Facebook Plans on Using Journalists to Control Its News, Again

Ready for a handful of liberal news sources and a maybe a conservative or two? How about a computer program that chooses what stories you should read? Facebook’s upcoming “News Tab” already sounds suspect. Especially, in light of previous attempts by the company to control its news feed. Facebook “will pay dozens of publishers to license content for News Tab, and news from many more will be included.” In Axios’ exact words “A small team of journalists will pick stories for a Top News section.” 

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

ELECTIONEERING: Facebook Pulls Another Trump Campaign Ad, This Time a “Women for Trump” Ad — Comes After Facebook Eliminated Top Pro-Trump Publishers from Their Page

Facebook removed a Women for Trump ad on Monday saying the ad violated Facebook policy.

According to Facebook and Gizmodo: “A Facebook spokesperson told Gizmodo that the ad violated a section of its policies that prohibits “content that asserts or implies personal attributes,” including “direct or indirect assertions or implications” about traits such as race, ethnicity, gender and sexual identity, religion, or financial standing.”

This follows reports in April that Facebook removed “hundreds” of Trump 2020 ads they say were in violation of policy.

In March 2018 Trump 2020 Campaign Manager warned Facebook to keep the playing field level.

In December 2018 Brad Parscale admitted in a tell-all interview with Frontline that the Trump campaign intends on spending millions on Facebook ads again in 2020 to help their candidate.  Parscale was very public about the success of the Facebook ad strategy in the 206 election.

Since that time Facebook has started removing Trump campaign ads.

And, as readers of this website know, Facbebook has eliminated traffic to ALL the top pro-Trump websites since the 2016 election.  Several of the top conservative websites from 2016 are no longer in business.  This was a well thought out strategy by Facebook after the loss of Hillary Clinton in 2016.

Facebook eliminated page views to a majority of top pro-Trump conservative publishers after the 2016 election.

In 2016 suburban voters and women would check their Facebook pages and see conservative news.  That is no longer the case.  And in November these voters chose Democrats.

Facebook continues to wipe out conservative publishers.

In early August Rush Limbaugh brought up how Facebook was censoring The Gateway Pundit page.

Via Rush Limbaugh:

I think it’s a far, far bigger threat that Google and Facebook pose because the threat is that they pose is largely invisible. They’re not on the front lines. Google is not out manning phone banks. They’re not running around town registering voters per se. What they are doing is engaging in constant human manipulation. And I think this is a situation that we’re on the verge of seeing become reality.

Now, we’ve all heard the stories about how Google and Facebook are censoring conservative content. Whole websites, whole blogospheres, individuals, and then an individual tweet. I had a friend who simply clicked on a link to the website the Gateway Pundit and Facebook sent them a warning saying that this is a dangerous site. You should monitor this site. We will be monitoring this site. You should restrict your usage of this website. Gateway Pundit. It’s a conservative blog and website that is no threat to Google or anybody.

Thank you, Rush Limbaugh!

Let’s pray the GOP and Brad Parscale take action soon against Facebook.
Before it’s too late.

The post ELECTIONEERING: Facebook Pulls Another Trump Campaign Ad, This Time a “Women for Trump” Ad — Comes After Facebook Eliminated Top Pro-Trump Publishers from Their Page appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

How We Can Safeguard Our Election Process

In the freest nation in the world, our system of government and our
very liberty depend on free and fair elections. Whether they’re selecting a mayor
or the president of the United States, every American must be able to trust the
process, or the democratic system itself breaks down.

When someone commits voter fraud, the process is no longer fair, everyone’s
vote gets diluted, and in some cases, election results are changed.

Contrary to the claims of many on the left, voter fraud is a very real
problem. As the Supreme Court noted when it upheld Indiana’s voter ID law, flagrant
examples of voter fraud have been documented throughout this nation’s history.

The National Commission on Federal Election Reform has said that in
many close elections, fraud can absolutely change the outcome. Cases of local
elections getting overturned because of fraud have occurred in New Jersey, Indiana,
and other states.

Although hundreds of people have been convicted in recent years, voter
fraud often goes undetected. And even when it’s discovered, overburdened
prosecutors rarely prioritize these cases.

Fraudsters can steal votes and change election outcomes in several ways, including: voting in someone else’s name, registering in multiple locations to vote multiple times in the same election, voting even though they’re not eligible because they’re felons or noncitizens, or paying or intimidating people to vote for certain candidates.

Unfortunately, many on the left are attempting to make election fraud
easier by fighting laws that require an ID to vote. They’ve pushed to get
noncitizens and jailed inmates to vote. And they’ve sued states that have tried
to purge their voter rolls of people registered in multiple states.

How can we fix the problem?

Since states control much of the electoral process, they must pass laws
requiring government-issued IDs to vote. That ensures people aren’t stealing others’
identities and their right to vote.

States should join voter registration cross-check programs to identify voters registered in multiple places. One cross-check program has identified hundreds of thousands of potential duplicate registrations across 30 states as well as evidence of illegal double voting.

States should also compare voter rolls with government records to
identify convicted felons and noncitizens who should be removed from the rolls.
And the federal government should cooperate with these efforts and make
Department of Homeland Security and other databases available to state
officials.

Preserving this great experiment that is America depends on having free
and fair elections where all Americans can trust the process and the results.

Something as critical as election integrity can’t be left to a simple
honor system. One of the most important roles of government is to safeguard the
electoral process and ensure that every voter’s right to cast a ballot is
protected. That not only protects our right to vote; that’s how we protect the
future of our very republic.

The post How We Can Safeguard Our Election Process appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Trump Slams Rashida Tlaib’s News Conference Tears: ‘She Is an Anti-Semite’

It was two thumbs down from the country’s critic in chief. Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s performance at the podium during her news conference Monday with Rep. Ilhan Omar had everything a television producer could be looking for: High drama; powerful women; and lots, and lots and lots of tears. But there was at least one member…

The post Trump Slams Rashida Tlaib’s News Conference Tears: ‘She Is an Anti-Semite’ appeared first on Conservative Tribune.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Report: DNC Chair Tom Perez to Fundraise in Mexico

Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairman Tom Perez will reportedly travel to Mexico to hold three party fundraisers with American expatriates next month.

According to Bloomberg, Perez will head up the events in Mexico City on September 28th.

The report says high-end access can cost as much as $15,000:

The events range from happy hour drinks with a $25 minimum student entry to a dinner where tickets range from $1,000 to $15,000.

The registration form on the DNC website require that attendees be U.S. citizens or permanent residents and enter passport or green card numbers. It is illegal for foreigners to contribute to American political campaigns.

DNC spokeswoman Xochitl Hinojosa confirmed that Perez will be holding the events.

With approximately 1.5 million American citizens residing in Mexico, per State Department figures, the trio of events could prove lucrative at a time when the DNC is being significantly outraised by the Republican National Committee (RNC).  For the month of June, Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings show the RNC raised $20.8 millionspent $14.3 million and had $43.5 million in cash on hand, while its Democrat counterpart only took in $8.5 millionspent $7.5 million and had $9.3 million in cash in the bank. However, the DNC also had $5.7 million in debt.

Perez has previously courted the support of Democrats living abroad, having delivered a speech in London in April 2018.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Report: Attorneys General Probe of Big Tech Could Launch in September

State attorneys general could launch an antitrust investigation into America’s largest technology companies as soon as next month, according to a report released Monday.

The Wall Street Journal reported that several attorneys general continue to move forward with an antitrust investigation of Silicon Valley, focusing on whether these companies stifle competition by using their marketplace powers. The attorneys general would likely issue civil investigative demands, which act similarly to subpoenas, to tech giants and other companies.

The report arises as President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice (DOJ) announced its antitrust review, which will focus mainly on Google and Facebook. The Journal reported in June that several attorneys general were considering a probe into antitrust concerns regarding Silicon Valley. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) continues to investigate Facebook, including the companies’ acquisition of nascent competitors as a means to stifle potential competitors to the social media giant. The FTC continues to look into whether Facebook purchased WhatsApp or Instagram to prevent those companies from becoming competitors.

FTC Chairman Joe Simons said recently that he remains prepared to break up big tech, even reversing past mergers, as part of the regulator’s antitrust investigation into big tech.

Reports have suggested that the antitrust investigation of the attorneys general could become bipartisan as many Democrats have an interest in curtailing the power of big tech as well.

North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein, a Democrat, said he is “participating in bipartisan conversations about this issue.” Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, another Democrat, said that he continues  “to be concerned with the aggregation of data in the hands of a few and [I] am always watchful of any monopoly.”

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, released a statement after last month’s meeting of attorneys general that the groups of attorneys discussed “the real concerns consumers across the country have with big tech companies stifling competition on the internet.”

Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Apple declined to comment regarding the Journal report. The companies have said that they operate fairly and do not engage in anticompetitive behavior.

One Google spokeswoman referred to congressional testimony by Adam Cohen, its director of economic policy, who said that the search giant has “helped reduce prices and expand choice for consumers and merchants in the U.S. and around the world.”

