Conservatives welcome. Libs & RINOs go away. It's all of you destroying the society and conservatives must no longer appease you!
Hayden Williams was at CPAC when President Donald Trump spoke of what happened to him and invited him onto the stage. President Donald Trump invites Hayden Williams — who was violently attacked on campus last month at UC Berkeley — on stage to talk at CPAC pic.twitter.com/JdkfN2kRAk — Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) March 2, 2019 Trump […]
via Weasel Zippers
Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us
CNN analyst Sam Vinograd compared President Donald Trump’s 2019 CPAC speech on Saturday to Adolf Hitler murdering six million Jews in the Holocaust.
“The men and women here today are on the front lines of protecting America’s interests, defending America’s value, and reclaiming our nation’s priceless heritage,” Trump said on Saturday. “With your help, we are reversing decades of blunders and betrayals. These are serious, serious betrayals to our nation and to everything we stand for. It’s been done by the failed ruling class that enriched foreign countries at our expense. It wasn’t America first, in many cases it was America last. Those days are over, long over.”
After CNN replayed the clip from Trump’s CPAC speech, Vinograd, a former Obama official, said: “His statement makes me sick, on a personal level, preserving your heritage, reclaiming our heritage, that sounds a lot like a certain leader that killed members of my family and about six million other Jews in the 1940s.”
Vinograd then stated that Trump “pretends that there are massive flows of illegal immigrants coming over our borders,” ignoring the over 360,000 arrests that were made on the border last year.
Then, without any evidence, Vinograd suggested that Russian President Vladimir Putin was somehow behind Trump’s CPAC speech.
“By the way, this whole CPAC speech, how many pieces, parts of President Putin’s to-do list was President Trump trying to accomplish today?” Vinograd continued. “He denigrated our institutions – the Department of Justice and U.S. Congress, he spread misinformation and conspiracy theories, he undermined the credibility of several of our institutions – he sowed divisions, he sowed confusion, he was speaking to his base but he was also saying things that really looked like Vladimir Putin scripted his speech. So it helped him perhaps with his base, and politically, while at the same time, making Russia’s job a lot easier.”
WATCH:
CNN’s Sam Vinograd compares President Donald Trump’s CPAC speech to Adolf Hitler murdering 6 million Jews in the Holocaust
She also suggests, without evidence, that Putin wrote Trump’s speech pic.twitter.com/7rn7bryQGn
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) March 2, 2019
Not surprisingly, Trump blasted the media during his speech, which lasted approximately two hours.
“I’ve learned because with the fake news — if you tell a joke, if you’re sarcastic, if you’re having fun with the audience, if you’re on live television with millions of people and 25,000 people, in an arena and if you say something like Russia please, if you can, it is Hillary Clinton’s e-mails! Please, Russia, please!” Trump joked at CPAC. “Please, get us the e-mails! Please!”
“So everyone is having a good time, I’m laughing, we’re having fun and then that fake CNN and others say, ‘he asked Russia to go get the e-mails. Horrible!'” Trump continued. “I mean, I saw it like two weeks ago. I’m watching and they are talking about one of points. He asked Russia for the e-mails. These people are sick and I’m telling you — they know the game. They know the game and they play it dirty. Dirtier than anyone who’s played the game. Dirtier than it’s ever been played.”
Also not surprisingly, Vinograd took issue with Trump’s joke, complaining on Twitter: “Hey legal eagles – is saying you were ‘joking’ about asking someone to commit a crime a reasonable defense? Trump just told #CPAC that he was ‘joking’ about asking Russia to hack HRC Apparently Stone didn’t think he was joking… nor the campaign officials that coordinated w him.”
Hey legal eagles – is saying you were “joking” about asking someone to commit a crime a reasonable defense? Trump just told #CPAC that he was “joking” about asking Russia to hack HRC
Apparently Stone didn’t think he was joking… nor the campaign officials that coordinated w him
— Sam Vinograd (@sam_vinograd) March 2, 2019
via Daily Wire
Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml
Mandel Ngan / AFP / Getty ImagesRep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., speaks during a committee meeting Feb. 27, 2019, at the Capitol. (Mandel Ngan / AFP / Getty Images)
Far-left New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote a Twitter rant against Immigration and Customs Enforcement, accusing the law enforcement agency of rape.
Ocasio-Cortez, in true socialist fashion, created a list of opponents within her party after 26 Democratic representatives voted for a provision that will require ICE to be notified when an illegal immigrant tries to purchase a gun.
On Wednesday, House Democrats voted for an anti-gun bill that will require background checks on all gun sales.
