these individuals. The Boy Scouts and the Big Brother organization have been compelled by the courts to accept homosexual leaders. Abusers of children are not Catholics or Christian. They are more likely Satanists.
In many circles, the three sentences of Bishop Tobin’s original tweet are considered “hate speech,” “poisonous thinking,” ”ignorant and bigoted,” and “homophobic.” These formerly unremarkable sentences are grounds for being ostracized, fired from your job, and even sentenced to prison in some locations.
Children are the primary target of the homosexual movement. One of their tactics is named some variation of Drag Queen Story Time. This is an international program where libraries and bookstores have men in drag read stories to children. The stated purpose of this program is to “instill a sense of love and acceptance in our children while encouraging them to be true to themselves.” Drag Queen Story Time organizer Matthew Humphrey has said previously that the event aims to let children know that it’s OK to be different and it’s OK for other kids to be different. However, drag queen Dylan Pontiff admitted that drag queens at these story hours “are trying to groom the next generation.”
Drag Queen Story Time has had a problem with a number of drag queens convicted of sexually assaulting children. Two drag queens from Houston represent only those known to have been convicted. ”William Travis Dees was convicted in 2004 of sex crimes against four young children (ages 4, 5, 6, and 8), was jailed, and is listed as a ‘high risk sex offender.'” Alberto Garza was convicted of assaulting an 8-year-old boy in 2008. Protecting children from such people is not hateful.
John Dietrich is a freelance writer and the author of The Morgenthau Plan: Soviet Influence on American Postwar Policy (Algora Publishing). He has a Master of Arts degree in international relations from St. Mary’s University. He is retired from the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Department of Homeland Security.
A Catholic bishop has ignited a controversy by reiterating traditional Catholic doctrine. He claims that homosexuality is harmful for children. Children appear to be the main target of the homosexual community.
Bishop Thomas Tobin, in Rhode Island, recently tweeted, “A reminder that Catholics should not support or attend LGBTQ ‘Pride Month’ events held in June. They promote a culture and encourage activities that are contrary to Catholic faith and morals. They are especially harmful for children.” This is Catholic doctrine and common sense.
For this, Tobin was severely attacked. Martina Navratilova claimed, “Catholic clergy has been a lot more dangerous to kids than LGBT.” Tobin has been described as a “hate-filled hypocrite” spreading “poisonous thinking.” Mia Farrow tweeted, “This is pure ignorance & bigotry.” British comic Julian Clary said, “May God strike you down Bishop, at His earliest convenience.” The Boston Globe proclaimed in a headline that Tobin is guilty of sending out a “homophobic tweet.” Joe Lazzerini, the president of Rhode Island Pride, said, “He is like the Donald Trump of the Catholic Church, he goes on Twitter and spews out hate.” Lazzerini further said he ”calls on Bishop Tobin to do some self-reflection as the majority of Catholic Rhode Islanders in this state reject the idea that to be Catholic is to be complicit to intolerance, bigotry and fear.”
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) was asked if it would make a statement of support for Bishop Tobin, but it chose not to comment. The U.S. bishops’ silence in effect supports Tobin’s critics. The Church has been silent on this issue with the exception of Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas. Strickland tweeted, “Please stop labeling bishops who speak the truth of the Gospel as homophobic. Stating this truth is not homophobia, it is simply reality.”
The homosexual mafia knows that a massive reaction to any criticism will result in its critics backing down. In all, the bishop’s tweet has so far received more than 65,000 responses. This induced Bishop Tobin to offer something of an apology. He wrote, “I regret that my comments yesterday about Pride Month have turned out to be so controversial in our community, and offensive to some, especially the gay community. That certainly was not my intention, but I understand why a good number of individuals have taken offense. The Catholic Church has respect and love for members of the gay community, as do I. Individuals with same-sex attraction are beloved children of God and our brothers and sisters.”
Critics of Bishop Tobin have commented on the extensive abuse of children by clergy in the Catholic Church as if he were responsible for this. Tobin obviously opposes this behavior. The Church has been infiltrated by homosexuals. Any organization that has access to young children is attractive to these individuals. The Boy Scouts and the Big Brother organization have been compelled by the courts to accept homosexual leaders. Abusers of children are not Catholics or Christian. They are more likely Satanists.
In many circles, the three sentences of Bishop Tobin’s original tweet are considered “hate speech,” “poisonous thinking,” ”ignorant and bigoted,” and “homophobic.” These formerly unremarkable sentences are grounds for being ostracized, fired from your job, and even sentenced to prison in some locations.
Children are the primary target of the homosexual movement. One of their tactics is named some variation of Drag Queen Story Time. This is an international program where libraries and bookstores have men in drag read stories to children. The stated purpose of this program is to “instill a sense of love and acceptance in our children while encouraging them to be true to themselves.” Drag Queen Story Time organizer Matthew Humphrey has said previously that the event aims to let children know that it’s OK to be different and it’s OK for other kids to be different. However, drag queen Dylan Pontiff admitted that drag queens at these story hours “are trying to groom the next generation.”
Drag Queen Story Time has had a problem with a number of drag queens convicted of sexually assaulting children. Two drag queens from Houston represent only those known to have been convicted. ”William Travis Dees was convicted in 2004 of sex crimes against four young children (ages 4, 5, 6, and 8), was jailed, and is listed as a ‘high risk sex offender.'” Alberto Garza was convicted of assaulting an 8-year-old boy in 2008. Protecting children from such people is not hateful.
John Dietrich is a freelance writer and the author of The Morgenthau Plan: Soviet Influence on American Postwar Policy (Algora Publishing). He has a Master of Arts degree in international relations from St. Mary’s University. He is retired from the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Department of Homeland Security.
The father of an 11-year-old autistic boy was shocked at a luncheon honoring his son’s fifth grade class when his son was given an award dubbing him the “most annoying male."
