Red Lobster Caves to Left-Wing Blacklist Campaign, Pulls Ads from Tucker Carlson’s Show


Restaurant chain Red Lobster is the latest company to cave to pressure from the far-left blacklisting campaign against Tucker Carlson, announcing Tuesday that they would no long advertise on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Tonight.

The Wrap reports that Red Lobster confirmed their removal of ads from Tucker Carlson’s prime time show, saying in a statement, “Red Lobster’s advertising buying guidelines reflect our core values and commitment to supporting programming that represents the highest standards of good taste, fair practice and objectivity.”

“We reserve the right to make changes to our purchases when the dialogue is no longer in line with our criteria.”

Red Lobster is the latest company to pull ads from Carlson’s show. He faced an ad boycott last month over comments criticizing American immigration policy, and he is once again in the crosshairs of the far-left over comments he made about many women who do not want to marry men who earn less than them.

When reached for comment, a Fox News spokesperson referred Breitbart News to a previous statement.
The statement reads:

We cannot and will not allow voices like Tucker Carlson to be censored by agenda-driven intimidation efforts from the likes of Moveon.org, Media Matters and Sleeping Giants. Attempts were made last month to bully and terrorize Tucker and his family at their home. He is now once again being threatened via Twitter by far left activist groups with deeply political motives. While we do not advocate boycotts, these same groups never target other broadcasters and operate under a grossly hypocritical double standard given their intolerance to all opposing points of view.

Carlson has indeed faced vicious tactics from the left before. In November, his home, where his wife was home alone, was targeted by Antifa, a group notorious for its tactics of violence and intimidation.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

PRESIDENT TRUMP Takes Swipe at Pelosi in Address to Nation: Some Politicians Say a Wall Is Immoral – Yet Have Walls Around Their Homes


PRESIDENT TRUMP Takes Swipe at Pelosi in Address to Nation: Some Politicians Say a Wall Is Immoral – Yet Have Walls Around Their Homes

Jim Hoft
by Jim Hoft
January 8, 2019

President Donald Trump dlivered his first-ever evening address from the Oval Office in the White House’s West Wing at 9 p.m. ET.

The address t the nation was expected to last 8 minutes.

During his statement that was televised on national television.

The President took a swipe of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi following her comments that a border wall is “immoral.”

There are at least 65 countries today that have border walls with their neighbors.

Pelosi has repeatedly said walls are immoral.

Pelosi has a wall in her backyard.

Trump slammed Democrats for their hypocrisy.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Hollywood Melts Down Before Trump Border Speech: ‘There Is No Crisis’ ‘Blatant Propaganda’


Hollywood celebrities went into full meltdown mode Tuesday before President Donald Trump’s address to the nation from the Oval Office on the crisis on the U.S.-Mexico border.

“Tonight the media will turn the oldest living Democracy into a reality show by allowing a pathological liar to treat American citizens like suckers. THERE IS NO CRISIS AT THE BORDER!” director Rob Reiner shouted.

Late-night host Stephen Colbert attacked his own network for deciding to air Trump’s address.

“My network will be carrying Trump’s Wall speech live. So at 9pm Tuesday, tune into CBS to See B.S.,” Colbert said.

President Trump announced his intention to deliver an address from the Oval Office on the issue of border security Monday. Many networks were at first unsure if they should air the address or not, but later, all major television news networks confirmed their plans to air the president’s address. In response, Democrats Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi demanded equal time for a rebuttal.

Other celebrities continued the meltdown. Comedian Sarah Silverman bemoaned networks airing “Drumpf’s blatant propaganda.”

“They want ratings AND integrity and you can’t have both. Not in this case. Nope,” Silverman said.

Bette Midler joined the meltdown, saying networks should air Trump’s speech “ONLY if they have the technology for an instant bullshit-to-English translation.”

Meanwhile, Chelsea Handler pleaded, “Please do not put this man on air. We have given him his power by bathing in his idiocy every day. Stop helping him.”