The bill would be considered a huge win for Democrats if it wasn’t spoiled by an amendment that 26 of them helped approve.
The amendment, which infuriated Ocasio-Cortez, will help deter illegal immigrants from buying firearms.
TRENDING: Watch: Dems’ Star Witness Implodes as Even CNN Calls Out Cohen for Lying
Ocasio-Cortez threatened to make a list of Democrats to challenge in upcoming elections, according to The Washington Post.
The Post reported that Ocasio-Cortez indicated that “she would help liberal activists unseat them in the 2020 election.”
The representative’s spokesman, Corbin Trent, said that Democrats who vote with Republicans “are putting themselves on a list.”
Ocasio-Cortez disputed the report and elaborated on the controversy by tweeting she is upset with Democrats for giving “more power” to ICE.
Again, didn’t threaten a primary.
I was upset that 26 Dems forced the other 200+ to vote for a pro-ICE provision at the last min without warning.
Because I think an agency that pins children down + forcibly injects them w/ antipsychotic drugs shouldn’t be given more power. https://t.co/1e3cWXzOT6
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) March 2, 2019
Ocasio-Cortez also accused ICE of “widespread reporting of rape.”
If you’re mad that I think people SHOULD KNOW when Dems vote to expand ICE powers, then be mad.
ICE is a dangerous agency with 0 accountability, widespread reporting of rape, abuse of power, + children dying in DHS custody.
Having a D next to your name doesn’t make that right.
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) March 2, 2019
RELATED: Ocasio-Cortez Draws Outrage Over ‘Ugly Racist’ Tweet
Ocasio-Cortez seems to be confused. It is MS-13 gang members — the animals who ICE protects us from — who are known to peddle drugs, commit rape and assault.
There are numerous reports of ICE arresting illegal immigrants who are wanted for heinous crimes such as murder and human trafficking.
Without ICE, there would be many more murderers, rapists and drug dealers running amok — which doesn’t seem to bother Ocasio-Cortez.
The representative wants to abolish ICE and leave Americans at the mercy of violent gang members and drug lords.
And she seems intent on getting rid of the few Democrats who had enough sense to keep illegal immigrants from purchasing guns in America.
Ocasio-Cortez is living in a fantasy world where law enforcement officials are the bad guys.
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
via Conservative Tribune
Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct
Civil wars are horrendous and bloody affairs. That’s why we should avoid them. They happen when two sides cannot settle on who runs the country. When they can’t reconcile the matter through elections, the country falls apart. When one side does not accept the election results, we have a countdown to a civil war.
This is the thesis put forth by journalist Daniel Greenfield. It rings true on many levels.
Does the fact that Democrats are rejecting a duly elected Republican president really mean they don’t accept the results of any election they don’t win? If so, we may be already nearing America’s Second Civil War.
via CanadaFreePress.Com
Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/
Democrats: What do you have in common with Billionaires?
How do you explain your support of a party of wealthy elites who live highly at your expense?
Did you know that almost every well-known billionaire backed Hillary Clinton?
Did you know that almost every one of them shorted the markets – meaning, they bet on the markets to plummet right after the November 2016 elections?
via CanadaFreePress.Com
Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/
Finally someone says what we’ve all been thinking…
Patrick Moore, the co-founder of Greenpeace, lectured Democrat darling and chatterbox Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the rules of life.
Moore opened up with the best line of the week… “Pompous little twit.” Then he went on to explain the impossibility of heating homes without fossil fuels.
Patrick Moore: Replying to @AOC
Pompous little twit. You don’t have a plan to grow food for 8 billion people without fossil fuels, or get the food into the cities. Horses? If fossil fuels were banned every tree in the world would be cut down for fuel for cooking and heating. You would bring about mass death.
This was similar to a Gateway Pundit tweet that was too challenging for chatterbox AOC.
Patrick Moore was not yet finished and rattled off a few more facts for the feckless AOC.
Patrick Moore: You are delusional if you think fossil fuels will end any time soon, maybe in 500 yrs. AOC’s attitude is unjustifiably condescending. She is a neophyte pretending to be wise. Her kind bring ruination if allowed to be “in charge”. (from the cheap seats).
You are delusional if you think fossil fuels will end any time soon, maybe in 500 yrs. AOC’s attitude is unjustifiably condescending. She is a neophyte pretending to be wise. Her kind bring ruination if allowed to be “in charge”. (from the cheap seats).
— Patrick Moore (@EcoSenseNow) February 23, 2019
Patrick Moore: ‘@AOC ‘s Green New Deal calls for:
“(J) removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.”
https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/
Technically (scientifically) this would mean removing all H2O vapour and all CO2 which would mean the eradication of all life on Earth.
Brilliant.
‘@AOC ‘s Green New Deal calls for:
"(J) removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere."https://t.co/t9HuWwC1rI
Technically (scientifically) this would mean removing all H2O vapour and all CO2 which would mean the eradication of all life on Earth.
Brilliant. ?? pic.twitter.com/i91rvW0HXI— Patrick Moore (@EcoSenseNow) February 19, 2019
Patrick Moore: ‘@RepAOC Perhaps you are unfamiliar with my wager. I will bet US$100K that global CO2 emissions are higher in 2025 than in 2015 (Paris). Will the “boss” put $$ where zie mouth ? is?
‘@RepAOC Perhaps you are unfamiliar with my wager. I will bet US$100K that global CO2 emissions are higher in 2025 than in 2015 (Paris). Will the “boss” put $$ where zie mouth ? is? pic.twitter.com/p3iNcQWj6v
— Patrick Moore (@EcoSenseNow) February 26, 2019
The post Co-Founder of Greenpeace RIPS Ocasio-Cortez: “Pompous Little Twit… You Would Bring About Mass Death” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
via The Gateway Pundit
Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com
Michelle Malkin doesn’t give a damn what the progressive media and PC hordes say about her. She speaks her mind – which is precisely why I enjoy her work so much.
Yesterday, she generated quite a bit of controversy (see this compilation of commentary) in her 20-minute speech to CPAC ). The entire speech is embedded below.
No small part of the criticism was implied outrage over her rejection of the “ghost of John McCain” in her jeremiad over the “grifters” who are “in bed with immigration saboteurs.”
.@michellemalkin: “I have been accused of being a ‘grifter’… but it’s the GOP sellouts, not just the radical open borders left, that’s in bed with immigration saboteurs. Like the ones who hijacked the tea party movement to shill for amnesty. Those are the real grifters.” pic.twitter.com/Htn9lpaEV0
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) March 1, 2019
She followed with a call-out of who she had in mind as saboteurs, and grifters:
“And yes I’m looking at you retired Paul Ryan,” she said. “And yes I’m looking at you Mitch McConnell. And yes I’m looking at you, Bush family. And yes I’m looking at you, the ghost of John McCain.”
Michelle Malkin points skyward and mocks “the ghost of John McCain” from the main stage at CPAC. Gets a standing ovation from some in the crowd. pic.twitter.com/9mqpkhFcR6
— Josh Billinson (@jbillinson) March 1, 2019
It’s worth noting that she called out other people, including the presence of communist Van Jones at CPAC.
Watch and enjoy a warrior who never relents and never gives up:
Michelle Malkin doesn’t give a damn what the progressive media and PC hordes say about her. She speaks her mind – which is precisely why I enjoy her work so much.
Yesterday, she generated quite a bit of controversy (see this compilation of commentary) in her 20-minute speech to CPAC ). The entire speech is embedded below.
No small part of the criticism was implied outrage over her rejection of the “ghost of John McCain” in her jeremiad over the “grifters” who are “in bed with immigration saboteurs.”
.@michellemalkin: “I have been accused of being a ‘grifter’… but it’s the GOP sellouts, not just the radical open borders left, that’s in bed with immigration saboteurs. Like the ones who hijacked the tea party movement to shill for amnesty. Those are the real grifters.” pic.twitter.com/Htn9lpaEV0
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) March 1, 2019
She followed with a call-out of who she had in mind as saboteurs, and grifters:
“And yes I’m looking at you retired Paul Ryan,” she said. “And yes I’m looking at you Mitch McConnell. And yes I’m looking at you, Bush family. And yes I’m looking at you, the ghost of John McCain.”
Michelle Malkin points skyward and mocks “the ghost of John McCain” from the main stage at CPAC. Gets a standing ovation from some in the crowd. pic.twitter.com/9mqpkhFcR6
— Josh Billinson (@jbillinson) March 1, 2019
It’s worth noting that she called out other people, including the presence of communist Van Jones at CPAC.
Watch and enjoy a warrior who never relents and never gives up:
via American Thinker Blog
Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/
When a mother tosses her newborn into a dumpster to die, it is considered murder in every state in the US. But when a newborn baby is left to die after birth in a hospital, why is it considered legal in almost every Democratic state?
Republicans attempted to pass the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act on Monday, failing miserably due to Democrats who seemingly support Infanticide.
Senate minority leader, Democrat Chuck Shumer, New York, said,
via CanadaFreePress.Com
Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/
The US presented evidence of additional nuclear sites which stunned the North Korean delegation.
President Trump walked away early after a deal could not be reached.
Bloomberg reported:
President Donald Trump said he walked out of his second summit with Kim Jong Un after the two leaders couldn’t agree on a deal to relieve North Korea of U.S. sanctions in exchange for Pyongyang giving up much of its nuclear weapons program.
Trump said Kim “wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety, and we couldn’t do that.” In exchange, the North Korean leader had offered to dismantle its main nuclear facility at Yongbyon.
“It wasn’t enough,” the president said at a news conference after the summit collapsed.
The U.S. presented Kim with evidence of additional secret nuclear sites, surprising the North Koreans, according to Trump. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo said that even without Yongbyon the country would still possess missiles, warheads and other elements of a nuclear program that were unacceptable to the U.S.
“Sometimes you have to walk,” Trump told reporters.
The post PRESIDENT TRUMP Walks Away from Kim Jong-un Talks — Leaves Summit Early appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
via The Gateway Pundit
Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com
One of the more controversial aspects of online money transfer company PayPal has been its treatment of certain groups it considers to be fringe political organizations — almost always conservative.
Some of these groups are indeed controversial enough that they would probably warrant a second look. Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes is one person who’s been banned from using the platform.
So has Laura Loomer, the conservative provocateur who chained herself to the door to Twitter’s headquarters after her Twitter account was also banned (while this certainly got attention, it doesn’t really bode well for one’s sanity and/or journalistic bona fides).
However, whatever direction PayPal is planning to go, it isn’t exactly working. While sites like Alex Jones’ Infowars — another PayPal exile — may indeed not be the most rigorous journalistic organizations in the world, banning them just flames the fires of conspiracy theorists. (PayPal’s August 2017 decision to ban the website Jihad Watch, a decision that was later rescinded, according to Fox News, didn’t help.)
In fact, it all might just make those on the right think PayPal is using some sort of far-left group to determine who’s going to get banished from its services.
TRENDING: Disgraceful Daily Show Host Used African Language To Hide Sick, Racist Joke at Oscars
Which, in fact, is exactly what PayPal is doing.
In an interview with The Wall Street Journal published Monday. PayPal CEO Dan Schulman said the company uses the Southern Poverty Law Center’s list of “hate groups” as, in part, a guide regarding whom to ban.
If you’ve ever followed the SPLC or its hate group list, it wouldn’t be too much of a stretch to say the group considers everything to the right of Marco Rubio giving a luncheon speech to a local chamber of commerce to be a hate organization.
In June of 2018, British Muslim pundit Maajid Nawaz and his group Quillam, both of which are anti-extremist and believe the Islamic faith should be modernized, won a $3.375 million settlement against the company for those bans, according to The Daily Caller.
There’s also the Alliance Defending Freedom and the Family Research Council. Both are fairly mainstream Christian conservative groups that are considered “extremist” and “hate groups” by PayPal, according to Faithwire.
Yet, Schulman doesn’t seem too concerned about all this.
“There are those both on the right and left that help us. Southern Poverty Law Center has brought things,” Schulman said.
“We don’t always agree. We have our debates with them. We are very respectful with everyone coming in. We will do the examination carefully. We’ll talk when we don’t agree with a finding: We understand why you think that way, but it still goes into the realm of free speech for us.”
Oh, OK. Are there any conservative groups you’d like to mention as being part of the discussion about who gets banned?
Anyone? Bueller?
No, that’s not going to happen, because of course it’s not.
It’s not just PayPal, either. As The Daily Caller points out, companies like Patreon, Indiegogo, Kickstarter, Google and Amazon, inter alia have also taken action against conservatives.
So how does PayPal not always agree with the SPLC? What are the other groups involved in making these decisions? How does PayPal come to these rulings on “fringe” groups? Again, we get nothing.
However, Schulman told The Journal that the 2017 clash in Charlottesville, Virginia, was a “defining moment” for the company, which should tell you something.
“Because the line between free speech and hate, nobody teaches it to you in college. Nobody’s defined it in the law,” Schulman said.
He said the company already had a working group to study the organizations that use its services, but decided to make it bigger after Charlottestville.
“The reason we had to expand the group is because websites may say something, but the links they have can link to hateful material and videos,” he said. “You can’t look at a headline and make a determination. You have to spend time to really think about it.”
If PayPal really is spending time to think about decisions like that, I’d like to hear about the conservative groups they’re consulting.
If not, one can only assume the worst — that it’s using an anti-Christian, anti-conservative group to discriminate when it comes to who uses its service.
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
via Conservative Tribune
Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct