Democratic Socialists Seek Campaign Manager for Sanders Independent Committee

The Democratic Socialists of America Party is looking to hire a campaign manager to run an independent expenditure committee in support of Bernie Sanders’ (I, Vt.) presidential candidacy.

The job listing, first obtained and reported on by the Daily Beast, seeks someone to "report to the Organizing Director and work closely with other staff to develop and strengthen Democratic Socialists of America’s campaign work to elect Bernie Sanders President."

By forming an independent expenditure committee, the DSA would be able to spend on political communications that directly advocate for Sanders’ nomination and election, but the committee could not coordinate their communications or activities in any way with the Sanders campaign.

According to its website, the DSA is the "largest socialist organization" in the United States. The Daily Beast reported it currently boasts a membership that exceeds 56,000.

"According to an official, the role that DSA would fill in bringing on a Sanders’ campaign manager is, in part, to keep pushing the senator on various issues," the Daily Beast reported. "That includes areas where he and DSA are on the same page and areas where they disagree, including on issues like SESTA, a bill Sanders and his 2020 competitors voted for but which sex workers have said puts lives in danger."

The DSA endorsed Sanders last month. However, the AfroSocialist and Socialists of Color Caucus within the party asked that the endorsement not be delivered until Sanders came around in support of reparations for slavery.

"Should the organization move forward with an endorsement of the Sanders campaign, despite his failure to adopt specific policy stances to address matters of persisting racial injustice and despite his unwillingness to champion reparations to specifically address the experience of the descendants of African slaves, it will risk alienating not just members of color within the organization, but people of color in the communities in which the DSA works," the caucus said in a letter, reported on by Vox.com.

A blog post on the main DSA website authored by Steve Max made the case for the party supporting Sanders, saying the party could play a major role in the election but only if "if it moves immediately, forcefully, and visibly to a position alongside the Bernie Sanders field operation."

"The main danger Bernie faces now, is the proliferation of boutique candidates each of whom threatens to detach a piece of what should be the Sanders Coalition," Max added.

The post Democratic Socialists Seek Campaign Manager for Sanders Independent Committee appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://freebeacon.com

Poll: 75 Percent Oppose Sanders On Letting All Prisoners Vote

Gee, who would have guessed this? America is still sane. Via Free Beacon: A large majority of Americans disagree with Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I., Vt.) stance that all prisoners should be allowed to vote in the United States, even those behind bars for violent crimes like the Boston Marathon bomber. A Business Insider poll found […]

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Tucker Carlson on CNN’s Stelter: ‘Dumb People Are So Self-Confident — Have You Noticed That?’

Tuesday during his opening segment, Fox News Channel’s Tucker Carlson hammered those in the media that decried President Donald Trump’s absence from last Saturday’s White House Correspondents’ Association dinner.

Carlson took aim at several of the event’s speakers for not recognizing others beyond those that agree with them ideologically when it comes to defending the First Amendment.

“In case you weren’t invited, the White House Correspondents’ Dinner took place over the weekend,” Carlson said. “For the third year in a row, Donald Trump was invited but took a pass and didn’t show up. That has never happened in the long history of the dinner. Presidents always show up. They always show in a tuxedo and head downtown to suck up to the White House Correspondents’ Association. They don’t want to do that. They hate going — every one of them — all Presidents deeply despised the news media, but they make themselves go. They have no choice. It is a hostage situation.”

Carlson then took on CNN’s “Reliable Sources” host Brian Stelter.

Partial transcript as follows:

CARLSON: If you blow off the dinner, the press will punish you — guaranteed. They won’t admit it, of course, they won’t say it’s personal, they will make up some story.

Here, for example, is Jeff Zucker’s spokesman, claiming that not going to media dinner is the same as attacking the media.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

BROOKE BALDWIN, CNN ANCHOR: Say what you will about the press, this is an event honors the First Amendment.