Check out all the celebrity madness below.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

House Republicans Demand Update from US Attorney Probing DOJ/FBI Corruption


House Republicans on Monday requested an update from U.S. Attorney John W. Huber, the prosecutor appointed by former Attorney General Jeff Sessions to review decisions made by the top levels of the Justice Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation for bias.

Reps. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Doug Collins (R-GA), and Mark Meadows (R-NC) sent a letter to Huber on January 7, 2019, requesting the update by January 21, 2019.

“We write to request an update on the progress of your review of irregularities involved with the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) actions during 2016 and 2017, including the process by which they undertook to comply with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), 50 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq,” they wrote.

“The DOJ’s and FBI’s actions and decision-making during the investigations of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump raise serious concerns about impartiality, fundamental fairness, and adherence to the rule of law. These concerns prompted separate reviews from the Department of Justice, the DOJ Inspector General (DOJ IG), and congressional oversight committees,” they wrote.

“For the past fourteen months we have been part of a joint investigation by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the House Judiciary Committee into these matters as well,” they wrote.

“Your investigation has been ongoing for over nine months. During the course of our extensive investigation we have interviewed more than a dozen current and former DOJ and FBI personnel, and were surprised to hear none of these potentially informative witnesses testified to speaking with you.”

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Read Trump’s Full Oval Office Speech on Border Security

Here is the White House transcript of President Donald Trump’s Oval Office speech on immigration delivered Tuesday night.

My fellow Americans: Tonight, I am speaking to you because there is a growing humanitarian and security crisis at our southern border.

Every day, Customs and Border Patrol agents encounter thousands of illegal immigrants trying to enter our country. We are out of space to hold them, and we have no way to promptly return them back home to their country.

America proudly welcomes millions of lawful immigrants who enrich our society and contribute to our nation. But all Americans are hurt by uncontrolled, illegal migration. It strains public resources and drives down jobs and wages. Among those hardest hit are African Americans and Hispanic Americans.

Our southern border is a pipeline for vast quantities of illegal drugs – including meth, heroin, cocaine and fentanyl. Every week, 300 of our citizens are killed by heroin alone – 90 percent of which floods across from our southern border. More Americans will die from drugs this year than were killed in the entire Vietnam War.

In the last two years, ICE officers made 266,000 arrests of aliens with criminal records – including those charged or convicted of 100,000 assaults, 30,000 sex crimes and 4,000 violent killings. Over the years, thousands of Americans have been brutally killed by those who illegally entered our country, and thousands more lives will be lost if we don’t act right now.

This is a humanitarian crisis – a crisis of the heart and a crisis of the soul.

Last month, 20,000 migrant children were illegally brought into the United States – a dramatic increase. These children are used as human pawns by vicious coyotes and ruthless gangs. 1 in 3 women are sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico. Women and children are the biggest victims by far of our broken system.

This is the tragic reality of illegal immigration on our Southern Border. This is the cycle of human suffering I am determined to end.

My administration has presented Congress with a detailed proposal to secure the border and stop the criminal gangs, drug smugglers and human traffickers. It’s a tremendous problem. Our proposal was developed by law enforcement professionals and border agents at the Department of Homeland Security. These are the resources they have requested to properly perform their mission and keep America safe – in fact, safer than ever before.

The proposal from Homeland Security includes cutting-edge technology for detecting drugs, weapons, illegal contraband, and many other things. We have requested more agents, immigration judges and bed space to process the sharp rise in unlawful migration fueled by our very strong economy. Our plan also contains an urgent request for humanitarian assistance and medical support.

Furthermore, we have asked Congress to close border security loopholes so that illegal immigrant children can be safely and humanely returned back home.

Finally, as part of an overall approach to border security, law enforcement professionals have requested $5.7 billion dollars for a physical barrier.
At the request of Democrats, it will be a steel barrier rather than a concrete wall. This barrier is absolutely critical to border security. It’s also what our professionals at the border want and need. This is just commonsense.

The border wall would very quickly pay for itself. The cost of illegal drugs exceeds $500 billion dollars a year – vastly more than the $5.7 billion dollars we have requested from Congress. The wall will also be paid for, indirectly, by the great new trade deal we have made with Mexico.

Sen. Chuck Schumer – who you will be hearing from later tonight – has repeatedly supported a physical barrier in the past, along with many other Democrats. They changed their mind only after I was elected president.

Democrats in Congress have refused to acknowledge the crisis. And they have refused to provide our brave border agents with the tools they desperately need to protect our families and our nation.

The federal government remains shutdown for one reason and one reason only: Because Democrats will not fund border security.

My administration is doing everything in our power to help those impacted by the situation. But the only solution is for Democrats to pass a spending bill that defends our borders and re-opens the government.

This situation could be solved in a 45-minute meeting. I have invited congressional leadership to the White House tomorrow to get this done. Hopefully, we can all rise above partisan politics in order to support national security.

Some have suggested a barrier is immoral. Then why do wealthy politicians build walls, fences and gates around their homes? They don’t build walls because they hate the people on the outside, but because they love the people on the inside. The only thing that is immoral is the politicians to do nothing and continue to allow more innocent people to be so horribly victimized.

America’s heart broke the day after Christmas when a young police officer in California was savagely murdered in cold-blood by an illegal alien who just came across the border. The life of an American hero was stolen by someone who had no right to be in our country.

Day after day, precious lives are cut short by those who have violated our borders.

In California, an Air Force Veteran was raped, murdered and beaten to death with a hammer by an illegal alien with a long criminal history. In Georgia, an illegal alien was recently charged with murder for killing, beheading, and dismembering his neighbor. In Maryland, MS-13 gang members who arrived in the United States as unaccompanied minors were arrested and charged last year after viciously stabbing and beating a 16-year-old girl.

Over the last several years, I’ve met with dozens of families whose loved ones were stolen by illegal immigration. I’ve held the hands of the weeping mothers and embraced the grief-stricken fathers. So sad. So terrible. I will never forget the pain in their eyes, the tremble in their voices, or the sadness gripping their souls.

How much more American blood must be shed before Congress does its job?

To those who refuse to compromise in the name of border security, I would ask: imagine if it was your child, your husband, or your wife, whose life was so cruelly shattered and totally broken?

To every member of Congress: pass a bill that ends this crisis.

To every citizen: call Congress and tell them to finally – after all of these decades – secure our border.

This is a choice between right and wrong. Justice and Injustice. This is about whether we fulfill our sacred duty to the American citizens we serve.

When I took the oath of office, I swore to protect our country and its people. And that is what I will always do, so help me God.
Thank you and good night.

The post Read Trump’s Full Oval Office Speech on Border Security appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

FLASHBACK: 7 Democrats Who Once Endorsed Border Fence, Tougher Border Security


Prominent leaders of the Democratic Party once fiercely endorsed border security, and had even voted to secure a border fence along the nation’s southern border.

These stringent calls for tougher border policy appear to have ceased since Donald Trump took office as President of the United States.

In 2006, Senate Democrats — including then-senators Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Dianne Feinstein, and Joe Biden — voted to secure a fence along the United States southern border. Check out the instances in which prominent leaders of the Democratic Party championed the border fence and stronger border security overall.

1. Barack Obama

“The bill before us will certainly do some good,” said then-Senator Obama in 2006, adding that the Secure Fence Act would provide “better fences and better security” and that it would make headway against “the tide of illegal immigration in this country.”

“Real reform means stronger border security,” said Obama several years later as president, during his 2013 State Of The Union.

“Independent economists say immigration reform will grow our economy and shrink our deficits by almost one trillion dollars in the next two decades,” said Obama during his 2014 State Of The Union, bringing up his alleged concern about stopping illegal immigration once again.

2. Hillary Clinton

“Look, I voted numerous times when I was a senator to spend money to build a barrier to try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in, and I do think you have to control your borders,” said Clinton, referring to the Secure Fence Act of 2006, “We need to secure our borders, I’m for it, I voted for it, I believe in it.”

3. Bill Clinton

A decade earlier, Hillary Clinton’s husband and then-president Bill Clinton affirmed his own beliefs that illegal immigration should be stopped in his 1995 State Of The Union, stating that “all Americans” were right to be “disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering [the United States],” adding that illegal aliens “impose burdens on [U.S.] taxpayers.”

4. Chuck Schumer

Schumer, who also voted in favor of the Secure Fence Act, elaborated on his pro-border security stance a few years later in a speech at the Georgetown University Law Center, in which the senator told his audience that referring to illegal aliens as “undocumented” is unacceptable.

“Illegal immigration is wrong, plain and simple,” said Schumer, “When we use phrases like ‘undocumented workers,’ we convey a message to the American people that their government is not serious about combatting illegal immigration, which the American people overwhelmingly oppose.”

“If you don’t think it’s illegal, you’re not going to say it. I think it is illegal, and wrong, and we have to change it,” added the senator.

5. Dianne Feinstein

“Democrats are solidly behind controlling the border, and we support the border fence,” said Feinstein of the Secure Fence Act of 2006.

6. Nancy Pelosi

In 2013, then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi referred to border security as a “basic principle,” and urged congress to support legislation that she claimed would secure the U.S. border.

7. Vice President Joe Biden

“We [President Obama and I] felt so strongly, from the day we took office, for the need for immigration reform,” said Vice President Biden in 2014, who had also voted in favor of the Secure Fence Act when he was a senator.

Biden continued, by criticizing those who choose to enter a foreign country illegally:

“Imagine — you say, ‘I got a good idea, let’s gather up everything we have, sell it, give it to some coyotes to take us to a country that doesn’t want us, drop us off in God knows where, we don’t [know] anybody, we leave everything that’s familiar to us. Let’s go, isn’t that going to be a great idea?’ These are horrible decisions these people are making.”

You can follow Alana Mastrangelo on Twitter at @ARmastrangelo and on Instagram.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Fact Check: Trump Is Correct, Black Americans Hurt Most by Illegal Immigration


During President Donald Trump’s Oval Office address on Tuesday evening, the president said black and Hispanic Americans are the most hurt by mass illegal immigration.

According to a fact check by Breitbart News, Trump is correct as analysis through decades shows that it is minorities in the United States that suffer the most from downward pressure on jobs, wages, and their communities caused by illegal immigration.

Center for Immigration Studies Director of Research Steven Camarota’s 2008 testimony before the U.S. Civil Rights Commission revealed that immigration hurts specifically poor and working-class African-American men the most.

“In my own research I have found that blacks are more likely to be in competition with immigrants than are whites,” Camarota said:

A 1995 study by Augustine Kposowa concluded that, “non-whites appear to lose jobs to immigrants and their earnings are depressed by immigrants.” A 1998 study of the New York area by Howell and Mueller found that a 10-percentage-point increase in the immigrant share of an occupation reduced wages of black men about five percentage points. Given the large immigrant share of the occupations they studied, this implies a significant impact on native-born blacks.

Camarota’s testimony also mentioned how some research has even concluded that employers prefer Hispanic and Asian illegal and legal immigrants over black Americans. Despite constant claims of labor shortages by the big business lobby and corporate interests, Camarota’s research found that the lack of wage growth for low-skilled American jobs, and even a decline in wages, almost certainly proves that there is not a shortage of low-skilled workers, in fact, quite the opposite.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Vermont Newspaper Turns on Bernie, Literally Begs Him Not To Run


The race on the left for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination is already underway, and independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders — a self-declared socialist who aligns with the Democrat Party — is widely considered to be among the front-runners to obtain that eventual prize and opportunity to face-off against President Donald Trump.

But all is not well in Sanders’ socialist paradise, as the progressive leftist senator is facing some significant resistance to his potential presidential campaign from various corners of the predominately liberal media, who have suddenly decided some three years after he first emerged as a contender to take a sharp look at him.

Perhaps surprisingly to some, one of the loudest voices thus far to speak out against a potential Sanders campaign is one of his home state’s newspapers — The Barre Montpelier Times Argus — which just published an op-ed against Sanders that was simply titled “Don’t run.”

“Bernie Sanders should not run for president. In fact, we beg him not to,” the paper’s editorial board wrote to begin the rather blunt piece.

“That is an unfavorable opinion, especially among most Vermonters and progressives who support the platform that has come to define him. But at this point, there are more things about another Sanders run at the White House that concern us than excite us,” the op-ed continued.

TRENDING: Chuck Norris Gives a Texas-Sized Two Thumbs Up for Border Wall, Makes Brilliant Suggestion To Fund It

The primary concern for the editorial board was that a run by Sanders risked deepening the rift that has already formed within the Democratic Party between the more moderate liberal wing and the more radical progressive left, a rift that had been highlighted by Sanders’ challenge in the 2016 primary against eventual failed nominee Hillary Clinton.

“We fear a Sanders run risks dividing the well-fractured Democratic Party, and could lead to another split in the 2020 presidential vote. There is too much at stake to take that gamble,” the paper lamented.

The paper then proceeded to suggest that it was Sanders’ “ego” that could cause a problem, and wrote, “For us, this comes down to principle over ego. It is one thing to start a revolution, but at a certain point you need to know when to step out of the way and let others carry the water for you.”

The Times Argus gave Sanders a nod for the “noteworthy following” he has garnered over the past few years, and seemingly praised the younger progressive candidates who’d run for office “under Sanders’ ‘revolution’ banner” to champion the “New Deal-era” leftist agenda, which included: “Rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure; reversing climate change; creating worker co-ops; growing the trade-union movement; raising the minimum wage; pay equity for women workers; trade policies that benefit American workers; making college affordable for all; taking on Wall Street; health care as a human right; protecting the most vulnerable Americans; and tax reform.”

Do you agree that another presidential run by Sen. Sanders could deepen the split in the Democratic Party?

“As a platform, it is massive. As a candidate, Sanders is exhausting,” the editorial board declared, prior to shifting gears to focus on other, less significant reasons why Sanders should refrain from another run for the White House.

Earlier in the piece, the editorial board had noted that Sanders had all but abandoned Vermonters and missed several key votes in Congress during his 2016 run, and complained that one was more likely to see him speaking on national TV than with reporters and constituents back home in Vermont, though they admitted those concerns were relatively minor.

“All signs point to another run, even with accusations this week that Sanders’ campaign staff, during the 2016 run, engaged in sexist remarks, as well as claims of poor treatment and lower pay for women,” the editors wrote, referencing several articles in mainstream outlets that had delved into the allegations of sexism and poor treatment of women by the 2016 Sanders campaign.

“And while none of the staff accusations have been levied against Sanders himself, his personality is abrasive,” the board continued. “He is known to be difficult to work with. The 77-year-old can be bombastic and prickly. He can be dismissive and rude in his arrogance. You are either with Bernie Sanders or you are not.”

The paper even suggested that Sanders was essentially a leftist mirror image of President Trump, and wrote, “That no-nonsense approach and his politics are endearing to many. But it is as extreme, on the other end of the spectrum in its policy elbow-throwing and idealism, as what we face today from the right in their standard bearer, Donald Trump.”

RELATED: Bernie Sanders Accused of ‘Sexist’ Attack on Liz Cheney

The editorial board concluded, “Taken together — ego, electoral math, a tired message and a prickly media darling — Sanders is convincing himself that he’s the person who can win the White House in 2020. We are not convinced he should.”

Considering all of the pushback Sanders has recently received from the Democratic Party-aligned media, in conjunction with the manner in which the party establishment had rigged the primary against him on the last go-round, it is a wonder that the senator even still gives Democrats and the liberal media the time of day and doesn’t just launch an independent run for the White House … even if doing so would effectively worsen the growing divide among the left that the Times Argus expressed so much concern over.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Republican Congressman Demands DOJ “Immediately Cease” Federal Funding For Nation of Islam


Republican Congressman Demands DOJ “Immediately Cease” Federal Funding For Nation of Islam

Cristina Laila
by Cristina Laila
January 7, 2019

On Monday, Congressman Vern Buchanan (R-FL) demanded the Department of Justice immediately cut off federal funding to the Nation of Islam.

The letter addressed to AG Matthew Whitaker cited the Washington Examiner’s December of 2018 report which revealed the Nation of Islam was receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal funding to teach Islam to prison inmates.

According to the Examiner, Nation of Islam leaders have received at least $364,500 in contracts and awards from the U.S. Bureau of Prisons and the Department of Justice between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2019.

Thanks, Obama!

“As you may know, the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center have designated the Nation of Islam as a hate group for its racist and anti-Semitic beliefs,” Buchanan wrote.

“The federal government should not use taxpayer dollars to subsidize one of the most infamous hate groups in the United States,” Buchanan added. “That’s why I’m demanding your department immediately cease all contracts with the Nation of Islam and prohibit it from receiving any contracts in the future.”

In June of 2018 Louis Farrakhan tweeted about the “satanic Jew.”
In October Louis Farrakhan compared Jews to termites.

In November Louis Farrakhan led chants of “Death to America!” in Tehran.

Our federal government has no problem giving a domestic terrorist organization like Nation Islam money while they withhold funding for the border wall. Let that sink in.

1-7-2019 VB Letter to DOJ by on Scribd

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Box Office: Clint Eastwood’s ‘Mule’ Crushes Spike Lee, Michael Moore, ‘Vice’


At 88-years of age, Clint Eastwood has another major box office success on his hands. As of this weekend, The Mule, which Eastwood both stars in and directs, has cleared an incredible $81 million.

Outside of Eastwood’s unprecedented staying power as a major star, director, and composer, what makes this success so surprising is that his little movie was released without much fanfare or advanced publicity. Many believe this was due to the studio’s fears about some of the movie’s content.

The Mule (you can read my review here) is based on the true story of 90-year-old Leo Sharp, who worked for a decade as a drug mule for a Mexican drug cartel. Eastwood does not shy away from presenting people, including his own character, as they really are, and this resulted in a number of moments that offended the Woke Fascists who currently rule the entertainment industry, and do so like a gang of low-rent Joe McCarthys.

Warner Bros. might have been concerned that if the movie go too much early attention, today’s modern-day witch hunters would push for a theatrical boycott. A legitimate fear now that the left has resurrected political blacklists with a vengeance.

Nevertheless, after being quietly released into 2800 theaters over the holidays and opening to $17 million, The Mule’s staying power is a marvel. As of this last weekend, Eastwood’s quiet little movie has expanded into an additional 700 theaters and in its fourth weekend grossed another $9 million.

Usually a movie, even successful ones, lose 50 percent of their opening box office on the second weekend. On its fourth weekend, The Mule grossed $9.1 million, which is more than 50 percent of its opening weekend, which almost never happens.

With $81 million in the bank, at this rate, The Mule is almost certain to cross the magic $100 million mark before the end of its theatrical run. Already it is crushing a number of movies produced to appease the Woke fascists, including Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 11/9 ($6 million), Spike Lee’s BlackkKlansman ($48 million), and Adam McKay’s Vice, a dishonest, poorly made and researched screed against former Vice President Dick Cheney, which has grossed just $29 million.

No CGI, no action scenes, no festival hype, no Oscar campaign… A simple, touching little story about an old man living in Middle America with a lifetime of regret is cleaning up at the box office…

If Hollywood tells a story that touches us without insulting us, we will come.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com