Matt Perault, Facebook’s director of public policy, said that the social media giant “faces intense competition for all of the products and services that we provide.”

Apple and Amazon echoed Facebook and Google’s comments, saying that their businesses compete fairly against other companies.

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, a prominent anti-big tech lawyer, said that the state attorneys general will consider “all actions,” including antitrust law, to curb the growing power held by Google, Facebook, and Amazon.

“We have seen a tremendous amount of consolidation in regard to social platforms and the tech industry over the last decade, and the result of that has become a handful of companies that have amassed a tremendous amount of data and power over the U.S. and world economy,” Landry told Breitbart News Daily host Alex Marlow in March.

Sean Moran is a congressional reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter @SeanMoran3.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Graham: IG report on Russiagate will be “ugly and damning”

Will it, or will it be the GOP’s equivalent of Mueller-mas? Lindsey Graham is in position to take an educated guess and do some strategic expectations-setting ahead of the inspector general’s report release next month. Instead, Graham told viewers and Fox News Channel’s Maria Bartiromo yesterday to buckle up because Michael Horowitz will issue an “ugly and damning” report about the FBI, the Department of Justice, and the entire Russiagate affair.

At least, that’s what will happen eventually, Graham promises (via RCP):

SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM: Well, you’ve got three lanes here. You have what the committee will do, my committee, you’ve got Mr. Durham who’s looking at criminality — he’s the U.S. Attorney in Connecticut — And you’ve got the DOJ Inspector General report. I think it will be coming out in weeks, not days, not months. The Horowitz report will probably be ugly and damning regarding the Department of Justice handling of the Russia probe.

MARIA BARTIROMO: Tell me about that, we know that the DOJ is not prosecuting James Comey. Learned that about a month ago. We know we just got the so-called 302 out of Bruce Ohr, that’s the investigation and interviews of Ohr with the FBI. And the IG report, we were supposed to get it months ago. How come it is so late?

GRAHAM: Every time you turn around you find something new. Mr. Horowitz is doing a very in-depth dive about the FISA warrant application. The behavior regarding the counterintelligence operation. He will send his report over to the Department of Justice, they will look at for classified information. I am going to meet with the Attorney General next week, I want to declassify as much as possible. On the American public to hear the story, I want all of this information to come out, I didn’t want people to believe what I said I want them to read for themselves how bad it was.

The warrant application to the FISA court, I think quite frankly was a fraud. I want all the committee cases out, where they will notice Christopher Steele hated Trump and that he was an unreliable informant. I want this information coming out that the Steele dossier with information coming from Russia is unverified information, I want the transcripts surrounding interviews with Papadopoulos to be released where it was clear he was not working with the Russians.

I want it all out. I want people to see how this investigation got so off the rails and I want people to be held accountable and I am patient, and not in a hurry, I want to do it right.

He’s meeting with Barr next week on this subject? If Horowitz isn’t done yet, that might be premature. After all, they can’t start making disclosure decisions until they know specifically what the report contains. Horowitz is likely to write the report with public release in mind, just as Robert Mueller and his team did with their special-counsel report. Barr has already been given presidential carte blanche for declassification on these investigations in order to achieve maximum possible transparency, and it’s a cinch that Trump will want as much of Horowitz’ report to be out in the open as possible.

With that said, though, Republicans run the risk of setting expectations too high. Thus far no one’s really sure what the IG will find, not even Graham. Could this have been a political hit from the start by a corrupt Obama administration, FBI, and intelligence community? Sure, but it might be a lot less than that; it might be that a few people let their political biases cloud their judgment and then everything else rolled downhill into a disaster of incompetence more than malice. Furthermore, an IG at the DoJ may not have the scope or jurisdiction to determine much more past that possibility, not unless people suddenly decided to get very loquacious about any potential conspiracy all of a sudden after years of guarded tongues.

Democrats just experienced the impact of promising an outcome at length only to have the official findings yank the rug out from under their conspiracy theories. Republicans might want to start thinking about shaping public perception early to keep from having to explain away any potential letdown on the Right when Horowitz finally speaks.

The post Graham: IG report on Russiagate will be “ugly and damning” appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

Homeless Trigger Sacramento Salon Owner To Leave. She Makes Viral Video Targeting CA’s Newsom.

A Sacramento salon owner moved out of Sacramento because of the mounting problems she faced due to homeless people excreting on her business’ doorstep and breaking windows, but she was not going down quietly; she made a video that went viral that slammed California governor Gavin Newsom for his inaction.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml