California Democrat Proposes Bill to Let Illegal Aliens Hold State Office

California Democrat Proposes Bill to Let Illegal Aliens Hold State Office

California State Sen. Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens) is co-sponsoring a bill that would make clear that illegal aliens may serve in state office.

The bill, SB 174, would amend an old provision in the state code that was originally drawn up in 1872 “to exclude Chinese immigrants and other ‘transient aliens’ from holding appointed civil positions,” the Los Angeles Times notes.

However, Lara’s changes would not restrict state offices to citizens or legal residents, but rather allow anyone present in the state to serve, regardless of immigration status.

California has already allowed at least two illegal aliens to serve in state office. Most recently, State Sen. Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles) appointed Lizbeth Mateo to the California Student Opportunity and Access Program Project Grant Advisory Committee.

Mateo is an illegal alien who was brought to the U.S. as a minor by her parents but is not eligible for deferred deportation under DACA because she returned to Mexico and attempted to re-enter the U.S. in 2013 as part of a protest. She was detained at the border and requested asylum — after spending several weeks in Mexico with family.

Lara, who has made attacks on President Donald Trump the hallmark of his faltering campaign for California Insurance Commissioner, is notorious for proposing radical legislation.

Last year, Lara helped introduce the “Healthy California Act,” which would create a single-payer, government-run health care system in the state — though he never indicated how the state would pay for it. He also proposed legislation to discriminate against any contractors who work on President Trump’s border wall, banning them for life from doing business with the state. Lara also successfully introduced sanctuary state legislation that prevents local governments and law enforcement agencies from contracting with the federal government to detain illegal immigrants.

Despite his left-wing politics, which fit the current political climate in the state, Lara is reportedly losing badly to former California Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner, who is running for his old job as an independent rather than as a Republican.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He was named to Forward’s 50 “most influential” Jews in 2017. He is the co-author of How Trump Won: The Inside Story of a Revolution, which is available from Regnery. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website:

Conservatives Urge Fairer Social Media Policies

MRC Founder and President Brent Bozell, MRC Censorship Project Director Allen West, and 61 other conservative leaders issued the following joint statement on Tuesday urging leading social media companies to adopt four key principles in order to ensure that conservatives receive equal treatment on these important platforms:

Social media censorship and online restriction of conservatives and their organizations have reached a crisis level. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s hearings on Capitol Hill only served to draw attention to how widespread this problem has become. Conservative leaders now have banded together to call for equal treatment on tech and social media.

Conservatives have encountered problems across platforms — Twitter, Facebook, Google, and its video platform YouTube especially. Social media firms have banned gun videos and rejected pro-life advertisements. They have skewed search results and adjusted trending topics in ways that have harmed the right. Firms have restricted and deleted videos, even academic content. Conservative tech employees have found their speech limited and their careers harmed. And top tech companies have given preferential treatment to anointed legacy media outlets that also lean left. These same tech titans then work with groups openly hostile to conservatives to restrict speech.

Here are four key areas that social media companies must address to begin to rectify their credibility problem:

1) Provide Transparency: We need detailed information so everyone can see if liberal groups and users are being treated the same as those on the right. Social media companies operate in a black-box environment, only releasing anecdotes about reports on content and users when they think it necessary. This needs to change. The companies need to design open systems so that they can be held accountable, while giving weight to privacy concerns.

2) Provide Clarity on ‘Hate Speech’: “Hate speech” is a common concern among social media companies, but no two firms define it the same way. Their definitions are vague and open to interpretation, and their interpretation often looks like an opportunity to silence thought. Today, hate speech means anything liberals don’t like. Silencing those you disagree with is dangerous. If companies can’t tell users clearly what it is, then they shouldn’t try to regulate it.

3) Provide Equal Footing for Conservatives: Top social media firms, such as Google and YouTube, have chosen to work with dishonest groups that are actively opposed to the conservative movement, including the Southern Poverty Law Center. Those companies need to make equal room for conservative groups as advisers to offset this bias. That same attitude should be applied to employment diversity efforts. Tech companies need to embrace viewpoint diversity.

4) Mirror the First Amendment: Tech giants should afford their users nothing less than the free speech and free exercise of religion embodied in the First Amendment as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court. That standard, the result of centuries of American jurisprudence, would enable the rightful blocking of content that threatens violence or spews obscenity, without trampling on free speech liberties that have long made the United States a beacon for freedom.

Social media companies must address these complaints if they wish to have any credibility with the conservative movement and its tens of millions of supporters. It is our hope they will do so in a positive way. If the social media firms engage the conservative movement with the spirit of cooperation, we will do our best to assist them.

Signed (affiliations are for identification purposes only):

L. Brent Bozell III
Founder and President
Media Research Center

LTC Allen B. West (USA, Ret)
Director, MRC Censorship Project
Media Research Center

Lamar Smith (TX-21)
Chairman, Media Fairness Caucus

Lila Rose
Live Action

Dr. Jerry A. Johnson
President & CEO
National Religious Broadcasters &
Internet Freedom Watch

Brigitte Gabriel
Founder and Chairman
ACT for America

Tony Perkins
Family Research Council

David Bozell
For America Inc.

The Honorable Edwin Meese III
Former Attorney General
President Ronald Reagan

Dave N. Bossie
Citizens United

Ken Cuccinelli, II
Senate Conservatives Fund

Morton Blackwell
Weyrich Lunch

Jenny Beth Martin
Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund

Ron Robinson
Young America’s Foundation

Tim Wildmon
American Family Association

James O’Keefe
Project Veritas

Richard Viguerie
American Targeted Advertising

Becky Norton Dunlop
Senior White House Advisor
President Ronald Reagan

Kelly Shakelford
President and CEO
First Liberty Institute

Cleta Mitchell
Political Law Attorney
Washington, DC

Penny Young Nance
CEO and President
Concerned Women for America

Kristan Hawkins
Students for Life of America

Mathew Staver, Esq.
Founder and Chairman
Liberty Counsel

Phil Kerpen
American Commitment

Charles Copeland
Intercollegiate Studies Institute

Frank Gaffney
Founder, President, and CEO
Center for Security Policy

Brian Brown
National Organization for Marriage

Clifford D. May
Founder and President
Foundation for Defense of Democracies

Patrick Reilly
Cardinal Newman Society

Honorable Tim Huelskamp, Ph.D.
Heartland Institute

Craig Shirley
Reagan Biographer and Presidential Historian

William A. Donohue, Ph.D.
Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights

C. Preston Noell, III
Tradition, Family, Property, Inc

James Martin
Founder and Chairman
60 Plus Association

Francis DeLuca
Civitas Institute

Gary Bauer
American Values

Diana Banister
Shirley & Banister Public Affairs

Bob Adams
Revive America PAC

Elaine Donnelly
Center for Military Readiness

Ryan Bomberger
Chief Creative Officer
Radiance Foundation

Tricia Erickson
President, Angel Pictures & Publicity, Inc
Publisher of

Richard P. Bott, II
President and CEO
Bott Radio Network

Saul Anuzis
60 Plus Association

Floyd Brown
Western Journal

Mark Fitzgibbons
President of Corporate Affairs
American Target Advertising, Inc.

Susan A. Carleson
American Civil Rights Union

Kevin Freeman
NSIC Institute

Angelo Codevilla
Senior Fellow
Claremont Institute

Paul Gessing
Rio Grande Foundation

T. Kenneth Cribb
President Emeritus
Intercollegiate Studies Institute

Colin Hanna
Let Freedom Ring

Gene Mills
Louisiana Family Forum

John Hinderaker
Center of the American Experiment

Everett Piper
Oklahoma Wesleyan University

Amy Kremer
Women for Trump

The Honorable Donald J. Devine
Director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management
President Ronald Reagan

Tom Donelson
Americas PAC

Jeffrey G. Hunt
Western Conservative Summit

George Landrith
Frontiers of Freedom

Patrick Brown
Liftable Media

Rod D. Martin
Founder and CEO
The Martin Organization

Tom McCabe
Freedom Foundation

Avik Roy
The Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website:

Fallout: The Hill Drops Out of White House Correspondents’ Dinner

James Finkelstein, chairman of the news outlet the Hill, announced in a letter to Steven Thomma, executive director of the White House Correspondents’ Association, that the Hill will no longer participate in the annual White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) dinner.

“The Hill, which has participated in the White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) dinner for many years, does not plan at this time to participate in the event moving forward,” he wrote. “In short, there’s simply no reason for us to participate in something that casts our profession in a poor light.”

Finkelstein singled out the WHCA’s choice of comedienne Michelle Wolf as the reason. “The kind of jokes told by this year’s headliner, Michelle Wolf, were out of line for an event that’s supposed to be fun — and fair,” he wrote. “Based on what Americans witnessed on national television at Saturday night’s dinner, a once-fine evening celebrating the strong, free press the WHCA speaks of has turned into an angry display and ad-hominem attacks.”

Also at issue are the WHCA’s reluctance to apologize and the fact that there has still been no apology to press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, whom Wolf singled out in a series of especially mean-spirited personal attacks.

“The association made apologies, albeit not to the press secretary, only after the pressure compelled it to happen. We hope the dinner can get back to talking about the importance of the Fourth Estate without the kind of ugly sideshow that completely overshadowed the event this year.”

The Hill did leave the door open to return but not without “major reforms.”

There are rumors that this will only be the beginning. Apparently, other news outlets are also talking about dropping out as the fallout from Saturday night’s debacle continues.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: