Rashida Tlaib Misrepresented Soros Stipend in Financial Disclosures

Congresswoman-elect Rashida Tlaib (D., Mich.) did not disclose the name of the source of funds for a fellowship that was paid by liberal billionaire George Soros—as required by the House ethics committee—and also disclosed a lesser amount than she received, according to a review of tax and financial disclosure forms.

The Washington Free Beacon obtained the most recent copies of tax forms for a number of Soros’s organizations, including the Open Society Institute, the legal name for the Open Society Foundations, the entity in which Soros pushes millions in funding to a number of liberal causes and organizations.

An expenditure of $85,307 to Rashida Tlaib in Detroit, Mich., from 2017 is shown on page 97 of the 321-page report to "to increase involvement of disenfranchised urban communities of color with their local governance process by creating a community benefits strategy for equitable development and creating a leadership training for impacted residents focused on negotiation skills and identifying leverage at the local level."

Tlaib did not report any income in the amount of $85,307 on financial disclosure forms submitted as she was running for office, which identified the names of the sources that provided her income in three of four cases. Tlaib received compensation from the Maurice & Jane Sugar Law Center, Wayne State University, and Metro Solutions, the forms show. 

However, the fourth reported source of earned income is marked as a "Leadership in Government Fellowship," but does not identify who provided the payment.

A press release from 2016 shows that Tlaib was chosen for a "leadership in government" fellowship by Soros’s Open Society Foundations along with seven other individuals.

"The eight fellows, chosen from the senior ranks of federal, state, and local government, will work on a wide variety of issue areas: devising new ways to bring criminal justice reform to local prosecutors’ offices; developing new strategies for helping school children exposed to trauma; improving life outcomes for low-wage workers, immigrants, and boys and men of color; and closing the digital divide, and more," the release reads.

Tlaib held this position until May of this year, according to the Open Society Foundations website.

Kendra Arnold, executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, a Washington, D.C.-based watchdog group, said that Tlaib’s failure to report the source of her income is "problematic" due to rules requiring that the income source be identified.

Candidates are required to disclose the name of groups and organizations that provide their source of income, according to the manual on financial disclosure statements from the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Ethics.

"Identify the source by naming the organization, corporation, or other entity making the payment. It is not necessary that individual clients of a business be named, only the business itself," the manual states on page 31. "For example, on Schedule C, an editor would report the name of the publishing firm as the source of earned income, not the clients for whom the work was performed. Describe the type of income as salary, commissions, fees, pension, etc., as appropriate."

The $68,307 income marked for the "Leadership in Government Fellowship" on the financial disclosure forms is also $17,000 less than the $85,307 that was marked as being paid out by Soros’s group.

Arnold said this discrepancy is not as clear and could be the result of hard costs associated with the program.

"Filers must report the exact amount of income earned by them," the ethics manual reads. "Filers are not required to report an amount for their spouse’s income; rather they should report "N/A" in the "Amount" column. Filers, however, are required to report the exact amount of an honorarium received by their spouse."

Tlaib was paid $139,873 by Soros’s group in 2016, tax forms show. Between 2016 and 2017, Tlaib received a total of $225,180.

Tlaib also did not report a 2018 income from the group despite being with them five months into the year.

Tlaib’s campaign acknowledged receiving the Washington Free Beacon’s inquiry but did not explain why the source of funding was excluded from her financial disclosure forms and why the amount is lower than what she actually received by press time.

The post Rashida Tlaib Misrepresented Soros Stipend in Financial Disclosures appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://freebeacon.com

Dad makes 10-year-old daughter walk five miles in the cold to punish her for bullying

Sixteen million views and counting for this since he posted it on Monday.

This man will be our next president.

In the video he addresses those who might disagree, saying, “I know a lot of you parents are not going to agree with this and that’s all right. I am doing what I think is right to teach my daughter a lesson to stop her from bullying.”

“Parents need to hold their kids accountable,” Cox said. “So that was me showing how I hold my kid accountable. I’m not going to be another parent that’s just going to brush things under the rug and say, ‘Kids will be kids.’”

He said this was the second time Kirsten has gotten in trouble for bullying and she was given a three-day suspension.

Said one cuckish Facebook commenter who doesn’t understand the value of discipline and obviously votes Green Party, “Cure bullying with bullying. Great lesson, what’s next beating your kids so they don’t hit [others?]” Sending her alone on a five-mile walk would have been reckless, but as you can see below that’s not what happened. In fact, he never made her do the whole five-mile route in one go. It was broken up over the course of her three-day suspension. Presumably she was never out in the cold for more than an hour or so at a time.

So what’s the objection? She probably spends at least that much time every day during the winter running around outdoors at recess or after school with her friends. It’s not even a gratuitous punishment in the sense of choosing an unpleasant chore at random and making her do it just to make her unhappy. He made her walk to school after she was suspended from riding the bus; she told him that he’d need to drive her for the next few days and he told her guess again. The lesson here, obviously, is that if she wants a warm vehicle to carry her along this route in the future she’d best be more considerate to the other kids on the bus. She has a “new appreciation for some of the simple things in life she used to take for granted,” he posted later.

If you want to shame him for something, shame him for making the video and sharing it, not for the punishment. Kids will be goofing on her for this for years. Here’s the clip; make sure to click the little audio symbol if you don’t hear sound when it begins to play.

The post Dad makes 10-year-old daughter walk five miles in the cold to punish her for bullying appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

Antifa Went To Protest Fascists. They Targeted The Wrong Group — And Threatened To Kill Me.

"Nazi go home! Nazi go home!" a woman led a crowd into chanting at me as I was cornered against a barrier. A line of police officers stood watching a few feet away. Aiming a bullhorn at my face, the woman continued screaming while others pushed me.
Why did I receive this welcome in downtown Seattle? Because I dared to take a camera into an Antifa protest.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Arrogant Trump-Hater Bill Kristol Hit with Disaster. Weekly Standard To Close in Days: Insider


Staff members of The Weekly Standard, the conservative magazine that has been critical of President Donald Trump, expect to see a shut-down after rumors about the magazine’s fate began to circulate.

On Tuesday, CNN published an article expressing uncertainty about the magazine’s future.

MediaDC, the magazine’s publisher, seems to favor its other conservative news organization, The Washington Examiner, which tends to be more positive toward Trump.

“They’re expanding the pro-Trump magazine that does what the owners want, while threatening closing of an independent magazine that has its own history and identity,” an unnamed source told CNN.

The Weekly Standard was founded by Bill Kristol, an anti-Trump neoconservative who currently serves as the magazine’s editor-at-large.

TRENDING: Border Patrol Busts Caravan Member in US, Turns Out He’s a Convicted Murderer

Kristol has been a vocal opponent of Trump since the beginning of Trump’s presidential run. He was also one of the major influencers behind the failed #NeverTrump movement.

Here’s how the magazine depicted the then-Republican candidate’s campaign back in January of 2016. (Note Kristol’s commentary.)

Do you think Kristol’s anti-Trump agenda is responsible for this shut-down?

Even when Trump does something conservatives would normally favor, like lowering taxes, Kristol manages to find a negative spin.

In a series of phone calls Tuesday, the magazine’s editor-in-chief, Stephen Hayes, told staff that the fate of the magazine is uncertain.

One staff member from The Weekly Standard told The Daily Caller that Hayes himself was left in the dark about the magazine’s future.

CNN reported that its sources had said MediaDC Chairman Ryan McKibben had asked to meet with Hayes late next week. McKibben wants the entire staff of The Weekly Standard be available after that meeting, CNN reported.

“Supposedly Steve Hayes doesn’t even know,” the staff member told The Daily Caller.

RELATED: Kellyanne’s Nails It with Hilarious Response to Bill Kristol’s Potential Presidential Run

An editor for the magazine told The Daily Caller that employees expect the magazine to shut down before 2019.

“I don’t expect it to exist after Dec. 14, 2018,” the editor said. “There is no budget for it at all.”

A former employee of The Washington Examiner offered another prediction.

“They’re either closing or they’re folding into a page of the Washington Examiner,” the former Examiner employee said.

However, a current editor at The Weekly Standard was more pessimistic.

“I don’t think ‘folded’ is the right word. It sounds more like get rid of us entirely,” the editor said.

It makes sense that the magazine couldn’t stay afloat with its anti-Trump spin while Trump remains popular among conservatives.

Given the state of the media market these days, there are plenty of reasons a publication could fold. But Kristol’s anti-Trump agenda certainly didn’t help.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Mueller Witness Credico Joins Maduro-Backed Russian Propagandist for Puff Piece Interview


Mueller Witness Credico Joins Maduro-Backed Russian Propagandist for Puff Piece Interview


by Jacob Engels
December 5, 2018

Abby Martin’s Empire Files, originally funded by the brutal socialist regime of Venezuelan dictator Nicholas Maduro, has returned after losing access to dirty money from the regime due to U.S. sanctions against Venezuela.

After a forced hiatus due to her funding being cut off following U.S. sanctions against Maduro’s brutal socialist “utopia”, former Russian propagandist and RT reporter Abby Martin has re-launched her Empire Files docu-series with discredited Mueller witness Randy Credico.

The nearly hour long interview was a veritable puff-piece from Martin, who has a past of 9/11 trutherism and accusations of toeing the Kremlin line from her former colleagues at Russian broadcast network RT.

It features many bizarro-world moments for both Martin and Credico, opening with the failed comedian’s outrage over people’s resistance to his penchant for anti-Semitic jokes, which you can see below.

Credico goes on lobbing fantastical allegations against Roger Stone, who has stated that Credico was his go-between for communication with Wikileaks during the 2016 election cycle. Text messages reported by multiple news organizations prove Credico’s role as a back-channel for Stone, though the comedian claims the communications were edited with no proof or push-back from the Kremlin-linked Martin.

The collusion between Martin and Credico in the extremely awkward interview leaves many wondering when the mainstream media and Russophobic Democratic party leaders will air their outrage. After nearly two years of rallying against Putin’s Russia, here you have a chief witness for Robert Mueller’s Russiagate investigation appearing with a Russian propagandist, yet not a peep from the progressive left.

Though Martin has launched a Patreon crowdfunding account for her cash-strapped docuseries in the aftermath of Trump’s sanctions on wire-transfers originating from Venezuela, it is unknown who provided the funds for her to get back in the game.

Considering her previous links to Russian news outlets and documented history of espousing Krelmin-backed talking points on geo-political issues, one has to wonder how Martin is funding her continued broadcasts.

Watch the entire interview below.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Ninth Circuit fully beclowns itself on illegal immigration

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has become an endless source of both headlines and gallows humor of late and yesterday was no exception. Apparently having grown tired of attempting to thwart the President’s initiatives on immigration and despite being smacked down by the Supreme Court on review, the judges on Tuesday went one step further and began striking down (or at least weakening) federal immigration law. Parts of Title 8, Chapter 12 dealing with harboring or encouraging illegal aliens had been challenged by open borders supporters and the Ninth Circuit had no problem wholeheartedly supporting their objections. (Washington Times)

A U.S. appeals court struck down a federal immigration law Tuesday that opponents warned could be used to criminalize a wide range of statements involving illegal immigration.

The law made it a felony for someone to encourage an immigrant to enter or live in the U.S. if the person knew either act is illegal.

The law violates the First Amendment because it criminalizes a substantial amount of protected speech, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said.

The statute, for example, would make it illegal for a grandmother to urge her grandson to ignore limits on his visa by encouraging him to stay in the U.S., Judge A. Wallace Tashima said.

Tashima, who was originally nominated as a District Court judge by Jimmy Carter and later elevated to the Ninth Circuit by Bill Clinton, seems to be taking an overly broad view of the free speech issue. Certainly, the First Amendment protects even the most unpopular speech and opinions, but it’s long been established that there are limits to that right.

What’s under discussion here is not an airing of opinions or debate of an issue. It’s an example of incitement to engage in criminal behavior. We already have similar laws on the books and have for ages. Laws covering Incitement to Riot (under Title 18) draw clear distinctions between “urging or instigating other persons” (which is illegal) and “advocacy of ideas or expressions of belief, not involving advocacy of any act” (which is not illegal).

Similarly, Title 8, Chapter 12 deals with a highly specific band of speech (as attorneys for the government described it in this hearing) which follows the same pattern. It defines the conduct as applying to any person who, “encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.” Nobody is being arrested for any advocacy of ideas or expressions of belief. The law deals with incitement of people to commit a crime.

But it seems doubtful that any of this is what was on Judge Tashima’s mind. This looks very much like another direct broadside aimed at the White House. Come on, man. Isn’t it time to break up this sprawling circuit court and absorb it into some others? The Ninth Circuit is just becoming a joke at this point. It’s looking more like a government sanctioned arm of the #Resist movement than part of the judicial branch.

Now the Supreme Court will need to be dragged into yet another debacle coming from the left coast. Hopefully, clearer heads will prevail there.

The post Ninth Circuit fully beclowns itself on illegal immigration appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

Republicans hacked after hiring the Democrats’ cyber-security firm, Crowdstrike


Why on earth would the National Republican Congressional Committee hire the same firm that allowed the Democrats’ emails to be hacked as their own cyber-security consultant? In fact, Crowdstrike is the same firm that claimed it was the Russians who hacked the Dems after then-DNC head Debbie Wasserman Schultz reportedly refused to let the FBI examine the computers.


Politico broke the story of the hack:



The email accounts of four senior aides at the National Republican Congressional Committee were surveilled for several months, the party officials said. The intrusion was detected in April by an NRCC vendor, who alerted the committee and its cybersecurity contractor. An internal investigation was initiated, and the FBI was alerted to the attack, said the officials, who requested anonymity to discuss the incident.


Did you catch that? Crowdstrike, the cybersecurity contractor, did not detect the hack, and it went on for months. It took another firm to belatedly clue in the NRCC of the failure.And even then, the news remained kept from people who ought to have known:


However, senior House Republicans — including Speaker Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California and Majority Whip Steve Scalise of Louisiana — were not informed of the hack until Politico contacted the NRCC on Monday with questions about the episode. Rank-and-file House Republicans were not told, either.


Luke Rosiak, ace investigative reporter at the Daily Caller News Foundation, presents more shocking news:


The NRCC paid Crowdstrike at least $120,000 in 2017, according to campaign finance records.


Gee, I could have allowed them to be hacked for only $60,000.


Crowdstrike’s track record for the Dems was so bad that it’s hard to imagine why the GOP would hire them:


 CrowdStrike was responding to the DNC’s hack as of May 5, 2016, but emails continued to be stolen for weeks. In fact, the majority of the emails WikiLeaks published were not even written until after May 5. That’s despite the fact that CrowdStrike claimed it knew within minutes that the problem was a specific virus and that it was tied to Russia. (RELATED: Most Wikileaks Emails Not Even Written Until AFTER DNC Knew It Was Hacked)


CrowdStrike, which is led by a Russian ex-pat and a former FBI official, took until June 10, 2016, to replace all the software in a move it believed would put an end to the breach. The last DNC email WikiLeaks published was written on May 25.


Politico reports:


Rep. Steve Stivers of Ohio, who served as NRCC chairman this past election cycle, did not respond to repeated requests for comment.


He’s got a lot to answer for.


NRCC logo via Facebook


Why on earth would the National Republican Congressional Committee hire the same firm that allowed the Democrats’ emails to be hacked as their own cyber-security consultant? In fact, Crowdstrike is the same firm that claimed it was the Russians who hacked the Dems after then-DNC head Debbie Wasserman Schultz reportedly refused to let the FBI examine the computers.


Politico broke the story of the hack:


The email accounts of four senior aides at the National Republican Congressional Committee were surveilled for several months, the party officials said. The intrusion was detected in April by an NRCC vendor, who alerted the committee and its cybersecurity contractor. An internal investigation was initiated, and the FBI was alerted to the attack, said the officials, who requested anonymity to discuss the incident.


Did you catch that? Crowdstrike, the cybersecurity contractor, did not detect the hack, and it went on for months. It took another firm to belatedly clue in the NRCC of the failure.And even then, the news remained kept from people who ought to have known:


However, senior House Republicans — including Speaker Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California and Majority Whip Steve Scalise of Louisiana — were not informed of the hack until Politico contacted the NRCC on Monday with questions about the episode. Rank-and-file House Republicans were not told, either.


Luke Rosiak, ace investigative reporter at the Daily Caller News Foundation, presents more shocking news:


The NRCC paid Crowdstrike at least $120,000 in 2017, according to campaign finance records.


Gee, I could have allowed them to be hacked for only $60,000.


Crowdstrike’s track record for the Dems was so bad that it’s hard to imagine why the GOP would hire them:


 CrowdStrike was responding to the DNC’s hack as of May 5, 2016, but emails continued to be stolen for weeks. In fact, the majority of the emails WikiLeaks published were not even written until after May 5. That’s despite the fact that CrowdStrike claimed it knew within minutes that the problem was a specific virus and that it was tied to Russia. (RELATED: Most Wikileaks Emails Not Even Written Until AFTER DNC Knew It Was Hacked)


CrowdStrike, which is led by a Russian ex-pat and a former FBI official, took until June 10, 2016, to replace all the software in a move it believed would put an end to the breach. The last DNC email WikiLeaks published was written on May 25.


Politico reports:


Rep. Steve Stivers of Ohio, who served as NRCC chairman this past election cycle, did not respond to repeated requests for comment.


He’s got a lot to answer for.


NRCC logo via Facebook




via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Bill And Hillary Clinton Are About To Go Away Forever


Yes, people, the day is coming, and it’s coming fast: We’re almost done for good with Bill and Hillary Clinton.

How can we be sure, you ask? Here’s how: Tickets to see them live and hear them blab about their lives are selling for the cost of a Big Mac meal at McDonald’s.

Not enough proof? Well, there’s this, too: New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd is finally sick of them.

The former first couple opened a 13-city speaking tour late last month with a premiere event in Toronto (why they think anyone in Canada wants to hear them whine about Hillary’s crushing defeat in the 2016 presidential election is anybody’s guess). They pulled just 3,000 people to an arena that seats 19,000.

Then they took their road show, “An Evening With the Clintons,” to Montreal, but they fared little better (and not for lack of trying: In a case of classic Clinton pandering, each said that Canada was superior to America).

And things kept getting worse. Ticket prices for their event in Texas plunged to just $6. Seems no one is interested in hearing them tell “stories and inspiring anecdotes that shaped their historic careers in public service, while also discussing issues of the day and looking toward the future,” which a press release promised.

Why are Bill and Hillary traveling the country charging people top dollar to hear them bloviate? It’s not the money: The couple made $250 million in the 15 years after Bubba left office (and Hillary made bank selling access — and favors — while she was secretary of state).

No, they just want … to be loved. Like poor Charles Foster Kane, they just need to be loved. “That’s why he went into politics. It seems we weren’t enough. He wanted all the voters to love him, too,” Jedediah Leland says in the classic Orson Welles movie.

But one person has fallen decidedly out of love with the Clintons. Dowd has finally had enough of the self-serving couple and last week called them out, calling them “shockingly un-self-aware.”

“I’m looking around Scotiabank Arena, the home of the Toronto Maple Leafs, and it’s a depressing sight. It’s two-for-the-price-of-one in half the arena. The hockey rink is half curtained off, but even with that, organizers are scrambling at the last minute to cordon off more sections behind thick black curtains, they say due to a lack of sales. I paid $177 weeks in advance. (I passed on the pricey meet-and-greet option.) On the day of the event, some unsold tickets are slashed to single digits,” Dowd writes.

“I get reassigned to another section as the Clintons’ audience space shrinks. But even with all the herding, I’m still looking at large swaths of empty seats — and I cringe at the thought that the Clintons will look out and see that, too. It was only four years ago, after all, that Canadians were clamoring to buy tickets to see the woman who seemed headed for history. I can’t fathom why the Clintons would make like aging rock stars and go on a tour of Canada and the U.S. at a moment when Democrats are hoping to break the stranglehold of their cloistered, superannuated leadership and exult in a mosaic of exciting new faces.”

So here’s the math: It’s Christmas 2018. Come January, the 2020 presidential contest begins in earnest. Democrats take over the House (look for endless investigations into President Trump), and the loudest, most partisan in the party will rise to the top. Former Democratic National Committee Chairman Donna Brazile said Tuesday that there might be upward of 30 people running for the Democratic nomination.

Now, make no mistake: Hillary will milk 2019 for all it’s worth. She’ll try to make it look like she might — just might — jump in for one last run. Some liberal supporters in the mainstream media (not Dowd, apparently), will push another run by the two-time loser. And she’ll use her dwindling clout to make even more money. (How much is enough with these people?)

But she won’t run, and she knows she won’t. Still, the pair just can’t bear to go away. Dowd summed up why: “The Clintons refuse to be discarded. It has been their joint project for half a century to be at the center of the public scene and debate. The way that the whole thing came crashing down in 2016 is too hard for them to bear. They would like to rewrite the ending, but there is no way to do that.”

No, there’s not. And Bill and Hillary are about to go away forever. The day is nearly here.

* A version of this article ran previously in The Washington Times.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Ouch! Trump Rips Macron and Globalist Elites on Suffocating Climate Change Gas Taxes


Ouch! Trump Rips Macron and Globalist Elites on Suffocating Climate Change Gas Taxes

Jim Hoft
by Jim Hoft
December 5, 2018

The ‘City of Lights’ became the ‘City of Fire’ this past weekend as thousands of angry citizens took to the streets to protest President Emanuel Macron’s exorbitant fuel tax to combat global warming.

According to the BBC — At least 110 people were injured, including 17 members of the security forces, and 270 arrests were made.

On Tuesday Macron backtracked on his gas taxes and pushed them off for at least six months.

President Trump was not shy about his response to the climate change crisis.
The president went after the global elites whose goal is to wipe out the middle class.

President Trump: I am glad that my friend @EmmanuelMacron and the protestors in Paris have agreed with the conclusion I reached two years ago. The Paris Agreement is fatally flawed because it raises the price of energy for responsible countries while whitewashing some of the worst polluters in the world. I want clean air and clean water and have been making great strides in improving America’s environment. But American taxpayers – and American workers – shouldn’t pay to clean up others countries’ pollution.

Ouch.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

So who’s the Mother of All Slumlords over in tumbledown Havana?


Lefties and Sandalistas have had a grand old time with their Cuba-worship: The mojitos. The malacon. The 1950s Chevys. The Buena Vista Social Club sound. The ‘quaint’ tumbledown buildings…


For President Obama and his naive sidekick, Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes, it was ‘eating with Raul,’ too. And that ‘apertura’ to Cuba and all its ‘quaint’ buildings was followed by paean after paean about all the tourism potential. Conde Nast got involved. Vanity Fair got involved. Oh so hip and chic.



Now USA Today has a report out about that tumbledown shambles so oohed and ahhhed at by the chi-chi left, and it’s not pretty:


In Havana, some of the same architectural gems that draw tens of thousands of American tourists crash to the ground every year. Causes range from weather and neglect to faulty renovations and theft of structural beams.


Carlos Guerrero, 45, said he and his family live “like scared dogs” in a crumbling building along Merced Street.


Neighbors tell them, “Get out of there! It’s going to collapse!”


“It makes you feel like going and living under a bridge,” said Guerrero, who vows to grab a machete and seek revenge on housing officials if anything happens to his wife and three children.


Some 3,856 partial or total building collapses were reported in Havana from 2000 to 2013, not including 2010 and 2011 when no records were kept.


The collapses worsened an already severe housing shortage. Havana alone had a deficit of 206,000 homes in 2016, official figures show.


What a hellscape. Imagine having to live in a building so dilapidated you fear for your life in a collapse every day, and that’s what counts as your home.



And let’s raise the question the press account didn’t: Who owns these things? Who’s the absentee landlord, who wins the title hands down as Mother of All Slumlords? Who’s the horrible owner who would allow a human being to live in such a collapsing firetrap? Imagine if such a creature lived in the U.S. Reader David Paulin emailed American Thinker editor in chief Thomas Lifson with these excellent observations:


Well, interestingly, USA Today’s article about the collapses fails to mention who actually OWNS the buildings — or go into any details, in a declarative sentence or two, about private vs. state ownership and what not, and its impact on the calamity of collapsing decaying buildings. Instead, there’s a sentence that soft-peddles everything, stating that the causes of the collapses “range from weather and neglect to faulty renovations and theft of structural beams.” The only hint of who owns the buildings (and why the owner is such a deadbeat landlord) is a reference to Cuba being “communist.”


So there you have it: Socialism. Socialism in its communist incarnation is the actual owner, and boy is it absentee. More specifically, that would be one Raul Castro, and whoever his appointed dupe is who nominally runs Cuba now, is the owner, because the Castro oligarchy owns everything.


This is what happens when socialism gets entrenched and socialists have all the power.


So where’s Sean Penn to denounce this hellscape? Where’s Maxine Waters? Where’s Oliver Stone? Where’s Bernie Sanders? Where’s the Rev. Al Sharpton? Where’s Ben Rhodes? Where’s Beyonce? Where’s Obama?


They’ve all have pilgrimaged to Havana to behold that charming and quaint architecture before it collapses onto its tenants and kills quite a few of them. Somehow they’re a bit tongue-tied.


And what we are now seeing as these quaint and picturesque buildings collapse onto their occupants is literally the ash heap of history.


It would be funny if it weren’t literally true.


Image credit: Unsplash, via Wikimedia Commons // CC BY-SA 1.0


Lefties and Sandalistas have had a grand old time with their Cuba-worship: The mojitos. The malacon. The 1950s Chevys. The Buena Vista Social Club sound. The ‘quaint’ tumbledown buildings…


For President Obama and his naive sidekick, Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes, it was ‘eating with Raul,’ too. And that ‘apertura’ to Cuba and all its ‘quaint’ buildings was followed by paean after paean about all the tourism potential. Conde Nast got involved. Vanity Fair got involved. Oh so hip and chic.


Now USA Today has a report out about that tumbledown shambles so oohed and ahhhed at by the chi-chi left, and it’s not pretty:


In Havana, some of the same architectural gems that draw tens of thousands of American tourists crash to the ground every year. Causes range from weather and neglect to faulty renovations and theft of structural beams.


Carlos Guerrero, 45, said he and his family live “like scared dogs” in a crumbling building along Merced Street.


Neighbors tell them, “Get out of there! It’s going to collapse!”


“It makes you feel like going and living under a bridge,” said Guerrero, who vows to grab a machete and seek revenge on housing officials if anything happens to his wife and three children.


Some 3,856 partial or total building collapses were reported in Havana from 2000 to 2013, not including 2010 and 2011 when no records were kept.


The collapses worsened an already severe housing shortage. Havana alone had a deficit of 206,000 homes in 2016, official figures show.


What a hellscape. Imagine having to live in a building so dilapidated you fear for your life in a collapse every day, and that’s what counts as your home.



And let’s raise the question the press account didn’t: Who owns these things? Who’s the absentee landlord, who wins the title hands down as Mother of All Slumlords? Who’s the horrible owner who would allow a human being to live in such a collapsing firetrap? Imagine if such a creature lived in the U.S. Reader David Paulin emailed American Thinker editor in chief Thomas Lifson with these excellent observations:


Well, interestingly, USA Today’s article about the collapses fails to mention who actually OWNS the buildings — or go into any details, in a declarative sentence or two, about private vs. state ownership and what not, and its impact on the calamity of collapsing decaying buildings. Instead, there’s a sentence that soft-peddles everything, stating that the causes of the collapses “range from weather and neglect to faulty renovations and theft of structural beams.” The only hint of who owns the buildings (and why the owner is such a deadbeat landlord) is a reference to Cuba being “communist.”


So there you have it: Socialism. Socialism in its communist incarnation is the actual owner, and boy is it absentee. More specifically, that would be one Raul Castro, and whoever his appointed dupe is who nominally runs Cuba now, is the owner, because the Castro oligarchy owns everything.


This is what happens when socialism gets entrenched and socialists have all the power.


So where’s Sean Penn to denounce this hellscape? Where’s Maxine Waters? Where’s Oliver Stone? Where’s Bernie Sanders? Where’s the Rev. Al Sharpton? Where’s Ben Rhodes? Where’s Beyonce? Where’s Obama?


They’ve all have pilgrimaged to Havana to behold that charming and quaint architecture before it collapses onto its tenants and kills quite a few of them. Somehow they’re a bit tongue-tied.


And what we are now seeing as these quaint and picturesque buildings collapse onto their occupants is literally the ash heap of history.


It would be funny if it weren’t literally true.


Image credit: Unsplash, via Wikimedia Commons // CC BY-SA 1.0




via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/