BRIAN STELTER, CNN CHIEF MEDIA CORRESPONDENT: Yes, that’s what it’s about. It’s an awards dinner and a fund-raiser. In the past, Presidents have always shown up even if they were angry. The President would get in time. It is yet another example of what we are seeing. The administration’s attack against the media takes many forms. One form is the President having a rally this Saturday instead of attending the dinner.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CARLSON: Dumb people are so self-confident. Have you noticed that? It’s almost like there is a self-esteem confidence reverse access. I think that’s real. Anyway, they are telling us that going to your own events instead of our event is a form of harassment. Do you know what’s not harassment according to CNN? Spying on former Fox reporter, James Rosen, and his parents because you don’t like what he is covering.

The Obama administration actually did that, and then Obama went to eight separate White House Correspondents’ Association dinners. Nobody ever denounced him as immoral. Obama hated reporters, by the way, most people do hate reporters for good reason. But reporters loved him back anyway. They agreed with his politics. That’s what happens.

Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

AOC May Have Broken Federal Law After Shadily Disguising Fundraiser as 5K Run

It’s safe to say that if you go to a 5K run with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s name attached to it, you’re not exactly under the impression that the money is going to go to the Republican National Committee.

However, depending on how the event is marketed, you may not necessarily be under the impression the money is going directly to Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign coffers — and that’s why the freshman representative finds herself embroiled in a controversy.

The “fun run,” which took place on Saturday in Astoria Park in Queens, could be mistaken as an environmental event if you didn’t look closely at the advertising for it.

“The Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez 5K & 1K Kid Dash is a Family Fun Run supporting U.S. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal on the Saturday following Earth Day,” the event’s website reads.

“Listen to live music, enjoy Fogo Azul as you cross the finish and learn about a Green New Deal.”

TRENDING: Watch: Dan Crenshaw Responds Perfectly to Deranged Critic Calling Him a ‘Nazi’ at Campus Event

The Facebook post about the run, similarly, didn’t give a whole lot of indication what the registration fees were going toward.

And, according to the New York Post, some runners certainly didn’t know.

“I think it’s really for this particular New Green Deal,” one runner said. “No question.”

“It’s going to help raise awareness and educate people,” another said.

“It’s to help the environment. To support the Green New Deal,” another woman told the Post. “It’s a good cause.”

Well, all right, perhaps they were running a race and weren’t exactly in the mode to explain themselves.

But then, Ocasio-Cortez didn’t seem interested in talking to an obviously winded New York Post reporter who tried to ask her questions en route.

Carrying an unidentified child, Ocasio-Cortez simpy ignored the issue.

RELATED: A Storm’s Brewing for AOC: ‘Multimillionaire Mystery Donor’ Steps Up to Knock Her Out of Office

She also didn’t mention her own campaign coffers while talking to participants before the event, according to the Post.

“We’re getting together for our own health, for our planet’s health … and to fight for the Green New Deal together,” she said, the Post reported.

Except … every dollar collected on Saturday went to AOC for Congress, the congresswoman’s campaign fund.

Does this fundraiser look shady to you?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

“It was a campaign fundraiser,” Ocasio-Cortez spokesman Corbin Trent told the Post.

This isn’t just sketchy, it’s also potentially illegal — especially when you consider that there was a 1K run for children as young as 3 with a $20 entrance fee.

For one thing, there are Federal Election Commission regulations regarding donations to a campaign by a minor. One of the stipulations, for instance, is that “[t]he decision to contribute is made knowingly and voluntarily by the minor.”

At an event where there were adults who clearly didn’t know what they were spending their money upon, what could be said about children who might be using their money under the misapprehension they were benefiting the Green New Deal as opposed to its progenitor?

Furthermore, FEC guidelines state that for a minor to give to a campaign, “[t]he contribution is not made using funds given to the minor as a gift for the purpose of making the contribution, and is not in any way controlled by another individual.”

When parents are ponying up crisp cash at an event raising money for Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign, that could be construed as a violation.

And there’s no denying the whole thing at least looks shady — like it’s a fundraiser disguised as a 5K run for the environment.

As one runner told the Post, “The site says it’s to benefit her environmental plan. If it is going to go directly to her campaign they should have said so.”

Now, I don’t pretend that FEC investigators are going to get themselves in a lather about an event that raised $11,000 for a freshman legislator who’s already raised $726,000 in just the first quarter of this year, almost all of it from outside her district.

Nor am I going to get myself in a lather about a dubiously advertised campaign event and pretend it’s some fantastic outrage.

Sure, Ocasio-Cortez could still get in a bit of trouble over it. However, in the whole scheme of Washington politics, the mire out of which swamp monsters like Abscam and the Clinton Foundation have lurched, $11,000 seems almost quaint.

However, Ocasio-Cortez has been in trouble for campaign finance issues that weren’t quite so quaint, particularly a complaint by the National Legal and Policy Center which alleged irregularities involving the funneling of campaign funds into shell companies, inter alia. While this is unconnected to the run, it could represent a pattern asserting itself.

Beyond that, there’s the self-serving nature of it all.

The implication, after all, is that raising money for Ocasio-Cortez benefits the health of the planet. Not that this goes directly to the Green New Deal or anything — after all, money can’t go specifically to a piece of legislation, no matter how impractical or moribund it may be.

Apparently, the fact that it’s going to directly to Ocasio-Cortez doesn’t need to be disclosed, either. Surely those runners and their offspring would recognize the righteousness of the cause if they were told, right?

That makes this shell game perfectly acceptable?

No, she’s not the only politician who would do this, but that’s the entire point:

No matter how she markets herself, she’s just another politician.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

SJWs Will Not Be Happy About This: 81% of Americans Agree That People Are Too Easily Offended These Days

The majority of Americans are sick and tired of the PC police and victimhood culture — on both sides of the aisle.

According to a new poll from the Morning Consult, 94% of Republicans, 82% of independents and 70% of Democrats agree that “people are too easily offended these days.”

“Large swaths of these respondents agreed that the ‘rules’ about what they can and cannot say are changing so fast it’s difficult to keep up, that people are offended too easily these days and that the current climate prevents some people from saying what they believe because others might find it offensive,” the Morning Consult reported. “But these were sentiments also shared with a majority of the poll’s broader population, suggesting that when it comes to free speech, Americans are not as nearly divided as some would argue.”

Interestingly, the majority of respondents across party lines believe that “people should be able to say what they really think, even when it might offend people.”

The pollsters also found that 75% of adults say the current climate prevents open political discourse.

The pollsters questioned 13,000 adult Americans about various aspects of the culture war.

The post SJWs Will Not Be Happy About This: 81% of Americans Agree That People Are Too Easily Offended These Days appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Under Fire, New York Times Finally Apologizes for Antisemitic Cartoon After Days of Failing to Do So

The New York Times has finally apologized for printing a blatantly antisemitic cartoon on the opinion pages of its international section last week.

The Times ran a cartoon on Thursday showing a blind President Donald Trump, wearing a skullcap, and being led around by Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu–who is portrayed as a dog. The leash and collar on the Netanyahu dog character in the cartoon have a Star of David on it.

It mirrors literal Nazi propaganda against Jews and then British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, as some on social media have noted:

The Times‘ decision to print this has come under near-universal criticism from across the media and political spectrum, and in response the Times on Saturday retracted and deleted the cartoon–issuing an editor’s note that did not include an apology.

“A political cartoon in the international print edition of The New York Times on Thursday included anti-Semitic tropes, depicting the prime minister of Israel as a guide dog with a Star of David collar leading the president of the United States, shown wearing a skullcap,” the initial editor’s note on Saturday retracting the image reads. “The image was offensive, and it was an error of judgment to publish it. It was provided by The New York Times News Service and Syndicate, which has since deleted it.”

While the Times retracted it, and said it was “an error of judgement to publish it,” its original editor’s note statement did not apologize for this. The Times also has not, as Breitbart News has already reported, been transparent with the public or its audience on how this happened or who in particular is responsible–or if multiple people were responsible–and what consequences that person or those people will face. A Times spokeswoman, Danielle Rhoades-Ha, also did not answer when asked by Breitbart News about structural reforms that may be necessary as a result of this mistake.

Many, including President Trump’s son Donald Trump, Jr., ripped the Times for not being journalistically responsible not only with its initial decision to publish the cartoon but also with the organization’s handling of the retraction:

Yair Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister’s son, also ripped the Times in an exclusive for Breitbart News.

Even so, despite the criticism, the Times held on for more than a full day after the initial retraction without an apology–and without any transparency about what was happening inside the newspaper and why this happened in the first place.

But now, with this latest statement on Sunday–three days after the publication of the antisemitic image and a full more than 24 hours after the initial retraction–the Times is finally openly apologizing for its actions and announcing an internal review and “significant changes” to its editorial process to come.

“We are deeply sorry for the publication of an anti-Semitic political cartoon last Thursday in the print edition of The New York Times that circulates outside of the United States, and we are committed to making sure nothing like this happens again,” the New York Times said in a statement.  The Times continued:

Such imagery is always dangerous, and at a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise worldwide, it’s all the more unacceptable. We have investigated how this happened and learned that, because of a faulty process, a single editor working without adequate oversight downloaded the syndicated cartoon and made the decision to include it on the Opinion page. The matter remains under review, and we are evaluating our internal processes and training. We anticipate significant changes.

The Times has still not identified who that “single editor” was who somehow made the decision, unilaterally, to publish this cartoon–or whether that person has been held accountable in any way, especially whether that person still works for the Times. The Times has also not stated whether anyone else should have been involved in the oversight process before the issue went to print, and whether anyone dropped the ball–and it has not stated what exactly is wrong with its internal processes and what changes are coming. Rhoades-Ha has still not answered any of these questions and more.

But the fact that the Times is now apologizing after initially refusing to do so, and announcing an internal review of its editorial processes that presumably if the publication believes in journalistic integrity as it says it does would be made public in its entirety upon conclusion of the review, shows just how serious a mistake this was for the so-called newspaper of record.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Weird News Roundup: Perverts, Weirdos And Really Dumb Criminals

Because you just can’t make stuff like this up!

Mom-Daughter Drone Duo Is Headed For Jail

A mother-daughter duo who used a $4000 drone to drop a package of contraband behind the walls of a Florida prison will themselves serve time as a result of a felony plea deal struck with prosecutors, court records show.

Cassandra Kerr, 40, and Concetta Didiano, 22, this week each entered no contest pleas to introducing contraband into a state correctional institution, a felony carrying a maximum of five years in prison.

As part of a plea deal, Kerr and Didiano (pictured above) are expected to each receive six months in jail when they are sentenced in late-July. The pair will also have to pay court and prosecution costs, according to plea forms.

Kerr and Didiano were arrested in mid-December, shortly after Martin Correctional Institution (MCI) staffers spotted a drone hovering over the facility around 2 AM.

Jailers were suspicious that the drone was “possibly delivering a package to the rooftop of one of the inmate housing facilities.

Read it HERE.

Men charged with having sex with 12 animals sentenced to 20-41 years

Three Clearfield County men who were charged with having sex with 12 animals over the past four to five years have been sentenced.

Matthew Brubaker, 31, Terry Wallace, 41, and Marc Measnikoff, 34, have all been sentenced to 20 to 41 years in state prison with additional probation.

Brubaker, Wallace, and Measnikoff, were charged with having sexual relations with at least 9 female horses, a cow, a goat, and dogs. Police say this happened on their property on Mouse Road.

A teenage boy, who also lived on the property, was reportedly forced to assist the men by restraining the animals while they engaged in their acts.

Read it HERE.

Florida man accused of firing urine-filled squirt gun at woman

Authorities in Florida say a 71-year-old man filled a squirt gun with urine and sprayed a woman who was walking her dog.

Gulfport police said in an arrest report that Joel William Benjamin approached the woman on Sunday and squirted her several times with urine.

The report says Benjamin told officers he would “do it again,” but it was unclear what motivated the attack.

Read it HERE.

Man sues parents over trashed porn collection

A man now living in Indiana is suing his parents after he says they destroyed his valuable porn collection.

FOX 17 is choosing to identify the plaintiff in this story as “Charlie,” as this is a civil case without any associated criminal charges.

The case dates back to October 2016 when, according to a lawsuit filed this week, Charlie moved into his parents’ home in Grand Haven after going through a divorce from his wife. Charlie apparently stayed for 10 months in their home, doing housework in lieu of paying rent. He was asked to leave after police had to be called to the house in August of 2017 for a domestic situation.

His parents allegedly traveled in November 2017 to his new place in Indiana to drop off possessions he had left at their home.

Allegedly missing from the items they brought: Charlie’s massive pornography collection.

Charlie says his parents told him that they destroyed the entire collection. A collection that consisted of over 12 moving boxes full of movies.

Read it HERE.

Australia wants to kill millions of feral cats by airdropping poisonous sausages

The Australian government wants to rid the country of 2 million feral cats by 2020 through airdropping poisonous sausages, shooting and trapping, and other controversial practices.

The government first announced its plan to kill two million cats by next year back in 2015 in a statement that has recently received notice, citing concerns for the nation’s native species and labelling feral cats as one of the “key threats” to the country’s biodiversity.

“Through our commitment to take decisive action on feral cats and other invasive species, we will significantly reduce the impact of feral predators and increase the resilience of our native species,” the government continued in its “Threatened Species Strategy” plan.

The first believed cats’ arrival to country occurred around the 1700s, according to CNN. Since that time, the government said, over “130 of Australia’s known species have become extinct, lost to us and to the world forever.” There are reportedly anywhere between 2 to 6 million feral cats estimated to be in Australia.

Read it HERE.

Do NOT put garlic in your vagina: Top gynecologist warns women

A gynecologist has urged women to not put garlic in their vagina to treat yeast infections.

Dr. Jen Gunter, based in California, went on a Twitter rant about the old wives’ tale, which recommends putting a clove inside the vagina for up to three days.

There are no studies to support the claim garlic has antifungal properties – apart from in a petri dish – and it could be a serious risk for further infections, Dr Gunter said.

The vagina is the ‘perfect’ environment for the botulism bacteria to grow, which can be life-threatening and lead to paralysis.

It’s not the first time doctors have busted similar myths, including one claiming parsley in the vagina can induce periods.

Read it HERE.

Florida man arrested for impersonating officer after pulling over undercover detective

A man was arrested for impersonating a law enforcement officer after he unknowingly pulled over an undercover detective.

The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office posted about the incident on Facebook.

They said that 26-year-old Matthew Joseph Erris decided to play cop, turning on his red and blue lights and pulling somebody over. However, he had no idea that the other driver was a real undercover Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office detective.

OOPS: When 26-year-old Matthew Joseph Erris decided to play cop, turn on his red and blue lights and pull somebody over,…

Posted by Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office on Thursday, April 18, 2019

Read it HERE.

Yep, you just can’t make shit like this up!

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

Synagogue Victim Hailed As Hero For Saving Kids After Gunshot To Leg, Witness Says

This man is being called a hero. A friend says 34-year-old Almog Peretz saved children during today’s synagogue shooting in Poway. Hear the story tonight on @fox5sandiego pic.twitter.com/FKBIc9tcCL — Kristen Shanahan (@k_shan7) April 28, 2019 Great job, Almog Peretz! Via Fox News: A 34-year-old man who was wounded when gunfire erupted inside a San Diego-area […]

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Andrew Gillum Fined for Ethics Violation, Four Other Complaints Dropped

So they spend three years and half a million and all he has to do is pay a fine? Via Free Beacon: That free April 2016 ticket to “Hamilton” from “Mike Miller” will cost former gubernatorial candidate and Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum $5,000 and could, perhaps, tarnish his Democratic Party “rising star” status for years. […]

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Ocasio-Cortez Slammed For Instantly Politicizing Synagogue Shooting

Social media users slammed socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) Saturday after she came out and attacked the Republican-controlled Senate and pushed for gun control immediately in the wake of the horrible white nationalist attack on a synagogue in California, which left one person dead and three others injured.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml/v